
Justice committee ends after heated exchange during minister's questioning
The Oireachtas Justice Committee ended abruptly after the chairman and vice-chair engaged in heated exchanges during questioning of Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan.
Committee chairman, Sinn Féin TD Matt Carthy was questioning the minister on the cost of international protection centres used to accommodate asylum seekers when vice chairwoman, Fine Gael TD Paula Butterly interrupted him.
The Louth deputy said the chair was not sticking to the purpose of the meeting — which was on department of justice estimates.
Mr Carthy responded by saying he was the chairman, to which she replied she was the vice chairwoman.
He asked her to be 'quiet' and as the exchanges intensified, she told him to 'do your job as chair properly'.
She said members asked specific questions relating to the estimates and claimed Mr Carthy was going away from that to other questions.
She added that the minister had indicated he would come back in September or October to talk about International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) centres.
Mr Carthy, representing Cavan/Monaghan, said his questions did relate to the estimates and claimed that there was 'clearly an agenda to undermine' him as chairman and that he would not tolerate it.
He asked committee officials to silence Ms Butterly's microphone and pointed out that he had allowed every other member to speak for a long time and did not interrupt them and that his questioning was taking up less time.
Mr Carthy then ended the meeting. Both he and Ms Butterly got off their seats and met each other half way and continued their exchanges as the live feed was cut.
Before the vice-chair intervened, Mr Carthy told Mr O'Callaghan that there were 'huge concerns' regarding IPAS, and said the lack of information about them fuelled local rumours and fears.
He told the minister that the contracting of private operators was happening 'in secret and in the dark' and questioned Mr O'Callaghan why they were being paid so much.
Mr O'Callaghan said he was trying to get away from using private contractors and said that was why he purchased City West hotel in Dublin and that state-owned properties were the answer.
He said he had instructed his officials to get the 'best value for money' in contracts with private operators.
Earlier in the hearing, Labour TD for Tipperary Alan Kelly also questioned the minister about IPAS centres, including the use of the remaining hotel in local areas.
On other issues, Cork North Central TD Padraig O'Sullivan said that in a reply to a parliamentary question he was told that the number of detections of drivers caught with a mobile phone have soared, from around 18,000 in 2022, to 19,000 in 2023, before jumping to around 22,000 in 2024.
The Fianna Fáil deputy said that there has been 7,000 detections by March 2025 and said that if that number continued the country was 'looking at the high 20,000s' by year's end.
Mr O'Sullivan said drivers were not only on their phones but looking at their iPads or operating various apps on elaborate car screens and were partially responsible for rising accidents and deaths.
Minister O'Callaghan said driving while looking at devices was 'highly dangerous' and said 'deaths are caused by it'.
He said the government and road authorities have to be 'relentless' in combatting this and cited improved garda detections and improved road conditions.
He said drivers need to realise that there is a good likelihood they will be caught and will face consequences.
On other topics, Minister O'Callaghan said:
The dispute over garda subsistence and travel allowance had been 'going on too long' but that the agreement of Revenue was needed;
He said reverting the pension scheme for gardaí who joined after 2013 back to the previous scheme would 'probably make the job more attractive', but said this would cost a 'very significant amount of money' as it would have to apply to all the public sector;
Gardaí suspended from duty were 'entitled' to have investigations completed as quickly as possible.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Post
4 hours ago
- Irish Post
Second arrest following slurry incident ahead of Ballymena Pride parade
A SECOND man has been arrested after slurry was spread on a number of streets in Ballymena, Co. Antrim ahead of the town's first ever Pride parade on Saturday. The incident has drawn condemnation from some politicians, with Minister for Justice Naomi Long describing it as: "Disgusting in every sense of the word." Fortunately, the event was able to go ahead following a clean-up operation involving organisers and local business owners. Police discovered the slurry shortly before 3am on Saturday and arrested a 19-year-old man. He has since been charged with criminal damage, possession of an article with a blade or point and causing material to be deposited on a road and is due to appear in court tomorrow. Officers have now revealed they have also arrested a 20-year-old man in relation to the incident. "The man was arrested on Sunday morning on suspicion of criminal damage, aiding and abetting criminal damage and causing material to be deposited on a road and he remains in custody at this time," said a PSNI spokesperson. "The matter is being treated as a hate crime and enquiries are ongoing." Anyone with information in relation to the incident can contact police on 101, quoting reference 191 of June 28. See More: Antrim, Ballymena, Pride


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails ‘giant win' as supreme court rules on his birthright citizenship order
