Colombia ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, will appeal
BOGOTA - Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe was sentenced by a judge on Friday to 12 years of house arrest for abuse of process and bribery of a public official, in a long-running case over connections to former right-wing paramilitaries.
Uribe was convicted of the two charges on Monday by Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia in a witness-tampering case that has run for about 13 years. He has always maintained his innocence.
Heredia read the sentence to the court in an afternoon hearing on Friday. Uribe will be fined $578,000, Heredia's ruling said, and barred from public office for more than eight years.
Uribe, whose legal team has said he will appeal the ruling, is to report to authorities in Rionegro, in Antioquia province, where he resides, and then "proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest," the ruling said.
Uribe and his lawyers appeared virtually at the afternoon hearing. There is an appeal hearing scheduled for August 4.
The conviction made Uribe the country's first ex-president to ever be found guilty at trial and came less than a year before Colombia's 2026 presidential election, in which several of Uribe's allies and proteges are competing for top office.
It could also have implications for Colombia's relationship with the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that Uribe's conviction was a "weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges" and analysts have said there could be cuts to U.S. aid in response.
Uribe, 73, and his supporters have always said the process is a persecution, while his detractors have celebrated it as deserved comeuppance for a man who has been accused for decades of close ties with violent right-wing paramilitaries but never convicted of any crime until now.
TESTIMONIES FROM FORMER PARAMILITARIES
Uribe, who was president from 2002 to 2010 and oversaw a military offensive against leftist guerrillas, was charged over allegations he ordered a lawyer to bribe jailed paramilitaries to discredit claims he had ties to their organizations.
Those claims stemmed from leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, who collected testimonies from former paramilitaries who said Uribe had supported their organizations in Antioquia, where he once served as governor.
Uribe alleged in 2012 that Cepeda orchestrated the testimonies in a plot to tie him to the paramilitaries, but the Supreme Court ruled six years later that Cepeda had not paid or pressured the ex-paramilitaries.
Instead, the court said it was Uribe and his allies who pressured the witnesses. Cepeda has been classed as a victim in the case and attended both Monday and Friday's hearings in person.
Two jailed former paramilitaries testified that Diego Cadena, the lawyer formerly representing Uribe, offered them money to testify in Uribe's favor.
Cadena, who is also facing charges, has denied the accusations and testified, along with several other ex-paramilitaries, on Uribe's behalf.
Each charge carried a potential sentence of six to 12 years.
Uribe, who was placed under house arrest for two months in 2020, is head of the powerful Democratic Center party and was a senator for years both before and after his presidency.
He has repeatedly emphasized that he extradited paramilitary leaders to the United States.
Colombia's truth commission says paramilitary groups, which demobilized under deals with Uribe's government, killed more than 205,000 people, nearly half of the 450,000 deaths recorded during the ongoing civil conflict.
Paramilitaries, along with guerrilla groups and members of the armed forces, also committed forced disappearances, sexual violence, displacement and other crimes.
Uribe joins a list of Latin American leaders who have been convicted and sometimes jailed, including Peru's Alberto Fujimori, Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Panama's Ricardo Martinelli. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Malaysia probing offensive video of influencers giving chicken bones as alms to homeless man
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Three content creators were criticised for filming themselves collecting the leftover bones of chicken they ate and offering it to a homeless person. In a video widely circulated on social media, three boys in M alaysia can be seen giving food scraps, including leftover bones from their meal, to a homeless man. Following a firestorm of complaints over it, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) said on Aug 5 that it had initiated an investigation. The MCMC added that it takes a serious view of the alleged actions to produce and disseminate content that exploits marginalised groups for cheap entertainment and to generate views. 