
10 best (but priciest!) bourbons for Father's Day, from Iowa to India
Bourbon is no longer the value it once was. Sure, great values still exist, but a growing marketplace of whiskey nerds and a willingness to sneaker-ify the spirit has led to robust resale markets and rising prices.
You don't always wind up paying for quality. Let's talk about when you do -- especially if you're looking for a gift that delivers beyond the presentation and price tag. Today in our final breakdown for FTW's Father's Day Whiskey Week Extravaganza (tm), we're talking about the higher-priced bottles of bourbon out there.
MORE WHISKEY LISTS FOR FATHER'S DAY:
-- Best flavored whiskeys
-- Best and most affordable bourbons
-- Best spicy ryes
-- Best Scotches, from reasonable to ridiculously expensive
My aim here is to cast a wider net and avoid some of the more popular names out there. Thus, no Pappy Van Winkle or Wellers on this list. Let's venture from Iowa to India and see what we've got. These are the best higher-priced bourbons I drank this past year.
Paul John Christmas Edition
First, let me assure you Paul John's bottles are much nicer than this (look! It's pretty!). But I respect the utility of the media sample. No frills, no fancy mailer, just a bottle, some fine brown party liquors and a brief note telling you what it is.
The spirit itself unveils a sharp, sweet and slightly spicy vanilla and oak once poured. The first sip leans into those craft ice cream flavors. It's got a little honey to it, tastes a little nutty and builds toward a boozy warmth that gets to, say, a 70 degree day before cooling back down. Fruit shows up throughout that spectrum; I'm getting a lot of orange but maybe some cherry as well.
This all weaves together to create a smooth, sweet whiskey. I believe it's my first foray into Indian whiskey, so there's a chance I'm gonna assume every one I have from here on out is like a Highland malt with the dials turned hard toward "dessert." The finish brings the spice you'd expect from an aged spirit, clean and dry and leaving you to come back for more. There's a little cinnamon and some assorted baking spices that create a familiar, comforting sip.
So yeah, if all Indian malts are like this, sign me up.
Wolves American Single Malt
Full disclosure: my first sip of Wolves wasn't for a review. Instead, I plucked the bottle from my shelf after roughly three hours of assembling a six-year-old's toys on Christmas eve in hope of respite. It delivered; smooth, sippable and, importantly, clean enough to leave me mostly hangover free for the following morning's 6 a.m. wakeup call.
Neat:
It pours a lovely dark caramel color with just a little bit of bead on top. You can smell the influence of the wine casks it spent the previous five years phasing in and out of right off the top. You get a little bit of white wine and some sweet lighter fruits to go along with that boozy malt. Despite a 48 percent ABV, it smells dense but not fiery.
There's a nice, low key sweetness that rumbles throughout the sip. It's a bit like honey and coats your throat and tongue similarly. It works because there's very little burn involved here; you're pairing smooth with smooth and the result is a whiskey with very little friction that's wonderfully easy to sip.
You get a lot of fruit, ranging from a little bit of wine to some sweeter, denser fruits like apple and ... maybe some pear? Either way, the sweetness works well with the light cereal backdrop of the malt. It's unmistakable as a whiskey, but softer than a bourbon, landing delicately between a happy hour drink and an after dinner one.
The standout feature is its replayable flavor; a whiskey you can sip throughout the night without fatigue. Let's see how that translates over a little bit of ice.
On ice:
The ice blunts that malty, wine-adjacent flavor that wafts up from the pour. The ice bumps up the smoothness ratio and brings out more of the lingering honey flavor. But it dulls the malt and a little bit of the fruit inside.
That's just about what I'm looking for, though. This is a perfect unwinding whiskey -- gentle enough to be sipped liberally but still with enough soft complexity to be interesting. This is more of a crowd pleaser than a heavy Scotch. It's a little sweet and slightly basic. But it works great over ice.
Heaven's Door bourbon: The Bootleg Series Vol. VI Aged 12 Years
This was released in conjunction with A Complete Unknown. That's the Bob Dylan movie I have not watched, but gladly would have in order to drink good bourbon. The bottle is a painted white with a barrio or holler landscape, which is lovely but doesn't give you a good look at the spirit inside.
