Istanbul earthquake leaves more than 150 injured
More than 150 people were injured in Istanbul after they jumped from buildings in panic as one of the strongest quakes in years hit the city on Wednesday.
Many people gathered in parks and others sat on doorsteps, or stood outside their homes in the centre of Istanbul as aftershocks from the magnitude 6.2 quake on the European side of the city continued to be felt.
"It started with a big tremor all of a sudden and we felt it very strongly," said Istanbul resident Neslisah Aygoren, sitting in a park. "I ran straight to my dog in fear, hugged it and we waited for it to end, lying on the ground. After that, we took our belongings and went straight to the street."
A total of 151 people were hurt and received hospital treatment after leaping from buildings in panic during the tremor but none were in a critical condition, the Istanbul governor's office said.
It said one abandoned building collapsed in central Istanbul, but nobody was hurt there, while there was no damage to energy or water infrastructure in the city of 16 million on the European and Asian shores of the Bosphorus Strait. Some shops closed.
Two years ago Turkey suffered the deadliest and most destructive earthquake in its modern history. That 7.8-magnitude quake in February 2023 killed more than 55,000 people and injured more than 107,000 in southern Turkey and northern Syria. Hundreds of thousands of people remain displaced, with many still living in temporary housing as a result of that quake.
The epicentre of Wednesday's quake, which hit at 12:49 pm (0949 GMT), was in the area of Silivri, some 80 km to the west of Istanbul. It was at a depth of 6.92 km, Turkey's AFAD disaster agency said.
Transport Minister Abdulkadir Uraloglu said inspections did not reveal any damage to highways, airports, trains or subways.
President Tayyip Erdogan said on X he was monitoring the situation and his office issued advice on what people should do in the case of further quakes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Danes to Gain Copyright Control Over Voice and Likeness
Copenhagen's Parliament has approved legislation granting individuals automatic copyright over their face, body and voice, empowering them to demand takedowns and compensation for unauthorised AI-generated deepfakes. Culture Minister Jakob Engel‑Schmidt underlined the urgency of this measure, warning that 'Human beings can be run through the digital copy machine and be misused for all sorts of purposes and I'm not willing to accept that.' Legislators across the political spectrum endorsed the amendment, regarded as Europe's first to recognise personal likeness as copyrighted content. It aims to cover hyper-realistic representations—photos, videos or voice clones—created without consent. Offending platforms could face significant fines, while individuals and artists may pursue damages. The bill will exclude content clearly marked as parody or satire. With Denmark assuming the EU Council presidency on 1 July 2025, the government plans to submit the draft for consultation by late summer and push for parliamentary passage in the autumn. Officials indicated this will provide time for broader European discussion of similar laws. ADVERTISEMENT While non-consensual deepfakes have appeared around the world—affecting public figures such as Taylor Swift and Pope Francis and fueling disinformation campaigns—the bulk of coercive content remains exploitative in nature. A 2019 report from Sensity AI estimated that 95% of online deepfakes are non-consensual pornography, with 90% featuring women. Under the proposed law, Danes would have the right to request swift removal of any infringing content. Platforms that fail to act may be fined, and affected individuals, including performers whose voice or image is replicated, could seek financial redress. Parody and satire are shielded under an exemption, though how enforcement will distinguish legitimate content from misuse remains to be clarified. Experts warn that the law may face legal scrutiny on grounds of compatibility with freedom of expression and existing EU regulations, such as the GDPR and Digital Services Act. Critics have flagged the possibility of overreach, especially concerning public discourse and artistic expression. Officials maintain that these protections are specifically targeted at unconsented deepfakes, not legitimate creative or critical content. The initiative places Denmark at the vanguard of deepfake regulation. Its focus on granting individuals proprietary control over their personal attributes, directly enshrined in copyright law, marks a novel strategy. It contrasts with initiatives in the United States—such as Tennessee's ELVIS Act or federal measures like the Take It Down Act—that focus primarily on sexual exploitation and do not offer such sweeping rights over likeness. Tech platforms anticipated to face challenges adapting to this framework, as they may need to integrate consent verification systems and proactive takedown processes. Generative AI firms may have to overhaul internal policies to ensure content featuring Danish citizens is handled lawfully. The planned fines and potential legal exposure are expected to incentivise rapid compliance. Consumer advocates welcome the measure, asserting it reinforces personal autonomy in the digital age. However, some legal scholars caution that policing deepfakes globally and balancing the boundary between misuse and satire will require detailed guidelines and pragmatic enforcement mechanisms. Denmark's move is likely to inspire parallel efforts across the EU. With its presidency platform, the country intends to encourage member states to replicate its approach. Key to this will be the harmonisation of legal standards across jurisdictions and clarity on enforcement tools under both copyright and broader EU law.
