logo
Amarillo City Council takeaways: Election results, public accusations, police chief search

Amarillo City Council takeaways: Election results, public accusations, police chief search

Yahoo09-07-2025
The Amarillo City Council on Tuesday, July 8 approved two resolutions affirming and clarifying the results of the May 3 and June 7 municipal elections, aiming to resolve lingering procedural concerns while drawing sharp criticism from a resident who contended the actions violated state law.
The council also voted to move forward with the city's search for a new police chief, approving a contract with a national recruitment firm specializing in public safety leadership.
Resolutions No. 07-08-25-2 and No. 07-08-25-3 attach previously omitted voting tabulations and certificates of election from the May 3 general election and the June 7 runoff. City officials said the documents had been part of the original canvassing process but were not included in the initial resolutions.
'These actions are consistent with state law and ensure completeness of the record and transparency for the public,' City Manager Grayson Path told council members. 'The results and outcomes remain unchanged.'
The resolutions passed unanimously among the three members present: Mayor Cole Stanley, Councilmember Les Simpson, and Councilmember David Prescott. Councilmembers Don Tipps and Tim Reid were absent.
Mayor Stanley said the city followed Texas Election Code and described the resolutions as 'an affirmation and clarification — not a re-canvass.'
'We simply received the tabulated results and fulfilled our duty under the law,' Stanley said. 'This doesn't change the election outcome, but it does complete the public record.'
He said any concerns about election procedures should be directed to the county election administrator, not the council, which hires the county to run city elections. Stanley acknowledged the need for clearer communication and said policy updates are likely.
During public comment, Amarillo resident Michael Ford challenged the legality of the city's actions. He argued the elections had not been lawfully canvassed and that the newly passed resolutions were an attempt to retroactively validate flawed procedures.
'All I've asked, and all the law requires, is that you hold a lawful canvass,' Ford said. 'Open the sealed returns, tabulate the votes by precinct, and include early voting — recorded in the minutes.'
He contended that the city's failure to perform a public canvass in accordance with Texas Election Code Section 67.004 rendered the certificates of election invalid. Ford warned that the council was knowingly adopting false records and cited several sections of state law outlining potential criminal penalties.
In a direct challenge, he questioned the legitimacy of newly seated Place 3 Councilmember David Prescott and others.
'You are not legally qualified to be here,' Ford said. 'Per the Secretary of State, no lawful canvass means no lawful certificate, no lawful oath, and no legal authority.'
Mayor Stanley did not directly respond to Ford's accusations during the meeting but emphasized afterward that 'everyone has a right to raise concerns' and that the council took an extra step 'to close the loop and provide transparency.'
The council also approved a contract with Public Sector Search & Consulting Inc., a California-based firm composed of former law enforcement executives who specialize in police and fire chief recruitments. The firm has conducted high-profile searches in cities like Dallas, Irving, Killeen, and Oklahoma City, and it has developed a national reputation for identifying community-oriented law enforcement leaders.
Deputy City Manager Andrew Freeman said the firm was selected from a competitive pool of 10 applicants. It stood out for its deep law enforcement knowledge and exclusive focus on public safety recruitment.
'They've built a strong national network of candidates and are constantly engaged with active and emerging police leaders through conferences and association events,' Freeman said. 'They understand what modern policing requires, and they know what Amarillo needs.'
The contract carries a base cost of $42,500 and is expected to exceed $50,000 with travel and logistical expenses. It will be paid for using salary savings from the currently vacant chief position.
Freeman said the process is already underway and includes stakeholder engagement, department input, and the creation of a recruitment brochure. Finalists — expected to number between three and five — will visit Amarillo for interviews and public forums.
'We're going to work with the firm to define the qualities we're looking for — someone with leadership strength, a commitment to transparency, and a strong sense of community connection,' he said.
The city hopes to have a new chief in place by November or December.
The council also authorized $3.8 million in funding for street preservation projects, including microsurfacing and cape seal work. The funds are part of a larger $11-12 million effort to address long-deferred infrastructure needs. Residents can track project locations through an online city map.
Stanley reaffirmed the city's opt-out policy on automated water meters and emphasized their benefits: real-time leak detection, accurate billing, and usage tracking.
He also addressed a shift in how public comments are managed during council meetings, including the return of a visible countdown timer to enforce speaking limits.
'Public meetings are about balance,' he said. 'We've made it easier for people to speak, but we also need to manage time to serve everyone.'
As the city addresses calls for greater transparency and prepares to select new public safety leadership, Stanley said the focus remains on public trust and progress.
'We're listening,' he said. 'And we're committed to doing the work to earn people's trust moving forward.'
This article originally appeared on Amarillo Globe-News: City council votes on election affirmation, police chief search firm
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