Fortunately, it pours the rich molasses color you'd expect from a bourbon that's nearly a teenager. It's dark and the smell coming off the top is rich rum raisin ice cream with a swirl of caramel. There's also a little tobacco, like you're dealing with a nice maduro wrapper cigar, though maybe not as earthy.
That tobacco lingers in a crisp finish, but there's a long way to go before you get there. It's a remarkably complex spirit, giving off that caramel raisin up front and a little chocolate. You do get a lot of that oak flavor, which imparts a little vanilla but mostly that light, Swisher-Sweet-but-good vibe that closes each sip and gives you something to think about.
You start light and end heavy, which is a lovely way to do it. There's little heat and absolutely no burn, which is what you'd expect from a 12-year bourbon but, more importantly, from a $500 one. That's a tremendous amount of money to spend on booze, but everything, from the presentation to the finish, is top shelf. The whiskey is smooth and complex. But, yeah, that's... pricy.
Too much for me to splurge on. But if you're looking for a splash gift or just want to treat yourself, you're getting a conversation starter and a pretty damn good bourbon.
Bhakta Whiskeys
Let's begin with the obvious. Bhatka's entire aesthetic is gorgeous. The tapered, ridged bottle looks like something stolen from the set of Metropolis or, if a more-current-but-still-dated vibe is more your thing, from the underwater city of Rapture. Let's talk about three A-grade expressions from Vermont.
2014 Armagnac Cask Finish Bourbon
It pours an enticing dark walnut color, lending credence to the fact it made it all the way to third grade inside oak casks. This is a nine-year malt, though only 125 days of that stretch was spent weaving through the fibers of armagnac barrels.
The smell is grain forward and sweet. There's the expected warmth of a 52.7 percent alcohol by volume cask strength whiskey. You get sweet caramel up front, which gives way to that heat you smelled earlier. That's the bouncer at the door. It's one you probably know how to get past if you're dropping $150 on a bottle of whiskey.
There's a little acidic fruit and that ongoing, creme brulee-ish current that comes with the caramel wafting from the top. It lingers, balancing between that sweet and spice before ultimately landing in the former camp. That makes it easy to come back to, but also potent enough to shine with an ice cube or two dropped in -- hey, drink however makes you happy.
Ultimately, it's a very nice bourbon that lives up to its bottle and accompanying price tag. The finish has an almost dessert quality to it, and it hides its big boozy payload well even with that aforementioned warmth.
2011 Armagnac Cask Finish Bourbon
As you might expect after the 2014, this is a nearly 13-year-old bourbon. That promises a smoother ride, tempered by a slightly stronger ABV at 55.5 percent. It's also got less corn (84 percent, down from 99 percent in the 2014) and the addition of rye and malted barley, which promises a little extra spice and warm dessert flavors.
Once again, it pours an engaging dark brown. Despite the higher ABV, the nose is less boozy than its younger peer. You get a little bread pudding, some brown sugar and the roasted malt that makes up its backbone.
You get sweetness up front before the warmth of a cask strength dram clocks in, bringing a wave of flavor with it. It's a melody of fruit flavor; lots of stone fruits (cherry, plum... date?), some raisin and that sweet, crystallized sugar vibe that ringed the 2014 version. It's not overly sweet, despite the sugar of the opening. The fruit flavors work well together, each bringing their own minor influence with a bit of baking spice to create a weird, boozy pie.
As expected, those extra three years create a mellower, smoother ride. That fruit lingers after it leaves your lips, giving you something to think on after it's gone. At the same price point as the 2014, but made in a smaller quantity, this is the bottle on which I'd rather splurge.
1928 Straight Rye Whiskey aged in Calvados and Armagnac Casks
This is a mix of five-year-old rye (60 percent), XO calvados (30 percent) and Armagnacs spanning multiple decades but starting as early as, you guessed it, 1928 (10 percent). Well, OK. That's... a lot.
It pours slightly lighter than the bourbons. It smells much lighter too, with heightened notes of fruit and a little floral tone. There's a little dark sugar to it, sticking with the pie adjacent undercurrents of Bhakta's over whiskeys.
