Europe's Arms Revival Pits Homegrown Wares Against US Stalwarts
The jockeying between European and US firms was in the spotlight at the Paris Air Show this week, where talk of fighter jets, drones and missiles led the conversation, instead of the commercial aircraft orders that typically dominate the expo.
Defense and security took up about 45% of the footprint on the show's floor — a 'strong increase' from two years ago, its organizers told Defense News.
Behind the shift is a growing realization in Europe that the region needs to become more self-reliant for its security, as threats escalate and the US signals a retreat under President Donald Trump. War has raged in Ukraine for more than three years, exposing the menace posed by Vladimir Putin's Russia, and Israel attacked Iran just days before the meeting began, putting countries in the Middle East more on edge.
After 80 years of peace, European nations haven't developed the 'culture of defense' seen in the US, Russia and Israel, said Roberto Cingolani, chief executive officer of Italian state-backed defense contractor Leonardo SpA.
'We were not as well prepared because we almost forgot that war could happen,' Cingolani said. 'We were more used to peacekeeping missions where you don't develop a real defense system, you develop an assistance system. And our army now is making a lot of effort for the so-called capacity boost.'
With Trump demanding that allies dedicate a greater share of their resources to defense, European NATO spending is expected to double by the end of the decade to as high as €800 billion in 2030, according to McKinsey.
NATO leaders meet next week at the Hague to discuss raising current spending targets.
'The surge in European defense funding is significant,' Hugues Lavandier, leader of McKinsey's aerospace and defense practice in Europe, said in an interview.
France's Dassault Aviation wasn't subtle about seizing the opportunity, touting its Rafale warplane as 'the choice of sovereignty' and conducting a demonstration above the makeshift chalets at Le Bourget airfield.
Lockheed Martin Corp. put its F-35 through the paces as well. At least half of Europe's 13 current customers for the fighter jet are talking publicly about buying more, said Frank St. John, Lockheed's chief operating officer, with other countries seeking US approval for purchases. By decade's end, Lockheed expects to have around 700 of its fighters on the continent, he said in an interview.
'We're headed into a period over the next three to five years of increasing budgets,' St. John said, including in the US, Japan and Australia.
According to the Financial Times, the US firm is also seeking a piece of the UK's Iron Dome-type missile defense project.
Boeing Co. had a muted commercial presence at the show because of the Air India crash involving one of its 787 Dreamliners last week. The US company sees an opportunity to expand in European defense with autonomous aircraft like its MQ-28 Ghost Bat drone, designed to fly on reconnaissance and tactical missions in tandem with crewed aircraft, Bernd Peters, vice president of business development and strategy, told reporters.
American defense contractors are increasingly willing to forge deals with European counterparts to better make the case for their wares. Honeywell International Inc. said it plans to acquire more companies in the region and expand in the UK, Germany and Czech Republic.
Lockheed is raising its investment with Rheinmetall AG to jointly develop missiles and rockets. The German supplier inked a separate drone-technology partnership with US startup Anduril Industries Inc. — underscoring the boom in demand for future weaponry.
Germany, Europe's biggest economy, is emblematic of the changes afoot. Its armed forces are shrinking as soldiers age, hampering the biggest push to re-arm since World War II. The government has lifted caps on defense spending, clearing the way for hundreds of billions of euros in expenditures.
Given the recent strains on the US relationship, many in Europe want to see the money allocated at home rather than with American companies that have long supplied NATO.
'The time has come to buy European products,' Michael Schoellhorn, who heads Airbus SE's Munich-based defense unit, said in an interview. 'That way we not only gain higher tax revenues but also the technology. If you just buy, the money is gone.'
But Europe needs weapons now, and its companies are struggling to gear up the factories and supply chains that would fulfill the demand.
To that end, France and Spain renewed their commitment to the troubled A400M military transport aircraft. Airbus, Thales and Leonardo are working to unify their satellite and space operations, and Leonardo, working with Rheinmetall, is trying to vacuum up the military vehicle business of Italy's Iveco Group NV.
Yet it's not certain whether these deals will ultimately go through, and a public quarrel between Airbus and Dassault Aviation, its French partner on Europe's FCAS Future Combat Air System, served as a reminder of the challenges going forward: Europe's defense industry is currently seen as too fragmented and driven by nationalistic priorities to truly compete with American, Russian or Chinese rivals.
For the current Eurofighter warplane, Airbus is aligned with Leonardo and the UK's BAE Systems, competing against the F-35 and Dassault Aviation's Rafale. On the next-generation FCAS, the German and French governments have teamed Airbus with Dassault.
