Potential Medicaid Cuts Demand Action, Here's How CIOs Can Step Up
The Senate's approval of more than $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade puts severe pressure on healthcare systems, and CIOs can't afford to stay in the background. With CMS and Medicaid budgets on the line, IT leaders must step up and collaborate with CFOs to streamline operations and maximize every dollar. CIOs must rethink the tech stack in both the front-end and back-end revenue cycle processes, where more innovative technology can deliver a real financial impact.
Front End Revenue Cycle
Incomplete and incorrect data collection at the front end of the revenue cycle process, such as pre-registration and patient registration, has a significant impact on the finances, leading to claim denials and errors in patient eligibility. According to the Experian State of Claims report, 67% of the patient data gap is in demographic information.
CIOs need to automate identity verification, starting with third-party lookup databases or system integrations. While not a complete fix, it's a critical first step to reduce manual effort and improve efficiency. To strengthen the front-end revenue cycle, CIOs must deploy strategic solutions that ensure accurate patient identification and streamline financial workflows to enhance operational efficiency. This includes implementing strong identity verification at registration to prevent fraud and duplicates, automating eligibility checks and prior authorizations, and enabling secure, user-friendly digital payment options.
Patients who lose Medicaid coverage often regain eligibility quickly—what disqualifies them this month might change by the next. Life situations change rapidly, and healthcare organizations must keep pace. By utilizing the tech stack to monitor and reassess eligibility in real-time, teams can help patients secure coverage as soon as they qualify again. This approach reduces unnecessary write-offs and recovers reimbursement for care that may become covered in the future.
When CIOs prioritize data accuracy and automation from the start of the patient journey, they reduce claim denials, expedite collections, and enhance the patient's financial experience.
Back End Revenue Cycle
The push for autonomous medical coding has gained traction as a way to speed up claim submissions and reduce AR days. While these solutions support—rather than replace—medical coders, CIOs are also moving forward with Agentic AI to streamline operations and drive greater efficiency across the board.
For example, after medical coding is completed, CIOs can implement an AI agent to perform a final review of each claim, checking it against the specific requirements of the insurance payer. If the claim meets all criteria, the agent automatically submits it. After the claim submission, if the payer rejects the claim, the agent identifies the denial reason code, pulls relevant claim and patient data, and corrects the issue. It also analyzes the root cause to prevent repeat errors. Over time, the Agentic AI learns from each interaction, continuously improving the accuracy of claim submissions. By orchestrating these intelligent, self-correcting workflows, CIOs can reduce denials, speed up reimbursements, and build a more resilient revenue cycle.
CIOs can transform the healthcare revenue cycle by embedding Agentic AI into workflows that still rely on manual tasks. To ensure success, they must build strong partnerships across internal teams, such as IT and operations, as well as with external vendors. When applied strategically, automation and AI in the revenue cycle deliver measurable ROI and drive lasting efficiencies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America?
On the heels of the Fourth of July -- and amid his feud with President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans over the president's tax policy bill -- tech billionaire Elon Musk announced plans for a brand new political party, dubbed "America Party," to represent what he called "the 80% in the middle." Musk, who recently left his temporary government post as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, told his X followers that his new party will "give you back your freedom." In a series of posts over the weekend, Musk said his party would use "extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield" to target "2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts," which he believes "would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws." So what would it take for Musk to launch his third-party effort? Here's an overview. Getting on the ballot To start, Musk would have to get his party on the ballots in the states where he wants to compete -- each with its own process for qualifying. In many states -- including Kentucky, where the race to fill retiring Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell's open seat in 2026 is heating up -- a party-designated candidate must win a nomination from a state-recognized political party that has received a certain percentage of votes in the previous presidential election -- or else a candidate has to run as an independent or a write-in candidate. In other states, the America Party's name itself could present a problem -- like in New York, where state law prohibits political parties from having the word "American," or any part of it, as part of their party names, according to Election Law Blog. Bankrolling these state-level efforts would take significant resources. Experts would be needed to navigate each state's election laws and political systems in order to identify and nominate promising candidates, and canvassers would have to gather thousands to tens of thousands of signatures for each candidate to get them on the ballot. Traditionally, candidates and their parties spearhead these operations, working together to strategize signature-gathering, voter registration, and campaign fundraising and spending. But Musk's America Party is unlikely to become a certified political party anytime soon, because the Federal Election Commission, which