logo
Friend or Food: Why Are Iceland's Orcas Taking in Pilot Whales?

Friend or Food: Why Are Iceland's Orcas Taking in Pilot Whales?

One day in June 2022 Chérine Baumgartner, a researcher at the Icelandic Orca Project, was watching from a dinghy as a pod of killer whales fed on herring—when she noticed something very odd about what seemed to be a young member of the pod. 'At first, we were like, 'Oh my god, this killer whale calf has a problem,'' she says. It was far tinier than normal and lacked an infant orca's characteristic black-and-pale-orange coloration. Baumgartner, now a Ph.D. student at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, suddenly realized she was seeing an entirely different species: a baby pilot whale. She and her team observed the pod for nearly three hours before weather conditions forced them back to land. They found the pod the next day, but the pilot whale calf was nowhere to be seen.
Scientists noticed orcas interacting with baby pilot whales off Iceland every year from 2021 to 2023. Each instance was short-lived and featured different individual pilot whales (dark-gray members of the dolphin family with a bulbous forehead) and different pods of orcas. Now, in a new study in Ecology and Evolution, Baumgartner and her colleagues describe the 2022 and 2023 incidents and posit three potential explanations: predation, play or parenting.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In all the sightings, a weeks-old pilot whale swam by a female killer whale in what scientists call an echelon position, with the young whale located beside and slightly behind the adult orca. In the 2022 and 2023 instances, the killer whales occasionally nudged the calf along. In 2023 a calf was seen swimming ahead of the group, possibly as if to run away—and at one point it was lifted, belly-up, out of the water on the back of an orca.
With the first possible explanation, the killer whales could have been keeping the young pilot whales around like a living lunch box; some orcas in Iceland are known to eat harbor seals and porpoises. But Baumgartner notes that these Icelandic killer whales are predominantly fish eaters and that they didn't display overtly aggressive behavior toward the pilot whale calves. So predation is less likely, though not impossible, she and her colleagues say.
Alternatively, the killer whales could have been playing with the young whales or using them to practice hunting. Iceland's orcas often herd herring, and they could have been incorporating the pilot whale calves in their hunting games.
Finally, the killer whales could have been extending their parental instincts to the young calves. Whales and dolphins in the wild often care for the young of other members of their pod, and although it's rare, dolphins have adopted calves from different species. In the pilot whales' case, Baumgartner says, she wouldn't categorize the relationship as adoption because the interactions seemed to be short-lived. The young pilot whales would likely have died without milk, and none of the female orcas were lactating at the time.
These three possibilities also aren't mutually exclusive, she says. 'It could be [that the orcas] encountered the pilot whale opportunistically, and some individuals played with the whale, and others tried to nurture it,' Baumgartner adds.
The other conspicuously missing pieces of the puzzle are how, in each instance, the orcas came across a pilot whale calf in the first place and what happened to that calf afterward. 'Was it lost or abandoned?' asks study co-author Filipa Samarra, principal investigator at the Icelandic Orca Project and director of the University of Iceland's research center on the Westman Islands. 'Or did the killer whales actively approach to take the calf away?' The researchers also wonder if the calves escaped or died or were killed or eaten by the orcas.
Sarah Teman, a graduate student in ecology at the University of Washington, who was not involved with the new study, says her jaw dropped when she saw pictures of the pilot whales with the orca pods. Teman previously studied southern resident killer whales interacting with porpoises in the Salish Sea off British Columbia and Washington State. In that research, she observed interactions that may have been motivated by nurturing, hunting practice or 'play'—and often ended up killing the porpoises. 'It was fascinating to see such similar behaviors' in the Icelandic orcas, she says, adding that the animals' interactions with the pilot whales seemed to be largely driven by nurturing or play behavior, just as had been seen in the southern resident killer whales' interactions with porpoises.
Samarra also speculates that the unusual interactions off Iceland could be a result of climate change because pilot whales increasingly follow schools of mackerel moving into warmer waters that overlap with the killer whales' range. She hopes that, next summer, her group will finally observe how the young pilot whales get entangled with the orcas and what happens to them next.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air quality alerts issued across Illinois. But how safe are you inside your home?
Air quality alerts issued across Illinois. But how safe are you inside your home?

Chicago Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Air quality alerts issued across Illinois. But how safe are you inside your home?

