‘What's the difficulty in working on Sunday?': Calcutta HC to primary teachers opposing duties for SIR
Justice Amrita Sinha, hearing the petition, observed that there is no legal bar on engaging primary teachers for BLO duties. In her order, she stated: 'The activities of the BLO are to be carried out in such a way that their teaching profession will not be hampered. As on this date, it cannot be ascertained as to the nature of work assigned to the concerned officer. The case has been filed under apprehension. Duties assigned to officers shall be strictly under the Comprehensive Instructions regarding BLOs as published by the EC in 2022.'
The SIR, recently conducted in Bihar, was meant to remove names of deceased or missing voters. It is now scheduled to be conducted in all states, including West Bengal. A letter regarding the same has been sent to the office of the Chief Electoral Officer. However, the specific nature of BLO duties has not been finalised.
Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Subir Sanyal submitted: 'A number of duties are assigned to me—full-fledged day-to-day work—whereas I am a primary teacher. As soon as the appointment letter was issued, I came under the EC. I am under deputation for revision of electoral rolls. No duty period has been mentioned. Where am I to work? How can I discharge dual duties? My teaching job is from 10 am to 4 pm. The Supreme Court says teachers have to be drafted minimally.'
Counsel Soumya Majumdar, appearing for the Election Commission, countered: 'It has been done in consultation with the schools and in line with the SC order. This electoral revision procedure is done six months before the date of election is declared. All circumstances have been weighed before issuing appointment letters. They will be given training and then put to work. Of 48,000 drafted, only 15 have filed cases. It is their apprehension that they will be called. The BLO goes to the house and brings information.'
To the petitioner's concern about working without a break, the bench remarked: 'The nation requires your service, what can be done? Why is it not possible to work on Sundays? Are you afraid that all the work will be given to you?'
A case had been filed last week in the Calcutta High Court alleging that primary teachers are being forced to perform BLO duties in violation of norms. Teachers claim that this additional responsibility is interfering with their teaching work and overburdening them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Rajya Sabha adjourned for the day amid protests over electoral rolls revision in Bihar
The Rajya Sabha was disrupted again on Tuesday as Opposition MPs continued to press for a discussion on revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The Rajya Sabha was adjourned for the day soon after approving two statutory resolutions. The Upper House saw its first adjournment around 11.45 am, when it was adjourned till 2 pm. When the Rajya Sabha met at 2 pm, Opposition MPs were on their feet demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar. Amid ruckus, Harivansh, who was in the Chair, took up two statutory resolutions, including one for extending the President's rule in Manipur for another six months. He said it was a constitutional obligation, and told the members that the House has passed only one Bill in the session so far. The Chair also disallowed any remarks made by Opposition leaders on issues other than the resolution that was being taken. Opposition MPs continued to raise slogans on the SIR issue, as a couple of members also tried to participate in the discussion on the resolution for extending President's Rule in Manipur beyond August 13. The resolution to extend the President's rule in Manipur, and the other one of the Finance Ministry to amend the Second Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, were passed by voice vote. The Chair then adjourned the House for the day as protests continued. Earlier, in the morning sitting, Congress and other Opposition parties created uproar in the Rajya Sabha soon after the House met, alleging CISF personnel were deployed in the House last week, an assertion vehemently rejected by both the Chair and the government, who said the personnel belonged to parliamentary security services. Protests by Congress and other Opposition parties during the morning session (Zero Hour) led to the adjournment of the proceedings till 2 pm.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Lok Sabha passes Bill enabling reservation of seats for tribal communities in Goa Assembly
The Lok Sabha Tuesday passed a Bill enabling reservation of seats for Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the Goa Legislative Assembly amid protests by the Opposition demanding discussion on various issues, including the Election Commission of India (ECI)'s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. Arjun Ram Meghwal, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Law and Justice, introduced the Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2024, on August 5 last year. It aims to provide provisions empowering the ECI to make amendments to the Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008, and to readjust the seats in the Goa Legislative Assembly for the STs of the state. The Bill addresses the long-standing issue of lack of reserved seats for STs in the 40-member Goa Assembly. On Tuesday in Lok Sabha, Meghwal urged the House to pass the Bill, and it was passed through a voice vote. This was the first and only legislative business transaction in Lok Sabha thus far during the Monsoon Session, which commenced on July 21. Lok Sabha was initially adjourned until 2 pm amid protests by the Opposition. As soon as the House reassembled in the afternoon, the Opposition members again started raising slogans. BJP member Sandhya Ray, who was in the chair, asked the Opposition members to allow the House to function. However, as they continued their protest, she adjourned the House for the day after the Goa Bill was passed. The other three Bills listed in the revised list of business in Lok Sabha, were the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024; the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025; and the National Anti-Doping Amendment Bill, 2025. However, these could not be taken up. In the Monsoon Session of Parliament, both the Houses have not been able to transact any business except a discussion on Operation Sindoor, India's military action on terror bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terro attack. The Opposition has been protesting in both Houses of Parliament against the SIR, alleging the EC's exercise was aimed at 'disenfranchising voters' in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections. Opposition leaders have been demanding a discussion on the issue in both Houses. Harikishan Sharma, Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express' National Bureau, specializes in reporting on governance, policy, and data. He covers the Prime Minister's Office and pivotal central ministries, such as the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Ministry of Cooperation, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Rural Development, and Ministry of Jal Shakti. His work primarily revolves around reporting and policy analysis. In addition to this, he authors a weekly column titled "STATE-ISTICALLY SPEAKING," which is prominently featured on The Indian Express website. In this column, he immerses readers in narratives deeply rooted in socio-economic, political, and electoral data, providing insightful perspectives on these critical aspects of governance and society. ... Read More