reviews political organizations' qualification as political parties, has not been in quorum to do so since a commissioner resigned in April, leaving the agency with just three commissioners. FEC commissioners can only be appointed by President Trump himself. It's not yet clear if Musk has filed any paperwork for his America Party, and an FEC spokesperson declined to comment on whether the agency has received any paperwork from Musk's team. Going the PAC route Faced with the long odds of gaining party certification, some election experts say that Musk, at least for the time being, could focus on House and Senate candidates through a super PAC. That's because ballot access for congressional races is governed by the states -- not the federal government -- so the America Party could still put its designated candidates on the ballot without the FEC's certification, as long as they pass state qualifications. And because super PACs are unconstrained by fundraising or spending limits, an America Party super PAC could be funded by unlimited donations from supporters including Musk himself, and could independently spend an unlimited amount of money in support of its candidates. The only catch is that super PACs are unable to work directly with campaigns the way FEC-certified political parties can -- but election lawyer Matt Sanderson of Caplin and Drysdale told ABC News that the efficiency of a super PAC can actually outweigh the advantages of a political party. "Form a super PAC, just call yourselves a political party -- that's not against the rules. The FEC blessing is not needed," said Sanderson, who was legal counsel for the No Labels movement during the 2024 election. "I actually don't think it makes a lick of sense in this day and age to try to form yourself as a national party committee." "They can call themselves whatever they want," Sanderson said, explaining that the FEC doesn't prohibit a super PAC from calling itself a political party as long as it doesn't coordinate directly with campaigns. "Just skip right past this very cumbersome and not-all-that-beneficial process, hold themselves out as a political party, and move forward." Joining forces Additionally, Musk could enlist the help of existing third parties, like the Libertarian Party or the Green Party. However, third parties historically have had little success in gaining office in the United States. During the 2024 election, the centrist group No Labels led a third-party presidential movement but ended its efforts months before the Republican and Democratic national conventions, after failing to find their candidate before their self-imposed deadline. Longstanding Libertarian Party nominee Chase Oliver ran in the 2024 presidential race but received less than 0.5% of the total vote. Still, a possible collaboration could be in the works: Musk has been in touch with one-time Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who in recent days has spearheaded a third party centrist effort of his own, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to ABC News. Caleb Burns, an election lawyer at Wiley Rein, acknowledged the potential significance of obtaining an official party status through the FEC instead of bypassing that step with a super PAC -- stressing the role of a political party as a "brand for politicians." "The success of any new political party will turn on whether there are sufficient candidates -- and, by extension, members of the public -- interested in aligning with that new brand," Burns said. "If the answer is yes, then it makes sense to do everything possible to enhance and promote that brand -- which means proceeding with the organizational and legal burdens necessary to create and formalize a new political party." "The critical predicate, however, is the political question of whether or not there is sufficient interest in a new brand of politician," Burns said. "For that, it seems we will have to wait and see what Mr. Musk concludes."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Many ‘Big Beautiful' Losses Won't Be Felt Til After Midterms, And That's Intentional
House Democrats have shifted to a new messaging strategy now that their Republican colleagues have given in to President Trump's wishes and passed the devastating 'big, beautiful' bill despite many Republicans' supposed concerns about the legislation. A sneaky, midterms-proofing provision is baked in to many of the unpopular impending cuts to social safety net programs — specifically, they're not going to inflict pain on the electorate until after the midterms. The new Medicaid work requirements, for example — which are expected to kick some 9 to 14 million Americans off their health care coverage over the course of the next decade — won't begin until 2027, and some states might qualify for extensions. The requirement for Medicaid recipients who are not disabled and who are between the ages of 19 and 64 to begin reporting 80 hours a month of work to keep their enrollment won't kick in until after November 2026. Similarly, the cuts to Medicaid provider taxes that states use to cover the costs of the program won't take place until 2028. There are some cuts that will be felt more quickly. Some of them fall into the bucket of culture war red meat — politically targeted stuff that goes after Obamacare, Planned Parenthood and non-citizens' access to health care coverage. Per Axios: Obamacare premiums would increase by more than 75% on average for enrollees next year without the enhanced subsidies. … Medicaid funding of Planned Parenthood will also be cut off for next year under the bill — a change the family planning organization said could result in the closure of nearly 200 clinics. Restrictions on which lawfully residing immigrants can access Medicaid will go into effect on Oct. 1, 2026. … As the minority party in both chambers, Democrats were not ultimately able to block the bill's passage in either chamber, but they have built up some messaging points about its reverse Robin Hood qualities: taking from America's low-income and working class in order