Al Etihad
18 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Prospects for stopping the financing of extremist groups in Europe
29 June 2025 18:41 By Dr. Mohammed Abdullah Al-Ali*Since its ouster from power in several Arab countries, the Muslim Brotherhood has faced a string of crises. Yet, it continues to operate in Europe, hiding under various names and receiving direct or indirect support. This persists despite the consensus on the need to counter the spread of extremist Islamist currents across societies, whether in the Middle East, Europe, or the entire world. In this context, TRENDS Research & Advisory, in cooperation with French Senator Nathalie Goulet, is organising a symposium at the French Senate titled "Stopping the Financing of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe" to address the challenges involved and the mechanisms required to stop such Muslim Brotherhood has long exploited Europe's open and free environment to spread its ideology and manage extensive financial networks. This tactic is not new; it has been used for decades, starting with the establishment and control of Islamic centres across Europe, followed by deep infiltration into charitable and humanitarian organisations and other forms of civil society institutions. The group operates through multiple organisational structures, effectively diverting attention away from the true nature of these entities, many of which receive European funding without recognising that these organisations follow the Brotherhood's ideological design. These institutions often serve as arms of the Brotherhood, active around the world in promoting extremist ideologies, soliciting donations, and channelling them into activities that threaten national security and deepen radicalisation in situation is made worse by the fact that the Brotherhood, which has been designated as a terrorist group in several Arab countries and its original home of Egypt, still has representative branches in dozens of countries worldwide. Some branches operate openly, while others disguise themselves as charitable, civil society, or even human rights organisations. In recent years, Europe has become a safe haven for the Brotherhood. Its affiliated organisations and institutions continue to pursue their agendas across the continent through a vast and multifaceted network that includes investment portfolios, banking operations, civil society work, the halal trade, and offshore business some European governments have tried to target the group's activities and place restrictions on prominent and well-known members. However, firm, coordinated crackdown measures have not been taken, probably because of the close links that some leaders of the international organisation of the Muslim Brotherhood have in European countries. Nevertheless, a confrontation is inevitable, as the Brotherhood actively works to establish hotbeds of extremism wherever it goes. Strict oversight in Europe is necessary to expose the extent of its activities, as is rigorous monitoring of its funding sources and connections to global terrorist networks. Ultimately, this could pave the way for the Brotherhood to be designated as a terrorist organisation, rather than waiting until it succeeds in expanding ideological infiltration across Europe and triggering social unrest and clashes with state countries have already begun rethinking their position on the Brotherhood. Growing security concerns about the group's influence on European societies, its promotion of hate speech, separatist ideologies, and religious extremism have led to concrete action. Austria, for example, banned the Muslim Brotherhood under anti-terrorism laws, while France has been closely monitoring the group's activities and assessing its infiltration into social, political, and even governmental structures. However, the absence of a unified European stance on designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist group continues to provide it with loopholes, enabling it to shift operations from one country to another and interact, remotely, with communities that have rejected its presence, while using European platforms to propagate a discourse of extremism and the lack of coordinated European action, there is consensus regarding the risks posed by the Muslim Brotherhood's activities in Europe. There is an urgent need to confront ideological projects that aim to undermine the foundations of the modern state, especially given that groups like the Brotherhood exploit the margins of freedom of expression to gradually build influence, infiltrate political and local institutions, reshape societal cultures, and exert pressure on national structures, including the European Union itself. This is often done through a number of transnational European organisations that share the same intensive activity of Brotherhood-affiliated entities in Europe is aimed at influencing national policies. Some of these groups appear to have developed working relationships with figures in finance and politics. They operate through networks that undermine the integration of minority