
Europe is breaking its reliance on American science
The effort - which has not been previously reported - marks the most concrete response from the European Union and other European governments so far to the U.S. government's retreat from scientific research under President Donald Trump's administration.
Since his return to the White House, Trump has initiated sweeping budget cuts to the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Centers for Disease Control and other agencies, dismantling programs conducting climate, weather, geospatial and health research, and taking some public databases offline.
As those cuts take effect, European officials have expressed increasing alarm that - without continued access to U.S.-supported weather and climate data - governments and businesses will face challenges in planning for extreme weather events and long-term infrastructure investment, according to Reuters interviews. In March, more than a dozen European countries urged the EU Commission to move fast to recruit American scientists who lose their jobs to those cuts.
Asked for comment on NOAA cuts and the EU's moves to expand its own collection of scientific data, the White House Office of Management and Budget said Trump's proposed cuts to the agency's 2026 budget were aimed at programs that spread "fake Green New Scam 'science,'" a reference to climate change research and policy.
"Under President Trump's leadership, the U.S. is funding real science again,' Rachel Cauley, an OMB spokesperson, said via email.
European officials told Reuters that - beyond the risk of losing access to data that is bedrock to the world's understanding of climate change and marine systems - they were concerned by the general U.S. pullback from research.
"The current situation is much worse than we could have expected," Sweden's State Secretary for Education and Research Maria Nilsson, told Reuters. "My reaction is, quite frankly, shock."
The Danish Meteorological Institute described the U.S. government data as "absolutely vital" - and said it relied on several data sets to measure including sea ice in the Arctic and sea surface temperatures. "This isn't just a technical issue, reliable data underpins extreme weather warnings, climate projections, protecting communities and ultimately saves lives," said Adrian Lema, director of the DMI's National Center for Climate Research.
Reuters interviewed officials from eight European countries who said their governments were undertaking reviews of their reliance on U.S. marine, climate and weather data. Officials from seven countries - Denmark, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain and Sweden - described joint efforts now in the early stages to safeguard key health and climate data and research programs.
LEANING ON THE U.S.
As a priority, the EU is expanding its access to ocean observation data, a senior European Commission official told Reuters. Those data sets are seen as critical to the shipping and energy industries as well as early storm warning systems.
Over the next two years, the senior official said, the EU plans to expand its own European Marine Observation and Data Network which collects and hosts data on shipping routes, seabed habitats, marine litter and other concerns.
The initiative was aimed at "mirroring and possibly replacing US-based services," the senior European Commission official told Reuters.
Europe is particularly concerned about its vulnerability to U.S. funding cuts to NOAA's research arm that would affect the Global Ocean Observing System, a network of ocean observation programs that supports navigation services, shipping routes and storm forecasting, a second EU official told Reuters.
The insurance industry relies on the Global Ocean Observing System'sdisaster records for risk modelling. Coastal planners use shoreline, sea-level, and hazard data to guide infrastructure investments. The energy industry uses oceanic and seismic datasets to assess offshore drilling or wind farm viability.
In addition, the senior EU Commission official said, the EU is considering increasing its funding of the Argo program, a part of the Global Ocean Observing System which operates a global system of floats to monitor the world's oceans and track global warming, extreme weather events and sea-level rise.
NOAA last year described the program, in operation for over 25 years, as the "crown jewel" of ocean science. It makes its data freely available to the oil and gas industry, marine tourism and other industries.
The United States funds 57% of Argo's $40 million annual operating expenses, while the EU funds 23%. The White House and NOAA did not respond to questions about future support for that program.
The European moves to establish independent data collection and play a bigger role in Argo represent a historic break with decades of U.S. leadership in ocean science, said Craig McLean, who retired in 2022 after four decades at the agency. He said U.S. leadership of weather, climate and marine data collection was unmatched, and thatthrough NOAA the U.S. has paid for more than half of the world's ocean measurements.
European scientists acknowledge the outsized role the U.S. government has played in global scientific research and data collection - and that European countries have grown overly dependent on that work.
"It's a bit like defense: we rely heavily on the U.S. in that area, too. They're trailblazers and role models—but that also makes us dependent on them," Katrin Boehning-Gaese, scientific director of Germany's Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, told Reuters.
'GUERRILLA ARCHIVISTS'
A number of European governments are now taking measures to reduce that dependence. Nordic countries met to coordinate data storage efforts in the Spring, Norwegian Minister of Research and Higher Education Sigrun Aasland told Reuters. European science ministers also discussed the U.S. science budget cuts at a meeting in Paris in May.
