
Timekettle W4 Pro vs Google Translate: Is premium hardware a step up from the free app?
Matt Horne / Android Authority
Timekettle's AI Interpreter Earbuds aim to usher in a 'new era of seamless global business interactions.' That's a bold goal, but a device that can fluidly translate a two-way conversation in real time might just achieve it. We've put the device through its paces by running side-by-side comparisons to see how the W4 Pro stacks up against Google Translate's Conversation Mode, on its own and when paired with the Pixel Buds Pro 2.
What is the Timekettle W4 Pro?
Matt Horne / Android Authority
The Timekettle W4 Pro is a pair of open-ear AI-powered interpreter earbuds engineered for real-time conversations across languages. Unlike traditional translation apps that rely on and turn-taking, the W4 Pro is built for fluid, two-way speech. With support for 40 languages and 93 accents, and powered by the advanced Babel OS platform, it enables multiple conversation modes. This includes One-on-One, which lets two people speak freely while wearing one earbud each.
Designed for a professional level of clarity and speed, the W4 Pro also supports offline translation, phone call translation, and even real-time subtitles while watching video content.
Google Translate: Free, but limited
Matt Horne / Android Authority
Google Translate's Conversation Mode is a solid starting point for multilingual communication. It's free, easy to use, and can get you through basic interactions. For simple travel phrases or transactional exchanges, it does the job well enough. But like most app-based systems, it's built around turn-taking. You tap the mic, speak, and wait.
Accuracy is generally good, though it occasionally stumbles over informal phrasing and filler words. The voice output is functional but lacks emotional nuance. Most notably, the app won't start translating until the speaker has clearly finished, leading to long pauses that can break the flow of conversation.
With the Pixel Buds Pro 2
Matt Horne / Android Authority
Adding Pixel Buds Pro 2 into the mix gives the experience a more private feel, at least in theory. In practice, Google Translate still depends entirely on the phone's mic for voice pickup. When you wear both buds, you can hear translations in your ears, but your responses are only displayed on-screen for the recipient.
Using one bud each, you hear all of the translated speech so both of you listen to the lines intended for the other person. There's no way to split the audio directionally in this setup, which makes the experience feel messy.
Ultimately, while Google Translate with Pixel Buds adds convenience, it doesn't change the core experience. You still have to take turns and tap the screen between speakers, and the system lacks the fluidity you'd want in more natural conversation.
Timekettle W4 Pro: Built for dialogue
Speaking and Listening Modes
Matt Horne / Android Authority
The Speaking and Listening modes on the Timekettle W4 Pro are the most familiar options for users coming from translation apps like Google Translate. One person wears both earbuds in these modes, although the input and output methods depend on who's speaking. In Speaking mode, the wearer of the buds speaks into the three-mic arrays of the W4 Pro, with the translation played from the phone speaker for the other person. In Listening mode, the phone mic will pick up the non-wearer's dialogue, with the translation delivered privately through the buds.
What sets the W4 Pro apart, even in this more familiar setup, is its responsiveness. It initially awaits an imminent pause, but if the speaker continues uninterrupted, it quickly processes and speaks the translation, helping conversations feel more fluid. In that sense, it's reminiscent of a high-functioning human interpreter, softly speaking the translation in your ear while simultaneously listening out for the next part of the conversation.
It's reminiscent of a high-functioning human interpreter, softly speaking the translation in your ear.
The Vector Noise Cancelation also comes into play for the person wearing the buds, fading the speaker out a little for a more focused experience. It's like seeing an interviewee talking on a show with the dubbed English translation over the top.
Translation accuracy appears equal to or better than Google Translate in testing, and latency is marginally quicker. The nuance and timbre of the voices (you can choose male or female) on the Timekettle W4 Pro also sound more natural than the robotic tone of Google Translate.
These modes are best suited for situations where one person does most of the talking and the other primarily listens, such as business meetings or presentations. They're not as good as One-on-One mode for rapid, two-way dialogue, but they're a clear improvement over Google Translate, where you hear both sides of the translations and may wait long periods before interpretation begins.
One-on-One Mode
Matt Horne / Android Authority
This is where the W4 Pro truly stands out. One-on-One Mode enables two people to each wear one earbud and speak freely, without screen taps or even needing the phone in earshot. Each earbud can record and play audio, letting you sit back and focus entirely on the conversation.
