How much junk food did you eat? A new test may soon tell
These include packaged snacks, soft drinks, ready-to-eat meals, and other industrially manufactured calorie-dense products and nutrient-poor products.This could be a breakthrough for nutrition research, which has long struggled with the inaccuracies of self-reported diet data.'The limitations of self-reported diet are well known. With metabolomics, we can get closer to an objective measure of food intake and also understand how diet may be impacting health," said Dr Erikka Loftfield, lead investigator and researcher at the National Cancer Institute.ALL ABOUT THIS SCOREThe NIH team looked at blood and urine samples for 12 months from two different groups: one observational study of 718 older US adults, and one clinical trial where 20 participants were fed two different diets, one high (80%) and one completely free (0%) of ultra-processed foods, each for two weeks.advertisementThe researchers found hundreds of tiny substances in the blood and urine, called metabolites, that were linked to how much ultra-processed food a person ate.Using machine learning, they created a special score called a poly-metabolite score that could tell how processed a person's diet was.These scores clearly showed the difference between when someone was eating mostly processed food and when they weren't, the study authors noted.WHY THIS MATTERSThe health risks of diets high in ultra-processed foods such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and even some cancers are well documented.But quantifying how much people actually eat is tricky, especially when relying on memory-based food logs or questionnaires. People could forget, under-report, or misjudge portion sizes.This biomarker-based tool could make large-scale population studies more reliable and help uncover stronger links between diet and disease.LIMITATIONS OF THE SCOREWhile the findings are promising, researchers caution that the current results are based mostly on older American adults.The scores still need to be validated in more diverse populations with different eating habits and levels of ultra-processed food intake.Besides this, the study didn't check whether these scores are linked to diseases like cancer or diabetes. That's something the scientists want to study next, to see if people with higher scores (meaning they eat more ultra-processed food) are more likely to get these illnesses.advertisementFor now, though, the study marks a step toward more precise nutrition science and maybe one day, doctors won't need to ask what you eat.Your body might already have the answer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'Biden couldn't finish a sentence without a nap': GOP drops autopen bombshell at Senate hearing
Tensions erupted during a fiery Senate Judiciary Committee hearing as GOP Senators accused Democrats of orchestrating a years-long cover-up of former President Joe Biden's cognitive health. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) delivered a blistering rebuke, demanding answers on who was truly making decisions in the White House. Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned law professor John Harrison over the moral obligation of staffers to tell the American Public about President Biden's physical and mental health. Show more Show less
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Who is Anjani Sinha, the Indian-origin surgeon nominated by Donald Trump as Singapore's ambassador?
Source: X Dr. Anjani Sinha, President Donald Trump 's nominee for U.S. Ambassador to Singapore, faced pointed criticism during his Senate confirmation hearing on July 9, after failing to answer several fundamental questions about the Southeast Asian nation and U.S. strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific region. Senator Tammy Duckworth pressed a seasoned orthopedic surgeon with no prior diplomatic experience, Sinha, on Singapore's trade surplus with the U.S., its role in ASEAN, and the strategic presence of the U.S. Navy in the region. His responses were inconsistent and at times inaccurate. The exchange quickly became tense, with Duckworth accusing Sinha of viewing the posting as a 'glamour job,' saying: 'You are not currently prepared for this posting, period, and you need to shape up and do some homework.' She added, 'You think this is a glamour posting, that you're going to live a nice life in Singapore, when what we need is someone who can actually do the work.' Who is Anjani Sinha? Despite the controversy surrounding his nomination, Dr. Anjani Sinha has had a long and accomplished career in medicine and business. He is a highly respected orthopedic surgeon and entrepreneur who has built multiple thriving medical practices across the United States. Early Life and Education Born in Bihar, India, Dr. Sinha earned his medical degree from Mahatma Gandhi Medical College. In 1972, he relocated to New Delhi, completing his residency at Safdarjung Hospital, affiliated with Delhi University and the Central Institute of Orthopaedics. In 1979, Dr. Sinha migrated to the United States. He interned at top institutions including Mount Sinai Medical Center and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, gaining a strong foundation in American medical practice. He would later specialize in orthopedic surgery and sports medicine. Career Dr. Sinha has established a prominent presence on the East Coast, building key-man orthopedic and surgical practices across eight locations in New York. He has also served as a senior surgical consultant in Florida. His work spans both the public and private sectors, interfacing with professionals across healthcare, business, and legal fields. Family and personal life Dr. Sinha has been married for 48 years to Dr. Kuntala 'Kiki' Sinha, a retired anesthesiologist and former faculty member at NYU. The couple became U.S. citizens in the mid-1990s after immigrating together in 1979. They have two children, Pooja (born 1981) and Sumeet (born 1983), both born in the United States. The Sinhas have embraced education as a core family value. Pooja is an alumna of Dartmouth and Harvard, while Sumeet studied at New York University and Columbia. They now have three grandchildren. As per The Edge Singapore, Dr. Sinha retains strong cultural and familial ties to India and the broader Indo-Pacific region. His extended family includes connections to Yashwant Sinha, a former Indian finance minister and the Opposition's candidate in India's 2022 presidential election.
