logo
Army leaders to Musk: We will DOGE ourselves

Army leaders to Musk: We will DOGE ourselves

Yahoo01-05-2025
WASHINGTON — Under pressure to make drastic budget cuts, Army leaders have struck an unusual agreement with Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency: Don't DOGE us; we will DOGE ourselves.
The process began at a March White House meeting attended by Vice President JD Vance, a Marine veteran; Army Secretary Dan Driscoll; and the Army chief of staff, Gen. Randy George, three defense officials familiar with the matter told NBC News.
Soon after the meeting began, Musk joined them. Together, the four men discussed Driscoll and George's plans to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in what they and other Army officials agree is wasteful spending. The two men's goal is to cut jobs, consolidate commands and radically change the Army acquisition process, the three officials said.
'We have been working to get the best, most lethal, most modern tools in the hands of our soldiers,' Col. Dave Butler, an Army spokesman, said in an email. 'To do this we have to leave behind the anchor of obsolescence. We have to stop spending money on yesterday's equipment and invest in war winning technology.'
Army leaders have long complained that members of Congress force them to spend billions of dollars on weapons, vehicles and programs they don't want. Often, the spending is driven by members of Congress focused on bringing jobs and money to their districts or attached to legacy programs the Army leaders no longer want, the officials said.
George has argued that there are too many general officer billets in the Army and that some of them can be eliminated, the three officials said. And Driscoll believes there are civilian roles that have become redundant or outdated. The two leaders also suggested consolidating some Army commands, including U.S. Army North, U.S. Army South and U.S. Futures Command, the officials said.
'By combining headquarters and reducing general officer billets, we will prioritize the maneuver formations who fight and win our nation's wars,' Butler said.
Musk and Vance approved, and now Army leaders have begun a campaign to make their own cuts instead of DOGE. They include eliminating several large Army programs; consolidating or slashing redundant positions, including general officers and civilians; and using a consulting firm to convince the public and Capitol Hill that the programs the Army doesn't want are failing.
Army leaders are considering cutting 8% to as much as 20% of its civilian workforce, with an early estimate of about 20,000 cuts to start, the officials said. They promised to take a tailored approach to the cuts.
Two programs on the chopping block are the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, known as the JLTV, and the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle, commonly known as the Humvee. Army leaders hope to focus spending on the newer Infantry Squad Vehicle, known as the ISV, instead.
Another example is the Army could stop buying the Delta variant of the AH-64 Apache helicopter in favor of the AH-64E, which Army leaders prefer, the officials added.
Army officials also hope to stop buying the Gray Eagle drone and replace it with newer-model drones. Officials said they are also considering changes to at least seven other programs.
In anticipation of congressional resistance to reducing jobs and money in their districts, the Pentagon has prepared a 'DoD Directive' that would give Army officials significantly more autonomy in what they can buy, according to the three officials.
The directive is expected to be signed this week. It would allow Army leaders to select the specific vehicles, drones and large weapon systems that the Army would use for years without Congress' overruling them in the budget process. The issue is so sensitive that Pentagon officials must sign nondisclosure agreements before they are briefed on the details, the three officials said.
Since Driscoll was sworn in as Army secretary, his approach has been unorthodox. Driscoll, a close friend of Vance's, joined the Army after having worked in finance. He has assured Trump administration officials and congressional officials that he would resist congressional pressure and let the Army buy what the military leaders believe they need, two defense officials said.
Driscoll has hired a public affairs consulting firm, MAD Global Strategy, to place news stories in targeted districts and make the case for why certain programs should be cut, according to the three officials.
One of the firm's partners, Jai Chabria, was chief strategist and general consultant for Vance's Senate 2020 campaign in Ohio, according to his company bio. MAD Global did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The firm is tasked with sharing Army information with the public that shows that certain programs are inefficient, overpriced or outdated. Defense officials said it is the first time they can recall that the Army has intentionally released information about specific programs' weaknesses to end them and convey to voters that Congress is forcing the Army to buy them.
MAD will give examples such as vehicles that are too heavy to cross bridges into training areas and expensive software from outside companies that could be produced inside the Army at far less cost. It will also describe historic buildings that the Army is forced to keep instead of constructing new ones, even though they're expensive to restore and maintain.
The overall goal, the officials said, is to give the public evidence that the current acquisition process is costly, time-consuming and inefficient.
'Over the past twenty years staffs and overhead have become bloated and ineffective,' Butler wrote.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop: Parker administration taps high-powered law firm to lobby Trump
Scoop: Parker administration taps high-powered law firm to lobby Trump