This makes a huge difference in practice. Conversations no longer feel like turn-based interactions. You can speak naturally, interject, and even overlap at times. Even if you deliberately try to interrupt each other mid-sentence, the system still manages to separate and translate the essential content accurately. That kind of resilience is what makes the W4 Pro feel less like a gadget and more like a tool.
It also solved one of the core frustrations of other setups: hearing both sides of the conversation. With One-on-One Mode, each person only hears the translation of what the other is saying, and not that of their own speech. It's easier to focus without needing to filter out audio that wasn't meant for you mentally, and it adds to the feeling that you each have your own personal translator on your shoulder.
Whether you're sitting close together or across a table with music in the background, the mic pickup stays consistent. The lack of screen interaction makes it feel like you are speaking directly.
Real-world performance and extra features
Matt Horne / Android Authority
The W4 Pro's open-ear design doesn't isolate sound as tightly as in-ear buds, but thanks to directional microphones and noise cancelation, translation quality holds up well even with background chatter, and even continues to deliver strong voice pickup in noisier locations like sports venues.
Alongside its core translation modes, other W4 Pro features add to its versatility: Phone calls: Real-time call translation performed well in back-and-forth speech. While overlapping voices created some confusion for the party without the W4 Pro, it's still a very useful tool if you need to make an important call to someone with whom you don't share a common tongue.
Real-time call translation performed well in back-and-forth speech. While overlapping voices created some confusion for the party without the W4 Pro, it's still a very useful tool if you need to make an important call to someone with whom you don't share a common tongue. Media playback: Watching YouTube with floating translated subtitles from the Timekettle app proved surprisingly effective. Even fast speech and slang-heavy content remained understandable, which would be a huge plus for language learners or casual viewers.
Watching YouTube with floating translated subtitles from the Timekettle app proved surprisingly effective. Even fast speech and slang-heavy content remained understandable, which would be a huge plus for language learners or casual viewers. Offline mode: A downloaded language pack for offline use delivered solid results, with English-Spanish among the 13 packs available. Relying on the device in areas with poor connectivity is a major advantage for travel and business.
A downloaded language pack for offline use delivered solid results, with English-Spanish among the 13 packs available. Relying on the device in areas with poor connectivity is a major advantage for travel and business. LLM translation: A trial feature in the Timekettle app uses AI to fit translations into a better context. It showed promise in Listening, Speaking, and One-on-One modes, delivering a more natural conversational flow while staying true to the speaker's message.
Timekettle W4 Pro: Verdict
Matt Horne / Android Authority
Tools like Google Translate are simple to use and fairly effective, especially considering they're free. They're great for travel, quick phrases, or one-off conversations. However, when the goal is to hold a fluid, back-and-forth discussion across languages, their limitations start to show.
The Timekettle W4 Pro stands out because, especially in One-on-One Mode, it unlocks the way real multilingual conversation should work. No tapping on screens or overlong pauses while the system waits for the other person to finish. It's an entirely different experience, particularly for professionals who might otherwise be paying for an interpreter. The $449 retail price is significant, but in that context, it might often prove to be a cost-effective investment. If the goal is to speak naturally and be understood, without tech getting in the way, it's hard to imagine a more intuitive solution on the market.
Comparison across major translation earbuds models
Timekettle
Timekettle W4 Pro
Timekettle W4 Pro
One-on-One mode enables hands-free conversations • Accurate, fast translations • Comfortable open-ear design
MSRP: $449.00
The Timekettle W4 Pro are AI-powered interpreter earbuds that support real-time, bidirectional translation across 40 languages and 93 accents. They offer multiple modes for conversations, meetings, media playback, and phone calls, with offline translation for select languages. The open-ear design supports up to six hours of continuous use, and the app works with both iOS and Android.
