Massachusetts mayoral candidate goes viral over unfortunate name: 'I am proud of it'
Geoff Epstein, 77, is a father of two who is hoping to secure the votes of 73,000 residents in Framingham, 22 miles outside of Boston.
Despite the slight spelling variation, he is candid about his name's unfortunate similarity to the other Epstein, a disgraced financier and sex offender who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking.
But Australian-born Geoff - who was also born on September 11 - insists that he won't change his name or when he celebrates his birthday.
'No way,' he told HuffPost. 'I like my name and I am proud of my family.
'That other one is a dead American and I am a [living] Aussie.'
He insists he could not be further from his namesake and has spent his time in Framingham trying to make it a better place.
'I have lived my life trying to be straight up and improving things,' he told the outlet.
Geoff Epstein, 77, is a father of two who is hoping to become mayor of Framingham, located 22 miles outside Boston
He unfortunately shares a namesake in Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and sex offender who died in jail in 2019
And another Epstein, who is also a politician, encouraged Geoff to stay proud of roots.
NYC councilman candidate Harvey Epstein - who shares a first name with predator Harvey Weinstein - told Politico: 'My advice to Geoffrey would be to lead with your values and who you are as a candidate.
'People will support you if you do the work and follow through.'
Geoff was drawn into public service while living in Newton, Massachusetts, where his son was attending primary school and he noticed he was struggling with math.
He later ran for the school committee on a science and math platform and won.
He was a member from January 2008 to December 2013, his LinkedIn showed.
'I learned that if you go out to the community and tell them the facts and what you're about that really works,' he said in an interview posted to his YouTube.
Epstein moved to Framingham in 2014 and joined the school committee in January 2018, despite his two children being grown. He left in December of 2021.
Despite the awkward similarity, Geoff (left) - who was also born on September 11 - has no intention of changing his name or when he celebrates his birthday
The father-of-two is hoping to upset incumbent Charlie Sisitsky (pictured)
The senior then shifted his focus to the city of Framingham, which led to his campaign this year.
He is running on a platform promoting education, bettering the infrastructure, protecting the environment, and better manage the city's finances.
'Either I leave or I stay and fight and I decided I would stay and fight,' he said.
The father-of-two is hoping to upset incumbent Charlie Sisitsky.
As for whether or not his name is helping or harming his campaign, he is unsure.
'No one locally cares about that at all,' the former theoretical physics professor told Politico.
Daily Mail has reached out to Geoff for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Husband of top lawyer, 47, suddenly dies during deep-dive expedition to shipwreck in Cape Cod
The husband of a top New Jersey lawyer has tragically died during a deep-dive expedition to a shipwreck off the coast of Cape Cod. Joe Mazraani had successfully conducted countless dives in his work as president of Atlantic Wreck Salvage. On July 29, he was diving with a group from his boat Tenacious when he reportedly suffered a medical emergency. He was hauled back onto the boat and other divers attempted to perform life-saving measures, but he could not be revived. Mazraani's wife, New Jersey Public Defender Jennifer Sellitti, said 'all indications point to a medical emergency.' 'While we are choosing to keep the details private, we currently have no reason to suspect diver error or equipment failure,' she said. The group had been exploring an unidentified shipwreck referred to as 'The Big Engine Steamer' at the time of the tragedy. It was brought back in to New Bedford, Massachusetts the following morning. State and local police, as well as the US Coast Guard, are investigating the circumstances of Mazraani's death. The well-known maritime historian and technical diver had been a scuba diver since the mid 1990s and had cut his teeth wreck-diving off the coasts of New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts. He was also a criminal defense lawyer. 'Joe Mazraani was larger than life,' his partner said in a moving tribute. 'He was kind, compassionate and generous. A mentor and a student, a friend, brother, son and partner. 'Whether motoring aboard D/V Tenacious, diving into deep and dangerous water, or defending his clients in court, Joe demanded the best of everyone around him. Sometimes he demanded it grumpily – but he always demanded by example. 'He lived every moment fully, without compromise. He did not want to die doing what he loved – none of us do. 'He wanted to survive it, to grow old doing it. But when you live at the edge, sometimes the edge pushes back.' The New Jersey Office of the Public Defender paid tribute to Mazraani in a Facebook post on August 1, writing: 'With deep sadness, we share the loss of Joe Mazraani, beloved partner of Public Defender Sellitti and a cherished member of the legal and diving communities. 'Joe passed on July 29 in a diving-related incident, believed to be caused by a medical emergency.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Epstein victim condemns ‘political warfare' in Trump administration's effort to release grand jury transcripts