Wow. The first sip is crisp. There's the sweet malt of the rye, but you also get a snappy fruit influence from the calvados. A little pear, some green apple and a very mild heat. That fructose sweetness lingers, even as the sharper fruit flavors fade away. It leaves a minor coating on your tongue, leaving a little vanilla alongside it.
This all makes me think I may like calvados more than I anticipated. And that it works well alongside rye. The blend is smooth and complex. While the 100-ish year old Armagnac makes little more than a cameo, it's also a conversation starter that doesn't put this bottle out of the price range of its peers. And at $69, it's significantly cheaper than Bhakta's headline bourbons.
Cedar Ridge The Beverly QuintEssential
This whiskey holds a special place in my heart. In part because it's Cedar Ridge, and everything they've done, including a Slipknot bourbon, is pretty good. But this bottle arrived at the end of the NFL playoffs. When my final story was filed after Super Bowl 59, this is the drink I poured to shut my brain off and untangle the knot of anxiety that had looped through itself over the previous 23 weeks.
I liked it then thanks to bold fruit flavor and a smooth finish. But I was also in no mood to actually review it. Now, we're pouring it again.
And, again, it's a lovely dark tea color. The smell off the top is roasted malt, a little salt and gentle stone fruit flavor -- cherry, plum and a little bit of chocolate. The bottle, with its ridged, segmented sections, deserves mention as well. It stands out in a Hibiki kind of way, which makes sense because as a Cedar Ridge flagship bottle it's a special expression.
The first sip is... wow. There's so much going on here and I really, really like it. You begin with sweetness and a minor brine that takes me back to some of the Islay scotches I prefer. You get some cherry and some baking spice and a little bit of warmth. Then, the finish. It's chocolate raisins and a little bit of malted milk. It's almost decadent, with the sherry cask the spirit spent six years breathing through really shining.
I thought my initial impression of this whiskey may have been the exploding synapses of an exhausted brain. You could have plied me with Malort and I probably would have sipped it happily after the NFL season wrapped. But The QuintEssential is every bit as good as I remember; sweet with just a little spice, warm and complex and, ultimately, a good memory wrapped in a gorgeous package.
Fox & Oden American Single Malt Whiskey
So let's talk about single malt. It's different from "single barrel," which means a bourbon that's been aged in a single barrel and thus can differ noticeably from bottle to bottle. Single malt means it's just one grain in the mix and that it's all from the same distillery. So, it's a bit of a marketing ploy than an indicator of quality -- you're better off with a bottled-in-bond in most cases than a single malt -- but it's still a fancy sounding wrinkle.
Fox & Oden is part of a Michigan whiskey revival that includes the genuinely great Joseph Magnus. The rye was lighter than expected, but still a delightful sipper. The single malt, hand-numbered and in a bottle befitting a craft distillery, pours a proper mahogany. It smells, from the top, like big, boozy fruit. Raisin, cherry, a little bit of burnt sugar. It's like an 1800s pudding, which means you get a little roasted heat with those sharp fructose flavors.
That sweetness hits up front and lingers through the entire sip. Underneath it you get some more fruit -- a little citrus, maybe even a little bit of chocolate and honey? -- before a smidge baking spice clocks in late. There's warmth, but no burn despite its 94 proof toll. The texture is a bit thicker than I'm used to, but that's not a problem.
It's really quite nice. This is a spirit I could sip all night -- slightly bready, slightly sweet and with a little floral influence and a lot of fruit. Some single malts fail to live up to the hype of its label. This one does not.
Ducks Unlimited 10-year (by the World Whiskey Society)
This is an absolutely gorgeous bottle. It's in an absolutely gorgeous case. And it's 10-year, cask strength bourbon. And I get to write about it, because my job is the fever dream of an overserved 19-year-old college student.
Seriously, look at the presentation on this guy!
Anyway, this pours a gorgeous mahogany. It smells like oak and vanilla, all playing a supporting role to a boozy stone fruit -- a little raisin and cherry and, I think, a little caramel. The opening sip is sweet on your lips but absolutely gives way to that cask strength. This is STRONG. Not undrinkable, obviously, but with enough heat to let you know this isn't an 80 proof spirit.
