logo
Trump document dumps raise questions of distraction

Trump document dumps raise questions of distraction

The Hill24-07-2025
The Trump administration has moved to release tranches of documents from controversial past investigations amid increasing scrutiny into its handling of the Epstein investigation — prompting criticism that the White House is seeking a distraction.
Last week, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released 114 pages of documents related to the investigation into Russia's efforts to influence the 2016 election — something President Trump raised again this week when he said former President Obama was guilty of treason in connection with the matter.
Then on Monday, Attorney General Pam Bondi released an Office of Inspector General review into Hillary Clinton's private email server, sharing it with Congress.
Hours later, Bondi and Gabbard released 230,000 pages related to the investigation into the Martin Luther King Jr. assassination.
'It doesn't take a whole lot of guesswork to say, 'Gee, do you think they kind of, maybe, sort of want to change the subject?'' said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who has called for the release of financial records related to Jeffrey Epstein, given his numerous wire transfers.
'I'm just saying — just saying — maybe. Possibly. Conceivably. That could be it.'
The flood of information has not gone unnoticed.
'They're not dumping documents. They're making up lies,' said Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee.
'The Trump administration is constantly promising conspiracy and then failing to deliver, which is what they did with Epstein, which is now why we're creating a whole new conspiracy, which is that President Obama is guilty of treason. It's a Ponzi scheme of conspiracy theories.'
When asked about Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell in the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump pivoted to talking about his predecessor.
'I don't really follow that too much. It's sort of a witch hunt. Just a continuation of the witch hunt. The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold.'
In a rare public statement, Obama called the accusations against him an effort at distraction.
'Our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' an Obama spokesperson said.
'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.'
It was Gabbard's Wednesday release of an additional classified report on the 2016 election put together by the House Intelligence Committee that most alarmed Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
'The only thing not being released is the Epstein files. But today, today's action sets a new low for a DNI,' Warner said, using an abbreviation for director of national intelligence.
'Of course it's a distraction. But this one is so grossly over the top, that it will put people in harm's way,' he added, noting that the House report references intelligence sources and methods.
Release of the documents gave MAGA influencers who were angry over the lack of Epstein disclosures for weeks a new topic — and grievance — to push. After Gabbard's first release, MAGA personalities called to arrest Obama administration officials and even the former president himself.
A study by Media Matters found that Fox News had mentioned Obama three times more than Epstein since Gabbard released her report Friday. Conversations about the former president spiked overall — more than doubling in the days after the Friday release.
But despite some conservative voices elevating Gabbard's releases, they have gotten mixed results.
While some have called the releases an important form of transparency and a delivery on a campaign promise, that has not negated their interest in Epstein.
House GOP leaders, for instance, moved to send members home for August recess a day early after disputes about the Epstein matter — and an unwillingness to face Democratic votes trying to squeeze Republicans on the Epstein issue — stymied the House. And the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Tuesday voted to subpoena Epstein's convicted ex-girlfriend Maxwell, following a motion from Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.).
In a separate vote late Wednesday, another Oversight panel moved to subpoena the files, as well as information on other figures.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), who has called for the release of numerous classified files and is leading an investigation into the JFK assassination, disputed that the timing had anything to do with Epstein.
'I know for a fact that the MLK documents were in the queue and scheduled for release, and so the timing was not obviously related,' Luna said.
'The MLK stuff was slated for release. … And then the Russia collusion evidence — documents of the hoax, actually, I also heard was scheduled for release. So I think that they're just trying to show that they're very transparent.'
Luna said it was proper to subpoena Maxwell, though she added that it would be improper for the Epstein associate to receive a pardon.
'I maintain my same position — haven't changed. We should see the documents,' Luna said.
For his part, Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) swiftly released the Clinton documents shared with him by Bondi.
'When you've been waiting eight years to get documents, you release them as soon as you get them,' he said.
Still, others see the issue as a problem of the administration's own making after years of embracing and promoting conspiracy theories, including those about Epstein.
'They've got a problem,' a source close to the White House said on the sentiment inside the Trump team.
'It's a little bit of the chickens coming home to roost. When you populate your administration [full] of people who propagated this and then all of a sudden, they hold the keys to the kingdom, now the true believers who aren't in government want to say, 'OK, open it up.' At some point this is where the ideal of the campaign, the promises made in the campaign, actually come home to roost. There may be nothing there, but they created a cloud in expectations that there was something there,' the source close to the White House said.
'Whenever Trump is truly in trouble, he changes the story by whatever means necessary,' added one longtime GOP lobbyist.
It's not clear that the strategy is working.
'They are releasing these other files, but they're refusing to release the files they promised their base, the Epstein files. I think they're digging their hole deeper,' said Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), a former House Intelligence Chair amid the GOP investigation into the 2016 election.
He noted that the latest information implies intelligence leaders mishandled the investigation by noting that Russia never accessed vote totals — something that was never in dispute.
'They're damned by the implication that they're pushing out all this other stuff, and they're still refusing to release the Epstein files.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule
Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule

Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) urged the Trump administration Thursday to maintain some parts of an artificial intelligence (AI) chip export framework laid out by former President Biden. In a letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the bipartisan duo called for the administration to keep provisions incentivizing companies to maintain most of their computing infrastructure for leading AI models in the U.S. and mandating 'robust' guardrails on data centers abroad. 'While the Diffusion Rule was rightfully criticized for being overly complicated and burdensome, it is essential that the Administration issues a replacement that keeps the center of gravity for AI infrastructure in the United States and imposes strong, robust security requirements on overseas facilities,' the pair wrote. Biden released the AI diffusion rule in his final days in office. The rule, which placed caps on chip sales to most countries other than a select few U.S. allies, faced sharp pushback from the semiconductor industry. The Trump administration rescinded the rule shortly before it was set to go into effect in May, arguing it would 'have stifled American innovation and saddled companies with burdensome new regulatory requirements.' Several months later, the administration has yet to offer a replacement. A group of Republican House members urged Lutnick earlier this month to provide a 'stable exporting structure' to take the place of the diffusion rule. However, a new framework may not be coming. Semafor reported Tuesday that the administration is weighing whether to scrap efforts to replace the rule. This comes after Trump unveiled his AI Action Plan last week, which underscored a shift in policy toward China, focusing less on export restrictions and more on boosting the adoption of American technology abroad. Seemingly in line with this approach, the Trump administration is allowing Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China once again. After initially placing new restrictions on H20 sales in May, the administration gave the chipmaker the green light earlier this month. The decision has faced pushback from multiple fronts, with former national security officials, several Democratic lawmakers and at least one Republican member voicing concerns about the decision.

Harris to give Colbert her first interview since 2024 election
Harris to give Colbert her first interview since 2024 election

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Harris to give Colbert her first interview since 2024 election

Former Vice President Kamala Harris will return to 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert on Thursday for her first post-election interview since her November loss to President Trump. The appearance comes days after Harris announced she would not run for California governor next year and also as she promotes her new book, ' 107 days ' detailing her short time as a presidential candidate after the withdrawal of then-President Biden. She'll be in conversation with Colbert, whose show is ending next year following his vocal criticism of both Trump and his network CBS's parent company Paramount's settlement of a lawsuit Trump brought against '60 Minutes' over its editing of an interview with Harris. Before his cancellation, Colbert had described the $16 million settlement as a 'big fat bribe' following the president's similar agreements with ABC and other media outlets. CBS insisted that canceling 'The Late Show' was a purely financial decision, but shortly after it was announced, Trump's Federal Communications Commission approved Paramount's desired merger with Skydance. Harris, who like Biden attended Trump's inauguration in January, has been relatively quiet in regards to his accusations about the 2024 campaign trail, although he's alleged she purchased endorsement from celebrities and should be prosecuted. Last month, she did, however, address Trump's move to deploy the military to Los Angeles amid his immigration crackdown. 'Deploying the National Guard is a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos,' she said on social media. 'In addition to the recent ICE raids in Southern California and across our nation, it is part of the Trump Administration's cruel, calculated agenda to spread panic and division.' 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' Harris added. 'Fear of a community demanding dignity and due process.'

Democrats blast Bessent over Trump baby accounts ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security' remarks
Democrats blast Bessent over Trump baby accounts ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security' remarks

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Democrats blast Bessent over Trump baby accounts ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security' remarks

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is facing heavy backlash from Democrats over a Wednesday remark in which he talked about 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.' 'In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security,' Bessent said Wednesday during an event with Breitbart News, discussing 'Trump accounts.' These are savings accounts the Trump administration has proposed for kids born between 2024 and 2028 in which the government will put $1,000. It was a part of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that he signed into law earlier this year. Social Security has long been a third rail in politics, and Democrats were quick to accuse Bessent of suggesting he and the administration saw the accounts as a future replacement for Social Security. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) said in a post on the social platform X Wednesday that Bessent was 'saying the quiet part out loud.' ''In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.' – Scott Bessent,' Luján said in his post, which featured a clip of Bessent's comments. 'That means gutting the promise our seniors earned and dismantling Social Security as we know it.' In his own post on X Wednesday, Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) offered an opinion similar to Luján's. 'Trump Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent said the quiet part out loud: Trump-Republicans want to privatize Social Security, turning it from a dependable safety net to a risky profit center for moneyed special interests at the expense of everyday Americans,' Reed said in his post. Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.) said on X that 'Republicans' ultimate goal is to privatize Social Security.' 'And we know that there isn't a backdoor they won't try to make Wall Street's dream a reality,' he added. Later on Wednesday, Bessent sought to clean up his remarks by arguing the new accounts would bolster Social Security. He said in a post on X that 'Trump Baby Accounts are an additive benefit for future generations, which will supplement the sanctity of Social Security's guaranteed payments.' 'This is not an either-or question: our Administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money,' he added. In an appearance on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' Thursday, Bessent said he was 'I was giving an interview, and I was talking about the $1,000 baby bonds that every American citizen, every newborn, is going to get.' 'The Democrats hate this program because the — it brings capitalism and markets to every American, not just their constituents at the upper end, and over time, the compounding is going to be an incredible supplement to Social Security, not a replacement. It is a compliment,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store