logo
U.S. Army is planning a parade for its anniversary — and Trump's birthday

U.S. Army is planning a parade for its anniversary — and Trump's birthday

Yahoo02-05-2025
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump might finally get his parade.
The U.S. Army is planning a big celebration to recognize not only the 250th anniversary of its founding, but also President Trump's 79th birthday, both of which fall on June 14. That celebration will potentially bring tanks and hundreds of other military vehicles and aircraft onto and over the streets of the nation's capital in June, according to three defense officials familiar with the planning.
During Trump's first term, the president sought to have a big military parade, but the plans were shelved over cost and concerns that some of the military vehicles, particularly tracked vehicles like tanks, could significantly damage the streets of Washington, D.C. and incur a huge price tag for repairs. The estimate for the parade being planned now is 'tens of millions of dollars,' according to two of the defense officials.
Trump didn't forget and now is considering a military parade to honor both birthdays. Current plans call for more than 150 military vehicles and 50 aircraft to rumble through a parade route through Washington on June 10, the three defense officials said. That could include Army wheeled vehicles, like Humvees and trucks, and so-called tracked vehicles, like tanks, two of the officials said.
The aircraft will include CH-47 Chinook helicopters and UH 60 Black Hawk helicopters, two of the officials said. And the famed Golden Knights are expected to jump from above, land near the viewing stands, and deliver a flag to the VIPs, most likely Trump, two of the officials said.
The Army is celebrating its 250th birthday with a number of events, including a fireworks display, a festival and a parade, Army spokesman Steve Warren said in a statement. "Parade planning is actively underway, and we anticipate approximately 150 vehicles, 50 aircraft, and 6,600 Soldiers to highlight the Army's 250 years of service to the nation," Warren said.
The plan for the tanks is not yet final. One option under consideration is to put the tanks on trailers, which would mitigate some of the damage to the streets, but that could also impact the aesthetics of the parade, officials said. They also plan to have a separate staging area for the heavy vehicles so they do not have to cross any of D.C.'s bridges, two of the officials said.
The vehicles would roll down the streets of Washington in columns, the officials said, in a way that some critics of the planned parade in his first term compared to what is more typically seen in places like North Korea and Russia. For now, the plan is to have Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Stryker Armored Fighting Vehicles, the Army's new Infantry Squad Vehicles and more, the officials said. All the Army vehicles would be drawn from the Army's 10 divisions, brought in mostly via train from bases like Fort Bliss, Texas to Fort Drum, New York.
Each division will dedicate between 200 and 400 people to the parade, the officials said. Under the current plan, some of the troops would sleep in government buildings, including the Department of Agriculture and U.S. General Services Administration buildings, according to two of the defense officials.
Asked about the parade last month, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser confirmed that planning was in the early stages and that the Trump administration had reached out about it, but said she had not been directly involved yet.
The parade theme will include U.S. wars throughout the Army's history and include soldiers marching in period uniforms, the officials explained.
The plans are still evolving but the current early estimate is the parade and static displays in D.C. will cost as much as $45 million, according to two of the defense officials, who said that could change as planning continues. The final estimates from inside the Army are not yet complete as plans for the parade have not yet been fully approved by the White House and the Army, two of the officials said.
Individual Army units will bear the ultimate cost of the parade, three of the officials said. In some cases, units would have to spend more than $1 million to participate. That could impact funds used for training, officials said. 'Could the parade potentially impact training? Absolutely,' said one of the defense officials. 'Will it impact training? That's unclear.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Is Losing His Army of Internet Alpha Males Over the Epstein Files
Trump Is Losing His Army of Internet Alpha Males Over the Epstein Files

Gizmodo

time20 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Trump Is Losing His Army of Internet Alpha Males Over the Epstein Files

