
Kamala Harris says she doesn't plan to return to ‘broken' system of US politics
On Thursday night the Democratic party's defeated presidential nominee, who replaced Joe Biden late in the 2024 campaign after he dropped his re-election bid, gave her first interview since losing the election to Donald Trump, talking to Stephen Colbert on The Late Show.
After she announced she will not run for the governorship of California just a day earlier, Harris told the TV show that it was about something more 'basic' than whether she wanted to run for something else instead — with the subtext being whether she will attempt a White House run again in 2028.
'Recently I made the decision that I just — for now — I don't want to go back in the system. I think it's broken,' she said, provoking a collective groan from the studio audience. Colbert later returned to the subject, saying that her remark was harrowing.
'Well, but it's also evident, isn't it?' she said.
Describing herself as a 'devout public servant', the former vice-president added: 'I always believed, that as fragile as our democracy is, our systems would be strong enough to defend our most fundamental principles. And I think right now that they're not as strong as they need to be. And for now I don't want to go back into that system.'
Harris's choice of The Late Show as the channel for her first post-election defeat interview was pointed. The most-watched talkshow was cancelled last month by the CBS network, which pleaded financial stress, though the decision was widely denounced as being politically motivated.
The cancellation was announced after Colbert had criticized CBS and its parent company Paramount Global for reaching a $16m settlement with Trump. The president had sued CBS News over an interview on the 60 Minutes show with Harris at the height of last year's presidential campaign, which Trump claimed had been manipulated in her favour.
None of this febrile back story was mentioned by either Colbert or Harris on Thursday. But she did delivery a passionate lament for the numbers of people who she said had 'capitulated' to the aggressive second Trump administration.
When Colbert invited her to say 'I told you so' after she had predicted many of Trump's most contentious moves — including Medicaid cuts, ignoring court orders, and 'massive tax cuts to the rich' — she replied: 'But Stephen, what I did not predict was the capitulation.' She went on: 'Perhaps it's naive of me … there should be many who consider themselves to be guardians of our system and our democracy who just capitulated, and I didn't see that coming.'
The timing of the interview was also poignant, as she was considered to be the automatic frontrunner if she had decided to run to become the next governor of California.
Her wider remarks on 'the system' help explain that decision, though they still notably left room for another possible presidential run. In the meantime, Harris has a book to sell, 107 Days, which she name-checked copiously on the Late Show in advance of its publication next month.
The book, as its title suggests, relates the story of the shortest presidential run of all time. She said it would give a 'behind-the-scenes sharing' of those intense days.
Whether it is to sell the book or to lay the foundations for another presidential bid remains a moot point, but Harris said she wanted to use the next period to 'travel the country and listen to people. I don't want it to be transactional, where I'm asking for their vote.'
Harris admitted that it had taken her months following her defeat before she had the strength to tune into the news again. 'You know, I'm just not into self-mutilation,' she said. Instead there had been 'lots of cooking shows', her top choice being The Kitchen.
— The Guardian
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Two-state option is the viable solution for Israel and Palestine
A two-state solution in the Holy Land, whereby a Palestinian nation will be established and allowed co-exist alongside Israel, is once more becoming obvious as the only genuine answer to solving the seemingly endless warfare in the region. The merciless horror that has been visited upon the Palestinian people over the last two years by Israel requires a solution and there is an increasing realisation that the battle lines between moderate and extremist visions for the future of Gaza and the West Bank are becoming clearer. On one hand, you have the views of such as Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his voluble far-right minister for finance, Bezalel Smotrich, backed by the benign inaction of the White House in Washington, trying to bury — literally — the two-state vision. On the other, there are those increasingly nauseated by what the Israeli government is doing, who have finally realised that that goal — of two countries living alongside each other harmoniously — will be dug into Palestinian soil unless they act now. The French and British have indicated their willingness to finally recognise Palestinian statehood, but only because the increasingly genocidal administration in Tel Aviv is demonstrating little enthusiasm for any potential settlement. Certainly, we are going to have to see, amongst other things, a reformed Palestinian Authority come into being if the Israeli government is to stop waging war in Gaza and make the two-state solution workable, but such an outcome is far from being beyond the realms of possibility. Hamas is not helping its cause, or that of the people it claims to represent, by screening images of skeletal hostages. Indeed, it is only buttressing hardline Israeli views. All concerned have to come to the realisation that the two-state option is the only realistic and workable solution and the sooner the increasingly entrenched radical views on either side come to this conclusion, the sooner the bloodshed will stop. Trump silencing critics Not alone has Donald Trump changed the face of global trade with his scattergun tariffs, but he and his administration are engaged in a witchhunt — a favourite word of the US president — against a wide array of American media outlets and outspoken academics, which is threatening the very fabric of democracy there. Trump has effectively silenced much of the media criticism against him personally, and his wider regime, because corporate owners fear his wrath. CBS — along with parent company Paramount — effectively fired the hugely popular late-night show host Stephen Colbert in order to secure administration approval of the sale of Paramount to Skydance. Similarly, Amazon billionaire and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos silenced any criticism of the Trump regime on the editorial pages of his newspaper, because he fears the wrath of Trump will impact on his businesses' profitability. So too American universities — for eons bastions of democracy and free speech — have had to crawl cap in hand to the White House to get funding restored after incurring that wrath because high-profile staffers have criticised his illegal, unconstitutional actions. This silencing of media and universities willing to criticise the notoriously thin-skinned Trump is happening across America. However, the shame is on those media outlets and educationalists that have allowed it. Bezos proudly amplified the Washington Post's 'Democracy Dies In Darkness' tagline when he bought the newspaper. Yet he has himself allowed a darkness to descend on one of America's most valued independent media resources. The silencing of those who have helped America to understand just how alarming this regime has become is a terrible indictment for a country that prides itself on being the leading player in a 'Free World'. