Starmer braces for major welfare rebellion
MPs are due to vote for the first time on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at 7pm.
Sir Keir hoped he had defused the revolt last week after he caved in to rebel demands to water down some of his welfare cuts.
But the Prime Minister is still facing a rebellion by dozens of Labour MPs who are due to vote against the Bill because they believe the Government's concessions do not go far enough amid concerns it will push tens of thousands of people into poverty.
Some 39 Labour MPs have signed a new amendment designed to torpedo the legislation.
That would be far short of the 83 needed to overturn the Government's majority and to kill the Bill but a rebellion of 39 would still represent a hammer blow to Sir Keir's authority.
Join the conversation in the comments section below.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Home Office unaware if foreign workers leave UK after visas end, MPs say
The Home Office does not know whether foreign workers are leaving the UK or staying to work illegally after their visas expire, a cross-party committee of MPs has said. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC), which scrutinises government spending, said the Home Office had failed to analyse exit checks since the skilled worker visa route was introduced in 2020 under the 1.18 million people have applied to come to the UK via this route between its launch in December 2020 and the end of Home Office said earlier this year that it was working to modernise border security and boost digital checks. The BBC has approached the Home Office for comment on the report. The skilled worker visa route replaced the Tier 2 (General) work visa after the UK left the European Union. The route was expanded in 2022 by the previous Conservative government to address skill shortages and job vacancies in health and social care in the wake of the Covid pandemic, driving net migration to record the PAC has accused the Home Office of failing to gather "basic information" on whether people leave the UK after their visas expire and showing "little curiosity about how the route was operating".Its report said the department still relied on airline passenger records to check if someone had left the country and that there had been no analysis of those records since 2020. It added that the Home Office needed to set out what measures would be put in place to record when people had left the report also said there was "widespread evidence of workers suffering debt bondage, working excessive hours and exploitative conditions" and accused the department of being "slow and ineffective" to tackle May, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the government would end overseas recruitment for care workers as part of the plans to curb near record net Office Permanent Secretary Dame Antonia Romeo has also said overstaying is a "problem" the department was "fixing".
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Barrister who is set to defend 'Starmer fire bomber' is fined after being caught drinking brandy in his car during a lunch break... of a trial
The barrister set to represent an alleged fire bomber of Sir Keir Starmer 's house has been fined after he was caught drinking from a bottle of brandy in his car during a lunch break - of a trial. Dominic Charles D'Souza will defend one of the men charged over suspected arson attacks on the Prime Minister's properties this year. But he has received a slight setback after being forced to cough up £3,000 by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) for 'professional misconduct' after his daydrinking caused a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court, east London to collapse in March 2023. The judge at the criminal trial was informed about the barrister's drinking and discharged the jury, the Telegraph reports. Mr D'Souza, who describes himself as the 'exceptionally charismatic' head of crime at London's Goldsmith Chambers law firm, was filmed by a van driver tucking into a couple of sips of brandy while he sat in the driver's seat. A BSB tribunal said: 'The film shows [Mr D'Souza] to take two short drinks from a bottle of spirits.' The barrister initially denied drinking alcohol on that occasion, claiming instead that he had been swigging Kombucha from the bottle. He later admitted drinking brandy, adding he 'was ill he took drink to calm his stomach'. The tribunal report says: 'When a report of this behaviour was made to the judge, Mr D'Souza withdrew from the case, the jury was discharged, and a new date was fixed for the criminal trial.' The panel found he had 'behaved in a way which was likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in him or in the profession'. It added he had 'behaved in a way which foreseeably interfered with the administration of justice' and 'wasted the time of the court'. The report concluded: 'It is difficult to conceive of a situation more likely to cause public disquiet than a barrister engaged in a trial sitting in the driver's seat of a car in the Crown Court car park drinking directly from a bottle of spirits. 'However, we bear in mind that [Mr D'Souza] believed himself to be acting unobserved in private, that he drank very little, and that he did so misguidedly in circumstances when he was unwell. 'There is no suggestion that [Mr D'Souza] was drunk before or after the event; in fact the evidence suggests he had performed effectively in Court.' Mr D'Souza admitted the three disciplinary charges brought against him was fined £3,000 and ordered to pay costs of £2,670. It comes after he posted a pictured from inside his Tesla in 2021, appearing to show him driving at 59mph. He claimed he had been 'parked in a service station' when it was taken and not driving. No action was taken against the barrister as he avoided the maxium punishment of a £200 fine and six points on his licence. The photo posted by Mr D'Souza looked as if it could only have been taken from the driver's seat with the digital dashboard of the vehicle clearly visible. Mr D'Souza posted the photo on his LinkedIn page and captioned it: 'On the way to Manchester in the most miserable weather, but thanks heavens I have an electric car otherwise I would not be getting there at all!'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office 'does not know' how many foreign workers stay in Britain to work illegally after visas expire, MPs warn
The Home Office fails to collect 'basic information' on foreign workers including whether they carry on working illegally in the UK at the end of their visas, MPs have warned. The Commons' Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found the department 'does not know' how many foreign visa holders leave the country when they are supposed to. A damning new report, published today, raised serious concerns about the operation of the skilled worker visa system which was brought in at the end of 2020. It comes after a Daily Mail investigation into a 'cash for care jobs scandal' last year found some agents charging overseas applicants fees of up to £20,000 to help them get a visa allowing them to come – and stay – here. The PAC's report said: 'We asked the Home Office whether it knows if people leave the country when their visa expires. 'The Home Office told us the only way that it can tell if people are still in the country is to match the data it holds on individuals with the passenger data it receives on people using airlines. 'The Home Office has not analysed exit checks since the route was introduced and does not know what proportion of people return to their home country after their visa has expired, and how many may be working illegally in the United Kingdom.' It added that officials had told the committee the problem 'was not solved' but there was 'scope to strengthen exit checks' under a new digital visa system currently being rolled out. The cross-party committee of MPs urged the Home Office to do far more to tackle visa overstayers. It recommended the department should 'undertake a full assessment … to identify gaps in its response', including studies of specific work sectors which should be updated every six months. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper should also make sure the Home Office can 'identify what data is needed to strengthen its response, including how to better understand what happens to people at the end of their visa', it added. PAC chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said: 'From when the government opened the skilled worker visa route in December 2020 up to the end of 2024, 1.18million people applied to enter the UK. 'Our report finds that this speed came at a painfully high cost – to the safety of workers from the depredations of labour market abuses, and the integrity of the system from people not following the rules. 'There has long been mounting evidence of serious issues with the system, laid bare once again in our inquiry. 'And yet basic information, such as how many people on skilled worker visas have been modern slavery victims, and whether people leave the UK after their visas expire, seems to still not have been gathered by government.' In the wake of the visa changes in 2020, net migration – the difference between those coming to live long-term in Britain and those emigrating – hit a record 906,000 in the 12 months to June 2023. It then fell to 413,000 last calendar year after the Tory government tightened the rules. A visa allowing overseas recruitment of care workers was particularly vulnerable to abuse, and saw 648,100 applications, including dependants, between 2022 and last year. Earlier this week the Home Office set out measures to phase out foreign care worker recruitment, plus a range of other new restrictions on other types of visa. Sir Geoffrey added: 'Further changes are now underway in this system, with an end to the overseas recruitment of care workers. 'Without effective cross-government working, there is a risk that these changes will exacerbate challenges for the care sector. 'Government now needs to develop a deeper understanding of the role that immigration plays in sector workforce strategies, as well as how domestic workforce plans will help address skills shortages. 'Government no longer has the excuse of the global crisis caused by the pandemic if it operates this system on the fly, and without due care.'