Air quality alerts issued Thursday in Illinois because of Canadian wildfire smoke marked the latest bout in an increasingly common summer occurrence. The alert covers 34 Illinois counties designated as having unhealthy air for all residents. Although it is recommended to hunker inside during these stretches, experts say indoor air quality can often be just as bad, if not worse, than outdoor air quality. 'When they're in the home, their windows are closed, the doors are shut and locked, and they think, 'this is my indoor air, and it's totally different than what's in the outdoor air,'' said Ian Cull, founder and chief science officer of Indoor Science, an indoor air quality consulting and training company headquartered in Aurora. 'But homes and all buildings are leakier than what people imagine.' There were two multi-day periods of bad air quality in the Midwest earlier this summer — both due to smoke from Canadian wildfires. In June, Chicago saw three days of some of the worst air quality in the world, and in mid-July, air quality was bad enough for the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to declare an 'Air Quality Action Day' – when air quality is at least unhealthy for sensitive groups for two or more consecutive days. Thursday afternoon, Chicago's air was ranked worst in the world, according to Swiss air quality technology company IQAir. But staying indoors with air conditioning doesn't offer complete protection — nor does it necessarily mean that your indoor air quality was good to begin with. 'Wildfire smoke contains particles that are so small they can get through ventilation system filters and AC units,' said Susan Buchanan, clinical associate professor of environmental and occupational health sciences at University of Illinois at Chicago. Fine particulate matter is defined as particulate matter measuring 2.5 micrometers or smaller. For comparison, the width of a human hair is about 80 micrometers. These particulates are the biggest and most dangerous pollutant in wildfire smoke. In the short term, fine particulate matter causes irritation of the eyes and respiratory system, with symptoms mimicking allergies or the common cold. Long-term exposure to wildfire smoke is still being studied, but exposure to other fine particulate matter causes a wide variety of health effects, including decreased lung function and heart issues or heart attacks. But even when outdoor air is considered healthy, indoor air quality can often be much worse than what's outside. That's because indoor products like cleaning supplies, candles, and even spray deodorant can significantly worsen indoor air quality, according to a series of studies released by Purdue University in February. Cooking fumes, dust, smoking indoors, and pet dander also bring down air quality. In addition, most homes are underventilated, or they rely on air conditioning systems that recirculate the dirty indoor air. That's why even when a home air purification system is in place, Cull said it's generally a good idea to open doors and windows every day or so to bring in fresh air. 'The whole benefit of ventilation is to flush out some of the contaminants that we've created,' Cull said. 'But then the tables are turned when outdoor air quality is bad. Then, indoor air, despite its chemicals from cleaners and personal care products, ends up being better than the outdoor air.' Air quality is measured on a scale of 0 to 500 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with 0 being good and anything above 300 being hazardous. The value is calculated from tracking five factors: ground-level ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. When air quality is above 100, sensitive groups are advised to limit outdoor time, and above 150, like it is Thursday, air quality is unhealthy for everyone. According to experts, climate change is increasing the intensity, frequency and reach of the Canadian wildfires. Buchanan recommended that people check the Air Quality Index online every day. 'People with respiratory conditions like asthma, pregnant people, and the elderly should stay indoors in AC,' she said. To keep indoor air as clean and fresh as possible, the Illinois Department of Public Health recommends that people minimize the amount of indoor-air pollutants they use. Chemical cleaning should wait until the air quality improves, and fuel-burning stoves should not be used. When these recommendations can't be followed, especially when outdoor air quality is bad for an extended period of time. Cull and Buchanan said a standalone air purifier is the best ally. Cull said that air purifiers with HEPA filters are the best for improving air quality. HEPA, which stands for high efficiency particulate air, is the highest standard of air filter, with the ability to remove at least 99.97% of the most common microscopic pollutants and particulate matter from the air. This includes pet dander, dust, pollen, mold, and even bacteria. Cull also warned that some air filters are known to produce ozone as a byproduct when they remove particulates from the air. This is most commonly seen in air purifiers with ionizers or UV light components. Dr. Momen Wahidi, an interventional pulmonologist and medical director of Northwestern Medicine's Canning Thoracic Institute, says that hospitalizations only went up a little bit during the last two air quality alerts in Chicago this year — but that doesn't mean that this is not an issue. 'I know I've dealt with this about a month or two ago, again from the wildfire,' he said. 'We're probably going to see this issue popping up more often.'

