Leftwing pundit Hasan Piker says US border agents quizzed him on Trump and Gaza
Hasan Piker, a US-born progressive political commentator, said he was stopped by US Customs and Border Protection agents and questioned about his opinions of Donald Trump and Israeli war policy as he returned to the country on Sunday from France.
Piker, recounting the incident on his Twitch livestream on Monday, said he was led to a private room at Chicago O'Hare airport and interviewed for nearly two hours about his political views.
'The goal here is to put fear into people's hearts, to have a chilling effect on speech that, like, the government is unafraid of intimidating you,' Piker said. 'Does this stop me from saying whatever the fuck I want to say? Of course not. Don't be ridiculous. But the reason why I wanted to talk about it was to give you more insight into what the government is doing, and to speak out against this sort of stuff.'
The leftwing streamer has built a mass following on YouTube and Twitch around his blend of political, cultural and social commentary. Piker, born in New Jersey, was carrying a US passport when he re-entered the US on Sunday, after a trip to France with his family to celebrate Mother's Day.
'I think they did it because they know who the fuck I am, and they wanted to put the fear of god into me,' Piker said.
'This is nothing but lying for likes,' Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement. 'Claims that his political beliefs triggered the inspection are baseless. Our officers are following the law, not agendas.'
She added: 'Upon entering the country, this individual was referred for further inspection – a routine, lawful process that occurs daily, and can apply for any traveler. Once his inspection was complete, he was promptly released.'
Piker repeatedly described the exchange as 'cordial' but said he was transparent with the officer interviewing him that he planned to speak out about his experience, which the streamer said felt anything but random and 'routine'.
Assuming the officer was familiar with his online commentary, Piker said he was candid about his views, telling the agent he was 'not fond' of the US president.
He said the officer was particularly focused on his criticism of Israel's prosecution of the Gaza war, asking him: 'Do you like Hamas? Like, do you support Hamas? Do you think Hamas is a resistance group?'
In response, Piker said he told the officer that he was a 'pacifist' and wanted 'the endless bloodshed to end'.
'I just kept repeating that over and over again,' he said, describing the line of questioning as 'insane' and a violation of his first amendment rights.
Piker said this was his first attempt to return to the US using the global entry program, which normally expedites travel. He was returning to the US to speak on Monday at the University of Chicago Institute of Politics.
Piker said neither his phone nor laptop were searched. He said the interview ended shortly after he asked whether he was being detained or if he was free to go. The officer told him he had not been detained, but Piker described it as a de facto detention'.
Chip Gibbons, the policy director of Defending Rights & Dissent, said in a statement: 'We are deeply disturbed that CBP is stopping political commentators at the border to interrogate them about first Amendment-protected activities. Such an abuse of power is an affront to press freedom.'
Alex Peter, an attorney and popular online creator who shares content about the American judicial system, wrote: 'DHS flagging and detaining one of the US's largest leftwing voices for their political opinions while the Trump admin suggests they might suspend habeas corpus does not portend well for the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump threatens to cut off New York City funds if Mamdani ‘doesn't behave'
Donald Trump on Sunday threatened to cut New York City off from federal funds if favored mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, 'doesn't behave himself' should he be elected. Mamdani, meanwhile, denied that he was – as the president said – a communist. But he reaffirmed his commitment to raise taxes on the wealthiest New Yorkers while saying: 'I don't think that we should have billionaires.' In an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump argued that a Mamdani victory was 'inconceivable' because he perceived the candidate to be 'a pure communist'. He added: 'Let's say this – if he does get in, I'm going to be president, and he's going to have to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money. He's got to do the right thing or they're not getting any money.' More than $100bn flows to the city from the federal government through different entities and programs, according to the city's comptroller last year. Speaking Sunday with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Mamdani said, 'no, I am not' a communist. He also said that he had 'already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am – ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for'. Mamdani said he was inspired by the US civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, who once remarked: 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There has to be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.' He then reiterated his intent to raise taxes on New York's wealthiest as part of a campaign pledge 'to shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods'. 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality – and ultimately what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' Mamdani said. 'And I look forward to work with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them.' Mamdani said the proposal reflected 'a description of what we see right now'. 'It's not driven by race,' he said. 'It's more of an assessment of what neighborhoods are being undertaxed versus overtaxed. 