House prosecutor chosen to read articles of impeachment in VP Sara trial
'While I did not personally have the chance to speak with any of the senator-judges, I understand based on the agreement between the House of Representatives and the Senate that one prosecutor will be asked to read the seven Articles of Impeachment during the June 2 session of the Senate,' impeachment prosecutor and Iloilo 3rd District Representative Lorenz Defensor told reporters in an online interview.
Defensor said it is not required for all 11 House impeachment prosecutors to be present at the Senate during the reading.
'I did not receive any instruction that all prosecutors are required to attend the June 2 session. But only one prosecutor will be required to read the seven articles of impeachment,' he said.
The House impeachment prosecution panel had met earlier this week, the last big group meeting before their appearance at the Senate, although Defensor said smaller groups may meet again this week.
He also said the 19th Congress may be ending soon but it is only their legislative duty that will be ending and not their duty relative to the impeachment.
Defensor was reacting to Senator-elect Vicente "Tito" Sotto III's statement that whatever was discussed in the 19th Congress cannot be carried over to the 20th Congress.
'Tandaan natin na kapag nagtapos ang 19th Congress, ang nagtatapos lang, ang aming legislative power. Hindi natatapos ang isang impeachment proceeding na nakahain na sa Senado,' Defensor said.
(Let us remember that when the 19th Congress ends, what only ends is our legislative power. An impeachment proceeding before the Senate will not be ended by that.)
He compared the impeachment case to a regular case filed in court.
'Once a case is filed with the trial court, the judge may retire, the judge may get promoted, but the case stays on with the trial court. Hindi nadi-dismiss ang kaso just because napalitan ang mga judges [The case is not dismissed just because the judges are replaced],' he added.
When asked if the issue may be brought before the Supreme Court, Defensor replied, 'As far as we are concerned, since the impeachment is a purely political question, the Supreme Court should not interfere with the impeachment process.'
But, he added, 'We will respect whatever decision the Senate will have on this and how they will act on it, as well as the Supreme Court on how they will decide on the pending petitions.'
There are two petitions before the Supreme Court: one filed by a lawyer asking the SC to compel the Senate to proceed with the trial and another filed by Vice President Sara Duterte asking the SC to block the impeachment, saying it violates the one-year ban rule.
'We also have to understand that the impeachment is the highest form of national inquest in our country. Hindi dapat pigilan ito [It must not be stopped] because the impeachment is intended to protect the people, to protect the government, from a high public official who is sitting in office and should be removed if necessary if she committed a violation of the Constitution,' Defensor stressed.
When asked if a senator can choose not to take their oath as an impeachment court judge, Defensor replied, 'If you are a sitting senator and an impeachment proceeding is pending before the Senate, you have to do your constitutional duty to take your oath and act as senator-judge. Just like the prosecutors, we did not request to be prosecutors, we did not intend to be prosecutors. But we were elected by 215 members of Congress. And it is incumbent upon us to do our Constitutional duty to prosecute this impeachment complaint.'
Regarding President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s pronouncements against the impeachment, Defensor said, 'The President should not be involved in the impeachment. And I'm glad to hear that the President as the head of the Executive Department will not interfere with the impeachment process. As the President is the most powerful man in the country, he will exert undue influence on the Senator judges and we want the Senator judges to act independently, free from any influence from the executive department.' — BM, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
21 hours ago
- GMA Network
No rules violated in VP Sara impeachment —House exec insists
The House of Representatives today confirmed that it has received the Supreme Court resolution asking for additional information and documents related to the petitions on the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte, and that it shall comply. "We confirm receipt of the notice sent by the Supreme Court yesterday, July 10, 2025. The matter has been forwarded to appropriate offices and has taken note of the directive of the court," House Secretary General Reginald Velasco told GMA Integrated News. "We will see kung ano yung order ng Supreme Court. Pag-aaralan ng legal department. We will also consult the prosecution team kung ano yung isasagot sa any order from the Supreme Court," he added. "The House of Representatives and Secretary-General Reginald S. Velasco, as respondents in the said petitions, have been required to submit the additional information enumerated in the Resolution, and will comply accordingly," House Spokesperson Atty Princess Abante said in a statement. "We have already referred the Resolution to the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), as our counsel, and shall coordinate closely with the OSG to ensure the submission of the required information within the non-extendible period of ten (10) days provided by the Supreme Court," she added. Velasco also maintained that his office did not violate the Rules on Impeachment when he did not immediately transmit the first three impeachment complaints to the Office of the Speaker. "Wala. Kasi nga under our rules kasi, yung impeachment complaint will stay with the Office of the SecGen and then will be referred at the time na okay na," Velasco explained. "Wala naman kasi timeline din yung from the SecGen to the Speaker," he added. Velasco also explained that several members of the House of Representatives had asked him for additional time to file their impeachment complaint. "Nagpahintay yung ibang congressman na huwag munang i-refer kay Speaker kasi nga meron pa silang complaint na mas maraming mage-endorse because of the time constraint, di ba? Pag ni-refer kasi yung, I mean if we follow the timeline, refer kay Speaker, refer sa (Committee on) Rules, and then refer sa (Committee on)) Justice. Remember sa Justice 60 days yon so masyado matagal yung proseso. So they requested me na maghintay lang for another complaint which will be endorsed by the required one-third," he said. Velasco also maintained that even though the Rules on Impeachment provide that he should immediately transmit the verified complaint to the Office of the Speaker, the rules do not specify a specific time frame. "Immediate. Pero wala rin time yon. Parang yung sa forthwith yon, di ba? Sa forthwith, wala rin timeline doon eh. Trial shall proceed forthwith, wala rin timeline. So it's up to the interpretation of the official concerned," Velasco explained. House impeachment prosecutor Rep. Joel Chua of Manila said the House will comply with the Supreme Court's orders. House spokesperson Princess Abante said the matter has been referred to the counsel of the House. "We have already referred the Resolution to the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), as our counsel, and shall coordinate closely with the OSG to ensure the submission of the required information within the non-extendible period of ten days provided by the Supreme Court," Abante said in a statement.—LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Palace on Alan Cayetano's Duterte house arrest resolution: 'Noted'
