The legacy of a Vietnam War hero scrubbed from a government webpage remains strong in the southernmost part of Texas
González was a United States Marine Corps sergeant from Edinburg, Texas, who joined the military in the late 1960s and was killed in action during the Vietnam War. In this southernmost region of Texas, known as the Rio Grande Valley, he is the namesake of a main thoroughfare, a park and an elementary school. Outside this area, his name has graced a US Navy warship for 30 years and, until recently, he had been featured among Hispanic veterans on the Naval History and Heritage Command website.
Like González's contributions, those made by women, LGBTQ+ individuals, people of color and historical figures are at the center of the Trump administration's purge of diversity, equity and inclusion-related content from government websites.
Some content on the Naval History and Heritage Command website has been 'moved to align with Department of Defense guidance and recent Executive Orders,' a spokesperson for the command told CNN earlier this month.
'This is a grave disrespect to Sgt. González's memory and a punch to the gut for South Texas and all of our service members. Has the President no shame?,' Democratic Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas said in a statement last month about Gonzalez's removal from a section on the website highlighting Hispanic veterans.
While González's name and contributions may have been removed from some digital realms, in the physical world – most importantly in Edinburg – community members inspired by his mother, fellow veterans and students are keeping his legacy alive.
González was born in Edinburg in 1946. During his teenage years, he played football and worked in the fields picking cotton.
'He was probably the smallest lineman, offensive lineman, in the football team but he probably was the toughest,' his childhood friend Pete Vela said in a 2023 documentary.
When González graduated high school in 1965, he joined the US Marine Corps and served two tours fighting in Vietnam. He often corresponded with his mother during his time overseas, checking in on her and wanting to know how his friends and family in Edinburg were doing.
He served his country as well as those around him. In Vietnam, González risked his life to bring an injured Marine to safety, and later stepped in the line of fire to direct enemy troops away from his platoon.
A letter dated January 24, 1968 to González's mother offers a glimpse of how the soldier chose to live a life of service. In his missive, González wrote about a friend who was killed and how he hoped people understood what the loss meant.
'Mother, I was shocked to hear that Victor got killed, but it's things that will happen in war,' González wrote.
'I hope all the people back home remember Victor, cause he didn't give his life for nothing. It was in the line of duty. His life was given willing, rather than taken. That's the way I want you to think,' González added.
Many believe he was preparing his mother for what would likely become his fate.
González died 11 days later on February 4, 1968 after he was wounded trying to save his fellow Marines during the Battle of Hue, a major clash at the old imperial capital that was considered one of the Vietnam War's defining moments.
In his final act of heroism, González moved fearlessly from numerous firing positions as his unit was pinned down by intense incoming fire to destroy an enemy rocket position and successfully suppressed hostile bombardment — actions that protected his fellow Marines but left him fatally wounded. He was 21 years old.
His mother, Dolia González, turned her grief into a life's mission, becoming the keeper and teller of her son's story. When you go around Edinburg asking about González, everyone quickly brings her up.
'It was the love and the memory of her son that was Dolia's identity, and it was enduring,' said Francisco Guajardo, CEO of the Museum of South Texas History, which has a permanent exhibit dedicated to González featuring his uniform and posthumous decorations and medals, including a Purple Heart and the Congressional Medal of Honor.
Dolia González was 'almost like the mother of the community,' Guajardo said, noting that she helped numerous families cope and heal after losing children in the Vietnam War.
More than 50 years since his passing, Freddy González's voice echoes throughout the Museum of South Texas History with words for his mom who waited for him in his beloved hometown.
'My mother is Dolia González,' the sergeant said, adding his full address.
'Is there anything you would like to say to her this Christmas time?' a man is heard asking him.
'Merry Christmas and Happy New Year,' González replies as loud noises are heard in the background.
The audio was recorded in December of 1967, weeks before González was killed. The other man is a DJ from a local radio station who traveled to Vietnam to meet soldiers and recorded their holiday messages.
González penned more than 150 letters for his mother and even asked her to listen to the radio station for a surprise.
At bedtime, Dolia González read and cherished those letters, Guajardo said, until one day she donated them to the museum.
'It is what has kept me alive,' Guajardo recalled her saying in 2020 when she handed him the letters. '…But I'm all out of tears, and I'm afraid that the letters are going to get lost, so you take them.'
About 3 miles southwest from the museum is Freddy Gonzalez Elementary. Inside the single-story building, many children have learned about González's bravery and the importance of serving in the military.
'Sgt. Alfredo Gonzalez is a true role model the students can look up to,' said Naida N. Torres, the school's principal. 'He exemplified bravery, honor, duty and sacrifice.'
There are about 525 students enrolled at the school and the majority of them are Hispanic, according to the latest data released by the National Center for Education Statistics.