'Cover-up.' That's the word ricocheting through the manosphere, echoing across X feeds and podcast episodes after the Trump administration released the so-called Epstein files, and declared the case closed. The backlash was instant and fierce. These were Donald Trump's most vocal defenders in the 2024 campaign: tradcons, alpha bros, influencers, and masculine revivalists who painted Trump as a bulwark against the liberal elite and the 'woke' takeover of America. They helped deliver young, disaffected male voters to Trump's camp by casting him as the last masculine figure standing between order and chaos. But now, many of them are openly accusing Trump's administration of betraying the very cause they rallied behind. On July 7, the Justice Department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, published its long-awaited report on Jeffrey Epstein. It concluded that Epstein was not murdered, that there was no client list, and that no prominent individuals would be charged. This announcement effectively shut down years of conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein's death and alleged sex-trafficking network, a narrative that had become sacred ground for many on the far right. The report landed like a bomb in the manosphere. Matt Walsh, one of the most influential traditional conservatives online, came back from a social media hiatus to unleash a firestorm. 'I've come back from vacation to learn that Epstein apparently wasn't an international child sex trafficker,' he posted on X on July 12. His thread—sharp, sarcastic, and furious—went viral, accusing the administration of gaslighting its base and retreating from a moral crusade it had once endorsed. 'Pam Bondi invited influencers to the White House and handed them big binders that literally said 'Epstein Files' in huge bold letters on the front. If the files never existed then why did the White House do that?' Walsh demanded. In another post, he added: 'The Attorney General said she had the client list on her desk. The White House made a big show of giving binders marked 'Epstein Files: Phase 1' to a bunch of influencers. Now they tell us that there is no list and we should stop talking about it.' The Attorney General said she had the client list on her desk. The White House made a big show of giving binders marked 'Epstein Files: Phase 1' to a bunch of influencers. Now they tell us that there is no list and we should stop talking about it. Well then why did you say there… — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) July 13, 2025Half of Walsh's recent posts are now dedicated to the Epstein drama, all dripping with skepticism and rage. With nearly 4 million followers and tens of millions of views on his posts, his revolt is hard to ignore. Trump Tries to Bury Epstein Scandal, but Elon Musk Won't Let Him Other right-wing influencers joined in. Tucker Carlson went even further, accusing Bondi's Justice Department of 'covering up Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and murder.' Charlie Kirk tiptoed around Trump, instead backing FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who is reportedly considering resignation over the report. Bongino himself was once a loud voice pushing the Epstein list theory before joining the administration. It would be a huge loss for the country if we lost Dan Bongino at the FBI. — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 11, 2025Jack Posobiec turned to gallows humor: 'Name things you trust more than the idea Epstein had no clients.' But he also made his position clear: 'I will not rest until we go full Jan 6 committee on the Jeffrey Epstein files.' Name things you trust more than the idea Epstein had no clients: — Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) July 13, 2025James O'Keefe, meanwhile, zeroed in on the redactions in the DOJ report. 'There are only two possibilities,' he wrote. '1) There is no more to the Epstein story. 2) There's a coverup.' There are only two possibilities; 1) There is no more to the Epstein story. 2) There's a coverup Time for us to hear directly from FBI agents — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) July 12, 2025The divide is growing. This isn't just about Epstein. It's about the right's narrative machinery losing one of its most potent weapons. For years, the Epstein case symbolized everything wrong with elite impunity. The idea of a client list, filled with powerful names who visited a private island rumored to be the center of a sex trafficking ring, was a cultural touchstone. Its perceived disappearance feels, to these influencers, like betrayal. This rupture reveals a dangerous paradox for Trump. He built part of his base on grievance, outrage, and conspiracy. Now that he's back in power, he risks becoming the very establishment those conspiracies targeted. The fallout also reflects a broader transformation within the online right. The manosphere is no longer just a cheerleading squad for Trump. It has its own hierarchy, its own causes, and increasingly its own enemies. As Trump urges his base to 'move on' and celebrate Pam Bondi, parts of the digital movement that helped propel him to victory are refusing to follow. They've drawn a line. And behind that line is the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein.

‘A privilege, not a right': Trump administration puts green card holders on notice
‘A privilege, not a right': Trump administration puts green card holders on notice

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘A privilege, not a right': Trump administration puts green card holders on notice

Are you traveling abroad with a green card as a guarantee of your re-entry into the United States? Customs and Border Protection (CBP) warns that you may experience difficulty entering under certain circumstances. The Trump Administration's new immigration policies include stricter screening of those entering the country through any port of entry, including those with legal permanent resident status. The CBP published a strongly-worded message on social media Tuesday detailing the current conditions for green card holders returning to the United States. 'Having a criminal record does not make you an honorable legal permanent resident. Possessing a green card is a privilege, not a right,' warns the CBP post. The agency notes that the United States government, 'under the laws of our nation,' has the authority to revoke green cards if laws are violated or abused. 'In addition to immigration removal proceedings, lawful permanent residents who present themselves at a U.S. port of entry with prior criminal convictions may be subject to mandatory detention,' the notice states. The warning is similar to previous messages directed at visa holders, in which federal agencies emphasize that immigration benefits can be revoked, which could lead to deportation. Under the Trump administration, foreigners have been deported even for minor offenses such as driving under the influence (DWI), according to official reports. This informational offensive by the administration includes various federal agencies, including the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which has also issued statements about stricter rules for granting immigration benefits, including permanent residency. The warnings also extend to international travelers entering through the Visa Waiver Program with ESTA electronic authorization, who could also face penalties if they violate the program's conditions.

Mexico's ‘Cool-Head' Trump Approach Tested by New Tariff Threat
Mexico's ‘Cool-Head' Trump Approach Tested by New Tariff Threat

Bloomberg

time34 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Mexico's ‘Cool-Head' Trump Approach Tested by New Tariff Threat

By and Maya Averbuch Save Mexican officials were taken aback by President Donald Trump's latest tariff threat after paying frequent visits to his top aides in Washington to convince him their efforts to fight drug trafficking were paying off. For months, US officials have been effusive about Mexican cooperation on issues related to the border and security. 'Very responsive,' raved Secretary of State Marco Rubio. ' Positive momentum,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store