50 Cent Gloats As Trump Nixes Pardon For 'Half-Innocent' Diddy, For Now
50 Cent Gloats As Trump Nixes Pardon For 'Half-Innocent' Diddy, For Now

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

50 Cent Gloats As Trump Nixes Pardon For 'Half-Innocent' Diddy, For Now

Donald Trump believes Sean 'Diddy' Combs is 'half-innocent' out of his sex-trafficking trial, but there will be no presidential pardon right now for the much-accused Grammy winner. And, just two days after Deadline exclusively reported that Trump was 'seriously considering' such a pardon and the White House played its cards close to the chest, Friday's no pardon stance makes Diddy foe 50 Cent very happy indeed. More from Deadline Sydney Sweeney American Eagle Ad Addressed By Clothing Company Amidst Partisan Uproar In Reaction To Dismal Jobs Report, Donald Trump Says He's Ordered Commissioner Of Labor Statistics To Be Fired Corporation For Public Broadcasting To Shut Down Operations After Loss Of Federal Funding 'Can you believe he thought he was getting pardoned,' the Power franchise EP and pro-Trump rapper posted on social media with an AI generated image late Friday after a still grievance fueled POTUS told Newsmax he wasn't inclined to grant Combs a get outta jail card. 'No Sir, you are not. You said very nasty things.' Yet, Trump being Trump, it could all change on a dime. Sticking it to federal prosecutors sweeping case, the eight-men and four-women jury just found Combs guilty of lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution on July 2. Though the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York now want self-declared swinger and domestic violence perpetrator Combs to continued to be denied getting out on a $50 million bond and be sentenced to several years behind bars on October 2, the reality is the not guilty decision on the harsh sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges was a serious blow for now fired lead prosecutor Maurene Comey and her team. Part of Trump's public and behind closed door dalliance with a Combs pardon is to stick a knife in the family of ex-FBI Director James Comey. The president also wants to punish what he views as an overreaching and too independent SDNY, sources tell me. Earlier Friday, months after Curtis '50 Cent' Jackson promised he would try to talk Trump out of any Combs pardon, the 'In Da Club' rapper posted a clip from the former Celebrity Apprentice host's sit-down with the fledgling conservative cable newswer where Trump agreed with reporter Rob Finnerty that any pardon for Diddy would 'more likely be a no.' Amidst a clemency campaign from Combs loyalists to the White House and those close to the transactional POTUS and Trump being Trump, the pardon 'no' tonight was qualified. Right after a discussion about a pardon for Jeffrey Epstein's newly cooperative confidant Ghislaine Maxwell, Finnerty asked: 'Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Would you consider pardoning him?' To which, a typically self-centered Trump replied: 'Well, he was essentially, I guess, sort of half innocent. Probably— I was very friendly with him but when I ran for office he was very hostile and it's hard. So, I don't know, it's more difficult.' Espousing ignorance one moment and then intimate knowledge the next about both Maxwell and Combs, Trump was just slightly less inclined towards the latter back in May when he was when asked about a pardon for the now convicted Bad Boy Records founder. 'I would certainly look at the facts if I think somebody was mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me,' Trump said on May 30 in the Oval Office just a couple of weeks after Combs' eventually eight-week long and often horrifically depraved trial began. Since our story on Combs receiving a possible pardon, MAGA media standard-bearers such as Megyn Kelly have pleaded Trump not to give the one-time mogul a pass. 'MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other,' the ex-Fox News host said on July 30. 'This would not help. GOP struggling (with) young female voters, most of whom will hate a Diddy pardon,' Kelly exclaimed in a pretty convincing argument that also served as a warning shot to the transactional and media thin skinned Trump Staring at a maximum of 20 years for the prostitution charges he was found guilty of, Combs remains at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. Diddy has been at the often criticized facility since his arrest last September in a NYC hotel. Trying to quell a MAGA uprising over the withholding of the promised files on the vile Epstein, who died in custody in 2019, Trump has been letting loose even more of a barrage of distractions that usual to direct attention away from his well-known relationship with convicted and well-connected sex offender Epstein and what the files may say about him. To that, just days after being granted immunity in a two-day conversation with a top DOJ official, the 20-year sentenced Maxwell was suddenly moved out of federal prison in Florida to a low-security prison camp in Texas. Maxwell, Combs …nothing to see here. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More

US president Donald Trump sacks jobs data chief after dismal employment report
US president Donald Trump sacks jobs data chief after dismal employment report

