UK government, museums urged to stop display of ancestral remains, repatriate them
For centuries, African ancestral remains, such as mummified bodies, skulls and other body parts, were brought to Britain and to other former colonial powers, often as "trophies" or as commodities to be traded and displayed.
There are growing calls worldwide for such remains, as well as looted art, to be repatriated to their communities or countries of origin.
Although some efforts have been made to confront the long-standing issue, African remains are still held in various institutions across the country, such as museums and universities.
"We cannot allow the dehumanisation of our ancestors," Connie Bell, from the 'Decolonising the Archive' project, said at an event on Wednesday organised by a cross-party parliamentary group on reparations, chaired by Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy.
In November 2024, Ribeiro-Addy brought the issue to parliament, saying colonial-era remains were being listed for sale by auction houses, on e-commerce platforms and social media.
A month before Ribeiro-Addy's remarks, an auction house in Tetsworth, Oxfordshire, withdrew a sale of such remains, including skulls from West Africa's Ekoi people, following criticism by native by local communities and advocates.
UK's deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said it was horrifying to hear Ribeiro-Addy's account, and agreed to further discuss the issue. A meeting with the culture minister will take place soon, Ribeiro-Addy said on Wednesday.
The cross-party group will present to the government 14 policy recommendations, including making all sales of remains illegal "on the basis they are not commercial objects but human beings".
The policy brief, produced by the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD), said the government should close loopholes in the Human Tissues Act 2004, which covers the removal, storage, use and disposal of human tissue.
The act does not, however, cover activities related to remains of people who died over a century ago, which excludes most ancestral remains held by museums and other institutions, AFFORD said.
AFFORD said the act should be amended to make public display of human remains an offence if done without consent. It also said a national restitution policy should be adopted, a body should be created to handle repatriation claims and collections of human remains should be mapped out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
39 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's tariff deadline delay brings hope, confusion to trade partners, businesses
WASHINGTON, (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's latest tariff delay provided some hope to major trade partners Japan, South Korea and the European Union that deals to ease duties could still be reached, while bewildering some smaller exporters such as South Africa and leaving companies with no clarity on the path forward. Trump's form letters to 14 countries informing them of planned tariff rates of 25% to 40% provided what he called a final warning on his 'reciprocal' tariffs, while pushing back Wednesday's previous deadline to August 1, a date he said on Tuesday was final, declaring: 'No extensions will be granted.' The move reflects Trump's frustration with trade negotiations that are proving lengthier and more complicated than the '90 deals in 90 days' that he expected, trade experts and administration officials say. The president, who announced on Tuesday a 50% tariff on imported copper and said long-threatened levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals were coming soon, said he has long favored simple tariffs over tedious trade talks that often involve red lines for some countries and their own requests for U.S. concessions. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba focused on the positive, saying his government would press ahead with negotiations toward a deal that 'benefits both countries, while protecting Japan's national interest.' Facing a 25% general U.S. tariff, Japan wants relief for its export-dependent auto industry from Trump's separate 25% automotive tariffs. It also has resisted demands for increased purchases of American rice. Japan, once viewed as an early favorite for a deal, faces an upper house election on July 20 and too many concessions could put Ishiba's ruling Liberal Democratic Party at risk. 'These countries are not folding. They're not giving him what he wants, so he's added another threat,' said William Reinsch, a former U.S. Commerce Department official who is a senior trade adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'He's put a new number to it and extended the deadline.' South Korea, where President Lee Jae Myung has been in office less than a month, also pledged to intensify talks for 'a mutually beneficial result' while analysts warned he would not be 'a pushover' for Trump or put South Korea at a disadvantage to Japan. Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, told Fox News on Tuesday more deals were possible even before the end of this week, as long as countries made concessions deemed worthy by Trump. India, in particular, looked close to a deal, but prospects were less clear for smaller countries such as South Africa, Thailand and Malaysia, which face tariffs of 30%, 36% and 25%, respectively. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa pushed back on Trump's 30% tariff rate, calling it out of sync with an average 7.6% South African tariff rate. But he instructed his negotiators to 'urgently engage' with Trump's team on a framework first submitted by the South African side on May 20. The Trump administration's negotiating time may be eaten up with larger partners, such as the EU, which did not get a warning letter or a change to its prescribed 20% tariff rate, double the 10% baseline. Sources familiar with the EU talks have told Reuters a deal could involve carve-outs for aircraft and parts, medical equipment and alcoholic spirits. They say the EU also wants certain automakers to export to the U.S. at rates below the 25% auto tariff. Such a deal would be similar to a framework agreement with the United Kingdom that had carve-outs for autos, steel and aircraft engines. Final squeeze After announcing his global 'Liberation Day' tariffs of 11%-50% in early April, Trump quickly dialed them back to 10% for most countries amid bond market turmoil to buy time for negotiations to lower foreign tariffs and trade barriers. Ryan Majerus, another former U.S. Commerce official, said Trump's three-month pause had not produced the desired results, and now the president was seeking to maximize his negotiating leverage. 'They're going to pressure-test things and see how far they can go, particularly for countries where there hasn't been any movement in the talks,' said Majerus, who is a partner at Washington's King and Spalding law firm. Steadier markets and strong economic data give Trump some room to maneuver, but time is short and 'the more granular you get in negotiating these things, the tougher the sledding gets,' he added. The deadline extension provides no relief to companies that are trying to keep up with Trump's tariffs. Executives say the rapidly shifting tariff landscape has paralyzed decision-making as they try to adjust their supply chains and cost structures to avoid tariff-induced price hikes. 'No company can really prepare for this,' said Hubertus Breier, chief technology officer for Germany's Lapp Holdings, a family-owned maker of cables, wires and robotics for factories. 'We are already incurring losses simply because of the uncertainty of the daily changing situation.' Lapp has difficult choices — absorb additional costs or pass them on to customers. Assuming permanently higher prices and costs, however, could threaten its long-term existence, Breier added. DeMejico, a family business in Valencia, California with a plant in Mexico that builds traditional Spanish and Mexican-style furniture, is struggling to adapt to Trump's 50% tariffs on imported steel. Robert Luna, the company's president, said the firm is importing heavy steel latches, hinges and trim parts separately to simplify the tariff calculation process and installing them at its Los Angeles-area showroom. The tariffs and higher U.S. wage costs are already inflating prices, and DeMejico faces further cost increases on furniture if Trump hits Mexico with a reciprocal tariff, Luna said. 'It's hard to do anything about this as a small business owner, so I just try to be stoic and see what happens,' Luna said, adding: 'My biggest worry is just keeping the company alive.' Luna said he thought the Trump administration was 'setting up the foundation to train people to pay tariffs.'
South Wales Argus
41 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Sport minister rejects calls to consult on alcohol ban in football stands
Stephanie Peacock said moves to reverse the prohibition, which has been in place since 1985, do not fall within the scope of the Football Governance Bill. MPs will have a say on the Tories' amendment to the Bill on Tuesday, if the party chooses to push it to a vote. Sport minister Stephanie Peacock (Chris McAndrew/PA) The minister also stopped short of agreeing to financial support for ex-players who have suffered brain conditions caused by heading footballs, but said the Government is 'committed' to looking further at player welfare. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Peacock said the Bill's focus is on the 'financial sustainability of football clubs up and down the country'. The Bill would introduce an independent regulator for the top five tiers of the men's game to ensure clubs are run sustainably and are accountable to their fans. The regulator will also have 'backstop' powers to impose a financial settlement between the English Football League (EFL) and the Premier League if they cannot agree one themselves. David Kogan, a media rights expert, has been named as the Government's preferred candidate to chair the Independent Football Regulator in April, and his appointment was endorsed by a cross-party committee of MPs. But Mr Kogan faces an inquiry into his appointment following the revelation that he had donated money to both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, as well as other Labour figures. During the Bill's report stage, shadow sport minister Louie French accused the Government of 'appointing a Labour crony to be the new sheriff of football'. Intervening, Ms Nandy said then-minister Stuart Andrew had 'actively headhunted the individual in question and added him to the shortlist'. Mr French also urged the Government to scrap the 'legacy ban which sees fans rushing to drink their beer before kick-off and at half-time'. On new clause one, he said: 'The alcohol ban, which has been in place since 1985, was introduced to help curb hooliganism on the terraces during the problematic era of British football. 