to extend tax cuts for the wealthy. Republicans have tried to bore the public with the details of the cuts they are pushing through in an attempt to (minorly) reduce the cost of the bill, speaking about the Medicaid and SNAP cuts in language of 'reforms' and 'common sense' work requirements. Because of that obfuscation, and because many of the most damaging impacts of the legislation won't be felt until after people have voted in the midterms next year, Democratic leadership is revving up its messaging this week while Congress is out to make that point explicit. Per the Washington Post: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York), in an interview on 'The View,' noted that Republicans' massive tax and immigration package, which President Donald Trump signed into law last week, 'has several provisions in the legislation that will not take effect until after the 2026 midterm election.' Some could be rolled back if Democrats take back the House next year, Jeffries said. You may recall the uproar a few months back when President Trump attempted to fire Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden and replace her with one of his closest allies, in an acting capacity. At the time, even some Republicans acknowledged they weren't sure of the legality of the Trump administration's move, as the Library of Congress is a legislative branch agency and under Congress' purview. It was just one of a series of actions the Trump executive branch was taking at the time to lawlessly flex power over the other branches of government. The Associated Press was first to report on Hayden's new position: The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation exclusively told The Associated Press that Carla Hayden will join the humanities grantmaker Monday as a senior fellow whose duties will include advising on efforts to advance public knowledge through libraries and archives. The year-long post places Hayden back at the center of the very debates over American culture that surrounded her dismissal. The White House ousted Hayden, the first woman and the first African American to hold the title, after she was accused of promoting 'radical' literary material by a conservative advocacy group seeking to squash Trump opposition within the federal government. The House rubber-stamped the White House's request for $9.4 billion in federal spending cuts to NPR, PBS and foreign aid programs earlier this summer, but it appears some Republicans in the Senate aren't exactly salivating to do the same. The upper chamber has until July 18 to pass the measure — a rescissions package sent over from the executive branch that includes a fraction of the federal spending that Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency slashed during that rampage earlier this year. The package officially rescinds Congress' allocation of those funds before the Trump administration is forced to spend it as Congress allocated it. According to new reporting in Politico, it appears some Senate Republicans want to draft their own rescissions package rather than passing another constitutionally backwards spending cut demanded — and in some ways already implemented — by the White House, trampling on Congress' authority to determine spending. Frustrated Judge Struggles In The Quicksand Of The Abrego Garcia Case On Not Losing Perspective In The Trump II Madness NEW from Josh Kovensky over the holiday weekend: Congress Throws More Money at Removing Immigrants than Most Countries Spend on Their Armies Critical Read About the BBB, Federalism and the Future of American Democracy How a Show About Truly Terrible People Became the Defining American Sitcom Conservative Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick has a warning for America Are We About to Have Labor Camps in the United States of America?
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Official Suggests Replacing Deported Farm Workers with Medicaid Enrollees
There are several layers to my conclusion that today's remarks from President Trump's agriculture secretary are among the most creatively maniacal I've heard yet from the administration. 'There's been a lot of noise in the last few days and a lot of questions about where the president stands and his vision for farm labor,' Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told reporters during a press briefing with Republican governors Tuesday. 'Ultimately, the answer on this is automation, also some reform within the current governing structure, and then, also, when you think about there are 34 million able-bodied adults in our Medicaid program, there are plenty of workers in America,' she continued. First, it touches on an issue that the Trump administration has struggled to reach a consensus on since the president first launched his mass deportation effort in states and cities around the U.S. As I noted in TPM's Morning Memo last week, Trump has been flip-flopping — to a truly cartoonish degree — on the question of whether to upend the agriculture and hospitality industries for the sake of following through on his core campaign promise: to deport people in cruel and attention-grabbing ways. While Trump's Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has excitedly sent ICE to terrorize and arrest immigrants in blue states and cities, there's been more hesitation around whether to conduct raids in rural communities, the kind that in many cases produce America's food, and where many residents, including farmers, voted for Trump. There's been similar hesitation around how and whether to target restaurants and hotels, which rely on seasonal workers and, in many cases, have executives that generously support the Republican Party. In mid June, DHS advised staff to temporarily pause ICE raids at farms, hotels and restaurants. Just days later, DHS officials reversed course on that directive. Last week, Trump grappled with the political realities of deporting farmers' workforce during an interview on Fox News, when he suggested, yet again, that ICE might not target farmers who employ undocumented immigrants as field workers. 