The US Supreme Court agreed on Friday to allow president Donald Trump to end birthright citizenship in some parts of the country, even as legal challenges to the constitutionality of the move proceed in other regions. The 6:3 decision, which was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and split along ideological lines, is a major victory for Mr Trump, and may allow the reshaping, even temporarily, of how citizenship is granted in the US. The order will not go into effect for 30 days, the justices said in their opinion, allowing its legality to be contested further. Mr Trump has hailed the ruling a 'giant win' and is due to hold a news conference at the White House shortly. READ MORE 'GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social. The justices also did not address the underlying constitutionality of the president's order to curtail birthright citizenship, potentially leaving that issue for another day. The court's ruling appeared to upend the ability of single federal judges to freeze policies across the country, a powerful tool that has been used frequently in recent years to block policies instituted by Democratic and Republican administrations. Justices across the ideological spectrum had been critical of these so-called nationwide injunctions, arguing they encouraged judge-shopping and improperly circumvented the political process by allowing one judge to halt a policy nationwide. The surprise decision means that an executive order signed by Mr Trump ending the practice of extending citizenship to the children of unauthorised immigrants born in the US would be set to take effect in 30 days in the 28 states that have not challenged the measure. The details of how the policy would be implemented were not immediately clear. The ability of a single federal judge in one part of the country to pause a policy nationwide has been a major stumbling block for Mr Trump. These so-called nationwide injunctions are controversial judicial tools, and have prompted intense debate over their legality. Federal trial judges have consistently ruled against the Trump administration, stymieing efforts to withhold funds from schools with diversity programs, to relocate transgender women in federal prisons and to remove deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan migrants. The case before the justices arose from an executive order signed by Mr Trump on January 20th, the first day of his second term, that appeared to upend the principle known as birthright citizenship, which has been part of the American constitution for more than 150 years. The announcement prompted immediate legal challenges from 22 Democratic-led states, immigrant advocacy organisations and pregnant women concerned their children might not automatically be granted citizenship. Within days, a federal judge in Seattle temporarily blocked the executive order. 'I've been on the bench for four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,' the Seattle judge said, calling Mr Trump's order 'blatantly unconstitutional.' Federal judges in Maryland and Massachusetts also issued orders pausing the policy. All three judges extended their orders to the entire country, even to states that had not brought legal challenges. On March 13th, the Trump administration filed an emergency application asking the justices to weigh whether such nationwide injunctions were legal. The Supreme Court has never issued a ruling that squarely addresses nationwide injunctions. But justices across the ideological spectrum have expressed skepticism over them. In an unusual move, the justices announced that they would hear oral arguments on the emergency application. — The New York Times / Reuters


Dublin Live
2 days ago
- Dublin Live
Sinn Fein TD denies having Special Criminal Court debate 'tactical wee'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A Sinn Féin TD has denied taking a "tactical wee" in order to miss his opportunity to call a Dáil vote on the Special Criminal Courts. Matt Carthy was absent from the Dáil chamber on Wednesday afternoon when a debate on the Special Criminal Court was passed without a vote. Sinn Féin traditionally voted against the non-jury court when the legislation came up for renewal every year. However, for the last number of years, it has abstained from the vote as new reforms were under consideration. On Wednesday, the debate ended more an hour earlier than expected as there were no more speakers in the Dáil chamber. Ceann Comhairle Verona Murphy stated that she had to call a vote on Sinn Féin's amendment but there was a "difficulty in that Deputy Carthy has stepped out". Junior Minister at the Department of Justice Niall Collins, who had declined an opportunity to speak and conclude the debate, stated that "that is the way it goes". A vote on the amendment was not called and those present in the Dáil Chamber then agreed to pass the legislation underpinning the Special Criminal Court without a vote. Mr Carthy returned and asked if he could move his amendment and that he was absent as he "had to take a call". However, the Ceann Comhairle told him that she "did not know if you were coming back" and that it was too late. Speaking on the Leinster House plinth on Thursday, Mr Carthy admitted that he had actually gone to the toilet and missed the end of the debate. However, he denied that it was a "tactical wee", a reference to the Australian children's TV show Bluey. He said: "It was just one of those occasions. There was a very long debate. I was there for the vast majority of it. "There was a number of groups left to speak, including several independent TDs, a number of government speakers, and the Minister of State, Niall Collins, was to give a closing address. I stepped out to answer nature's call, to be quite frank about it. While I wasn't there, the minister saw an opportunity and didn't take his opportunity to give a closing address. "The independents who were due to speak weren't present, and therefore he was able to ensure the passage of the legislation without any vote. I thought it was petty to be honest, but that is politics." He added: "No, [it wasn't a tactical wee]. It was a tactical position on the part of the Minister of State. It was what we call an old fashioned political stroke." Government sources, however, denied that there was any "stroke", arguing that there was also a Sinn Féin speaking slot that Mr Carthy and other TDs were not present for. They also suggested that he "effectively got rid of opposition speaking time" as the Sinn Féin slot was skipped and independent TDs missed their slots that were pushed forward as a result. Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice . For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.