'But 40 years on, and with the modern game enjoying a more family-friendly atmosphere in stadiums across the country, clubs, fans and the Conservatives are urging the Government to consult on lifting the ban on alcohol. 'As football fans know, we have this legacy ban which sees fans rushing to drink their beer before kick-off and at half-time, this often leads to the fans being delayed entering the stadiums and overcrowding on the concourses. 'This is why we have listened to clubs and fans, especially those lower down the football pyramid, and are urging the Government to end the two-tier approach to football plans as part of their Football Governance Bill.' Responding, Ms Peacock said: 'This is outside the scope of the Bill, which is focused on sustainability of clubs and game overall. I've raised the issue with the Home Office, as I committed to do during the Bill committee, as it is their policy lead.' Labour MP for Caerphilly Chris Evans (Andrew Matthews/PA) A number of MPs, including Labour's Chris Evans (Caerphilly) had tabled amendments to the Bill calling for greater support of past players who have developed neurodegenerative diseases as a result of heading footballs. Referring to the Liberal Democrats' amendment which called for a financial scheme to provide care, Ms Peacock said it is 'not within the tight regulatory scope of the Bill'. She told MPs: 'The Secretary of State and I recently met with a small group of affected families and ex-footballers, including individuals associated with Football Families for Justice (FFJ), to discuss player safety and welfare for those suffering with dementia. 'The Government is committed to looking further at this issue and supporting the families and football authorities to come together to address issues of lifelong consequences from concussion as well as post-career mental health and financial crises. 'I'm afraid this amendment is not within the tight regulatory scope of the Bill, although that does not mean the Government is not aware and very sympathetic to the calls that are being made on this issue, both in this House and for many former players and their families. 'This Bill is focused on the financial sustainability of football clubs up and down the country.' The Liberal Democrats had also tabled an amendment which proposed that at least 10 Premier League football matches should be made available on free-to-air television channels such as the BBC or ITV. The party's culture spokesperson Max Wilkinson said: 'If we are to get the next generation of fans involved, the easiest way to make sure that they are entertained and that they're engaging is by making football free-to-air.' Ms Peacock said: 'The Government believes that the current list of events works well, and it strikes an appropriate balance between access to sporting events and allowing sports to maximise broadcasting revenue. 'In domestic football, the present arrangements under the listed events regime have protected key moments such as the FA Cup final, while ensuring that the Premier League, the EFL, and the FA, are able to raise billions of pounds annually, which is invested back into the pyramid. 'We all want to see more matches being televised, free-to-air, but that must be balanced against investment and not risk it.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer should be ashamed of awkward charade he put Rachel Reeves through – even Matt Hancock didn't stoop THAT low
AS awkward encounters go, it was right up there with one of those 'business as usual' photocalls when a famous man has been caught with his trousers down and wheels his wife out for the cameras. Except that, this time, it was Sir Keir Starmer's right-hand woman Rachel Reeves gurning her way through an 'unscheduled' (aka painfully staged) appearance designed to limit the damage sustained by the sight of her crying in the Commons just the day before. 6 The heat was on the PM, painted as callous for failing to publicly back his Chancellor or notice her distress, so the spin doctors got busy with this blatant damage-limitation exercise which, to my mind, had more to do with saving his reputation than hers. 