Aasland said Norway was setting aside $2 million to back up and store U.S. data to ensure stable access.
The Danish Meteorological Institute in February started downloading historical U.S. climate data in case it is deleted by the U.S. It is also preparing to switch from American observations to alternatives, Christina Egelund, Minister of Higher Education and Science of Denmark, said in an interview.
"The potentially critical issue is when new observations data stop coming in," the Institute's Lema said. While weather models could continue to operate without U.S. data, he said the quality would suffer.
Meanwhile, the German government has commissioned scientific organizations, including the center, to review its reliance on U.S. databases.
Since Trump returned to the White House, scientists and citizens worldwide have been downloading U.S. databases related to climate, public health or the environment that are slated for decommissioning - calling it "guerrilla archiving."
"We actually received requests—or let's say emergency calls—from our colleagues in the U.S., who said, 'We have a problem here... and we will have to abandon some datasets', said Frank Oliver Gloeckner, head of the digital archive PANGAEA, which is operated by publicly funded German research institutions.
About 800 of NOAA's 12,000-strong workforce have been terminated or taken financial incentives to resign as part of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency cuts.
The White House 2026 budget plan seeks to shrink NOAA even further, proposing a $1.8 billion cut, or 27% of the agency's budget, and a near-20% reduction in staffing, bringing down the NOAA workforce to 10,000.
The budget proposal would eliminate the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, NOAA's main research arm, which is responsible for ocean observatory systems including Argo, coastal observing networks, satellite sensors and climate model labs.
It is also reducing its data products. Between April and June, NOAA announced on its website the decommissioning of 20 datasets or products related to earthquakes and marine science.
NOAA did not respond to requests for comment.
Gloeckner said there were no legal hurdles to storing the U.S. government data as it was already in the public domain.
But without significant funds and infrastructure, there are limits to what private scientists can save, said Denice Ross, a senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists, a nonprofit science policy group and the U.S. government's chief data officer during Joe Biden's administration.
Databases need regular updating - which requires the funding and infrastructure that only governments can provide, Ross said.
Over the last few months, the Federation and EU officials have held a series of talks with European researchers, U.S. philanthropies and health and environment advocacy groups to discuss how to prioritize what data to save.
'There is an opportunity for other nations and institutions and philanthropies to fill in the gaps if U.S. quality starts to falter," she said.
(Reporting by Kate Abnett in Brussels, Valerie Volcovici in Washington, Sarah Marsh in Berlin and Alison Withers in Copenhagen. Additional Reporting by Andreas Rinke. Editing by Suzanne Goldenberg)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump's 'America First' may fuel global currency shift
EUROPE and Asia could leverage United States President Donald Trump's "America First" strategy for their own benefit, eventually spurring the development of regional tripolar foreign exchange (forex) blocs that could erode the dominance of the US dollar and reshape global markets. The US dollar has struggled this year, especially since Trump's April 2 tariff announcement. While the currency jumped recently following the announcement of US-European Union trade deal, this short-term move doesn't change the long-term trends that could undermine the greenback's position. Economic dominance in the future could largely depend on access to affordable, efficient energy to power artificial intelligence technologies. And in the race to dominate the industries of the future, the US is arguably going in reverse. It's retreating from the renewables space, as seen in the administration's recent move to eliminate many clean energy subsidies. The president appears to be making the bet that the US can maintain energy dominance indefinitely by relying on its own fossil fuel resources. This could ultimately result in uncompetitive power costs in the future, given that China is already dominating in clean energy technologies like solar and electric vehicles. While Trump may be seeking to enhance American self-sufficiency, the administration's policies may actually be increasing the country's dependency on foreign capital. Trump's recently passed budget bill — which looks pretty ugly to fiscal watchdogs despite its name — could cement the US' position as the world's biggest capital importer by adding an expected US$3.4 trillion to the US deficit over the next decade, according to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, potentially locking in six to seven per cent budget deficits for years. The US has also been running current account deficits of roughly four per cent over the past several years, and this widened to six per cent of gross domestic product in the first quarter, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. By spending beyond its means and running these twin deficits, the US will continue to require large amounts of foreign capital inflows. But this capital may soon be harder to come by, if Europe and Asia seek to keep more of it closer to home. While Europe has agreed to increase US energy purchases through the recently announced US trade deal, much of that agreement remains up in the air. Meanwhile, Asia has begun to trade more internally, as China has been focusing on export diversification. A growing regionalisation of supply chains began during the Covid-19 pandemic and appears to be accelerating as Trump seeks to