That leaves you with a sweet, warm bourbon that brings a lot of flavor at the expense of the smoothness you might expect from a 10-year whiskey. At cask strength, you're getting a pure expression straight from the barrel, which is effectively a challenge. Ultimately, the headline is stone fruit, molasses and a little vanilla, all against a backdrop that's warm but doesn't quite burn.
I'm on board. Maybe not at $300, but given the absolute beauty of the case and bottle, it's a proper price for a solid spirit and a gorgeous presentation. I wouldn't buy this for myself, but I would buy it as a gift. And I'd be happy as hell to receive it.
Joseph Magnus Triple Cask
From October's "A" review:
Wow. Just uncorking this bottle makes it clear where this whiskey came from. There's a distinct sherry smell that floats out of the neck once you crack the seal.
Pouring it into a proper glass reveals a rich tea coloring and a complex, fruity nose. You're getting those grapes, sure, but there's a little cherry, peach, and other stone fruits to turn a simple sniff into an olfactory pattern of paisley.
It's awesome.
The first sip is notable in how long it lingers on your tongue and how many different permutations it runs through over what feels like 10 full seconds. The warmth of a 100 proof bourbon is there -- though it never burns -- as you go from sweet fruit, to grain, to a little spicy ...plum? to oak and finally a return to that cognac beginning.
There's a lasting chewiness to each sip; a dry finish with rounded off edges, if that makes sense. I'm not a wine guy, but the grape-stained barrels here impart a lot of flavor beyond your standard vanilla/oak/tannins. Those weave their way into a proper bourbon in a spirit of cooperation rather than combat.
There's just so much to unpack here, but all of it is good.
If you're looking for a bourbon to sit and take your time with, Magnus should be your jam. As long as you're OK with a little cognac and sherry in the mix.
Smokeye Hill Straight Bourbon Whiskey
The bottle promises five years in the barrel and a 93 proof spirit -- toned down from cask strength, but still a bit stronger than your typical pour. It smells slightly spicy, with vanilla, cinnamon and a little green apple-ish fruit to it.
It's sweet up front, with that apple sweet-and-sour candy vibe casting its lot from the outset. That doesn't hang over the sip, however. There's a lot lurking underneath. There's some mild spice which helps build up that pie-adjacent profile; some light clove and a little heat. The body is medium dense, but the finish still lingers gently on your tongue with a little burnt sugar to it.
There's a slight acidity that helps carry things along. No burn, but a little warmth and some cutting spice that bumps up the replay value of this bourbon. That makes it valuable and versatile -- a worthy sip neat, on ice or in the occasional cocktail (but I wouldn't throw it in with just anything).
The straight bourbon may not have as much cache as the well-lauded Smokeye Hill Barrel Proof. But it's also about one-third the cost of its venerated brother. That makes it a solid value -- and a fancy tasting whiskey at a reasonable price.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trust insists shorter day has minimal impact
A school trust that is testing having a shorter school day on Fridays believes pupils will have more time with teachers in the classroom. Following consultations, teachers at Reedham Primary and Winterton Primary in Norfolk will use a Friday afternoon for planning and professional development time. If successful, it could be rolled out in all Consortium Trust schools, including a further nine in Suffolk, by September 2027. Andrew Aalders-Dunthorne, the trust's chief executive, said: "The intention of this programme is to make sure children have teachers in front of them for more time than they already do now." Since the Covid-19 pandemic, the schools already have an earlier start to the day and a shorter lunch break. "Because we have extended the school day after the Covid pandemic to 08:30 BST starts and we have maintained that all the way through, so the reduction actually is quite minimal," said Mr Aalders-Dunthorne. While the national guidance is 32.5 hours of teaching a week, the chief exec said the trust was closer to 34 hours at the moment, which meant teachers could finish in the classroom at 12:15 each Friday when the trial starts. He said: "The key reason is to use the finite resources of the trust more effectively, which is largely around staffing and finance to ensure that we are using what we do have effectively. "One of the challenges for small rural primary schools is the ability to release teachers to keep up to date with their training... all teachers are entitled to a 10% reduction in their timetable to allow them to participate in planning and preparation - we have found this very disruptive in small primary schools." On a Friday afternoon, a childcare provision put in place would be focused around the curriculum for working parents until 15:15 which the chief exec hoped would minimise the impact on working families. "The division is pretty equally split. Some parents have come to us and they are really pleased... they welcome the opportunity to start their weekend early," he said. "We have other parents quite rightly expressing issues around potentially lost learning time and the impact on working families." The trust said it had sent letters and run consultations with parents ahead of introducing the trial In November. Mr Aalders-Dunthorne said if it had no positive impact on pupil outcomes, behaviours and attendance, it would not be carried forward. He said: "We are absolutely passionate of making sure that primary schools in rural communities are seen as community assets and we will do everything within our power to protect them and this trial is one of those pieces of innovation which we think could support those schools moving forward." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Shorter school day planned for Fridays Consortium Trust