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US president Donald Trump sacks jobs data chief after dismal employment report

US President Donald Trump on Friday fired the head of the government agency in charge of monthly jobs data after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported. In a post on his social media platform, Trump alleged that the figures by the Bureau of Labor Statistics were manipulated for political reasons, saying Erika McEntarfer, the director of the agency who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, should be fired. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' The US leader later posted: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' While Trump provided no evidence, the charge that the data was faked was seen as an explosive reaction that threatens to undercut the political legitimacy of the US government's economic data. For decades, Wall Street investors and economists have mostly believed the data to be free from political bias. McEntarfer's removal condemned After Trump's initial post, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS,' Chavez-DeRemer said. But condemnation soon followed. A group that included two former BLS commissioners, including William Beach, who was appointed by Trump to the position, berated McEntarfer's firing. They particularly objected to the charge that the data was altered for political reasons. 'This rationale for firing Dr. McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers,' the statement from the group, the Friends of BLS, said. Beach and former President Barack Obama's BLS commissioner, Erica Groshen, signed the letter. 'Firing the Commissioner ... when the BLS revises jobs numbers down (as it routinely does) threatens to destroy trust in core American institutions and all government statistics,' Arin Dube, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, said on X. 'I can't stress how damaging this is.' Report shows 73,000 jobs were added in July Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated. The report indicated that the US economy has weakened significantly under Trump, following a slowdown in economic growth in the first half of the year and a spike in inflation in June, which appeared to be a result of the pressure on prices brought on by the president's tariffs. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate job numbers,' Trump wrote. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate; they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Related Fed's Powell leaves interest rates unchanged despite Trump demands Trump administration partners with Big Tech to launch health data tracking programme Trump has not always been so suspicious of the monthly jobs report and responded enthusiastically after the initial May figures came out on 6 June, when it was initially reported that the economy added 139,000 jobs. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG!' Trump posted at the time. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, and then further revised to just 19,000.

States sue Trump administration over access to care for transgender youths
States sue Trump administration over access to care for transgender youths

Washington Post

time26 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

States sue Trump administration over access to care for transgender youths

A coalition of more than a dozen states sued the Trump administration on Friday over health care for transgender young people, claiming the White House has 'relentlessly, cruelly, and unlawfully targeted transgender individuals' since President Donald Trump took office. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, seeks to have part of one executive order issued in January declared unconstitutional. The order targets gender-affirming care provided to people under the age of 19, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgical procedures, which it refers to as 'mutilation.' The lawsuit also asks the court to declare unlawful the Justice Department's targeting of providers of gender-affirming care. The section of the order that is being challenged directs the Justice Department to use laws such as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, those against female genital mutilation, and child custody legislation to carry out the administration's aims. 'It is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another,' Trump's order says, calling the treatments 'a stain on our Nation's history.' The states of Massachusetts, California, New York, Connecticut, Illinois, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wisconsin, as well as the District of Columbia and Josh Shapiro in his capacity as Pennsylvania governor, filed suit. The lawsuit, filed against Trump, the Justice Department and Attorney General Pam Bondi, argues that the executive order conflicts with states' remit to regulate and police medicine and violates the 10th Amendment, which protects states' powers, and is in conflict with many state antidiscrimination laws. Nearly every major medical association endorses the availability of gender-affirming care for transgender young people, citing reductions in depression, substance abuse and suicide attempts. 'Empirical evidence has demonstrated that trans and nonbinary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression,' the American Medical Association has said. But the issue, and others related to transgender people, has animated conservatives. Trump has said he wants the 'official policy of the United States' to be that there are only two genders and has referred to being transgender as a 'falsehood.' The administration has moved to ban transgender service members from the military, relocate incarcerated transgender women into men's prisons and bar transgender people from using restrooms that align with their gender identity in federal buildings, among a slew of anti-trans measures, many of which have been challenged in court. After the January order, the lawsuit says, the Justice Department began 'intimidating providers into ceasing care through threats of civil and criminal prosecution.' 'These threats have no basis in law,' the complaint says. 'No federal law prohibits, much less criminalizes, the provision or receipt of gender-affirming care for transgender adolescents.' Puberty blockers temporarily inhibit sex hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, and other hormone therapies introduce them to the body. Gender-affirming surgeries, such as breast reductions for transgender men, are rarely performed on minors. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in an email that 'everyday Americans resoundingly support' the administration's actions. 'The President has the lawful authority to protect America's vulnerable children through executive action, and the Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on this issue,' she added. In June, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store