drive production back to the US and all major global powers focus on securing regional raw material access (e.g., rare earths and other critical minerals) for national security purposes. This shift could eventually create the foundation for true regional forex blocs across Asia, Europe and the Americas. Within Asia, Pan Gongsheng, governor of the People's Bank of China, has recently highlighted China's interest in having the yuan play a larger role in a multi-polar currency world. While China's capital account remains closed, Asian currencies already primarily trade off the yuan rather than the US dollar. Even though China faces challenges, such as its fight against deflation, its efforts on this front — namely, boosting consumption and reining in excess supply, especially in the renewable energy space across solar, wind and batteries — could ultimately help attract more foreign capital by boosting China's growth profile and corporate earnings. In a world of currency blocs, Europe and Asia could emerge as potential winners, as they erode the US' position as the world's financial powerhouse. So while many investors may get lost in the short-term currency noise, it might be wise to instead focus on the long-term signal.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
New York Declaration fails Gaza's reality
THE New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine, issued late last month and endorsed by the Arab League, the European Union and 17 states is a masterclass in political evasion — fine words that dare not confront the central facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict. The declaration bluntly demands that Hamas relinquish power in Gaza and disarm, handing authority over to the Palestinian Authority (PA). Yet when it comes to Israel's decades-long occupation, its illegal blockade and devastating military campaign that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians — most of them women and children — it retreats into euphemism. It is a deliberate choice to privilege political convenience over legal obligation. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel, as the occupying power, must protect the civilian population. The destruction of homes, hospitals, schools and water systems; the starvation of civilians; and the displacement of nearly two million people are not "collateral damage" but grave breaches under Articles 53 and 147, attracting individual criminal responsibility. The declaration rightly condemns Hamas' Oct 7 attacks as war crimes and crimes against humanity. But justice cannot be selective. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court applies equally to armed groups and states. If its authors truly believe in the rule of law, then they must apply it without fear or favour. The declaration's vision for Gaza's future is equally troubling. By proposing the transfer of authority to the PA backed by an international stabilisation mission, it risks turning the PA into an unelected subcontractor for the occupation — administering Gaza without real sovereignty. History shows that transitional administrations, from Timor-Leste to Kosovo, succeeded only when paired with credible elections, clear timelines for self-governance and respect for self-determination. The declaration offers none of these guarantees. Most tellingly, it evades the root cause of Palestinian resistance: the occupation itself. The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) 2024 advisory opinion reaffirmed that Israel's occupation is illegal and must end "as rapidly as possible" while the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2334 demands the cessation of all settlement activity, calling it a "flagrant violation" under international law. Yet the declaration treats these binding norms as optional talking points. It says nothing of the siege imposed on Gaza since 2007, or the refugees' right of return under United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194. There is no insistence on lifting the blockade, opening humanitarian corridors or securing reparations for the destruction. In short, it offers Palestinians process without protection and symbolism without sovereignty. If the world is serious about peace, any credible agreement must meet three minimum standards: Impartial investigations into all alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity — whether committed by Hamas, Israel or any other actor — under ICC jurisdiction or an independent UN mechanism. Enforceable timelines for ending the occupation, dismantling illegal settlements and lifting the blockade, in compliance with the ICJ's opinion and existing UNSC resolutions. Guarantees of Palestinian self-determination through internationally supervised elections in Gaza and the West Bank, and constitutional processes reflecting the will of the Palestinian people — not the dictates of external powers. Without these, the declaration is not a peace plan but a blueprint for managing Palestinian submission. Some will argue that half-measures are better than none. But unjust peace is no peace. I have spoken to Palestinian children who have lost their entire families and represented them in legal proceedings. I have read the legal texts meant to protect them — and seen how those protections collapse when expedience trumps principle. The world does not need more declarations that appear balanced on paper but tilt towards power in practice. It needs the courage to hold every violator of international law accountable, and the resolve to end an occupation that is both illegal and immoral. Until then, Gaza will remain not a test case for peace, but the gravest indictment of the international system's unwillingness to enforce its own laws.


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says
FILE PHOTO: Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney arrives at a press conference to make an announcement on recognizing Palestinian statehood, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Patrick Doyle/File Photo