Mint
15 hours ago
- Mint
A cosmic mystery: Is China building the world's biggest telescope?
Astronomer Robert Kirshner investigates some of the universe's biggest questions: What happens when a star explodes? Is the universe still expanding? He recently added a new mystery to the list: Is China quietly building the world's biggest telescope? He would like to know, because he leads a rival telescope project in the U.S. There are clues. In January, state-owned Nanjing Astronomical Instruments said on social media that it won a $22 million bid for a dome to surround a 48-foot telescope. In an April social-media post, students visiting a science institute mentioned researchers showing them mirror arrangements for such a telescope. And a top Chinese astronomer told state media he wanted to finish the telescope before he retires. Yet Chinese officials haven't directly acknowledged the observatory, which would threaten American technological leadership and potentially give Beijing a military advantage. 'You would expect, normally, some kind of chest thumping," said Kirshner, a Harvard emeritus professor. The leading Chinese astronomer and his institute, a national research organization that appears to be in charge of the telescope, didn't return requests for comment for this article. If China is building the big scope, that raises another question. 'Why the hell are they doing that?" said Matt Mountain, head of the nonprofit organization that manages observatories, as well as the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes, for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mountain has two hypotheses. First, astronomical advances benefit both scientific and military purposes, as astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson highlighted in his book 'Accessory to War." Huge telescopes can look at military satellites, not just stars and planets. The second hypothesis: Beijing is investing in astronomy to inspire children to enter the sciences—so it can surpass the U.S. in a couple of decades. 'Astronomy is an entry-level drug for science, technology, engineering and math," said Mountain. American institutes are the New York Yankees of modern astronomy. By Kirshner's count, 18 of the 23 astrophysics-focused Nobel Prize winners in the last half-century worked in the U.S. While space telescopes such as the James Webb get more attention these days, those on the ground still matter. They are easier to service and much bigger, offsetting disadvantages such as light pollution and atmospheric distortions. Bigger telescopes mean sharper images, making it easier to determine the distance between faraway objects, Kirshner said. Astronomers can then discover more planets orbiting stars in the Goldilocks temperature range that could support life. The Hubble and Webb space telescopes have mirrors with diameters of about 8 feet and 21 feet, respectively. The four biggest ones currently on Earth—one in Spain and three in the U.S.—are all roughly 33 feet in diameter. If China completes a 48-foot telescope soon, it would be the world's biggest, unless a delayed 128-foot European telescope in Chile is finished first. Kirshner's Thirty Meter Telescope group, an international project with U.S., Canadian, Indian and Japanese institutions, proposes a 98-foot telescope on Hawaii's Big Island. Instead of making one massive mirror, which would require mountain transport and the construction of an unfeasibly huge furnace, it would use 492 hexagonal segments, each 4.7 feet wide. These giant telescopes cost roughly $1 billion to $2 billion, Mountain said, and costs rise with size. They also take years to build. Drawing on political rather than scientific wisdom, Kirshner realized it would help make the case in Washington for big-telescope funding if he could show China was building one too. Kirshner's best sources have been Chinese-speaking peers who informally confirmed the development of a telescope site in the Tibetan Plateau, in China's southwest. Mountain says Chilean astronomers told him China was also exploring a Southern Hemisphere observatory in Chile. Armed with the information, Kirshner met congressional staffers and National Science Foundation officials. He ran into a roadblock in May, when President Trump proposed to Congress that the NSF's annual budget be cut to $4 billion from $9 billion. Trump's science and technology adviser said then that scientific progress had stalled in some fields and more federal money wouldn't necessarily mean more scientific impact. In its budget request, the NSF proposed advancing only the Giant Magellan Telescope, which is backed by a California-headquartered consortium. At 83 feet wide, the Magellan would be bigger than China's but smaller than Kirshner's proposed telescope. Like the European telescope, this observatory would be in Chile. The Magellan's location would leave China with the Northern Hemisphere's biggest telescope. Earth's curvature means each hemisphere offers different views. Kirshner got a reprieve in mid-July. A Senate spending committee recommended minimal cuts to the NSF, and said it supported both the Magellan project and Kirshner's Thirty Meter Telescope. Kirshner called on Congress to endorse what he called a 'vigorous response to China's efforts." Write to Stu Woo at