'Disseminating content that degrades or insults individual dignity is not just unethical but also leads to the normalisation of inhumane culture in society,' it added. The social media content regulator also reminded members of the public not to share similarly provocative content that could disrupt public order. In the video in question, which went viral on Aug 4 , three young male content creators can be seen claiming to 'want to do a good deed' as a departure from their usual theme of completing quirky challenges – like swimming in the trunk of a truck , for instance – before the clip cuts to them eating fried chicken from a fast food eatery. Claiming it would be a waste to discard the chicken bones, the trio can be seen stuffing them into a pack of rice meant to be for 'people in need'. In the final part of the clip, they approach a homeless man sleeping outside another restaurant and give him the packet of rice with leftover bones. He is seen thanking them for the handout, although he is not recorded consuming it. The man appears to have been approached in downtown Johor Bahru. The video, which has since been taken down by its creators, incensed many online commenters, with many questioning the boys for creating content and chasing views at the expense of the man's dignity. 'Before becoming an influencer, learn how to be human,' one wrote on video app Douyin, where the clip was first uploaded on Aug 3. In a later video , the three content creators clarified the man had agreed to 'act out' receiving a pack of bones and rice for the camera. Behind the scenes, they said, they had given him a fuller meal with two pieces of fried chicken, sharing a clip of him receiving said food items. 'Please give us a better chance to give back to society,' one of them said, directing their apology to all Malaysians while promising to 'make more meaningful videos'. The incident was widely discussed online by other content creators, even leading to some buying fast food meals and handing them out. Creativity may be limitless, but content creators should consider drawing a clear line where showing respect is concerned, said Malaysia's Deputy Minister for Communications Teo Nie Ching. She noted the video creators' clarifications, but said the video still left many feeling uncomfortable by misleading, dramatising and offending viewers. 'Is this a good way of becoming popular? By stepping on someone else's dignity?' she said on Facebook. 'I do not see the humour, but feel more disgusted by the distasteful actions and how it loses sight of the basic respect of another human, someone from a marginalised community.' If found to have violated the Communications and Multimedia Act by sharing offensive content online, the video creators face fines of up to RM500,000 (S$151,800) and a two-year jail term.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Bangladesh grapples with fraught politics a year after former PM Hasina fled
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A protester vandalises a mural of Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina with paint, demanding her resignation at Teacher Student Center (TSC) area of University of Dhaka in Dhaka, August 3, 2024. REUTERS/Mohammad Ponir Hossain/File Photo DHAKA - Bangladesh marks on Tuesday a year since long-serving former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina fled the South Asian Islamic nation following student-led protests, but it is still grappling with instability. Here are key tasks ahead for the country of 173 million governed by the interim administration of Nobel peace laureate Muhammad Yunus. DEADLY JULY PROTESTS Led by the 'Students Against Discrimination' group, they initially targeted a quota system in public sector jobs but escalated into deadly unrest as protesters, demanding Hasina's resignation, clashed with security forces and supporters of her Awami League party. Protesters blamed the government for a crackdown that killed hundreds and injured thousands with unrest peaking on August 5 when Hasina was forced to flee to neighbouring India just before protesters stormed her official residence. YUNUS TAKES CHARGE An interim government was formed and tasked with restoring stability and preparing for parliamentary elections. Yunus, 85, took charge as de facto prime minister. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim World Israel to decide next steps in Gaza after ceasefire talks collapse Singapore Singapore-made bot matchmakes strangers virtually – without profile photos Life Urinary issues: Enlarged prostate affects half of men in their 50s and up Singapore Jail for man over scheme to buy phones worth more than $45k with stolen credit card details Singapore Conditional warning for ex-manager at Mendaki accused of trying to obtain laptop as bribe It promised sweeping institutional reforms but progress has been slow and fragmented, despite broad consensus on key reforms such as restoring a non-partisan caretaker government to oversee elections, depoliticising state institutions and overhauling the Election Commission. But deeper reforms have stalled in the face of sharp disagreements with political parties over proposals for constitutional change, judicial reform and introduction of a bicameral parliament. Political analysts point to a widening gap between public expectations and outcomes. ELECTION, INCLUSION AND CONTENTION Yunus' government is caught between the need for reform and pressure for early elections, its biggest challenge. Yunus has suggested February 2026 as a possible date after the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) of former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia called for a December 2025 deadline. Further strain has been added by the controversy over the exclusion of Hasina's Awami League party, after its registration was suspended, effectively barring it from contesting. Many want it to participate, despite its top leadership being prosecuted for alleged violations of human rights during the protests. Without broad political inclusion, the