'Nothing to see here' was the intended message as she sat next to the PM, laughing with all the gusto of someone enjoying a private audience with none other than comic genius Billy Connolly. Nothing's that funny dear — least of all the launch of Labour's 10 Year Health Plan. Rictus grin firmly in place, she gave a blessedly brief speech to assembled health workers, telling them 'it's great to be here today' but fooling no one as to the true intention of her presence there. There followed a hug with the PM that, if you imagine the prospect of Ann Widdecombe and John Sergeant performing a rumba together on a Strictly Christmas special, would give you some idea of how excruciatingly awkward and clumsily choreographed it was. To my mind, it would have been a far greater power move had Reeves refused to take part in this charade and let her political colleagues stew in the hot tears that many believe were caused by her exhaustion and frustration. Those old enough to remember the scandal of former Tory Cabinet minister David Mellor having a tawdry fling with a bit-part actress, still squirm at the memory of his wife and children being paraded at the end of the family driveway for an awkward 'business as usual' press photocall. To this day, a 'five-bar gate moment' is the phrase used by journalists when it comes to jaw-dropping displays of shamelessness in the Westminster bubble. But when former Health Secretary Matt Hancock was caught on his office CCTV snogging an aide, his wife Martha emerged alone from the family home for a dog walk, head held high and looking a million dollars. After all, he was the idiot, not her. So why should she make it easy for him? Rachel Reeves FINALLY addresses Commons tears after she and Keir Starmer put on awkward show of unity And it's not just politicians. After actor Dominic West was spotted getting cosy with former co-star Lily James in Rome, he later posed with wife Catherine Fitzgerald for the assembled paps outside their home alongside a sign that read 'Our marriage is strong and we're very much together'. 6 6 They remain so. Whether the political union of Starmer-Reeves lasts much longer remains to be seen. BOASTING about spending your money on a great experience, rather than buying a vastly expensive watch, is more socially acceptable apparently. And of course, another bonus is that a nice holiday or Michelin-starred dinner can't be snatched off your wrist by some oik on an e-bike. RISKY PATH TO TAKE THE Salt Path – a supposedly 'non-fiction' book about a couple's struggle against adversity – sold two million copies and was made into a movie starring Gillian Anderson and Jason Isaacs. But The Observer has now revealed a few potholes in the story of 'Raynor and Moth Winn' who, it turns out, were once known as Sally and Tim Walker. Instead of losing their money in a business deal that went wrong, it's alleged that Sally stole £64,000 from a previous employer and their UK home was repossessed when a loan to repay it turned sour. On top of that, several neurologists have cast doubt on whether Moth really has the rare and debilitating neurological condition corticobasal degeneration. Consequently, PSPA, the only charity that supports people with CBD and progressive supranuclear palsy, has now cut ties with the couple and says 'too many questions remain unanswered'. One might be why no one at the charity thought it odd someone who claimed to have the condition for 18 years was seemingly so well. But the biggest mystery is that this couple thought they could blithely reinvent history in such a public way without someone from their past calling them out. Heavy on the testosterone 6 6 ON Saturday, Sharon and Ozzy Osbourne invited me to Birmingham's Villa Park to see his and Black Sabbath's last ever live performance. A fan told me: 'It's the greatest line-up in metal history.' And, sure enough, rock stars such as Guns N' Roses, Anthrax, Yungblud, Slayer, Aerosmith's Steven Tyler and Metallica turned up to play tribute to the godfather of heavy metal himself, with all proceeds going to three charities. Ozzy was moved to tears by it all and so was the 40,000-strong crowd which, despite looking like a Hell's Angel convention, was joyous and trouble-free. And as if that wasn't enough testosterone for one day, movie stars Jason Momoa (Aquaman) and Joe Manganiello (Magic Mike) were among the fans flocking to see the Prince of Darkness perform one last time. There wasn't a metrosexual shaved chest in sight. KILLER HADN'T A CLUE 6 AUSSIE Erin Patterson murdered her in-laws by deliberately serving them death cap mushrooms in beef Wellington. During the ten-week trial, it emerged that her mobile phone data showed she had travelled to two locations where the lethal fungi had been spotted, bought a food dehydrator on the way home, made individual servings instead of one joint, put her own portion on a different coloured plate to the others, was later caught on CCTV buying sandwiches despite claiming to be suffering from sickness and diarrhoea, and was spotted dumping the food dehydrator at the local tip. A nasty piece of work she clearly is, but master criminal she clearly ain't. ONE in five Gen Zs say that they regularly jump queues, and 53 per cent of them think that's OK. A spokesperson for American Holidays, which commissioned the research, says: 'The younger generation is reshaping how we wait in line, from the pub to the passport desk.' Hmmm. Among themselves, maybe. But try any of that nonsense when there's a Baby Boomer behind you and, trust me, you'll know that it's very much not ok.