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
From the Urdu Press: ‘India must not blink before Trump', ‘Parliament should debate Bihar SIR'
Amid the standoff between the government and the Opposition over the Election Commission (EC)'s special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, the proceedings of Parliament during the current Monsoon Session have been a washout so far, barring a special discussion on Operation Sindoor in both the Houses. On the geopolitical front, US President Donald Trump has threatened a further escalation of tariffs on Indian goods, prompting a pushback from New Delhi. While continuing with saturation coverage of the SIR row and the parliamentary deadlock over the week, the Urdu dailies also kept their focus on the tension between India and US over the Trump tariff regime. SIASAT Commenting on President Trump's announcement slapping India with a 25% tariff on goods from August 7 besides an unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia, the Hyderabad-based Siasat, in its August 1 leader, says that while the Trump administration had been making various moves against the interest of New Delhi for some time, it has now openly adopted an 'anti-India stance'. 'Trump's bid to impose 25% tariffs on India has come amid the ongoing negotiations between the two countries for a trade deal. This is unfortunate as it may have adverse implications for Indian economy,' the editorial says. 'It could not only hurt Indian exports but also have a negative impact on jobs in the country.' The daily points out that India has forged strategic ties with America over the last two decades. 'New Delhi has been on the same page with Washington on a raft of geopolitical issues. This has been reflected even in India's growing proximity to Israel. However, Washington seems to be now unilaterally taking various measures undermining the friendship between the two countries,' it says. 'This has happened despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi's close relationship with President Trump.' The editorial notes that just after announcing 25% tariff on Indian goods, Trump declared that the US and Pakistan have concluded a deal to develop the latter's oil reserves. 'All this is meant to target India. Even during Operation Sindoor following the Pahalgam terror attack, the US had tried to hyphenate India and Pakistan, which was unfair to India,' it says, adding that New Delhi must review its foreign policy. 'While having good relations with various countries, it must be ensured that our national interests are not compromised. The US may be a global power but if continues to warm up to our enemy country, then we should also not shy away from standing up to it. India must send a clear message to the US that we will not come under its pressure on our national interest.' URDU TIMES Referring to the Congress and other Opposition parties' questioning of the EC's 'neutrality', the Mumbai-based Urdu Times, in its August 4 editorial, points out that they have been demanding a debate in the Lok Sabha as well as the Rajya Sabha on the Bihar SIR issue, but the government has rejected it, leading to a parliamentary logjam. 'While the EC has always been an autonomous constitutional body, it was T N Seshan who as the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) in the 1990s undertook massive reforms and enforced the model code of conduct to turn the poll body into a formidable institution. The EC then started commanding respect even from the country's top political stalwarts, who would abide by its directives in their campaigns,' the editorial says. 'However, in recent years, the EC's image has taken a beating amid allegations that it has leaned towards the government,' it says, adding that the mechanism for the appointment of the Election Commissioners has also undergone a change. The daily says that despite its status as an independent body, the EC's impartiality has now come under questioning from various quarters, including the Opposition parties. 'This has been seen in various cases, ranging from the 2024 Lok Sabha polls to the Assembly elections in Haryana and Maharashtra, to the SIR exercise. The Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has highlighted them,' it states. The EC has come under cloud over the ongoing SIR in Bihar where 65 lakh existing voters have been deleted from its draft rolls, with the exercise going to be implemented next in states like West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, which are slated for polls early next year, the edit says. 'With the SIR controversy snowballing amid worry among a large section of electors, the Opposition has been pressing for a discussion on this public issue in Parliament, which the government should accept in light of its gravity as per democratic norms.' URDU TIMES Flagging a Mumbai court's verdict in the 2008 Malegaon blasts, in which six people were killed and 100 others injured, Urdu Times, in its August 1 editorial, points out that the National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. The court observed that there was 'strong suspicion' about their role but that cannot be a substitute for 'legal proof'. The editorial notes that the Malegaon case ruling came days after the Bombay High Court delivered its judgment in the July 11, 2006 Mumbai train blasts, quashing the 2015 verdict of a special court which had awarded death sentence to five accused and life imprisonment to seven others. After the acquittal of the 12 accused who had been languishing in prison for 19 years, the edit says, a key question has arisen as to 'who were the real perpetrators of Mumbai 7/11 case', which killed 189 commuters and wounded 824 others. 'The BJP-led Mahayuti government then promptly moved the Supreme Court to challenge the high court's verdict.' The editorial states that in the Malegaon blast case too, the victims have not got justice and are planning to challenge it in the higher courts. However, the Maharashtra government has shown 'double standards' in its stances over the two cases, it says. 'In the Malegaon case, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said the court verdict has proved that terror has never been saffron. His deputy Eknath Shinde echoed similar views. However, they have not said anything about the acquittal in the Mumbai 7/11 case. Instead, their government rushed to the apex court to challenge it,' the daily says. 'There could not be different standards for ensuring justice. The victims in all cases are equally entitled to it. And their perpetrators must be brought to justice too. The victims in both the Mumbai 7/11 and Malegaon blast cases have been waiting for it for nearly two decades – they have been failed by shoddy investigations and poor prosecution by various agencies.'
