Judge grants Palestine Action urgent hearing to try to stop ban taking effect
An order is due to be laid before parliament on Monday which would proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation, making being a member of – or inviting support for – Palestine Action a criminal offence carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in jail.
The move, announced by the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, last week, would place Palestine Action alongside the likes of al-Qaida, Islamic State and National Action. It has been criticised as draconian by protest groups, civil liberties organisations and various politicians.
At a short-notice hearing at the high court on Monday, it emerged that Huda Ammori, a co-founder of Palestine Action, is to be given an opportunity to apply for 'interim relief' with respect to the proscription order.
David Blundell KC, representing the Home Office, said that the plan had been for the order to be debated in parliament this week and then signed on Friday to come into effect on Saturday.
But the judge, Mr Justice Chamberlain, said if an application by Palestine Action for interim relief on Friday was successful it would 'have the effect of suspending its [the order's] operation'.
Ammori's lawyers contend 'there has been a failure of the duty to inform the claimant of the basis on which it is proposed to restrict her rights through proscription' and to 'afford her the opportunity to make representations before any decision to restrict her rights'.
The submission also states that while 'extensive consultation has taken place with the Israeli government and arms companies … no opportunity has been provided for other groups affected or concerned by the proposal to proscribe Palestine Action, including Liberty, Amnesty International and other civil society organisations'.
Liberty, Amnesty International and the European Legal Support Center have submitted supporting witness statements for Ammori's case alleging the unlawful misuse of anti-terror measures to criminalise dissent, Palestine Action said.
Ammori said: 'The court's decision to grant an urgent hearing this week is indicative of the vital importance of what is at stake in this case, including the far-reaching implications any proscription of Palestine Action would have on fundamental freedoms of speech, expression and assembly in Britain.
'This is the first attempt in British history to criminalise direct action, political protest, as terrorism, mimicking many authoritarian regimes around the world who have used counter-terrorism to crush dissent. This would set an extremely dangerous precedent, with repressive impacts right across the Palestine movement.'
'Spraying red paint on war planes is not terrorism. Causing disruption to the UK-based arms factories used by Israel's largest weapons firm, Elbit Systems, is not terrorism.'
Palestine Action says it uses direct action to seek to prevent serious violations of international law by Israel in and against the Palestinian people.
Cooper took the decision to ban it under anti-terrorism laws three days after the group claimed an action against military aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Five people have been arrested in connection with the incident.
Cooper said there had been 'a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'.
Another hearing has been scheduled for 21 July when Ammori would seek permission for a judicial review to argue that the proscription order should be quashed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK accused of hypocrisy at landmark UN foreign aid conference
The UK has been accused of 'hypocrisy' over its lack of high-level participation at a key global development finance summit, on top of cuts to Britain's aid budget – while talking up its role in helping lower-income nations. The accusations have been made at the fourth Financing for Development Conference (FfD4), a once-a-decade summit happening all week in Seville, Southern Spain, where delegates are aiming to tackle the perennial problem of how to help developing countries access the money they need. Thirty-two African countries currently spend more on debt repayments than on healthcare, and 25 African countries spend more on debt payments than on education, an issue that activists say needs urgent action. Some 50 world leaders are due at FfD4, including Emmanuel Macron of France, Mark Carney of Canada, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. The UK, however, has only sent a government minister in the form of Baroness Chapman, the international development minister. 'A level of ambition from the UK government would have been demonstrated clearly by sending higher level participation such as the prime minister or Foreign Secretary,' Lydia Darby, a senior policy advisor at Save the Children, told The Independent. Ahead of fDf4, writing in The Independent, Baroness Chapman called for a 'new era for global aid and development', that would see developing countries helped in building their own tax systems, and greater investment in developing countries from the private sector, among other measures. Hannah Bond, Co-CEO at ActionAid UK, said that it is 'hypocritical' for the UK to talk about 'fair finance' while cutting overseas aid. 'If the UK truly cares about fair finance, it must honour its overseas aid commitments, tackle unfair debts, and pay its fair share in addressing the climate crisis,' Bond said. 'Without this, talk of fair finance is nothing more than empty PR.' Baroness Chapman's appearance comes off the back of the UK cutting its foreign aid budget from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI) - which is expected to reduce foreign aid by £6.2 billion by 2025. Alex Farley, from advocacy group Bond, said that it is 'impossible' to see how the UK can deliver on existing funding commitments, respond to humanitarian crisis, and tackle climate change, following he 0.5 to 0.3 per cent cut. 