logo
Cost of one-bedroom apartments soaring in Wicklow as average hits €191,000

Cost of one-bedroom apartments soaring in Wicklow as average hits €191,000

While the average list price of a home in the county is now €454,929, a rise of 13pc compared with a year ago, the price for a one-bedroom apartment has risen by 26.5pc. This compares with a two-bedroom terraced house, which has risen to €250,000, an increase of 13.6pc, while your three-bed semi has risen to €330,000, an increase of 10.4pc.
Commenting on the steep rise for a one-bedroom apartment in the county, Garret O'Bric, from agents HJ Byrne, in Bray, said that one-beds don't come around very often and they are 'a bit of an oddity' in the market, even though they are viewed as a first step on the ladder.
He said the last one-bedroom apartment he sold in Bray, an own-door home in a good location at Wilford Court, fetched well over €300,000.
While it is down to demand, he added that some banks are reluctant to give loans for a one-bed and there is a different loan-to-value on them.
"Most first-time buyers don't really want them because you can't rent out another room, investors don't really want them because they'd rather go for a two-bed. But it's also affordability,' he said. 'It's the low-hanging fruit for people if they are going to get on the ladder.'
Asking prices for houses have soared by an average of 12.3pc nationwide to €357,851 in the past year, according to the Daft.ie House Price Report for Q2. The report also notes that this rate of house-price inflation is the highest since the Central Bank's mortgage-lending rules, which were introduced in 2015.
It means that outside Dublin, Wicklow remains the most expensive county in Leinster to buy a home.
The report also notes that the typical property sells for a price that is 1.1pc below its listing price – but that gap has changed a lot over time. For example, during the period 2010-2012, properties sold on average for 10pc less than their initial listed price.
Across the country, the typical transaction price in the second quarter of 2025 was 6.3pc above the listed price. A year ago, the gap nationally had been 3.5pc, while two years ago, in Q2 2023, the typical transaction price was 1.1pc above the listed price.
However, the second quarter of 2025 saw the highest level of 'market heat' ,measured by the premium paid by buyers above the listed price than at any other time since the start of 2010.
The Daft report author, Ronan Lyons, was quite blunt in his assessment of the current state of the housing market, when he said: 'Ultimately, the market is still starved of supply.'
Remarking that there is 'little to be cheery about', he added that there are simply too few homes on the market at the moment.
"On top of an insufficient number of new homes being built, there are also not enough second-hand homes being traded,' he said. 'In the year to June 1, there were a total of just over 51,000 second-hand homes put on the market. For comparison, in 2019, before all the disruption of Covid, there were almost 67,000 homes put up for sale.'
Scarcity and strong demand will put 'acute pressure on prices', he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disqualification and €130,000 fine for former Irish Nationwide finance director confirmed
Disqualification and €130,000 fine for former Irish Nationwide finance director confirmed

Irish Times

time3 days ago

  • Irish Times

Disqualification and €130,000 fine for former Irish Nationwide finance director confirmed

The High Court has confirmed a Central Bank inquiry decision fining Irish Nationwide Building Society's former finance director John Stanley Purcell €130,000 for his role in regulatory breaches at the lender before its collapse during the financial crisis. The president of the High Court , Mr Justice David Barniville, also confirmed the inquiry's decision to reprimand Mr Purcell; disqualify him for four years from company involvement and to order that he and the bank pay their own legal costs related to the inquiry. The sanctions were decided upon following the long-running inquiry by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), which cost more than €24.3m, into the conduct of INBS' affairs. Under the relevant law, the sanctions only come into effect if confirmed by the High Court. READ MORE [ Fifteen years, €24.3m and 1,384 pages later, was the Irish Nationwide inquiry really worth it? Opens in new window ] When seeking that confirmation on Tuesday, barrister Shelley Horan, for the CBI, said Mr Purcell had agreed to the application proceeding in his absence. Mr Purcell did not intend to appeal the inquiry findings concerning him and accepted the content of the sanctions decision but had suggested a fine of €100,000, counsel said. After the inquiry panel decided a €130,000 fine was appropriate, Mr Purcell said he would pay that within 14 days of confirmation, counsel said. In his ruling, Mr Justice Barniville noted the Central Bank Act provided, where there is no appeal or challenge to an inquiry decision, the court 'shall' confirm the decision and proposed sanction unless it involved a manifest and fundamental error of law or disproportionality. The Central Bank inquiry looked into seven sets of alleged regulatory breaches between July 2006 and September 2008, including that INBS allegedly failed to process loans in line with its own policies and to obtain property security for commercial loans. Between 2008 and 2010, INBS suffered financial losses in excess of €6 billion, primarily arising from the impairment of its commercial loan book. INBS cost taxpayers €5.4 billion to rescue during the financial crisis before its remains were folded in 2011 into IBRC, previously Anglo Irish Bank. The inquiry found, between 2004 and 2008, Mr Purcell, as a board member of INBS, participated in breaches of financial services law by the lender relating to its commercial lending. The report of the inquiry was provided to Mr Purcell and the bank's enforcement section in April 2024 and a hearing last October heard submissions before deciding on sanctions. On Tuesday, having considered the evidence and the law, Mr Justice Barniville said he was satisfied the court was required to make the confirmation orders sought. The sanctions decision seemed 'wholly proportionate' to the findings made and was not disputed by the bank or Mr Purcell who had adopted a 'reasonable' and 'sensible' approach. Mr Purcell was among five INBS directors originally subject to the Central Bank inquiry when it was established in 2015. After public hearings started in late 2017, the bank reached settlement agreements with three of the original five – former INBS chairman Michael Walsh; one-time head of commercial lending Tom McMenamin; and former head of UK commercial lending Gary McCollum. They were fined a total of €243,000, with the largest amount paid by Mr McCollum. It dropped its case against the failed lender's former long-standing managing director, Michael Fingleton , now aged 86, in December 2019, due to his health issues. The High Court is currently hearing a civil case brought against Mr Fingleton by the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC), which took over INBS's assets in 2011, for alleged negligent mismanagement of the lender. He is not in a position to give evidence in that case.