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why cockpit audio deepens the mystery of Air India crash
Investigators have uncovered a chilling discovery in the preliminary investigation into the Air India Flight 171 crash which killed 260 people in June. Just seconds after takeoff, both the 12-year-old Boeing 787 Dreamliner's fuel-control switches abruptly moved to the "cut-off" position, starving the engines of fuel and triggering total power loss. Switching to "cut-off" is a move typically done only after landing. The cockpit voice recording captures one pilot asking the other why he "did the cut-off", to which the person replies that he didn't. The recording doesn't clarify who said what. At the time of takeoff, the co-pilot was flying the aircraft while the captain was monitoring. The switches were returned to their normal inflight position, triggering automatic engine relight. At the time of the crash, one engine was regaining thrust while the other had relit but had not yet recovered power. Air India Flight 171 was airborne for less than 40 seconds before crashing into a crowded neighbourhood in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad, marking one of India's most baffling aviation disasters. Investigators are probing the wreckage and cockpit recorders to understand what went wrong just after takeoff. The Air India flight climbed to 625 feet in clear weather before losing location data 50 seconds in, per Flightradar24. Saturday's 15-page report offers early insights. The investigation - led by Indian authorities, with experts from Boeing, GE, Air India and Indian regulators, alongside participants from the US National Transportation Safety Board and the UK - also raises a number of questions. Investigators say the lever-lock fuel switches are designed to prevent accidental activation - they must be pulled up to unlock before flipping, a safety feature dating back to the 1950s. Built to exacting standards, they're highly reliable. Protective guard brackets further shield them from accidental bumps. "It would be almost impossible to pull both switches with a single movement of one hand, and this makes accidental deployment unlikely," a Canada-based air accidents investigator, who wanted to remain unnamed, told the BBC. That's what makes the Air India case stand out. Air India crash report live updates Fuel to engines cut off before Air India crash, preliminary report says Who are the victims of the Air India plane crash? "It does beg the question: why did the pilot, any pilot, actually push the switches to the off position," Shawn Pruchnicki, a former airline accident investigator and aviation expert at Ohio State University, said. "Was it intentional, or the result of confusion? That seems unlikely, as the pilots reported nothing unusual. In many cockpit emergencies, pilots may press the wrong buttons or make incorrect selections - but there was no indication of such a situation here, nor any discussion suggesting that the fuel switches were selected by mistake. This kind of error doesn't typically happen without some evident issue," he told the BBC. Peter Goelz, a former managing director of the US's NTSB, echoed a similar sentiment: "The finding is very disturbing - that a pilot has shut off the fuel switch within seconds of flying." "There's likely much more on the cockpit voice recorder than what's been shared. A lone remark like 'why did you cut off the switches' isn't enough," he said. "The new details suggest someone in the cockpit shut those valves. The question is, who, and why? Both switches were turned off and then restarted within seconds. The voice recorder will reveal more: was the flying pilot trying to restart the engines, or the monitoring one?" Investigators believe the cockpit voice recorder - with audio from pilot mics, radio calls and ambient cockpit sounds - holds the key to this puzzle. "They haven't identified the voices yet, which is crucial. Typically, when the voice recorder is reviewed, people familiar with the pilots are present to help match voices. As of now, we still don't know which pilot turned the switches off and back on," said Mr Goelz. In short, investigators say what's needed is clear voice identification, a full cockpit transcript with labelled speakers, and a thorough review of all communications from the moment the plane was pushed back from the gate to the time it crashed. They also say this underscores the need for cockpit video recorders, as recommended by the NTSB. An over-the-shoulder view would show whose hand was on the cut-off switch. Before