OCUFA Challenges Ontario Government's Narrative on Postsecondary Funding Crisis, Welcomes Review with Call for Meaningful Faculty Consultation
TORONTO, ON, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations (OCUFA) today responded to the announcement by Minister of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security (MCURES) Nolan Quinn of $55.8 million to expand teaching training seats across Ontario. While OCUFA welcomes any new investment in the postsecondary sector, the organization asserts that the Ontario government is not taking meaningful action to address the deep-seated financial crisis facing Ontario's world-class public universities.
Minister Quinn highlighted that the investment would train up to 2,600 new teachers by 2027, prioritizing accelerated programs, French and technological education, and seats in northern, rural, Indigenous, and remote regions. However, when asked on the broader financial challenges confronting the sector, Minister Quinn attributed these issues to "unilateral decisions" by the federal government regarding international student study permits.
"The financial struggles plaguing Ontario's postsecondary education sector are not a sudden development, nor are they solely a result of federal changes to international student permit caps', stated OCUFA President Nigmendra Narain.
"For decades, Ontario's universities have endured chronic underfunding, consistently ranking dead last in Canada in per-student funding. We are disappointed to see the Ontario Government downplay its own responsibility in supporting this vital sector."
OCUFA is deeply concerned that Ontario's universities are currently grappling with program closures, enrollment pauses, increasing precarity among faculty, and significant challenges in funding the province's most promising talent. The undergraduate programs that produce the students who enter teacher's college are not only underfunded, but are now facing cuts, limiting the academic preparation of teachers. While the $55.8 million for teaching pathways is a positive step, OCUFA emphasizes that these recent commitments only scratch the surface of the sector's needs. To simply reach Canada's national per-student funding average, Ontario requires an immediate investment of at least $2.78 billion, possibly more depending on the impact of declining international student enrolment. Without substantial and ongoing funding commitments, Ontario's position as a world leader in postsecondary education, research, and scholarship will continue to be at jeopardy.
OCUFA welcomes the Minister's announcement that his ministry will be reviewing how funding is delivered across the postsecondary sector. "We sincerely hope for meaningful consultation during this process and that the Ontario Government will ensure the voices of university faculty and academic librarians across the province are not only heard but respected," said OCUFA Executive Director Jenny Ahn, echoing recommendations made at OCUFA's Funding Our Future: Keeping Universities Public conference in 2023.
Founded in 1964, OCUFA represents more than 18,000 professors and academic librarians in 30 faculty associations across Ontario. It is committed to enhancing the quality of higher education in Ontario and recognizing the outstanding contributions of its members towards creating a world-class university system. For more information, please visit the OCUFA website at www.ocufa.on.ca.
CONTACT: Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations media@ocufa.on.caError al recuperar los datos
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores
Error al recuperar los datos
Error al recuperar los datos
Error al recuperar los datos
Error al recuperar los datos
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US to restart trade negotiations with Canada immediately, White House says
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States will restart trade negotiations with Canada immediately after Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday. "Absolutely," Hassett said on Fox News when asked about the talks restarting. President Donald Trump asked the Canadians to take the tax off at the G7 meeting in Canada, he said. "It's something that they've studied, now they've agreed to, and for sure, that means that we can get back to the negotiations." Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Less, But Better: How Jordan Harper Built A Cult Skincare Brand
Barefaced founder, Jordan Harper Courtesy of Barefaced When Jordan Harper, a board-certified Nurse Practitioner, began sharing clinical skincare advice online in 2017, she wasn't chasing virality or founder status. Her content was about education—showing before-and-after's, answering questions, and demystifying skincare with the same attention she brought to thousands of patients in her clinical practice. That commitment to education, community building, transparency, and efficacy laid the foundation for what would become Barefaced , her minimalist skincare brand built on the simple ethos: less, but better. With a recent five-year anniversary under her belt, Harper still owns 100% of the business. She's never taken on outside funding, never launched a product just to hit a quota, and has resisted every industry norm pushing for flash over function. In an industry known for pumping out an overwhelming number of choices for consumers and waste in general, Barefaced offers the antithesis. It's a clinical skincare brand built on clarity and restraint Barefaced Courtesy of Barefaced "Quality at Barefaced starts with intention,' says Harper. 