'I don't back away,' he said. 'What I do have, I cherish our farmers. And when we go into a farm and we take away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who were good, who possibly came in incorrectly. And what we're going to do is we're going to do something for farmers where we can let the farmer sort of be in charge. The farmer knows he's not going to hire a murderer.' However, it now appears that at least one Trump administration official — one who is specifically tasked with supporting and regulating America's farmers — is supportive of the raids on farm workers plowing ahead. Rollins has, she professes, found a solution for those in the industry she oversees: Farmers short on field laborers due to mass deportations could replace the work with some sort of amorphous AI. You know, the kind that picks tomatoes. Alternatively, they could nab some of those purported freeloaders (child-free, able bodied adults between the ages of 19 and 64) on Medicaid who will soon have to complete work requirements (at least 80 hours per month of work, volunteering, education, or training) in order to access health care, thanks to Trump's disastrous, Medicaid-slashing megabill. While the bill's passage may have finally satiated the desires of Republicans who have long pushed to impose work requirements on low-income Americans who receive health coverage through Medicaid, the majority of Medicaid recipients who are not children and who are not disabled already do work, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. The Congressional Budget Office even released data on the legislation that showed adding work requirements would kick people off Medicaid and decrease federal spending on the social safety net program, but it would not actually increase employment. That's not how Rollins sees it. Per her, a new crop of Medicaid recipients looking for jobs when work requirements kick in next year (shockingly, after the midterms) can be sent to the fields. Perhaps this is magical thinking on Rollins' part. Perhaps not. We will just have to see. While there is not yet data on the demographic of voters that will lose their health care coverage due to Medicaid work requirements, we do know a decent amount about whose health care coverage is at risk as part of the general, sweeping cuts Republicans just imposed. Many are, in short, Trump voters. Per NPR: More than two-thirds of nearly 300 U.S. counties with the biggest growth in Medicaid and CHIP since 2008 backed Trump in the last election, according to a KFF Health News analysis of voting results and enrollment data from Georgetown. Many of these counties are in deep-red states such as Kentucky, Louisiana, and Montana. Before the megabill passed the Senate, the New York Times did a deep dive on the demographics of constituents who might be most affected by the proposed cuts put forward by House Republicans. While large cuts to Medicaid will likely hit densely populated urban areas represented in Congress by Democrats hardest (based on the percentage of the population enrolled in Medicaid), a good chunk of rural counties where more than 30 percent of the population is covered by Medicaid have Republicans representatives in the House. That data includes and applies specifically to House Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-LA) own district. Per the Times: Of the 10 congressional districts with the highest share of residents enrolled in Medicaid, nine are held by Democratic legislators. There are also pockets of the country that rely significantly on the program where voters favor Republicans. Of the 218 seats Republicans control in Congress, 26 are in districts where Medicaid covers more than 30 percent of the population, according to a New York Times analysis of federal enrollment data. We will see if this unhinged solution to the administration's mass-deportation problems is the one that sticks. Back on good terms with President Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is already acting as a mouthpiece for Trump's agenda, warning that if the world's richest man (and one-time DeSantis ally) Elon Musk decides to support third-party candidates he will end up harming Republicans in the midterms. Musk announced he'd be creating an 'America Party' over the weekend after weeks of teasing it. 'The problem is, when you do another party, especially if you're running on some of the issues that he talks about, you know, that would end up — if he funds Senate candidates and House candidates in competitive races, that would likely end up meaning the Democrats would win all the competitive Senate and House races,' DeSantis said Monday evening. In comments to reporters during a Cabinet meeting today, Trump threatened another federal power grab on New York City if Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani wins the race. Mamdani is a Democratic socialist who has run on a campaign of affordability. He faces other challengers in November, including current Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent after Trump, in February, made him an offer he couldn't refuse. 'If a communist gets elected to run New York, it can never be the same. But we have tremendous power at the White House to run places where we have to,' Trump told The New York Post Tuesday of Mamdani. 'New York City will run properly. I'm going to bring New York back. I love New York. 'We're going to straighten out New York. It's going to — maybe we're going to have to straighten it out from Washington,' he continued. Media Companies Like Paramount Should Think Twice Before Settling With Trump JD Vance: Some Americans Are More American than Others Trump Stages Another Boffo Reality TV Episode In LA Park Thanks to the GOP Megabill, You'll Pay Higher Utility Bills On Not Losing Perspective In The Trump II Madness Supreme Court allows Trump to launch mass layoff and restructuring plans The Tariff Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves Team Trump struggles to control the Epstein 'client list' fire it helped create