boarding Flight 171, both pilots and crew passed breathalyser tests and were cleared fit to fly, the report says. The pilots, based in Mumbai, had arrived in Ahmedabad the day before the flight and had adequate rest. But investigators are also zeroing in on what they describe is an interesting point in the report. It says in December 2018, the US Federal Aviation Administration issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) highlighting that some Boeing 737 fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged. While the issue was noted, it wasn't deemed an unsafe condition requiring an Airworthiness Directive (AD) - a legally enforceable regulation to correct unsafe conditions in a product. The same switch design is used in Boeing 787-8 aircraft, including Air India's VT-ANB which crashed. As the SAIB was advisory, Air India did not perform the recommended inspections. Mr Pruchnicki said he's wondering whether there was a problem with the fuel control switches. "What does this [bit in the report] exactly mean? Does it mean that with a single flip, that switch could shut the engine off and cut the fuel supply? When the locking feature is disengaged, what exactly happens? Could the switch just flip itself to off and shut down the engine? If that's the case, it's a really serious issue. If not, that also needs to be explained," he said. Others, however, aren't convinced this is a key issue. "I haven't heard of this which appears to be a low-profile FAA issuance. Nor have I heard any complaints [about the fuel switches] from pilots - who are usually quick to speak up. It's worth examining since it's mentioned, but it may just be a distraction," said Mr Goelz. Capt Kishore Chinta, a former investigator with India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), wonders whether the switches tripped because of a problem with the plane's electronic control unit. "Can the fuel cut-off switches be triggered electronically by the plane's electronic control unit without movement by the pilot? If the fuel cut-off switches tripped electronically, then it's a cause for concern," he told the BBC. The report says fuel samples from the refuelling tanks were "satisfactory". Experts had earlier suggested fuel contamination as a possible cause of the dual engine failure. Notably, no advisory has been issued for the Boeing 787 or its GE GEnx-1B engines, with mechanical failure ruled out for now pending further investigation. It also said that the aircraft's Ram Air Turbine (RAT) had deployed - a clear sign of a major systems failure - and the landing gear was found in "down position" or not retracted. The RAT, a small propeller that extends from the underside of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, acts as an emergency backup generator. It automatically deploys in flight when both engines lose power or if all three hydraulic systems register critically low pressure, supplying limited power to keep essential flight systems operational. "The deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) strongly supports the conclusion that both engines had failed," Mr Pruchnicki said. A Boeing 787 pilot explained why he thought the landing gear was not retracted. "These days, every time I take off in a 787, I notice the landing gear retraction process closely. By the time the gear handle is pulled, we're already at about 200ft (60.9m), and the entire gear retraction process completes by around 400ft - roughly eight seconds in total, thanks to the aircraft's high-pressure hydraulic system." The pilot believes the one flying had no time to think. "When both engines fail and the aircraft starts going down, the reaction goes beyond just being startled - you go numb. In that moment, landing gear isn't your focus. Your mind is on one thing: the flight path. Where can I put this aircraft down safely? And in this case, there simply wasn't enough altitude to work with." Investigators say the crew tried to recover, but it happened too fast. "The engines were switched off and then back on. The pilots realised the engines were losing thrust - likely restarting the left one first, followed by the right," said Mr Pruchnicki. "But the right engine didn't have enough time to spool back up, and the thrust was insufficient. Both were eventually set to "run", but with the left shut down first and the right too late to recover, it was simply too little, too late."


USA Today
14 hours ago
- USA Today
Pilot confusion over fuel cutoff cited in Air India crash report
Indian authorities released a preliminary report into the crash of Air India Flight 171 on June 12, which killed 260 people. According to investigators, the Boeing 787 crashed shortly after takeoff, soon after the engine fuel cutoff switches were moved from the "run" position to the "cutoff" position, effectively stopping the flow of fuel to both engines. The report also said that the pilots can be heard on the cockpit voice recorder, with one asking the other why he moved the switches to the cutoff position, and the other responding that he did not do so. The report did not specify how the switches were moved. Both switches were subsequently returned to the "run" position, and the engines were beginning their reignition process about 10 seconds before the pilots called out mayday and the crash occurred.