'It is not to work backwards from a racial assessment of neighborhoods or our city. Rather, it's to ensure that we actually have an equal playing field.' Many New Yorkers and moderate Democratic politicians have expressed concern over Mamdani's win over former governor Andrew Cuomo in the 24 June primary for the Democratic nomination. Among those to endorse him was progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. But he has not been endorsed by many other prominent Democratic party figures, including the New York governor, Kathy Hochul, who said coolly after his win: 'Obviously, there's areas of difference in our positions, but I also think we need to have those conversations.' Mamdani said on Sunday that he was looking forward to discussions with Hochul, saying: 'Ultimately, my policies, my vision, it's driven by an assessment of what's actually happening.' Asked if he thought moderate Democrats were afraid of him, Mamdani said: 'I think that people are catching up to this election. 'Ultimately what we're showing is that by putting working people first, by returning to the roots of the Democratic party, we actually have a path out of this moment where we're facing authoritarianism in Washington DC' under the Trump administration. In his comments on Mamdani's having secured the Democrats' nomination in the heavily Democratic city, Trump said: 'It's shocking.' 'I used to say we will never have a socialist in this country,' the president said, in part. Asked about Mamdani's proposals to oppose his administration's immigration crackdown and to arrest Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot in New York, Trump said the mayoral candidate would 'be very unsuccessful' on both counts. 'He's a radical left lunatic,' Trump said. Mamdani, for his part, said Democrats 'need to be a party that's not just against Donald Trump – but also for something'. 'And our campaign was for working people, bringing dignity back into those lives,' Mamdani said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Mount Rushmore experts reveal if Trump can be added to the iconic monument - as sculptor's granddaughter gives blunt response
Donald Trump 's dream of one day being carved into Mount Rushmore is unlikely to ever become a reality due to concerns the sculpture could collapse if it's tampered with. The four faces carved into the South Dakota mountain - George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln - are among the most popular American leaders to this day. Trump's ambitions to join them on the iconic sculpture would be hugely divisive, but the president theoretically could direct his administration to begin work carving him in. Robin Borglum Kennedy, the granddaughter of the iconic artist Gutzon Borglum who dreamed up and executed the sculpture, believes it is no place for Trump - or any other living president. 'It was conceived as a tribute to the ideals of America,' she told the New York Times. 'Not to any one man.' Borglum Kennedy believes Mount Rushmore is a historical memorial to America, rather than a tribute to the politics of the men who her grandfather chose to include. And experts have warned any new additions risks destroying the four monuments which already exist among the cracks and fractures deep within the stone. Geomechanical engineer Paul Nelson, who worked on the monitoring system at Mount Rushmore, warned: 'One of the concerns about an additional face is that you could activate these fractures. 'If you remove material, you could be removing support.' Nelson noted it would be 'extremely difficult, if not impossible, to carve an additional face on Mounth Rushmore', warning as an example that a new face could cost Lincoln's nose. While there is technically plenty of room for another face, the reality is the rock is so fragile it mightn't be possible. While much of the mountain is granite, there are pockets of pegmatite crystal, rose quartz and schist which are unsuitable for carving. Borglum had to abandon his plans of carving torsos for each of the former presidents due to the instability of much of the rock, and even stopped works on one of the faces and moved its location after it was determined the area to the side of Lincoln was unstable. In all, he changed his initial plans nine times to work around the challenges of the rock. Even within the faces there are deep chasms and cracks which had to be delicately worked around and left in place to avoid risking the integrity of the entire work. Former superintendent of Mount Rushmore National Memorial Dan Wenk said: 'You wouldn't add another face to Borglum's Mount Rushmore just like you wouldn't add one to da Vinci's 'Last Supper'.' 'But I recognize that these types of ideas are no longer off the table. 'Fortunately, from my view, and not just for Trump but anybody else, they're fighting against the reality of the rock.' Trump first expressed his dreams of one day being memorialized on Mount Rushmore during his first term in a conversation with then South Dakota representative Kristi Noem. He said it was his 'dream' to be included on the mountain. In response, Noem gave Trump a model sculpture of Mount Rushmore with his face included on it. But the idea resurfaced when he was reelected when MAGA congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna filed legislation to make the change. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. The National Park Service has shot down any ambitions to expand the sculpture, arguing in a statement: 'The carved portion of Mount Rushmore has been thoroughly evaluated, and there are no viable locations left for additional carvings.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Glastonbury 2025 is one of the festival's most politicised events in recent memory