It's not easy to go from being a rival on a high stakes weapons program to becoming its partner on the next one, said Jean-Brice Dumont, head of air power at Airbus.
'We have to make the 'Europe of defense' — it has to happen,' he said. But 'you are having two competitors poised to marry, and that creates a natural ambiguity, a natural paradox.'
With assistance from Anthony Palazzo.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Formula 1 renewable energy shift drives 26% drop in carbon footprint
By Olivia Raimonde and Alastair Marsh Motor racing, a sport known for flashy, petrol-guzzling racecars speeding at hundreds of kilometers per hour across twisting asphalt tracks, hasn't been a pastime known for sustainability. Formula 1 is trying to change that. Often referred to as 'the pinnacle of motorsport,' the racecar organisation, which hosts an annual championship featuring the best drivers in the world, has seen its carbon emissions drop 26 per cent since 2018. At the end of the 2024 season, the sport's carbon footprint fell to 168,720 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from 228,793. F1 said in a statement on Wednesday that it's halfway toward achieving its minimum 50 per cent reduction target, as set out in its 'net zero by 2030' commitment. 'It's the culmination of a lot of work,' said Ellen Jones, head of environmental, social and governance at F1, in an interview. 'We've changed the way we operate, changed the way we work' with the racing teams and promoters, as well Formula 1's management and regulator, she said. A major factor in the reductions has been a years-long shift to renewable energy, Jones said. Investment in sustainable aviation fuel for travel and freight use, and other alternative energy sources, including solar and biofuels, contributed to the decline. Next year, F1 has set a target for the cars to have new hybrid engines and be powered entirely by advanced sustainable fuel. The sport has achieved carbon reductions across the four major categories that it tracks: factories and facilities, down 59 per cent since 2018; logistics, down 9 per cent; event operations, down 12 per cent on a per-race basis; and travel, down 25 per cent. An increase in using remote operations and changes to the race schedule also have resulted in lower greenhouse gas emissions. Having remote broadcast operations has allowed about 140 personnel to avoid having to travel to the race location each weekend. And changing the date of the Japanese Grand Prix to align with other races last year in the Asia-Pacific region also contributed to lower emissions. In 2026, the date of the Monaco Grand Prix will be moved to align with other European events and eliminate an additional transatlantic crossing. F1 said its climate commitment is 'set in accordance with the science' from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and aligns with the panel's definition of net zero emissions. The racing series' goal is to reduce absolute emissions by a minimum of 50 per cent from a 2018 baseline, which was calculated using guidance set by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. F1 has faced criticism from activists who say the sport is harmful to the environment. In 2022, demonstrators with Just Stop Oil sat on the track during the 2022 British Grand Prix, disrupting the race. The construction of Madrid's Grand Prix street circuit also has prompted backlash.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sanctions as deadly as war, linked to mass fatalities every year: Study
Sanctions can cause as many fatalities as armed conflict, with unilateral penalties being associated with more than half a million deaths per year, according to a new analysis. Unilateral and economic sanctions imposed by the US and the European Union lead to a substantial increase in mortality that disproportionately hurts children younger than five years old, the study published in the Lancet Global Health journal found. Sanctions can hobble public health provision and keep humanitarian organisations from operating effectively, weighing on the death toll. 'Woodrow Wilson referred to sanctions as 'something more tremendous than war.' Our evidence suggests that he was right,' authors Francisco Rodríguez, Silvio Rendón and Mark Weisbrot wrote. 'It is hard to think of other policy interventions with such adverse effects on human life that continue to be pervasively used.' The researchers, whose work was funded by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a progressive think tank, looked at mortality rates by age group in sanctions episodes for 152 countries between 1971 and 2021. They used four unique econometric tools to isolate the causal relationship between categories of sanctions and higher mortality rates. Their findings were consistent across all four methods: Global, economic and unilateral sanctions are all associated with higher death tolls. United Nations sanctions are not, to any statistically significant level. The term 'global sanctions' in the study refers to all penalties, whereas 'economic sanctions' are trade and financial deterrents and 'unilateral sanctions' are imposed by either the US or the EU. UN sanctions potentially have less impact given they're framed as efforts to minimize impact on civilian populations, the authors point out, while US sanctions often aim for regime change or shifts in political behavior, which deteriorates living conditions in target countries. 'Many times, a rogue regime will blame sanctions for all the problems of its country,' Jeremy Paner, a sanctions lawyer at Hughes Hubbard, told Bloomberg before seeing the study. 'It's easy to blame the US or Brussels.' Paner, who previously served as lead sanctions investigator at the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, was skeptical of the study's conclusion, emphasizing that OFAC works to ensure that humanitarian groups can work in sanctioned countries effectively. 'The point of sanctions is to further foreign policy and American values, including humanitarian work,' he said. Rodríguez, the study's lead author and an expert on sanctions and the crisis in Venezuela, countered that even if humanitarian aid is allowed into sanctioned countries, there are formidable obstacles to delivery. Banks and nonprofits often avoid interactions with the sanctioned nation regardless of the exceptions for aid. 'Saying, 'I'm going to block your oil exports, but I'm going to allow you to continue importing humanitarian goods,' is almost like saying to somebody who has just lost their job, 'Don't worry, you can still go into the store and buy whatever you want,'' Rodríguez said in an interview. For decades, academics have debated how sanctions affect mortality, but have struggled to prove such a relationship. Joy Gordon, who focuses on sanctions at Loyola University in Chicago, said the Lancet study offers a 'compelling argument, supported by rigorous methodology, that sanctions directly impact mortality' across age groups. The researchers urged policymakers to exercise restraint with sanctions, especially as the tool's use has ballooned. Some 25 per cent of countries were sanctioned by the US, EU or UN between 2010 and 2022 — up from 8 per cent of countries in the 1960s, according to the study, which cited Global Sanctions Database figures.
