Gavin Newsom Wants To Make the Country's Most Expensive Gas Even More Expensive
Despite this shortfall, Newsom's budget calls for maintaining or extending expensive government programs, including the state's cap-and-trade program, which was set to expire in 2030.
Launched in 2013 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the state, the program sets a GHG emissions cap for "covered entities," which includes electricity generators, oil refineries, and manufacturing facilities. Entities must comply with this annual cap either by voluntarily reducing their GHG emissions or by purchasing allowances (essentially permits to emit 1 ton of carbon dioxide equivalent) at quarterly auctions.
Most of the money generated from these auctions goes to the California Climate Investments program, which has funded $12.8 billion worth of environmental and energy projects since 2014. The California Air Resources Board estimates that these projects have prevented over 1,000 premature air pollution-related deaths.
At the same time, cap-and-trade has been prohibitively expensive for consumers. While some auction funds go toward utility bill rebates, the program has increased energy costs for Californians. The state's Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that it adds 23 cents per gallon to gas prices, which could increase to 74 cents per gallon if the state decides to pursue more aggressive GHG reductions. The state currently has the highest gas prices in the country.
Wayne Winegarden, senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute, tells Reason that the program is a "bad tradeoff." Compared to when California launched the cap-and-trade program, "total energy related CO2 emissions in California is down 6.2%. This is around the national average (5.4% decline). It is way behind states like West Virginia that saw a 14% decline."
While some Climate Investment money has funded environmentally beneficial projects like wetland restorations, the program has mostly prioritized funding for politically preferential projects and social programs. State law mandates that 25 percent of auction revenues ($7.4 billion since 2014) go toward California's high-speed rail project, which, after nearly two decades has yet to transport a single passenger. In his budget proposal, Newsom calls for "at least $1 billion annually" to be provided for the project.
Another 20 percent of program revenues ($2.2 billion since 2014) are mandated to fund the state's Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program. The program has over 13,000 affordable housing units under contract and has reduced GHG emissions in the state at a price of $4,100 per metric ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). The state's urban tree plantings, meanwhile, have reduced GHG emissions in California for a cost of $54 per metric ton of CO2.
The program's ineffectiveness is further compounded by the underlying policy issues that stymie environmental progress in the Golden State.
Despite throwing $1.5 billion toward wildfire prevention through the cap-and-trade and additional money in annual budgets, the state continues to experience damaging and expensive wildfire seasons because of stringent environmental regulations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Getting a restoration project approved "often involves years of analysis, public comment, and litigation before projects can even begin," writes Shawn Regan, vice president of research at the Property and Environment Research Center, in City Journal.
These delays increase fire risk and put more people in harm's way. "In 2020, for example, the Berry Creek area in California was devastated by the North Complex Fire while critical thinning projects were mired in CEQA reviews. The fire killed 16 people," explains Regan.
State and private land managers in California have set a goal to conduct prescribed burns on 400,000 acres annually by this year, reports The New York Times. In 2023, the most recent year in which data are available, federal and state agencies and private property owners completed prescribed burns on close to 260,000 acres.
As California has looked to reduce its energy sector emissions through renewable energy projects and mandates—which have forced Californians to pay some of the highest electricity rates in the country—the state has made it illegal to build clean and reliable nuclear power plants. The state's remaining nuclear power plant—Diablo Canyon—generates about 9 percent of California's electricity and is scheduled to shut down in 2030 unless state lawmakers step in.
In a little over a decade, California's cap-and-trade program has increased energy costs for the state's residents while doing little to significantly reduce GHG emissions. With a $12 billion budget shortfall, it could be time for California lawmakers to reevaluate the program.
"There are simply better ways to reduce emissions without imposing such a large cost on the state," says Winegarden.