'Every ingredient we use has a clinical reason to be there—no fluff.' Her medical training shaped how the brand formulates balancing potent actives with skin-soothing ingredients making sure the final product is efficacious without compromising the skin barrier. 'Some ingredients get flagged by watchdog groups, but dosage is everything. The dose makes the poison. We formulate at levels that are effective but still safe for sensitive skin,' she points out. That clinical pragmatism extends to the brand's design and packaging choices. 'I'm overwhelmed by too many options in any aisle—especially beauty. We keep our visuals clean and minimal because calm, not chaos, is our design philosophy,' she says. Even the packaging reflects this: made with 50% post-consumer recycled materials, the components are both sustainable and prestige-quality. 'I wanted the outside to reflect the integrity of what's inside—without adding waste.' Barefaced Courtesy of Barefaced Barefaced launched with a four-step core routine and has grown slowly and deliberately from there. Harper doesn't chase trends or seasonal hype. She tells me that every product starts by addressing a real, clinical need. 'If we can't make it better than what's already out there, we won't make it,' she says. She explains to me that product development can take years. 'Testing and formulation take 18 to 24 months. We plan two years out, and even then, we'll pull the plug if it's not right.' Case in point: a nearly finished eye cream that didn't meet her standards. 'I wasn't 100% confident. And if I'm underwhelmed, our customers will be too. That's not a risk I'll take.' Instead of chasing newness, Harper spends just as much time upleveling her existing formulas. A full brand refresh in 2021 updated packaging and improved formulations. Another round of reformulations is rolling out this fall, further refining the core collection. 'We always ask: Can we make what we already have even better? That's where the results are—within the routine.' A Business Built on Trust, Not Hype Barefaced Courtesy of Barefaced Harper didn't come from a business background. In fact, she launched Barefaced in 2020 by maxing out five zero-interest credit cards. 'I didn't even know what venture capital was,' she laughs. The brand has been profitable since day one and remains debt-free. While retailers have courted her, Harper has turned down partnerships that would pressure her to launch products. 'The big beauty retailers make you commit to a specific amount of new launches quarterly,' she continues. Barefaced, Harper explains, has been built on trust. 'Our customers are our investors. That's who we're accountable to,' she says. And the numbers back it up—Barefaced has a 90% customer return rate and 52% of orders come from subscribers. 'You can sell something once. But repeat purchases? That means we're doing something right.' Barefaced certainly is. According to a recent study from MobiLoud, the beauty industry has an average of around 25.9% repeat customer rate. Something else that is unique to Barefaced that I have never seen a brand do is to sell another company's products on their website. Barefaced sells several Revision Skincare products on its website. Harper explains, 'If a product already exists and it's best in class, we're not going to remake it just to have our name on it. We're here to curate what works, not add to the noise.' Leading With Expertise—and Humanity Barefaced Courtesy of Barefaced Harper's path from practitioner to founder wasn't linear. 'I didn't start out trying to be a brand. I was just posting educational content and seeing what resonated,' she says. That connection with her community as a creator shaped every decision. 'I invested in them for years before we ever launched a product.' Being a public-facing founder has had its challenges, but Harper's clinical roots keep her grounded. 'I'm not for everyone, and I'm okay with that. I show up with integrity. Am I always, right? No. But I can sleep at night knowing I stand by what I share.' She finds inspiration in like-minded brands—Merit, Hanni, Crown Affair, Westman Atelier—that prioritize quality, restraint, and connection over churn. 'I admire founders who care deeply about what they're building and who they're building it for.' The Juggle Is Real Harper also happens to be a mom of four, a role she balances with entrepreneurship by applying the same structure she used as a nurse practitioner. 'Time blocking has been key. Success for me is being present—at work and at home.' She outsources what she calls 'secondary tasks' (like cooking and laundry) so she can prioritize what only she can do: leading her business and raising her kids. 'I run my family like I run my business. We plan, we delegate, and we're intentional.' What's Next for Barefaced? Barefaced Courtesy of Barefaced As Barefaced celebrates five years, Harper isn't focused on scaling for the sake of scale. 'I want to deepen our connection with our community—with more education, more one-on-one support, and in-person experiences.' What sets Barefaced apart isn't just what's in the bottle—it's the clinical lens, the consistency, and the quiet rebellion against everything the beauty industry usually demands of its founders, particularly if investors are involved. 'This industry taught us that more is better, that we need a 12-step routine and new products every month. I just don't believe that anymore,' Harper says. 'I think our skin—and our customers—deserve better than that.' What Harper has built is rare—starting a creator, she earned trust before launching a brand rooted in clinical efficacy, integrity, and intentional growth. As she continues to redefine modern skincare, Barefaced proves that slow, clinical, and customer-first can still win in an industry obsessed with speed and scale.
Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Is Canada's Digital Services Tax?
OTTAWA, CANADA - APRIL 30: A Canada Revenue Agency sign seen outside its National Headquarters ... More building in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, on April 30, 2025. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images) Canada's digital services tax (DST) was supposed to take effect Monday morning—instead, it died in the middle of the night. After years of legislative and diplomatic buildup, economic studies, and Canadian insistence that this was about fairness in taxation—not trade provocation—Ottawa scrapped the tax mere hours before collections would have begun. The sudden reversal stemmed from President Trump's declaration that the policy was, in fact, a 'blatant attack' on the U.S.—and his threats of curtailing trade talks unless Canada took a step back. So, in an increasingly familiar geopolitical dance, one government's attempt to tax U.S. tech giants slammed into Washington's red line: Silicon Valley's profit margins. At its core, Canada's DST was straightforward: a 3% levy on the Canadian revenues of large digital companies, which was defined as those making more than CA $20 million annually from Canadian users. Revenue generated in Canada by Canadians streaming movies, shopping online, or clicking ads, would have been subject to the tax. What Was Taxed By the Digital Services Tax? The tax would have applied to digital services revenue earned since 2022, potentially putting U.S. firms like Amazon, Google, Apple, and Meta on the hook for two years' worth of back taxes—billions in uncollected revenue. Canadian officials insisted this was about closing a gap in the tax system—just as Italy did before them. Tech giants reap enormous profits from Canadian users but, often, pay little or no tax in Canada. As we saw in Italy, however, asserting digital tax sovereignty over U.S. profits comes with a cost. The backlash came fast and loud. Trump pulled the plug on trade talks with Canada, calling the DST a 'deal breaker' and promising steep new tariffs on Canadian goods if the levies were enacted. Ottawa folded. This is a well-worn policy path. France passed a similar tax in 2019, only to freeze enforcement after Washington threatened tariffs on champagne, cheese, and handbags. India, Italy and the United Kingdom have each taken turns attempting to walk the DST line—usually followed by swift American retaliation and a return to negotiations. In each case, the American line remains the same: these taxes unfairly target American firms. And they sometimes do, at least in effect. This is chiefly owing to U.S. firms dominating global digital markets. That turns nondiscriminatory levies on paper into discriminatory taxes in practice. A Broken Global Framework Canada's retreat isn't the end of story—just as France, Italy, and India's wasn't before them. It is just another chapter in a repetitive saga. Around the world, countries are confronting the issue of tech companies earning massive profits from users within their borders, without establishing a legal or taxable presence. Old tax treaties just weren't drafted with cloud computing and multibillion-dollar advertising platforms in mind. National governments, lacking a uniform international framework, improvise; they impose unilateral digital taxes, not because they want a trade war but because they're tired of watching their tax revenue fly out the door. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has been working on a global deal, under the umbrella of Pillar One and Pillar Two, to allocate taxing rights and set minimum rates. The process, however, moves at a glacial pace—negotiations have dragged on for years, deadlines have been set and passed, and implementation dates disappear beyond the horizon. This leaves national governments in a bind. They can either do nothing and forfeit billions in potential tax revenue, or go it alone and risk U.S. tariff retaliation—ultimately having to retreat and return to the negotiation table even weaker than they were when the levies were enacted. It's a lose-lose proposition. Outlook Canada may have stepped back, but this story will continue to develop. The same fundamental mismatch between where profits are earned and where profits are taxed continues to bubble just under the surface. The U.S. insists any DST levied on tech giants is discriminatory. Other countries persist in their view that the status quo is what is truly unfair. In the absence of movement on an enforceable global regime, we're stuck watching the same movie with different dubbing. Until a real international compact is agreed upon, one that can actually be implemented and enforced, digital tax policy will remain less a question of sound tax policy and more one of leverage.