A victim of Jeffrey Epstein has condemned what they called the Trump administration's 'political warfare' in its handling of government files on the late convicted sex offender as the Justice Department pushes for the release of grand jury transcripts in his New York federal case. Epstein was a wealthy financier who died in a New York City jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for federal sex trafficking charges. He had been accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls. About a decade earlier, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. Early last month, the DOJ and FBI came out with a memo stating there was no so-called client list of powerful people who may have partaken in Epstein's crimes; it also said Epstein did, in fact, die by suicide, and 'no further disclosure [of information regarding Epstein] would be appropriate or warranted.' The memo sparked backlash, notably from Trump's own base, as it left many unanswered questions and concerns the government may be covering up materials that would be of interest to the public. Trump then asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'produce any and all pertinent' grand jury testimony from the investigations into Epstein, 'subject to Court approval,' citing the 'ridiculous amount of publicity' over them. A Florida judge quickly denied the DOJ's request but the feds' bid in New York is still being considered. Victims in the New York case were asked to respond to the DOJ's request and two of them did so in court documents filed Monday. Both were unnamed as is their right to remain anonymous. One Epstein survivor wrote to District Judge Richard Berman, 'Dear United States, I wish you would have handled and would handle the whole 'Epstein Files' with more respect towards and for the victims. I am not some pawn in your political warfare.' 'What you have done and continue to do is eating at me day after day as you help to perpetuate this story indefinitely. Why not be completely transparent? Show us all the files with only the necessary redactions! Be done with it and allow me/us to heal,' the victim said. In the letter to the judge the victim also seemingly called out the Trump administration for what they said was its protection of the wealthy over Epstein's victims. 'You protect yourself and your powerful and wealthy 'friends' (not enemies) over the victims, why? The victims know the truth, we know who are in the files and now so do you,' the victim said. It's unclear who exactly the victim was referring to, but Trump's decades-old relationship with Epstein has recently been scrutinized, and there have been reports the president was told his name appears in the Epstein files. Trump reportedly cut ties with Epstein before his 2008 plea deal and appearing in the files does not mean there was any wrongdoing. Trump himself has denied any wrongdoing. The victim asked Berman to have the attorneys of the victims review any suggested redactions if the transcripts are released. The Independent has reached out to the White House and DOJ for comment. Another victim told Berman: 'The latest attention on the 'Epstein Files', the 'Client List' is OUT OF CONTROL and the ones that are left to suffer are not the high-profile individuals, IT IS THE VICTIMS. Why the lack of concern in handling such sensitive information for the victims sake?' That survivor also called out the feds for what they saw as protecting 'wealthy men.' 'I feel like the DOJ's and FBI's priority is protecting the 'third-party', the wealthy men by focusing on scrubbing their names off the files of which the victims, 'know who they are,'' they said. The victim asked Berman to consider a third-party review of any documents that may be released ' to ensure that NO victims names or likenesses are revealed.'
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Harvard president reportedly says he is not considering $500m deal with Trump
The Harvard University president, Alan Garber, has told faculty a deal between the Ivy League institution and the Trump administration is not imminent – and denied reports that the university is considering a $500m settlement with the White House, Harvard's student newspaper the Crimson reported. The Crimson attributed that information to three unnamed faculty members in a report published early on Monday. According to the publication, Garber said Harvard was seeking to resolve its dispute with the Trump administration through the court system. Negotiations between the Trump administration and Harvard reopened in June after the president halted billions in federal funding to the university. That came before Columbia University in July reached a $221m settlement with the Trump administration to restore federal funding that was frozen amid allegations that certain universities across the US were not doing enough to combat antisemitism. Harvard University said on 29 July that it was complying with Trump administration demands to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff. But the university said it would not share records of employees in student-only roles. The New York Times reported Harvard was open to spending up to $500m to resolve its dispute with the Trump administration. A faculty member reportedly told the Crimson that Garber denied it was true Harvard was open to spending that much – and he added that claim was leaked to the Times by the White House. The New York Times told the Crimson it stood by its reporting. 'A Harvard spokesperson declined to comment but disputed the characterization of Garber's remarks after publication,' the Crimson reported. 'Harvard officials, including Garber, have consistently maintained that they will not agree to any deal that threatens the university's academic freedom. But it remains unclear exactly what Garber sees as essential.' The Crimson noted Harvard had already taken steps to try to appease the Trump administration by eliminating its diversity offices, cutting ties to a Palestinian university, following through on a commitment to establishing ties with Israeli universities, and centralizing disciplinary powers under Garber. Harvard is currently in court against the Trump administration, fighting federal attempts to end international student enrollment at the university and challenging the federal freeze on research funds. A judge has issued preliminary injunctions in the university's lawsuit challenging the international student enrollment ban, and a judge appeared skeptical of the Trump administration's arguments for freezing federal research funds, though Trump has vowed to appeal any victories in court by Harvard. Harvard did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Guardian.