communities, fuel ethnic tensions, promote hatred, and maintain ties to global terrorist groups. Confronting the dangers of such activity requires an intellectual response to extremist ideologies, the promotion of values of tolerance and coexistence, and the strengthening of international cooperation, particularly between Europe and the Middle East. It is equally important to review the sources of financing and both direct and indirect support provided to civil society organisations to ensure that such resources do not fall into the hands of extremist groups like the Brotherhood, which could ultimately turn those resources against our societies in the form of radicalisation and Research & Advisory has played a leading role in combating extremist ideologies and Islamist movements, with a particular focus on the Muslim Brotherhood. The centre's efforts are dedicated to dismantling the narratives of terrorist thought, challenging anarchic doctrines, exposing doctrinal distortions, and countering radical methods of spreading extremism. Through a diverse range of publications, TRENDS explores various aspects of these groups across the Middle East, Europe, and the world and works with governments, decision-makers, and parliamentarians to lay the groundwork for effectively confronting the threat of extremist organisations in order to build societies based on peace, dialogue, and shared values. *The writer is the CEO of TRENDS Research & Advisory
Gulf Today
21 hours ago
- Gulf Today
African leaders' call to meet energy needs
At the Africa Energy Forum 2025 which opened at Cape Town in South Africa, there was a sense of urgency as ministers from many of the countries talked of the need to build infrastructure, integrate the grid and go for renewable energy to reach power to 600 million on the continent who do not have access to it. South Africa's Minister for Electricity Dr. Kgosientsho Ramokgopa called out saying, 'Africa can no longer be seen as a passive recipient of imported solutions. We have the natural resources. The human capital, and the ambition to drive our own energy transition.' African Development Bank President Dr. Akinwumi Adesina spelled the magnitude of the energy challenge that Africa faces. He said, 'Africa requires $90 billion in annual energy investment through 2030. This is achievable if the right partnerships, de-risk investment, and focus on sustainable, inclusive models.' By the end of June 17, EnergyNet managing director Simon Gosling, said, 'This forum is not about promises – it's about delivery. Africa stands at a historic crossroads. What we decide to do together in the days ahead will shape our energy future for generations.' The meetings will continue to achieve their goal. For the year and more, African leaders have been speaking clearly, loudly and even differently from other parts of the world. The African governments and leaders are determined to chart an independent path for the African continent. They have realized that depending on the advanced economies of Europe, America and Asia will not help Africa to solve its problems. The African leaders are now thinking differently and loudly. They realize that Africa has to build its own infrastructure, and that it has to be done through cooperation among different African countries, cutting across national and regional boundaries. It is this emphasis on pan-African approach that strikes the perfect, positive note. Given the political volatility prevailing in many parts of Africa, it might seem unrealistic to talk about pan-African approach. But the truth of the matter is that no country, including the relatively well-off and politically strong South Africa, cannot hope to achieve the economic goals that only a united Africa can hope to achieve. The experiment of European Union (EU) seemed a vague dream when it set out on a small scale in 1956, but it had been built brick by brick by sensible European leaders who were wise enough to realise that national rivalries are of not much use in the face of a modern economy. It will be argued and rightly too that to build something akin to the European Union in Africa would take decades. But it is an important fact that some of the African leaders are showing the statesmanship needed to build something for the future. It is going to be a hard struggle for Africa and its leaders. But what will work for them is the fact that their eyes are set on the common goal of strengthening Africa on the energy front. What is important is the recognition of the goal that Africa's needs can be met only at the continental level. Africa is resource rich continent, and its leaders have recognized that European powers, and now the new market agent of Asia, China, have looked to Africa to tap the natural resources which the African people have not tapped for themselves. They now seem to recognize the fact they Africans will have to help themselves. Can the Africans raise the huge amounts they need to build the infrastructure? They have to because they have no option. African leaders have accepted the fact that they need to plan and act together.