legitimacy of a vote could be suspect. The newly formed National Citizen Party (NCP), born out of the 2024 protests, is viewed by critics as being favoured by Yunus' administration, which the government denies. But the suspicion could also cloud the credibility of the vote. CHANGED POLITICAL CULTURE, BUT FRAGILE GAINS Law enforcement remains a challenge, though analysts say freedom of expression has expanded since Hasina's exit while suspected forced disappearances during her tenure appear to have stopped. Political violence, mob attacks and harassment of journalists and minorities, especially women, are regularly reported. Mob violence claimed at least 199 lives between August 2024 and July 2025, says rights group Ain o Salish Kendra. New York-based Human Rights Watch warns that while some authoritarian practices have ended, the interim government has adopted troubling tactics of its own. Among these arbitrary detentions, mass arrests, and politically motivated prosecutions mostly targeted at supporters of Hasina's party, the group said. Torture in custody and use of the Special Powers Act continue, mirroring repressive tactics of the past, HRW said. The government denies the charges. JULY DECLARATION A charter, called the 'July Declaration' after last year's uprising, is set to be unveiled on Tuesday, laying out a roadmap for democratic reforms. Drafted by the government in consultation with political and student leaders, it aims to commit to electoral reform, constitutional changes, and institutional accountability. It is seen as both a symbolic tribute and a strategic blueprint for Bangladesh's political transition. But critics warn it could remain merely symbolic without legal safeguards and broad parliamentary consensus to help drive major change. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Jail for man over scheme to buy phones worth more than $45k with stolen credit card details
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ding Jiun Hao had pleaded guilty to two counts of engaging in a conspiracy to commit cheating, and one count of removing the benefits of criminal conduct out of Singapore. SINGAPORE - A Malaysian driver has been jailed over his involvement with a group that came to Singapore to buy 23 phones by using stolen credit card details . Most of the devices , which were worth over $45,000 in total, were later resold in Malaysia for profit . Ding Jiun Hao, 26, was sentenced to two years' jail on Aug 5. He had pleaded guilty to two counts of engaging in a conspiracy to commit cheating, and one count of removing the benefits of criminal conduct out of Singapore. His childhood friend, Tang Chin Huat, then 27, who is also a Malaysian, was sentenced to a year and 11 months' jail in June. A third man, identified as Liau Wei Zheng , is still at large and is believed to be in Malaysia. Deputy Public Prosecutor Ronnie Ang said that the police are making efforts to locate and apprehend him. Court documents stated that Tang and Ding worked as drivers, ferrying passengers between Malaysia and Singapore. In early November 2024, Liau asked Ding if he wanted to earn some extra money. Liau also told him that an unknown person, known only as 'Boss', would give him credit cards belonging to other people to buy 'as many iPhones as possible' in Singapore, for resale in Malaysia. The court heard that third parties had stolen details linked to these cards. Such details were later stored in Liau's electronic wallet. 'Boss' had promised Liau RM500 (S$151) for every phone they sold, and Liau offered to share the profits with Ding, who agreed to take part in the scheme . As they needed a car to travel to and around Singapore, Ding asked Liau to rope in Tang, who owned one. Liau then contacted Tang, who also agreed to be part of the scheme. As part of the plan, Liau would receive 50 per cent of the profits, while the other two men would receive 25 per cent each. On Nov 8, 2024, the three men travelled to Singapore in Tang's car to visit four mobile phone shops at places including Orchard Road and Geylang. They decided to leave Singapore after they bought 13 phones at an Orchard Road shop and one of its employees sensed that something was amiss due to this large purchase. DPP Ang said: '(The employee) held back five phones and requested passport verification from Liau before releasing the phones. 'Liau and Ding went back to the car and left without those five phones as Liau wanted to return to Malaysia as soon as possible.' The three men went back to Malaysia with the 18 remaining iPhones, worth more than $39,700 in total, and Liau later sold the devices. He then gave Ding and Tang RM2,250 each. Ding was arrested when he re-entered Singapore on Nov 10, 2024, to ferry passengers. He was remanded before he was released on bail 16 days later. He has made no restitution. Tang, who found out from newspaper reports that he was a wanted man, returned to Singapore on Nov 24, 2024, and surrendered himself to the authorities. He has made restitution of $2,000. On Aug 5, defence lawyer Clarence Lun pleaded for Ding to be given a year and four months' jail. The lawyer from Fervent Chambers added: 'He was not the mastermind, organiser, or initiator of the conspiracy. Rather, the offences were orchestrated primarily by Liau... who remains at large.' Mr Lun also said that Ding had come from a very poor family, and had 'acted out of naiveté and misguided trust' after Liau persuaded him.