'Let alone undo the damage these cuts have done to our reputation and credibility with countries,' he added. 'It would be nice to hear the government expressing regret for its cuts to the aid budget, rather than blithely claiming that they are somehow doing developing countries a favour,' Michael Jacobs, from the think tank ODI, told The Independent. Mr Jacobs added that the claim that private sector money can substitute public funds is 'silly at best, disingenuous at worst'. This is because 'the private sector wants returns, while much aid - for health, schools, sanitation, climate adaptation - doesn't make a profit, so is not investable', he said. Catherine Pettengell, executive director of NGO network Climate Action Network UK concurred that the UK had 'failed to sufficiently support developing countries' calls for fairer debt, tax, international cooperation, and climate finance ' in build-up to the conference. 'It's a crushing blow that only compounds the recent UK aid cuts,' she added. Attendees of FfD4 say, however, that it is not all doom and gloom in Seville. The final agreement of the talks - the Compromiso de Sevilla - was in fact agreed to just ahead of this week's conference. According to Save the Children's Ms Darby, there is notably positive language on matters including international tax cooperation and an agreement to initiate an intergovernmental process on debt. 'The document is an important step with plenty to build on in the months and years to come,' Darby said - though she acknowledged it has inevitably fallen short of 'the transformative ambition that civil society and vulnerable communities worldwide had called for'. While the UK, along with the EU, has been accused of watering down key priorities for low-and-middle-come countries, these countries have at least contributed much more positively than the US, which withdrew from talks ahead of the conference over the refusal from the rest of the world to delete the goal of 'sustainable development' from the text.
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Martin Prior of Northampton jailed for abuse of young girls
A man has been jailed after being found guilty of sexually abusing young Prior, of Crestline Court, Northampton, was found guilty at Northampton Crown Court of seven offences, including sexual assault of a girl under the age of 13 and causing or inciting a girl under 13 to engage in sexual a sentencing hearing on Friday at the same court, the 36-year-old was jailed for a total of nine years and must serve at least two-thirds of the sentence before being eligible for Con Laura Beeby of Northamptonshire Police described Prior as a "sexual predator" who targeted children for "his own gratification". 'Abhorrent offending' The offences took place during the mid to late 2000s, but only came to light in 2020 when the survivors disclosed the abuse to police during an unrelated investigation. During the inquiry, officers identified at least three victims. Prior was subsequently charged with one count of rape of a girl under 13, six counts of sexual assault on a girl under 13, one count of assault of a female, and one count of inciting a girl under 13 to engage in sexual was found not guilty of the assault and rape charges but was convicted of the remaining seven was also given a Sexual Harm Prevention Order and will remain on the sex offenders' register Con Beeby added: "All of these children were vulnerable due to their age, and the repeated abuse Prior subjected them to has caused them significant and lasting harm and distress. The courage in finally revealing Prior's abhorrent offending cannot be overstated."The only shame and guilt in a case like this lies with the offender, and I hope this outcome can provide some small comfort to the survivors as they continue to heal." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Selfless and loving' man, 29, dies after being pulled from sea at popular holiday spot
A 29-year-old man died on the beach after going on his first holiday with friends to Skegness, his heartbroken family has said. Aaron Keightley was pulled from the sea by lifeguards south of the central beach in Skegness, Lincolnshire, at around 3.30pm on Monday. A fundraiser has been set up by his sister Shannon Smith on GoFundMe, aiming to collect £8,000 to help the family get his body transported home and cover funeral costs. Mr Keightley's heartbroken sister said: 'My brother lost his whole future. He went on his first friends' holiday and lost his life to the sea on Skegness beach. 'Not only do we as a family have to get through this heart-wrenching pain but we have to now somehow get him back home from Hull, before we can even start to grieve his loss which can cost us thousands. 'We really want to give him everything and more and show him how loved and adored he is and always will be, there will never be another person like him so selfless and loving.' She said her brother would 'give anyone his last pound' and he deserved a 'great send off'. 'He will forever be 29. No age to lose your life - his mum, dad and siblings are hurting beyond belief,' she added. A RNLI Lifeguards representative in Lincolnshire told The Independent: 'At 3.30pm yesterday, lifeguards in Skegness recovered an unconscious member of the public from the water south of central beach, after he got into difficulty in the surf. 'Despite their best efforts to resuscitate him, the casualty sadly passed away at the scene. Our thoughts go to the family and friends affected by the incident, along with many of the beach visitors who witnessed the tragic events at the time.' A 60-year-old man died in May after trying to help two children who appeared to be in distress in the sea near Skegness.
