Plans to build on 14 green belt sites criticised
About 3.6% of the city's green belt land, across 14 different sites, would be developed under the council's proposals.
Campaigners said the plans were "insulting" and raised concerns about increased pollution and damage to the environment.
But government inspectors said the council must build more homes and green belt land could be considered for development, according to a Sheffield City Council spokesperson, who said a consultation would be launched on the plans.
The proposals are part of the city's Local Plan - a document outlining where new homes and businesses should be built.
Government planning inspectors concluded the council would need to build 3,529 more new homes than its initial target - bringing the total to 38,012 homes to be constructed by 2039.
They also asked the authority to find an additional 53 hectares of land for employment uses.
The council said it had explored all opportunities to develop brownfield sites first, but these options had already been exhausted.
Inspectors said there may therefore be exceptional circumstances that would justify the use of green belt land, the council said.
The plans are due to be voted on at a council meeting on 14 May, with a public consultation expected to take place in the summer and a further examination of the proposals by government inspectors later in the year.
Handsworth resident Sadie Charlton says she finds the council's approach "cowardly" [Tom MacDougall/BBC]
Sadie Charlton lives in Handsworth - one of the areas where green belt sites have been proposed for development.
She said the community had been "blindsided" by the plans, which she branded "insulting".
"In S13, we're one of the most deprived areas within Sheffield, we have least access to our beautiful spaces in the Peak District, we're on the other side," she said.
Attempts to contact councillors about the plans had been met with "the same copy and paste reply," Ms Charlton added.
"Nobody's speaking to us, nobody's listening to us. They're waiting for this vote to go through so it's out of their hands - it's cowardly."
Chapeltown residents Deborah and Richard Nutbrown say the proposal has been "forced upon" them [Tom MacDougall/BBC]
Chapeltown is another area in which areas of green belt land have been shortlisted for development.
Deborah and Richard Nutbrown said they worried that the green belt "buffer zone" between their home and the M1 could disappear as a result of the proposals.
Mr Nutbrown said there had been "very little information about what's going to happen".
"It's extremely frustrating, it feels as if it's totally been forced upon us," Mrs Nutbrown said.
"Once the green belt's gone, the green belt's gone - the more that's taken, the more grey Sheffield will become."
She said she understood the demand for housing but feared the plans would create more traffic and harm wildlife.
Matt Sieczkarek and his partner Matthew Pegler started a petition to protect Chapeltown's green belt [Tom MacDougall/BBC]
Matthew Pegler, who also lives in Chapeltown, said he felt the situation had been "handled behind closed doors, without the knowledge of the people that it will affect most".
He launched a petition against the plans, which had been signed by more than 1,500 people.
The green belt represented a "boundary line" between Sheffield and Barnsley, and its erasure would "merge" the two urban areas, Mr Pegler said.
His partner, Matt Sieczkarek, said he was not convinced the option of redeveloping brownfield sites had been fully explored and he wanted the council to provide evidence.
The proposals will be examined by planning inspectors following a public consultation [BBC]
Tom Hunt, leader of Sheffield City Council, said the Local Plan was a "crucially important" document that would help to shape the city.
"The overwhelming majority of homes will be built on brownfield land, which means land that has previously been developed," he said.
"The Local Plan will help to deliver more affordable housing, support regeneration and investment and enable the delivery of infrastructure to support communities."
The plan had been "shaped by the cross-party Labour, Lib Dem and Green council administration," he said.
A six-week public consultation was planned for the latest changes and would be launched in late May, he added.
