Department of Public Expenditure faces ‘embarrassing' €700,000 Revenue bill after payroll errors
Department of Public Expenditure
is facing having to pay about €700,000 in interest to the
Revenue Commissioners
over delays and inaccuracies in its tax deductions.
Members of the Dáil
Public Accounts Committee
queried whether the issue was 'embarrassing' for the department which oversees public-sector efficiency. The secretary general of the department, David Moloney, told the committee on Thursday that there had been significant errors and he was not happy about the situation.
The issue relates to deductions from the retirement benefits of former public service staff with high-value pensions worth more than €2 million. In such cases the tax is paid by the pension administrator, who recoups the money by reducing the benefits over a 20-year period.
The committee heard that a review of about 20 cases by the
Comptroller and Auditor General
, Seamus McCarthy, between 2015 and 2023 found that while deductions had, correctly, been made from the pensions, in only six instances had the money actually been paid over to the Revenue.
READ MORE
Deductions worth about €2.3 million had remained on the books of the department.
A subsequent Revenue sample audit this year identified other issues regarding taxation of high-value pensions. Bernie Kelly, chief executive of the National Shared Service Office, said a review had identified 23 cases where chargeable excess tax (CET) had not been calculated correctly, of which 19 had been validated. She said this had generated a liability of €1.4 million.
Ms Kelly told Fine Gael TD James Geoghegan that about €230,000 in interest payments would be triggered on foot of the liability in the case where the CET had been incorrectly calculated.
The department had earlier told the committee that more than €468,744 in interest payments had been paid in relation to the earlier cases where the tax had been correctly calculated but the money was not passed on the Revenue.
Mr Moloney said it would be a matter for the Revenue Commissioners as to whether further penalties would be applied in addition to the interest.
Mr Geoghegan asked Mr Moloney whether this was 'embarrassing' for the Department of Public Expenditure to have to make interest payments to the Revenue Commissioners for the late payment of taxes when it held other departments to account over their spending.
Mr Moloney said he was not happy about the situation and that his department strived to pay people correctly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Dublin gay bar to keep late-night licence after judge dismisses objection
One of Dublin's best known gay bars will retain its late-night dance licences despite complaints from a resident living in an apartment above it. Tommy Bergin claimed the noise coming from the Street 66 bar on Parliament Street was 'bonkers' and he could not sleep before 3am on Friday or Saturday night and also on Sunday nights of a bank holiday weekend. He said the bar now had a late-night licence for 130 days a year. Dublin District Court judge Máire Conneely dismissed his objection to Street 66 bar's late-night licence. She said the court had to take into account where the bar is located and its environs. READ MORE It was 'not reasonable' to live in an apartment in a city centre location where there are lots of bars and late-night venues and expect that the music would be inaudible. Mr Bergin, who moved into an apartment above the bar in 2019, made a similar application last year. He stated that mitigation measures taken after last year's application went before the late Judge Marie Quirke had made little difference to the problem. She ordered that the premises implement a 10 decibel drop in the music levels. Mr Bergin's barrister Conor Duff suggested that the premises was simply not suitable as a late-night venue. Bar owner Siobhán Conmy was emotional on the stand when she told the judge that she had spent €58,000 on noise mitigation measures. 'I have always offered to do anything that people have asked. My heart is really in it,' she told the judge. The late-night licence accounted for 30 per cent of her business and she was fearful of losing it. Acoustics expert Diarmuid Keaney said he had fitted two noise limiters, one in the front bar and the other in the back, to comply with Judge Quirke's order, and neither had been tampered with. Judge Conneely said the management company had said there were others within the building who complained, but none had come forward to give evidence. There were no actual Irish or EU standards that could be referenced in relation to what constitutes a noise breach and experts were divided on the matter. The fact that the premises had been a late-night bar for many years was a 'relevant matter that the courts must take into consideration'. The judge found it 'strange' that Mr Bergin's complaint has been ongoing for three years, but he had not sought to engage directly with the owner about the issue. Taking all that into account, she dismissed Mr Bergin's application.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Starmer and Martin to hold talks following Labour revolt over plan to abort Troubles Legacy Act
Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Keir Starmer , Britain's prime minister, are expected to hold talks this week, possibly on Thursday, after the UK government's plan to scrap Legacy Act immunity for British soldiers and others sparked a revolt within the Labour Party. Mr Starmer's Labour government had promised to effectively repeal and redraft the Act, which was found by a court in the North to be incompatible with human rights law. The Irish Government had also lobbied hard against the Act, passed in 2023 by the Tories even though it was opposed by both sides of the community in the North. However, the plan to withdraw immunity, potentially opening up soldiers and others to prosecution for acts committed during the Troubles, has become politically controversial in Britain. READ MORE Alistair Carns, the Labour government's veterans minister and a former royal marine, has threatened to resign if British soldiers are stripped of immunity. Labour backbenchers in working-class constituencies with big numbers of former soldiers, notably in England's midlands and north, also expressed concern. That led to fears in Downing Street of yet another backbench rebellion should it press ahead. Revolts from the backbenches have already forced the UK government into embarrassing U-turns on welfare cuts. Some of the most restive Labour MPs are in constituencies where Nigel Farage's Reform UK is their biggest electoral threat. Labour MPs who spoke to The Irish Times speculated Downing Street could reverse the plan to replace the Act or water any redraft down to prevent a rebellion. [ Keir Starmer was quick to condemn Kneecap, but strangely silent on Moygashel Opens in new window ] Colum Eastwood, SDLP MP for Foyle in Derry, challenged Mr Starmer over the issue at prime minister's questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday. He said the prime minister had gone to the North to meet victims' families and 'looked people in the eye and promised them that no murderer will be immune from prosecution'. He asked Mr Starmer to 'recommit' to the repeal plan. The prime minister responded: 'Can I begin by saying I have a profound respect and debt to our veterans who served' in the North. This prompted exasperation from Tory benches. One MP could be heard exclaiming: 'For f**k sake.' The prime minister did not directly respond to Mr Eastwood's exhortation to recommit, although he repeatedly referred to it as the 'failed Legacy Act' and the promise of immunity as 'false'. [ 'Worst of any prime minister': Ten moments that defined Labour's first year in power in the UK Opens in new window ] He also said, however, that veterans would be protected from 'unjustified persecution'. Officials were working on plans for Mr Martin and Mr Starmer to speak on Thursday or later in the week if necessary. An Irish government source said engagement is ongoing and the Government's priority is to assist victims and families. If the UK government backtracks on its plan, however, officials speculated it would cause friction between the two governments.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on house prices: heading ever higher
House prices continue to head higher, with the latest figures from the Central Statistics Office showing a 7.9 per cent annual increase in May, up from 7.6 per cent the previous month. While there are some regional variations, prices for both houses and apartments are increasing across the State. Those who want to buy are having to pay up. Nor is there any sign in the short term that the trend is going to change. Demand remains strong with wages and employment on the rise. Also, as well as new buyers, there are a large number of people with mortgage approvals who have yet to find a property to buy and are continuing to search. Supply, meanwhile, remains inadequate. The result is higher prices and a scramble for properties that are coming on to the market. In terms of transactions, the biggest growth by far is in the first-time buyers market and much of this is concentrated in Dublin and the commuter counties. These borrowers are taking on ever larger mortgages – supported by higher earnings and also, in many cases, by financial support from their families. One concern must be that at least some of these borrowers are taking on very large mortgages and a significant amount of financial exposure, notwithstanding the Central Bank borrowing rules. In turn Government demand supports – the Help-to-Buy and First Home schemes – are allowing buyers to take on more expensive properties. Such is the state of the rental market that despite large mortgage bills, outgoings are in many cases less than would be required in the rental market. READ MORE That new borrowers are having to take on this scale of loans is of concern at a time when the economic outlook is uncertain. A trade war between the US and EU would certainly hit employment and earnings growth. The difficulty for both borrowers and lenders is that the scale of this threat is impossible to calibrate. So, for now at least, property prices continue to head upwards. Whether their current level is justified by economic conditions is, however, now very much open to question.