Axios

time35 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Parker administration taps high-powered law firm to lobby Trump

The Parker administration is tapping a high-powered national law firm to lobby the Trump administration to support the mayor's "safer, greener, cleaner" agenda. Why it matters: Lobbying is a part of most cities' playbook, but maintaining working relationships with the president and federal lawmakers could prove especially crucial for Philadelphia, which relied on $2.2 billion in federal aid last year. Driving the news: Holland & Knight, a Florida-based law firm with a big footprint in Washington, D.C., has secured a new one-year, $150,000 contract with the city, city spokesperson Joe Grace tells Axios. The mayor's office publicly bid the contract earlier this year, saying it needs support and funding increases from the federal government to "assist the city in being the safest, cleanest, greenest city with economic opportunity for all." The contract description on the city's website stressed the need to foster "positive relationships with members of Congress and the president's administration, regardless of political affiliation." The big picture: Unlike her predecessor, Mayor Cherelle Parker has avoided publicly clashing with President Trump — a cautious strategy that has caused consternation among some advocates and residents who want the mayor to forcefully denounce Trump's policies. Between the lines: Parker doesn't appear to want to risk the city's overall future by criticizing the president on issues she can't directly influence, longtime political analyst Larry Ceisler tells Axios. Parker — who last month secured a $6.8 billion budget, raising city spending by nearly 7.5% from last year — "understands her lane as a mayor of Philadelphia," Ceisler says. "She is not getting distracted by all these other things that are going on around her." State of play: Holland & Knight has served as a consultant for several Philadelphiaadministrations over more than a decade, Grace says. The firm has already tallied at least $30,000 in the first quarter of 2025 to lobby for the city on issues ranging from affordable housing and homelessness to city waterregulation, per OpenSecrets. Philly spent $240,000 on lobbying under the Biden administration last year, with half of that amount going to Holland & Knight. What they're saying: Holland & Knight has been instrumental in facilitating conversations with "key contacts within federal government or other cities or municipalities," Grace says.

Johnson, Trump push wary House Republicans for July 4 passage
Johnson, Trump push wary House Republicans for July 4 passage

E&E News

timean hour ago

  • E&E News

Johnson, Trump push wary House Republicans for July 4 passage

Speaker Mike Johnson and President Donald Trump are digging in to pass Republicans' massive tax and safety-net reform bill by Friday in time for a July 4 celebration. The biggest hurdle in their way right now: dozens of House Republican holdouts who are wary the bill doesn't deliver on key promises they've made to their constituents. From fiscal hawks to vulnerable centrists worried about the Senate's steeper Medicaid cuts, a substantial cross-section of the House GOP conference would rather take the time to amend the package and send it back to the Senate. Advertisement Head GOP rebel Chip Roy of Texas said Tuesday the chances of passing a bill out of the House by that deadline are 'a hell of a lot lower than they were even 48 hours ago' based on what he saw of the Senate bill.

Matthew A. Winkler: Let AI explain why Tesla's critics are losing
Matthew A. Winkler: Let AI explain why Tesla's critics are losing

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Matthew A. Winkler: Let AI explain why Tesla's critics are losing