For the 50th anniversary of González's death, students stood outside of the school wearing red, white or blue T-shirts to form an American flag. They sang 'God Bless the USA' when some of the military's top brass filled the school's gymnasium in 2019 to present González's mother with the Congressional Medal of Honor flag. And they've met some of the veterans who served with González.
''First, we don't know him as Freddy, he is Sgt. Alfredo Gonzalez and second, I wouldn't be here today if it wasn't for him',' Torres recalled the veterans told students after a 2018 ceremony marking the 50th death anniversary of González.
González's presence and relevance in the school goes beyond simply being a namesake or having a memorial in the office with his uniform, military flag and certificates of recognition.
Instead of having an animal as a mascot, students see the USS Gonzalez, the Navy destroyer homeported more than 1,600 miles away in Virginia and named after the sergeant, as the symbol unifying their school community.
The bond between the elementary school and the battleship is so unique that the ship's crew has traveled to Edinburg to meet with students and have a Texas flag from the school on display at the USS Gonzalez.
Before being sent to its new home, the flag was raised next to the school's memorial garden that features a large marble stone with the names of soldiers from Edinburg who 'gave their lives for our country,' Torres said.
'Over 500 students and staff surrounded the pole with their hands over their hearts as the flag was raised to the top (of the flagpole),' the principal added.
On any given night, a number of veterans who attended school in Edinburg with González and other service members get together at the American Legion Alfredo Gonzalez Post 408.
While they enjoy singing on karaoke nights, dancing or playing the Mexican bingo-style game of lotería together, the veterans are the proudest when they have a chance to honor González's memory and support their community, several post members told CNN.
'(H)is memory is alive and we want to keep it alive by everything that we do, in everything that we do when we go out and represent the American Legion,' said Claudia Noyola, a retired Army veteran and finance officer of the post's executive committee. 'We're not just representing ourselves. We're representing Freddy González, his sacrifice. He's the hero.'
George Rabago, a Marine veteran and another member of the post's executive committee, said he is involved with the post because he doesn't want González or the group's memory to disappear.
One of the reasons Rabago joined the post was 'to follow the path of the older generation. And you know, hopefully carry the name of Freddy González until then, until the next generation comes in,' he said.
But they are not passively waiting for a younger generation to take over. Noyola, was a JROTC instructor at Edinburg High School and next month, the post will host its annual Freddy Gonzalez 5K, which helps them raise funds for scholarships.
When asked about González's contributions being removed from the Naval history webpage featuring Hispanic veterans, Noyola said she doubts it will change how Edinburg celebrates González.
'Everyone is so proud of our veterans, and so regardless of what's going on with the current administration, nothing's going to change here in Edinburg.' Noyola said. 'We will never erase any memory. Websites can come and go. We will always honor Freddy González and his legacy and his mother, Dolia González, for everything that she did.'
Sehila Mota Casper, the executive director of Latinos in Heritage Conservation, a non-profit advocating for preserving the cultural history, places and stories of Latinos in the US, said the Trump administration's efforts around DEI are 'detrimental to Latinx, BIPOC and underrepresented communities,' further inequality and damage the visibility of Latinos.
'I think it's a moment where we all need to stand up and speak out,' Casper said. 'We need to all collectively say that this is not okay, that you're erasing our history.'
González's biography is currently listed on government websites related to his Congressional Medal of Honor and the USS Gonzalez.
After grieving González for more than 56 years, his mother died last year at the age of 94.
Together, the veterans in Edinburg, the museum staff, students and many people who crossed paths with her said they are carrying on her mission in their own ways. They are making sure the González family legacy lives on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.' A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of 'legacy content recently' and the exhibit eventually 'will include all impeachments.' There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: 'We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness.' But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. It's part of a larger effort around American stories The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions like removing the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and getting rid of the leadership at the Kennedy Center. 'Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools,' said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. 'Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history.' It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. 'If they don't control the historical narrative,' he said, 'then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics.' It shows how the presentation of history matters In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, 'The Death of a President.' Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. 'We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world,' said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. 'So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth.' Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was 'concerned and disappointed' about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors 'should have red lines' and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. 'You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this ... why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?' Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: 'The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels.' ___
2 hours ago
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON -- For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.' A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of 'legacy content recently' and the exhibit eventually 'will include all impeachments.' There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: 'We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness.' But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. It's part of a larger effort around American stories The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions like removing the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and getting rid of the leadership at the Kennedy Center. 'Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools,' said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. 'Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history.' It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. 'If they don't control the historical narrative,' he said, 'then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics.' It shows how the presentation of history matters In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, 'The Death of a President.' Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. 'We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world,' said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. 'So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth.' Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was 'concerned and disappointed' about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors 'should have red lines' and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. 'You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this ... why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?' Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: 'The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels.'