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Sprat ban overdue The Government's proposed ban on the inshore fishing of sprat by large trawlers is not before time. In fact, the move might have come a little too late, as overfishing of the species has already had a dramatic effect on the wellbeing of our native maritime wildlife, from sharks, dolphins, and whales, to sea birds such as puffins and kittiwakes. As a result of large-scale fishing, sprat numbers have seen a huge decline, and thus reduced the food supply to a wide variety of native species. The plan to stop trawlers over 18m in size from fishing within six nautical miles of our coastline can only boost sprat numbers, thus improving prospects for other maritime creatures. Sadly, however, the new restrictions will run only from October 1 until September 30, 2026. And while it may be that the authorities here are only trialling this inshore fishing ban and planning for more focused action in the future, it seems Government action may have come too late. For too many years now, the native Irish fishing industry has been treated as the poor relation to the agriculture sector when it comes to doling out necessary financial supports. This has meant that we have allowed our rich maritime resources to be plundered by other nations who care less about the wellbeing of Irish aquatic wildlife. Their fishing fleets, invariably better resourced and equipped than ours, do not discriminate in what they catch and therefore species which they have little use for, are arbitrarily and routinely over-fished. Hopefully, this limited ban will have an immediate effect in conserving a fish vital to our rich and abundant animal kingdom. It seems almost certain, however, this is a subject that will have to be revisited. Read More Irish Examiner view: Cork Crime series prompts us to seek out the roots of criminality


Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on policing: domestic violence must be a key focus
Two days after Deputy Commissioner Justin Kelly was confirmed as successor to Garda Commissioner Drew Harris a fresh policing controversy erupted. A review of roads policing found a significant minority of frontline gardaí were uninterested in performing their duties. Indeed, they had a 'blatant disregard' for their jobs, often to the point of hostility. The report is yet to be published, but when the detail of the poor performance and belligerence of the problematic gardaí is laid bare, the controversy will only intensify. The episode is a timely lesson for Kelly as he prepares to take over as Garda commissioner on September 1st, when Harris resigns after seven years. Policing is complex, often problematic, and the next controversy is never too far away. Even if the vast majority of Garda members are committed and hardworking, things will go wrong. Docile, even corrupt, gardaí will create significant problems with the capacity to undermine the force in the eyes of the public. Shocking as the new roads policing revelations are, they have emerged because Garda Headquarters commissioned consultants to carry out a review after receiving claims in an anonymous letter from a Garda whistleblower. It is reassuring that Garda Headquarters was willing to unearth that incompetence and poor service, even if the details are stark. The continuation of that approach, being willing to proactively address problem areas in the force, must be one of Kelly's top priorities. This is a cultural approach he must lead and be seen to lead. READ MORE The Dubliner seems like a formidable policeman, with an impressive record from frontline uniform duties in some very challenging parts of Dublin to leading teams of specialist sex crime investigators. He also has experience leading some of the Garda's special units and was head of the organised and serious crime branch of the force. Though the fight against the gangs must continue, there is evidence from several sources – academia, NGOs and the Garda itself – that domestic and sexual violence is being perpetrated in the Republic at a scale we are only beginning to face up to. Victims, mostly women, are being beaten and terrorised in their homes by controlling men. Harris said this week that violent pornography had become so 'normalised' that sexual offenders were mimicking extreme behaviour in their attacks. As he comes to the job, Kelly is best known for his high profile senior management role in tackling the crime gangs and cartels that run Irish organised crime. This work must go on. However, with the gun feuds having dissipated over the last decade, the Garda must also refocus. Tackling the physical, sexual and psychological violence being inflicted on vulnerable victims across Irish society – most of it waged by men on women – must be a key part of this.

The Journal
12 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump threatens to ramp up tariffs on India for its dealing with 'Russian War Machine'
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP threatened today to 'substantially' hike US tariffs on goods from India over its purchases of Russian oil – a key source of revenue for Moscow's war on Ukraine. Trump's heightened pressure on India comes after he signalled fresh sanctions on Moscow if Russia did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Ukraine, more than three years since Russia's full-scale invasion. Moscow is anticipating talks with the US leader's special envoy Steve Witkoff, who is expected to meet President Vladimir Putin this week. Today, Trump said in a post to his Truth Social platform that India was 'buying massive amounts of Russian Oil' and selling it for 'big profits.' 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,' Trump added. 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' But he did not provide details on what tariff level he had in mind. Advertisement For now, an existing 10 percent US tariff on Indian products is expected to rise to 25 percent come Thursday. Today's threats against India come after Trump last week ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines in response to what he called 'provocative' comments from Russia's ex-president. Russia, in its first comments on the deployment, today urged 'caution'. 'Russia is very attentive to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation. And we believe that everyone should be very, very cautious with nuclear rhetoric,' the Kremlin's Peskov said. The chief of staff to Zelenskyy today backed Trump's actions. 'The concept of peace through strength works,' Andriy Yermak wrote on social media. 'The moment American nuclear submarines appeared, one Russian drunk — who had just been threatening nuclear war on X – suddenly went silent,' he added. Trump has previously threatened that new measures could mean 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. This would further stifle Russia, but would risk significant international disruption. - © AFP 2025