See price at Manufacturer site
See price at Amazon

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analyst Says He's Buying Cisco (CSCO) Amid Attractive Valuation – ‘Definitely Benefitting from AI'
Jim Lebenthal from CNBC Investment Committee said in a recent program on CNBC that he's buying Cisco Systems Inc (NASDAQ:CSCO) shares. "Cisco Systems Inc (NASDAQ:CSCO), if you look at the earnings revisions, is definitely going higher and it's with good reason. If you've listened to their last several earnings calls, they are definitely benefiting from AI, definitely benefiting from the data center buildout, and it's just not reflected in the multiple," he said. Engineers using the latest Cisco TelePresence technology to collaborate with colleagues around the world. GreensKeeper Asset Management stated the following regarding Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) in its Q3 2024 investor letter: 'In the third quarter, we decided to exit our investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO), as we believed the stock had become fully valued and reallocated the capital to one of our international positions. We also initiated a new position in a Canadian company shortly after the quarter ended. As we may still accumulate shares, we will defer discussing this new holding for the time being. Our top ten positions are detailed in the table below. Further portfolio disclosures, including performance statistics, are available on the pages immediately following this letter.' While we acknowledge the potential of CSCO as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jessica Inskip Explains AI Growth Catalysts for IBM Stock
Jessica Inskip from recently said while talking to Schwab Network that she likes International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) because of the company's growth catalysts related to enterprise and AI. 'I've liked IBM for quite some time because it's an enterprise solution that offers consulting but also a lot of technology solutions for enterprises. And that's really important as we think about AI. We want to see our investors—really, the market wants to see that—translate into earnings, and IBM is the leader in that and the beginner of that.' Inskip also talked about a recent bullish call on IBM Common Stock (NYSE:IBM) from Wall Street: 'On top of that, the headline that caught my attention today was that with Deutsche Bank, where they were praising IBM for helping to modernize and strengthen their infrastructure. That IBM had a very large role in their large-scale digital transformation. And on top of that, AI plus cloud tailwinds. So if we think about the needs for AI, if you're a company and you're not on the cloud, that's step one in order for you to access AI and start getting those types of solutions. IBM is a solution for you. So with growing exposure to cloud migration and AI, IBM's positioned for that. They are absolutely going to capture that, and it's an essential enterprise infrastructure for AI but also blockchain and cloud.' Photo by Ruben Sukatendel on Unsplash As of the end of Q4, IBM's AI products and services surpassed $5 billion in total bookings, with $2 billion added just since last quarter. Last year, IBM updated its Granite family of AI models for enterprise use, making them about 90% more cost-efficient than large models. RedHat is also key in IBM's open-source GenAI strategy. Management highlighted that RHEL AI and OpenShift AI platforms are gaining traction, along with IBM's watsonx AI solutions. The company expects its software business to grow by at least 10% in 2025, up from 8.3% growth in 2024. While we acknowledge the potential of IBM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
Quantum, Moore's Law, And AI's Future
microchip integrated on motherboard In the game of AI acceleration, there are several key moving parts. One of them is hardware: what do the chips look like? And this is a very interesting question. Another is quantum computing: what role will it play? Another is scaling. Everyone from CEOs and investors to engineers is scrambling to figure out what the future looks like, but we got a few ideas from a recent panel at Imagination in Action that assembled some of the best minds on the matter. WSE and the Dinner Plate of Reasoning Not too long ago, I wrote about the Cerebras WSE chip, a mammoth piece of silicon about the size of a dinner plate, that is allowing the centralization of large language model efforts. This is an impressive piece of hardware by any standard, and has a role in coalescing the vanguard of what we are doing with AI hardware. In the aforementioned panel discussion, Julie Choi from Cerebras started by showing off the company's WSE superchip, noting that some call it the 'caviar of inference.' (I thought that was funny.) 'I think that as we evolve, we're just going to see even more innovative, novel approaches at the hardware architecture level,' she said. 'The optimization space is extremely large,' said Dinesh Maheshwari, discussing architecture and compute units. 'So I encourage everyone to look at it.' Panelist Caleb Sirak, also of MIT, talked about ownership of hardware. 'As the models themselves start to change, how can businesses themselves integrate them directly and get them for a fair price, but also convert that AI, and the energy involved, into a productive utility?' 'What is a computer, and what can a computer do?' asked Alexander Keesling, explaining his company's work on hardware. 'We took the fundamental unit of matter, a single atom, and turned it into the fundamental unit of information, which is a quantum bit … a quantum computer is the first time in human history where we can take advantage of the fundamental properties of nature to do something that is different and more powerful.' Jeremy Kepner of MIT's Lincoln Lab had some thoughts on the singularity of computing – not the race toward AGI, but a myopic centralization of an overarching 'operation.' 