Planning inspectors would the use the feedback to set the agenda for hearings on the proposals.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds or catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Related internet links
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
HIV/AIDS support to Africa survives U.S. spending cuts in last-minute reversal
The decision preserves vital funding for treatment, testing, and prevention efforts, and averts what many global health advocates warned would have been a major setback in the fight against AIDS. The BBC reports that U.S. Senators have backed away from a proposal to cut $400 million from PEPFAR, the global HIV/AIDS relief program, as part of a larger $9 billion rescissions package aimed at canceling previously approved federal funding. Multiple U.S. senators from both parties raised concerns about the proposed cuts to PEPFAR, a landmark HIV/AIDS program launched by ex-President George W. Bush and credited with saving tens of millions of lives globally. Republican Senate Majority Whip John Thune acknowledged there was ' a lot of interest ' in preserving the program's funding, according to the BBC. The decision comes amid former President Trump's broader efforts to reduce U.S. spending on global health and humanitarian aid under his "America First" policy. His administration consistently pushed for cuts to foreign assistance, including key programs like PEPFAR. A mathematical modeling study published in eClinicalMedicine highlights PEPFAR's pivotal role in expanding access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) across sub-Saharan Africa. Since its launch, the number of people receiving ART in the region has surged from nearly zero in the early 2000s to around 21 million by 2023. This expansion led to a dramatic decline in HIV/AIDS-related deaths, from 2.2 million in 2003 to 390,000 as well as a sharp drop in new infections, from 3.2 million to 640,000 over the same period. The proposed rollback has drawn sharp criticism from global leaders and public health experts, who warn that slashing such funding could lead to a resurgence of HIV cases, particularly in low-income countries where U.S. support constitutes a significant share of healthcare funding. Domestic budgets boost HIV response Under President Trump's administration, proposed cuts to global HIV programs led to major setbacks in countries heavily dependent on U.S. funding, many of them in Africa. Clinics in some regions were forced to scale back or shut down entirely, interrupting life-saving treatment for thousands. UNAIDS reports that over 26 million lives have been saved through global HIV efforts, stating: 'New HIV infections have been reduced by 40% since 2010, and 4.4 million children have been protected from acquiring HIV since 2000.' The agency, however, warned that 'if the world does not act, there could be an extra six million new HIV infections and four million AIDS-related deaths by 2029.' The global health body also highlighted the ripple effects of reduced international HIV funding, noting that many of the hardest-hit countries are responding by increasing domestic investments. 'Some 25 of the 60 low- and middle-income countries included in the report have indicated increases in domestic budgets for their HIV responses in 2026,' it stated. 'The projected collective rise, an estimated 8% or roughly USD 180 million, is seen as encouraging, but the report cautions this is 'not sufficient to replace the scale of international funding in countries that are heavily reliant. '
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
'I promised Delia we would open our chequebook'
Norwich City's majority shareholder Mark Attanasio, pictured with his son Mike, flew in to speak to fans at Carrow Road [Rob Butler/BBC] A new era of financial strength is well under way at Norwich City, but supporters may have to remain patient for a revamp of the stadium. That was the message from the football club's top brass when they spoke to Canaries fans about the big issues. Advertisement Majority shareholder Mark Attanasio, who fronts the FB Norfolk Holdings group, had flown in from the United States hot on the heels of the £6.9m signing of Danish international Mathias Kvistgaarden. The American said he had told his predecessors, Delia Smith and Michael Wynn Jones, that the group would "open our chequebooks" as they chased a return to the Premier League. After a disappointing 13th place finish in the Championship last season, a change of head coach has led to a busy transfer window, giving supporters hope of an upturn in fortunes. Attanasio said: "One of the pledges I actually made to Delia and Michael before was that we would open our chequebook and do everything we could to make the team as best as it can be – something that the community could keep being proud of. Advertisement "The goal is, of course, to get back to the Premier League." The businessman also owns the Milwaukee Brewers baseball team in the US, and he has ensured Norwich benefit from shared knowledge, including a need to specialise in young talent. He added: "If you have a younger club who can keep bringing players up, you can sustain success. That's what we've done with Milwaukee in the last seven years "We've been in the play-offs six years out of seven and this year we have the