Crypto investors need more detailed warnings about risks involved
Crypto investors need more detailed warnings about risks involved

Irish Times

time3 days ago

  • Irish Times

Crypto investors need more detailed warnings about risks involved

Financial regulators can noticeably increase the impact of their warnings about the risk of investing in crypto assets by incorporating 'behaviourally informed' messages about the dangers of losing money, a new study has indicated. Research conducted by the Central Bank of Ireland found that more specific warnings about the risks associated with the asset class, coupled with price volatility information, can improve risk comprehension and perception among at-risk investors. In a research paper published on Tuesday, Central Bank economist Danish Us-Salam said that younger people 'with less investment experience' tend to be the most at-risk of falling prey to bad information about crypto products. 'Inexperienced investors are particularly at risk, as information on social media platforms and aggressive marketing campaigns can positively influence their investment decisions,' he said. READ MORE The research is based on an online experiment in which participants viewed promotions for crypto assets and more traditional stock investments. [ Crypto trading exchange Kraken secures EU-wide licence from Central Bank Opens in new window ] The study found that risk perception increased notably among subjects who were given more behaviourally specific, detailed warnings about risky investments. One such warning given to participants was: 'Don't invest in crypto assets unless you're prepared to lose all your money. This is a high-risk investment. You could lose all your money and are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong.' Risk comprehension and perception increased among participants exposed to this message compared with those exposed to the standard 'your capital is at risk' warning, typical of many financial products. Mr Us-Salam said the findings support policymakers' mandate to 'design and implement risk communication strategies that are not only informative but also behaviorally cognizant'. He said: 'Enhanced risk warnings that strategically increase the salience of critical information and employ recency effects can lead to better-informed investment decisions, thereby safeguarding individuals at risk of investments in crypto assets.' Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhouf has long taken a sceptical view of crypto assets, saying most explicitly in a blog post two years ago that it 'might be more accurate' to describe them as 'Ponzi schemes' rather than investments. The regulator continues to warn potential investors that crypto assets are not regulated financial products and that consumers 'face the possibility of losing all their money if they buy crypto'.

Central Bank to question Gary Gannon's right to challenge its role in sale of Israeli bonds
Central Bank to question Gary Gannon's right to challenge its role in sale of Israeli bonds

Irish Times

time3 days ago

  • Irish Times

Central Bank to question Gary Gannon's right to challenge its role in sale of Israeli bonds

The Central Bank of Ireland wants to raise objections to a Social Democrats TD's application seeking to bring proceedings against it over its role in facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds on the European market, the High Court has heard. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty on Tuesday scheduled for next October Gary Gannon 's application seeking High Court permission to bring his case. Mr Gannon is seeking a court order requiring the Central Bank to exercise its powers under European regulations to prohibit the marketing, distribution or sale of bonds issued by the state of Israel. Patricia Brazil, senior counsel appearing for Mr Gannon and instructed by McGarr Solicitors, said she was seeking an urgent hearing date for the 'leave' application in the case. People seeking to bring judicial review proceedings must first be granted permission, or 'leave', by the High Court. READ MORE Barrister David Sweetman, for the Central Bank, said his client wants to raise objections at the hearing of Mr Gannon's application for permission. These objections include Mr Gannon's locus standi, or right, to bring the proceedings, the court heard. Ms Justice Gearty said the case arises from a concern about the continuing conflict in the Gaza Strip . She noted the situation there is 'horrific'. However, the judge said she would not grant an expedited hearing date for Mr Gannon's 'leave' application. While noting it was 'invidious' to compare, the judge said Mr Gannon's case differs from more urgent cases in the court's judicial review list relating to children in this State whom the court can 'help directly'. Ms Justice Gearty directed Mr Gannon's application be set for a date in October. In a sworn statement to the court, Mr Gannon said he believes and is advised that investors in, and holders, purchasers and sellers of Israeli bonds risk being 'complicit in genocide, with various implications for them'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store