Almost everything said about Tesla Inc. these days ranges from bad to worse. The majority of 61 analysts following the electric vehicle and clean energy company led by Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk say investors should avoid buying the stock. Plummeting sales at home and abroad underscore Bloomberg Intelligence research showing 31% of car buyers - including 41% of women who identify as Democrats - are less likely to purchase a Tesla after Musk, the unelected leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, became a pariah inside and outside the White House. President Donald Trump accused his biggest campaign donor of being a "big-time drug addict." Even Musk's artificial intelligence-powered chatbot, Grok, said Tesla is in a "precarious position" with a 15% to 25% risk of a "death spiral." The media take on Tesla omits the unimpaired outlook that data compiled by Bloomberg show: The EV startup founded by engineers Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning in 2003, still is the world's largest automaker, ninth-largest public company and worth more than the gross domestic product of Saudi Arabia. For all its might as the global sales leader, Toyota Motor Corp. is about a quarter of Tesla's $1.04 trillion market capitalization. The top 10 automakers, excluding Tesla, amount to $812 billion, or 78% of Tesla's value. For all the discussion about Tesla's lost cachet and "demand problem," the Model Y remains the best-selling EV model globally in 2025, which would be the third consecutive year if the trend holds, and shows no signs of losing its sales-leading position over legacy automakers in China, Europe and the US. Shareholders need only look at financial history to be unmoved by the doom mongering. Tesla's $97.7 billion of revenue last year is more than 30 times its sales a decade ago, outperforming the second-fastest growing company, China's BYD Co., whose most recent annual sales are 12 times its 2014 revenue. Tesla earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), totaled $14 billion, more than 300 times the company's profit a decade ago. No. 2 BYD, grew 15 times based on its EBITDA, which measures core business profitability since this item excludes the impact to earnings from financing and tax decisions. Tesla's current market capitalization is 31 times bigger than a decade ago, which is another way of saying none of the top 10 automakers are competitive with Tesla's revenue growth, profit and market value, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. When Tesla on April 22 announced its biggest earnings disappointment in five years - 27 cents a share in the first quarter, or 38% lower than the 43-cents-a-share average estimate - the stock rose 5.37% the next day after Musk told shareholders the financial impact of autonomous driving will become material in the second half of 2025. The Tesla-designed computer chip for autonomous driving uses AI rather than expensive sensors and high-precision maps, and Tesla anticipates significant market share, potentially 99%, or at least 90% in the autonomous car market, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. So when the question "Why is Tesla's market value four times Toyota's?" was addressed to the Bloomberg Terminal's Document Search and Analysis tool, the AI-driven function accessing news, research and analysis with full attribution and transparency, provided the following perspective: Tesla's AI and autonomous technology vision -According to Tesla's Q1 2025 earnings call on April 22, the company is positioning itself primarily as (an) AI and robotics company that will generate value through autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots, not just as a traditional automaker. -According to news, Tesla's AI and autonomous driving technology alone is valued at $1 trillion, according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives. -According to Tesla's Q1 2025 earnings call on April 22, the company expects to achieve full autonomous driving capabilities at scale by mid-2025, which would transform their business model. Leadership and future growth expectations -According to news, Tesla's $1 trillion market capitalization is heavily influenced by Elon Musk's leadership and vision. -According to Tesla's Q1 earnings call on April 22, management believes Tesla could become worth more than the next five largest companies combined with successful execution. -According to news, analyst Gary Black argues that traditional automotive P/E ratios shouldn't be applied to Tesla due to different growth prospects. Vertical integration and manufacturing advantages -According to Tesla's Q1 earnings call on April 22, the company has significant vertical integration advantages, including battery production, lithium refining and manufacturing capabilities. -According to Tesla's Q1 earnings call on April 22, the company is leading in humanoid robotics development and expects rapid scaling of this technology. Market challenges -According to news, Tesla faces multiple challenges including sales slump, profit declines, brand backlash and stock volatility. -According to news, there is significant debate among finance experts about whether Tesla's valuation is justified or disconnected from reality. As much as Tesla depends on 125,665 employees in the US, Europe and Asia, it has been sustained by the original foresight of its founders, Eberhard and Tarpenning and subsequently Musk, who provided the investment that enabled Tesla to disrupt and transform the auto industry. "People in general, and equity investors in particular, want to see absolute commitment and belief in a vision of a better future," Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, who covered the auto industry since the 1980s, wrote in a note to clients last week. "They also want to be part of a winner's story, especially if there is an element of redemption in that narrative. That is something no algo or spreadsheet can understand, which is why hero-led companies are often so valuable." (With assistance from Shin Pei.) Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store