Scientists Created an Antimatter Qubit That Could Upend Physics
Scientists Created an Antimatter Qubit That Could Upend Physics

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Scientists Created an Antimatter Qubit That Could Upend Physics

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: The explanation behind the universe's matter-antimatter asymmetry—an apparent violation of a fundamental law of nature known as charge-parity-time (CPT) symmetry—is one of particle physics' greatest mysteries. A new study details how scientists at CERN created antimatter qubits, which could improve physicists investigations into magnetic moment differences between matter and antimatter. This breakthrough—along with CERN's ongoing effort to protect the transport of particles to other laboratories—could drastically improve baryonic antimatter research. The universe is filled with something instead of nothing—and that's a problem. Well, a quick clarification: This unexplainable quirk of science is great news for you, me, and every other living being throughout the cosmos, since it means that we (being made of matter) get to exist. But from a particle physicist's perspective, it represents a massive gap of knowledge in the Standard Model, which is our current best guess at explaining the strange world of the subatomic. The Swiss-based particle physics laboratory CERN, home of the Large Hadron Collider, is at the forefront of exploring this particular unknown, which is an apparent violation of a fundamental law of nature known as charge-parity-time (CPT) symmetry. This nearly 75-year-old theory posits that matter and antimatter behave identically, meaning that they should have annihilated each other mere moments after the Big Bang. But for some reason, matter prevailed. Now, a recent study—led by scientists at CERN and published in the journal Nature—details a new tool in their exploratory toolbox for trying to understand why the universe contains something instead of nothing. At its most basic, researchers created the world's first antimatter 'qubit'—the quantum-powered building blocks of quantum computers—in an effort to study matter-antimatter asymmetry with higher fidelity. This was achieved by the Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE) collaboration using the antimatter factory at CERN. Like most things that deal with quantum properties, the main challenge was keeping the antiproton from experiencing decoherence, in which a qubit loses its quantum properties via disruptions from the surrounding environment. The researchers successfully kept the antiproton trapped and oscillating smoothly between quantum states for almost a minute and then measured transitions between magnetic moments using a process known as 'coherent quantum transition spectroscopy.' Although an incredibly complicated process, CERN describes this method like pushing a child on a swingset: With the right push, the swing arcs back and forth in a perfect rhythm. Now imagine that the swing is a single trapped antiproton oscillating between its spin 'up' and 'down' states in a smooth, controlled rhythm. The BASE collaboration has achieved this using a sophisticated system of electromagnetic traps to give an antiproton the right 'push' at the right time. And since this swing has quantum properties, the antimatter spin-qubit can even point in different directions at the same time when unobserved. This qubit isn't destined to run in some hyper-advanced quantum computer. Instead, its role lies in exploring the very edge of the standard model of particle physics. Previously, BASE collaboration has shown that magnetic moments of protons and antiprotons are identical up to just a few parts-per-billion—any detectable deviation would violate CPT symmetry and possibly explain why protons outnumbered antiprotons following the Big Bang. However, these results used incoherent techniques impacted by magnetic field fluctuations and perturbations caused by the measurements themselves. This new technique suppresses those interferences and makes coherent observations that are many times more accurate than previous magnetic moment experiments. 'This represents the first antimatter qubit and opens up the prospect of applying the entire set of coherent spectroscopy methods to single matter and antimatter systems in precision experiments,' BASE spokesperson Stefan Ulmer, a co-author of the study, said in a press statement. 'Most importantly, it will help BASE to perform antiproton moment measurements in future experiments with 10- to 100-fold improved precision.' And this new level of precision is only the beginning. A simultaneous effort known as BASE-STEP (Symmetry Tests in Experiments with Portable Antiprotons) utilizes a portable trap system so antiprotons can be transported to other facilities with more stable environments. In October of last year, BASE-STEP successfully transported 70 protons via truck on a round trip at CERN's main site. This will allow labs throughout Europe—and maybe, one day, the world—to work on one of physics' most puzzling mysteries. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword

Novartis to pay Matchpoint up to $1 billion to develop anti-inflammatory therapies
Novartis to pay Matchpoint up to $1 billion to develop anti-inflammatory therapies

Yahoo

time24-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Novartis to pay Matchpoint up to $1 billion to develop anti-inflammatory therapies

(Reuters) -Swiss drugmaker Novartis will pay up to $1 billion to U.S. biotech Matchpoint Therapeutics to develop oral drugs for several inflammatory diseases. Matchpoint said on Thursday it will use its technology to develop drugs that block the activity of a specific protein, helping to lower the production of inflammation-causing signals. The company will lead the research and drug development process, using the funding from Novartis. If Novartis exercises its option to exclusively license the program, the drugmaker will have global rights to develop and commercialize all products resulting from the collaboration. Matchpoint said it will receive up to $60 million in upfront payment and research funding, with up to $1 billion in total potential payments, including option exercise fee, and development and commercial milestones. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store