third most wins out of 15 in the National League, all with really young players." Senior Norwich City staff took part in a special BBC Radio Norfolk Scrimmage Q&A [Henry Miller/BBC] Johannes Hoff Thorup was dismissed as the club's head coach in April after struggling to achieve consistent results with a young squad. Advertisement Attanasio is confident new head coach Liam Manning, brought in after leading Bristol City to the Championship play-offs, will do a better job. He added: "That has to translate on to the pitch... and we needed a coach who could develop players but also needed a coach who could win. "[Manning] took a club last year who didn't have the resources we had – or, at least, didn't spend the resources – to a play-off spot, and that's the goal for this year." About 150 Canaries supporters attended the special Scrimmage event [Henry Miller/BBC] Attanasio and Manning sat alongside sporting director Ben Knapper and executive director Zoe Webber for a special episode of BBC Radio Norfolk's Scrimmage show at Carrow Road on Tuesday. Advertisement A question about the potential for the club's 27,000-seater stadium to be expanded was among those asked. Webber said: "We're looking at a few projects in and around the stadium. It is incumbent on us to make sure that we are using all of the space that we've got in the stadium and bringing that up to a good standard, first and foremost. "We've had a look at plans for the City Stand – some were leaked online recently, some visuals – so it is very much something we are looking at. "But at the moment it is quite cost-prohibitive, and we need to work through the feasibility of these projects going forward." Advertisement Attanasio was able to offer one update about the stadium which brought cheers, though. He said: "Our goal is to cherish this facility. I do have a request from Delia that we keep the name 'Carrow Road'." Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Related stories Related internet links
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Much Fuel Does A Boeing 747 Burn Per Hour, And How Much Can It Hold?
Boeing's very first jetliner, the 707, began commercial flights in 1958. A scant 10 years later, the demand for air travel was so great that Boeing unveiled its new 747 to the world, which held more than twice the number of passengers as the 707. Originally, the 747 was to be a double-decker configuration, but engineers struggled with freight capacity and the ability to rapidly evacuate passengers in the event of an emergency. Eventually, a compromise was reached where the double-deck height was still present at the front of the aircraft, creating the 747's unmistakable, signature hump. On cargo-carrying variants of the 747, this clever design facilitated placing the cockpit above and out of the way of the hinged front nose section for loading. The resulting upper-deck area behind the cockpit could be utilized for additional seating or a swinging lounge and bar area. Total passenger capacity depends on how each 747 is configured, but fitting 660 of your fellow humans onboard is possible in a dense layout of exclusively economy seats. For propulsion, the Boeing 747 relies on a brace of four turbofan engines that burn a whopping 3,500 to 3,800 gallons of fuel per hour at cruising speed. The exact fuel burn rate is dependent on the passenger capacity, as well as the particular make and model engines that are installed. Suffice to say, however, the average 747 burns about one gallon of fuel per second. Obviously, that insatiable thirst for kerosene-based Jet A-1 requires a massive fuel capacity to match. Read more: How Much Do Car Salespeople Make? The Pay Structure Explained The Boeing 747 isn't just one of the largest commercial jets, it's also one of the fastest. Its impressive cruising speed of 580 MPH means that one mile is covered every 6.2 seconds. Using the fuel burn rate provided by BBC's Future Planet, that equates to fuel economy of 0.18 miles per gallon. While that figure is certainly shocking, one must also consider that, unlike the latest Toyota Prius, the 747 is carrying hundreds of passengers over which to amortize the expenditure. In order to facilitate such high fuel consumption on the long-haul international routes that are typical of the Boeing 747, it carries approximately 48,400 gallons of fuel. That's enough to get you from, say, New York to London. However, longer routes like Los Angeles to Sydney require more fuel capacity still. Indeed, some variants like the 747-8i Intercontinental carry 63,034 gallons of fuel. So where does 50,000 to 60,000 gallons of fuel go? Primarily, the fuel tanks are located in the aircraft's wings, although select 747s are configured to store additional fuel in the plane's horizontal stabilizer at the tail. Over the years, aviation authorities worldwide relaxed rules that prohibited jets with two engines from operating long overwater flights. That ushered in the dominance of modern aircraft like the Airbus A330 and Boeing's own 777 which are more fuel efficient with only two engines. Nowadays, the 747 passenger jet is disappearing, but it's not altogether gone. If you want to experience the Queen of the Skies one final time, check out our list of airlines that still operate them on certain routes. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