'Every single computer in the high end that we built for the last many decades has only done one operation,' he said. 'So there's a lot to unpack there, but it's for very deep mathematical and physics reasons: that's the only operation we've ever been able to figure out how to accelerate over many decades. And so what I often tell the users is, the computer picks the application. AI happens to be acceleratable by that operation.' He urged the audience to move forward in a particular way. 'Think about whatever you want to do, and if you can accelerate it with that kind of mathematical operation, you know the sky is the limit on what you can do,' he said. 'And someone in your field will figure it out, and they will move ahead dramatically.' Engineering Challenges and AI Opportunities The panel also mentioned some of the headwinds that innovators must contend with. On the other hand, Jeff Grover noted the near-term ability of systems to evolve. 'We're actually quite excited about this,' he said. The Software End Panelists discussed the relevance of software and the directions that coding is going in. 'Programming languages are built for people,' Sirak said. 'How do you actually change that to build languages and tools that AI can use?' Choi mentioned benchmarks like inference rates of 2900 tokens per second for Llama 4. 'Open source models are rich for developers,' she said. 'What that's doing is building a bridge between the bravest developers. I would say the early adopters tend to be very courageous, and they're willing to code on things that they've never seen before.' The Fast Car Several panelists talked about a particular metaphor to a Ferrari, with Choi referencing 'Ferrari-level' speeds for the Cerebras chip. Maheshwari talked about 'exotic' chips, and design from an architecture paradigm, comparing certain builds to 'picking up groceries in a Ferrari.' He also mentioned the imperative of keeping the technology 'street legal.' Moore's Law and Progress Kepner talked about being surprised by what computers can do, and the size of investment in the industry. Moore's law, he said, implied an upper limit for spending. He predicted another decade of efficiencies, and cited the Ozaki scheme, a matrix method for preserving precision in calculations. What About Quantum? 'I think that the first area where we're going to see quantum computing impact is going to be in research,' Keesling said. 'These problems, at their core, are (about) trying to answer what happens when atoms and electrons interact with one another and develop these emergent behaviors … how we think about chemistry, how we think about drug interactions, how we think about material properties, all comes from electrons and atoms moving.' There was a lot to unpack in this panel discussion, including details on how we're going to achieve progress in the next few years. The Ozaki Scheme Going back to this matrix idea, I was not familiar with this term, so I looked it up and asked ChatGPT to describe it in basic English. 'It's named after Makoto Ozaki, the person who came up with the idea,' the model told me. 'He found a smart way to do very accurate math (like multiplying big grids of numbers) using fast but less accurate tools (like low-precision numbers). His method splits the work into small, simple steps and then carefully puts the pieces back together to get the exact right answer.' Going further, ChatGPT, just to be nice, even gave me a medieval storyline to show how the Ozaki scheme works, and to contrast it to other alternatives. I'm just going to print that here, because it's interesting. The Tale of the Kingdom of Matrixland In the kingdom of Matrixland, the royal court has a big job: multiplying giant tables of numbers (called matrices). But the royal calculator is slow when it uses fancy, high-precision numbers. So the King holds a contest: 'Who can multiply big matrices both quickly and accurately?' Sir Ozaki's Clever Trick Sir Ozaki, a wise mathematician, enters the contest. He says: 'I'll break each matrix into small, easy pieces that the royal calculator can handle quickly. Then I'll multiply those simple parts and put them back together perfectly.' The crowd gasps! His method is fast and still gives the exact right answer. The King declares it the Ozaki Scheme. The Other Contestants But other knights have tricks too: Lady Refina (Iterative Refinement) She does the quick math first, then checks her work. If it's off, she fixes it — again and again — until it's just right. She's very accurate, but takes more time. Sir Compenso (Compensated Summation) He notices small errors that get dropped during math and catches them before they vanish. He's good at adding accurately, but can't handle full matrix multiplication like Ozaki. Lady Mixie (Mixed Precision) She charges in with super speed, using tiny fast numbers (like FP8 or FP16). Her answers aren't perfect, but they're 'good enough' for training the kingdom's magical beasts (AI models). Baron TensorFloat (TF32) He uses a special number format invented by the kingdom's engineers. Faster than full precision, but not as sharp as Ozaki. A favorite of the castle's GPU-powered wizard lab. The Ending Sir Ozaki's method is the most exact while still using fast tools. Others are faster or simpler, but not always perfect. The King declares: 'All of these knights are useful, depending on the task. But if you want both speed and the exact answer, follow Sir Ozaki's path!' Anyway, you have a range of ideas here about quantum computing, information precision, and acceleration in the years to come. Let me know what you think about what all of these experts have said about the future of AI.