FY25 audit report: Concerns voiced over non-independence of AGP Office
The report highlights that the AGP, a constitutional office under Article 100 of the Constitution, continues to operate as an attached department of the Ministry of Law and Justice rather than as a separate division, as mandated.
According to the report, the Prime Minister's Office, via Letter No 658/SAPM/2018 dated May 30, 2018, approved in principle the reorganisation of the AGP's office as an independent division. The directive also sought to provide legal cover to the AGP's role in the appointment of law officers.
However, auditors found that these orders have yet to be implemented, which, they noted, undermines the constitutional status of the Attorney-General's office.
The audit report termed this continued subordination of the AGP to the Law Division a violation of the prime minister's order and recommended immediate corrective measures to ensure compliance with both the Constitution and the PM's directive.
In its response to the audit, the AGP Office acknowledged that a similar observation was made in the 2018–19 and 2019–20 audit cycles. It stated that the matter was taken up with the Law and Justice Division and subsequently, referred to the Cabinet Division for a final decision.
The case remains pending.
A Departmental Accounts Committee (DAC) meeting held on February 6, 2025, directed that the issue be referred to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) for further deliberation.
The auditors have recommended that immediate steps be taken to formalise the AGP's independent status in line with constitutional provisions and the prime minister's instructions.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Police arrest former AJK premier Abdul Qayyum Niazi
Former Prime Minister of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and a leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Sardar Abdul Qayyum Niazi, has been arrested by police from the Samahni area of Bhimber. He was 'illegally taken into custody' while he was heading to address a public rally in AJK on Sunday, the PTI said in a statement on its Facebook page. AJK Police arrested the former PM near Jhandi Juntra while he was travelling from Samahni to attend a rally in Bhimber. On this occasion, a scuffle also broke out between police and PTI workers. PTI launches 90-day 'do or die' movement Aaj News cited sources as saying that Niazi was participating in a public contact campaign to mobilise support for a rally to be held in Lahore on August 5, aimed at securing the release of PTI founding chairman Imran Khan. Sources said that after being taken into custody, the former AJK premier was transferred to Mirpur. The arrest of the PTI AJK President has increased concerns about the potential for further arrests of party leaders and the possibility of police blocking PTI convoys from travelling to Lahore. Police said arrest warrants were issued against Niazi two days ago in connection with the May 9 riots. The PTI leader was facing more than 11 cases, they added. Jailed Imran Khan's sons likely to join rally demanding his release On July 31, in a post on X, the ex-AJK PM wrote: 'The issuance of arrest warrants against the central and provincial leadership of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf before the August 5 protest is apparently a planned political revenge. 'Targeting dozens of leaders is a blatant insult to the Constitution, law, and democracy. This approach is a moment of reflection for the credibility of state institutions and public trust.' Niazi has served as the 13th prime minister of AJK from August 4, 2021, to April 14, 2022.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Communication ministry & NHA projects: FY25 audit uncovers over Rs5.29bn malfeasance
ISLAMABAD: The Audit Report 2024–25 has uncovered over Rs5.29 billion in financial irregularities and procedural violations in the Ministry of Communications and its key agency, the National Highways Authority (NHA), across various highway infrastructure projects. The highest irregularity, amounting to Rs2.51 billion, was found in the irregular award of work without approval of PC-I. The audit observed that the NHA initiated construction work on certain packages without the necessary planning approval, violating rules under the Planning Commission and the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA). This raised questions about both transparency and compliance with federal development guidelines. Another glaring discrepancy involved the loss of Rs551.87 million in Package-1 of the Hakla–DI Khan Motorway, where the work was prematurely awarded before acquiring the required land. The project faced long delays due to land acquisition issues, pushing up costs and causing disruption to the overall CPEC Western Route timeline. NHA projects: Ministry releases Rs56bn, parliamentary panel told In a related observation, Rs511.67 million was paid to contractors due to faulty measurements and misapplication of rates in the same package. The auditors noted that quantities claimed and paid were not properly validated by field staff or supported with engineering estimates. The report also highlights that the NHA suffered a loss of Rs360.91 million due to irregular bidding practices and flawed escalation calculations during another section of the Hakla–DI Khan Motorway project. The tendering process failed to ensure a level playing field and did not reflect prevailing market conditions. An unjustified price adjustment of Rs300.8 million was also recorded, where contractors were awarded price escalations even beyond the allowed notification period. This adjustment was granted without verifying if actual cost changes warranted such increases. Separately, auditors flagged Rs272.17 million in non-adjustment of recoverable advances, where contractors had been paid mobilisation funds that were never deducted from final bills. This reflects serious lapses in internal controls and contract enforcement. An additional Rs224.55 million was lost due to delay-based price adjustments that were granted to defaulting contractors. Despite poor progress, the NHA allowed escalations instead of enforcing penalties under contract clauses. Another audit para noted Rs217.2 million paid for non-scheduled items, which were outside the scope of the original PC-I and were never approved by the competent authority. This was done without competitive bidding and against standard procurement practices. Finally, the auditors revealed Rs344.5 million in undue benefit given to a contractor by ignoring contract clauses related to progress and milestone penalties. The NHA failed to enforce provisions that could have prevented overpayments and encouraged timely completion. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Unjust police certificates stigmatise acquitted citizens: LHC
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has recently observed that issuing a police character (PS) certificate reflecting a criminal history of an accused despite his acquittal by a court of law in an FIR violates the individual's constitutionally protected right. The court said such a practice not only violates the individual's protected right to human dignity but also imposes a lasting and unjust stigma upon a citizen who has been exonerated through due judicial process. The court said, once an accused has been acquitted by a competent court of law, he is to be considered, treated and regarded as innocent person under the law. Despite a conclusive acquittal of an accused any continuous reference or inclusion of the relevant FIR in official documents like police character certificate is unwarranted, the court observed. The court passed this order in a petition of Abdur Rehman Faryad challenging issuance of a PC certificate mentioning his name in the FIR despite his acquittal by a competent court of law. The court said the petitioner is entitled to a PC certificate that reflects his acquittal and the absence of any subsisting criminal liability. The court said the allegations levelled against the petitioner do not involve moral turpitude, nor do they relate to any offence against the State. The court said it would be legally unjustified to draw any adverse inference or attach any stigma to the petitioner merely based on the registration of an FIR. The court; therefore, directed the Home Secretary Punjab to ensure the issuance of a PC certificate in favour of the petitioner, which accurately reflects his present legal status. The said certificate shall exclude and omit any reference whatsoever to FIR registered at Police Station Nawan Kot, Lahore, in the light of the petitioner's lawful acquittal and the absence of any existing criminal liability, the court added. The court noted that law enforcement agencies have the administrative authority to maintain internal records of reported incidents, including FIRs, for various legitimate purposes. The court said the retention of such data, so long as it is confined to lawful administrative use and is not disclosed or misused in a manner prejudicial to the rights of the individual and cannot be construed as a violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The court; therefore, directed the office to transmit copy of the court order to the Inspector General of Police Punjab and the Chief Secretary Punjab, to ensure its strict implementation in light of the court's directions and observations. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