''Noted.'' This was the response of Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Claire Castro when asked for comment on the resolution filed by Senator Alan Peter Cayetano calling the Philippine government to push for the interim release of former president Rodrigo Duterte before the International Criminal Court (ICC). The senator also urged the administration to enter into an agreement to place Duterte under house arrest at the Philippine Embassy in the Netherlands. According to Castro, Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin ''Boying'' Remulla already made a remark about the request for interim release. ''Nagsalita na po ang SOJ Boying Remulla patungkol po sa interim release. At kung may ganiyan pong mga suggestions mula kay Senator Alan Cayetano, noted,'' she said during Friday's briefing. Manila Representative Bienvenido Abante, who chaired the House committee on human rights in the 19th Congress, expressed no objection to the proposed Senate resolution saying it may have no impact at all. "The resolution does not have any bearing at all dahil 'yung resolution naman is asking the Philippine government, di ba? And the request should come from the Philippine government kung papagamit nila 'yung ating embassy sa Netherlands para 'yung ating dating Pangulo ay doon siya mag-stay," Abante told reporters in an online interview. "I believe that Sen. Allan would have the right to file any resolution. Yet sa akin, I don't think there is any bearing on that as far as the ICC is concerned," he added. The legislator said there is no assurance yet if the Philippine government will heed the resolution in case it is adopted by the Senate. But even if the government does, Abante, said, it is also unknown what action the International Criminal Court will take on the matter. "Well, it remains to be seen kung 'yan ay aprubahan ng ating pamahalaan. As far as I'm concerned, kahit na po siguro ang ating pamahalaan ay mag-request sa Netherlands about that, I do not know if the ICC would listen sapagkat palagay ko mukhang hindi na yata pinakinggan 'yung petition ng kampo ni dating pangulo na siya ay ilagay sa isang o itangkilik ng ibang bansa. So kung 'yan ang nangyari, I don't think that the ICC would also try to accommodate him on that," Abante explained. He reiterated that he has no objection to the resolution especially if it concerns the health of the former president. "I do not have any problem with that actually. If the government will be able to justify that resolution, baka maaari. Sa akin, medyo okay na rin kung, halimbawa, he'll be staying at the embassy ng Pilipinas for health consideration. Again, gusto ko lang sabihin na I do not know if the ICC would actually listen. But sa akin, walang problema yon," he said. "Siguro naman, I think the Philippine Embassy also has, perhaps, a mandate to help the Filipino abroad on that consideration. Palagay ko naman, titingnan din maigi ng ating embahada ang health condition ng ating dating Pangulo because that would be their concern," Abante added. ACT Teachers Party-list Rep Antonio Tinio, for his part, expressed belief that Cayetano's proposal cannot be implemented because the Philippines is no longer a party to the Rome Statute. "The proposal to have Duterte detained in the Philippine embassy in The Hague is a non-starter, since the ICC will only consider interim release to a member state. Too bad for him now, since Duterte himself caused the Philippines to withdraw from the ICC. Or does the senator expect special treatment for Duterte from the ICC? In which case it's not going to happen," Tinio said in a statement. "Yet another senator playing to the gallery, telling Duterte supporters what they want to hear to rally the faithful and keep them agitated," he added. Duterte was arrested in the Philippines by local authorities on March 11, based on a warrant of arrest issued by the ICC. He is currently detained in the Scheveningen Prison in The Hague. His daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, earlier said that the former president has lost a lot of weight since his detention in The Hague, describing him now as 'skin and bones.' She also said that her father has asked that his remains be cremated should he pass away while detained in The Hague.—AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Sara Duterte seeks justice for Filipino seafarers killed in Houthi attack
Vice President Sara Duterte on Friday condoled with the bereaved families of the Filipino crew members who reportedly died when their commercial vessel was attacked by Houthi rebels in the Red Sea. 'Ipinapaabot ko, kasama ang buong Tanggapan ng Pangalawang Pangulo, ang aming pakikipagdalamhati sa pamilya ng tatlo nating kababayan na OFW seafarers na namatay sakay ng MV Eternity C,' Duterte said in a video message. (I, along with the entire Office of the Vice President, extend our condolences to the families of our three OFW seafarers who died aboard the MV Eternity C.) 'Aming pinagdarasal ang hustisya para sa kanilang tatlo at kaligtasan ng kanilang mga kasamahan,' she added. (We pray for justice for the three of them, as well as for the safety of their fellow crew members.) The cargo ship Eternity C sustained engine damage after it was hit during an assault by the Iran-backed Houthi group on Monday, July 7. The Liberia-flagged, Greek-managed vessel had 22 crew members on board—21 of whom are Filipinos and one is Russian. Migrant Workers Secretary Hans Cacdac said Thursday that three more Filipino crew members were rescued from the ship, bringing the total number to eight. Cacdac, however, said that the 13 other Filipino sailors remain unaccounted for, and as many as four deaths from the Houthi attack still need to be verified. The Department of Foreign Affairs had said two Filipino seafarers were "most likely" killed in the incident. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