The post Gavin Newsom Wants To Make the Country's Most Expensive Gas Even More Expensive appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
'Train wreck': Trump slams Musk after billionaire announces new political party
President Donald Trump took aim at Elon Musk after his former adviser announced the creation of new political party following staunch opposition to the president's signature legislation. "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump wrote on social media July 6. "He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States." Musk announced the formation of the "America Party" on July 5, the day after Trump signed his mega-bill. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects the legislation will increase the national debt by $3.4 trillion, which Musk as lambasted. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," Musk wrote on his social media platform X on July 5. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Trump criticized third parties in his July 6 post. "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats," Trump wrote. Musk − the world's richest person with a worth of $405 billion, according to Forbes − spent nearly $290 million to help Trump and other Republicans get elected. In the opening months of Trump's presidency, Musk led the effort to slash federal agencies through the Department of Government Efficiency. The two have feuded in recent weeks as Musk strongly criticized Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which includes tax cuts, increased spending on immigration enforcement and the military and deep spending cuts in Medicaid. The bill increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. Musk has threatened to boost primary challengers against those who supported the bill, which included all but two Republicans in the House and three in the Senate. "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!" Musk wrote before Trump signed the legislation. "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk had taken steps to repair his strained relationship with the president ‒ including personally apologizing for insults he made during his combative exit from the Trump administration last month - before the new round of sparring.


CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
Gov. Newsom to join Los Angeles city leaders in event marking six months since Palisades, Eaton fires
California Gov. Gavin Newsom will join Los Angeles city leaders on Monday at an event marking six months since the Palisades and Eaton fires killed more than two dozen people and destroyed thousands of homes in January. Both of the fires erupted on Jan. 7, forcing tens of thousands to flee in the midst of a severe windstorm that fueled the rapid spread of the flames. By the time both blazes were finally contained, they combined for 37,469 acres burned, 29 people killed, 16, 251 structures destroyed and more than 2,000 buildings damaged. In the months since, Angelenos have rallied to support the impacted communities with a litany of events as they rebuild where their lives were so suddenly uprooted. During Monday's event, leaders will "recognize the six month anniversary of the devastating firestorms that hit Los Angeles, as well as the progress made and steps being taken to rebuild and restore the communities affected," according to a release from Newsom's office.

Politico
8 hours ago
- Politico
Summers, Miran highlight worst- and best-case scenarios for Trump's megabill
'These higher interest rates, these cutbacks in subsidies to electricity, these reductions in the availability of housing, the fact that hospitals are going to have to take care of these people and pass on the costs to everybody else, and that's going to mean more inflation, more risk that the Fed has to raise interest rates and run the risk of recession, more stagflation, that's the risk facing every middle-class family in our country because of this bill,' Summers told host George Stephanopoulos on ABC's 'This Week.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the law will increase the national deficit by $2.8 trillion over the next decade, taking into account the legislation's impact on inflation, interest rates and economic growth. Miran, whose interview followed Summers', called his response to the law 'doom-mongering,' echoing comments from National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett who told CBS' Weijia Jiang on 'Face the Nation' Sunday the CBO's estimate is misguided. 'It's the same combination of policies, tax cuts, deregulation, trade renegotiation, and energy abundance that gave us astounding economic growth in the president's first term, 2.8 percent until the pandemic,' Miran said. 'And that's exactly what we forecast again, very similar numbers.' Summers called Miran's council's forecast projecting $11 trillion in deficit reduction from the bill 'respectfully, nonsense,' arguing that scaled back federal funding for education and research and development will have a negative impact on economic growth. 'There is no economist anywhere, without a strong political agenda, who is saying that this bill is a positive for the economy,' said Summers, who served as director of the National Economic Council in 2009-10. 'And the overwhelming view is that it is probably going to make the economy worse.' Miran also defended the law's controversial cuts to Medicaid, which the CBO predicts will result in 11.8 million more Americans becoming uninsured by 2034. Democrats have gone on the offensive against the law's Medicaid provisions, rolling out attack ads bashing Republican lawmakers who voted for the bill and recruiting candidates to challenge them in next year's midterm elections. 'The best way to make sure people are insured is to grow the economy, get them jobs, get them working, get them insurance through their employer,' he said. 'Creating jobs, creating a booming economy is always the best way to get people insured.'