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Who is Ghislaine Maxwell and why her testimony could change the Jeffrey Epstein case
Ghislaine Maxwell, the former British socialite and convicted sex offender, may be ready to speak out about her long-standing association with Jeffrey Epstein. According to a report in the New York Post, Maxwell is expected to meet US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to explore the possibility of a deal in exchange for cooperation with federal authorities. Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence at a low-security prison in Florida, was convicted in 2021 for recruiting and grooming young girls for Epstein, who died by suicide in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. 'She's going to make a deal,' said noted lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who once represented Epstein. 'That's how it works. They make deals with mafia members, and they'll likely do the same here.' Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of late British media tycoon and former Member of Parliament Robert Maxwell, who once owned the Daily Mirror and publishing giant Macmillan. Known for her elite connections, Ghislaine was a regular in high society circles and even counted Britain's Prince Andrew among her close friends, often being spotted at royal residences, including Windsor Castle, the news agency AP reported. However, her life took a dramatic turn after her father's mysterious death in 1991, when he fell off his yacht. Investigations later revealed that Robert Maxwell had embezzled millions from his companies' pension funds, sending shockwaves through the UK. It was soon after his death that Ghislaine Maxwell was seen seated beside American financier Jeffrey Epstein at a memorial service, marking the beginning of a controversial partnership. Maxwell reportedly dated Epstein and later became a key figure in his inner circle, managing his multiple residences and staff. She has since been convicted for her role in Epstein's sex trafficking operation and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence in the US. Legal experts believe Maxwell could hold critical information about the full scope of Epstein's sex trafficking operation, including names of both victims and alleged perpetrators. Some of Epstein's victims were reportedly forced to recruit others, further complicating the case. Maxwell, often referred to as the 'Rosetta Stone' of the Epstein scandal, is believed to have deep insight into both Epstein's circle and his finances. Though she has largely remained silent, Maxwell has indicated through her brother Ian Maxwell that she is willing to testify before a Congressional committee. If that happens, it would mark the first time her full version of events is heard by federal authorities. Until now, she has maintained her innocence and refused plea negotiations. The case has resurfaced after the US Justice Department announced plans to release information from recent FBI raids on Epstein's properties, only to later reverse the decision. This renewed focus has made Maxwell's account more significant than ever. The Justice Department has maintained there is no existing 'client list' linked to Epstein's alleged network. Maxwell's brother, Ian, has echoed that claim, stating that what some refer to as a 'list' was merely a high-profile address book, not evidence of trafficking. He also insists that his sister should never have been prosecuted, citing Epstein's 2007 plea deal in Florida, which promised immunity to his co-conspirators. However, New York prosecutors successfully argued that the deal was not applicable outside Florida. Maxwell has been incarcerated since 2022 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee. Her family has repeatedly raised concerns over her safety, citing poor living conditions, solitary confinement, and a lack of adequate staffing at the prison. With her legal appeal options dwindling, barring a final petition to the US Supreme Court, Maxwell may now be more inclined to cooperate in hopes of a sentence reduction. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump, who has previously dismissed the Epstein case as a 'hoax,' responded to the news of possible cooperation by saying, 'It sounds appropriate to do, yeah,' according to Politico. As questions around Epstein's death and his powerful connections continue to spark speculation, Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony may finally shed light on one of the most scandalous and mysterious criminal cases of recent decades.