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Glastonbury Festival became the unwilling centre of a row involving Keir Starmer's government and the BBC, after it played host to not one but two controversial performances over the weekend. This year's event was held in its traditional location of Worthy Farm, Somerset, where around 200,000 music fans flocked to see performances from acts including rock band The 1975, pop singer Olivia Rodrigo, Rod Stewart and Neil Young. Dominating much of the conversation this year, however, was the presence of Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap and a headline-generating performance from punk band Bob Vylan, who played the Other Stage immediately before Kneecap's set. The prime minister and other public figures had earlier voiced their objections to Kneecap's performance due to band member Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, being charged with a terror offence – for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah, while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at a gig in November last year. Discussing his bandmate's forthcoming court date onstage, Naoise O Caireallain, who performs under the name Moglai Bap, said they would 'start a riot outside the courts', before clarifying: 'No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.' The trio also led chants of 'f*** Keir Starmer' after the prime minister said their performance would not be 'appropriate'. Kneecap criticised the Prime Minister from the stage (Yui Mok/PA) (PA Wire) However, it was Bob Vylan's set in the moments before Kneecap took to the stage that generated a bigger row, and made this year's festival one of the most politicised in recent memory. The duo led crowds in a chant of 'death, death to the IDF' – a moment that was broadcast live by the BBC – prompting Avon and Somerset Police to say they were assessing video footage of both performances. Glastonbury organisers said they were 'appalled' by Bob Vylan's conduct and that their chants 'very much crossed a line'. The BBC called the band's language 'deeply offensive' and confirmed it would not be shown on demand on iPlayer. The prime minister said: 'There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech... The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.' Bob Vylan performing at Glastonbury (Yui Mok/PA) (PA Wire) Kneecap and Bob Vylan's performances –as well as statements in support of Palestine from artists including Joy Crookes, Turnstile, Nadine Shah – were in stark contrast to headliners The 1975. Controversial frontman Matty Healy made a nervous speech about how he didn't want the band's legacy to be 'one of politics… we want it to be that of love and friendship'. 'I'm not trying to be too earnest, but you can go out into the world and there's loads of politics everywhere,' he continued. 'We don't need more politics. We need more love and friendship.' Matty Healy performing during The 1975's headline set at Glastonbury 2025 (Invision) In a positive review for The Independent , critic Hannah Ewens wrote: 'Undoubtedly, nerves or not, they've established themselves as the first future legacy headlining band of their generation.' There were plenty of secret sets across the sun-soaked weekend (along with plenty of sunburn), predictably most of which were rumbled hours before the acts in question took to the stage. It had long-been rumoured (and was later confirmed) that US pop star Lorde would make an appearance on the day she released her new album, Virgin. The mysterious 'Patchwork' – in a prime spot on the Pyramid Stage on Saturday – turned out to be Britpop heroes Pulp, while Haim blurted out that they were the 'TBA' act on the Park Stage later that evening. Pulp's Jarvis Cocker during the band's surprise set on the Pyramid Stage (Getty Images) Other highlights singled out by The Independent 's critics included Irish pop singer CMAT's triumphant spot on the Pyramid Stage, pop-rock star Alanis Morissette, and Grammy-winning rapper Doechii, pop star Charli XCX and headliner Neil Young, whose three sets clashed as Young topped the bill on Saturday night. American rapper Busta Rhymes received a rapturous reception, while the UK's own Skepta saved the day after alt-rock band Deftones were forced to cancel their set due to illness. Following the controversies of Saturday's sets by Kneecap and Bob Vylan, musician Nadine Shah played on the Other Stage with a backdrop that displayed images of a devastated Gaza. She ended her set by playing voicenotes from Palestinian children, which brought her to tears. The backdrop was designed by digital artist Cold War Steve and closed on an image of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu sitting on deckchairs in a bombed-out Gaza while Starmer served them cocktails. At the end of the set, she read out an open letter by Artists for Palestine UK in support of Palestine Action – the organisation that the government is proposing to ban under anti-terrorism laws. The mural by Led By Donkeys at Glastonbury, featuring likenesses of Trump, Musk and Putin (Led By Donkeys) Around the festival site, too, were demonstrations and statements against figures including Tesla CEO and former Trump advisor Elon Musk. The protest group Led By Donkeys erected a billboard installation that featured Musk inside a rocket, with figures including Trump, Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Jeff Bezos, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and author JK Rowling queuing to board. 'Send them to Mars… while we party on Earth,' the slogan said. 'Music brings us together!' Rod Stewart told his audience at the Pyramid Stage as he took on the Legends Slot on Sunday, not long after endorsing Farage in an interview with The Times. The 'Maggie May' rocker brought out special guests Mick Hucknall of Simply Red Fame, as well as The Rolling Stones' Ronnie Wood and singer Lulu. He also invited Glastonbury founder Michael Eavis onto the stage, to celebrate his upcoming 90th birthday, with his proud daughter, festival co-organiser Emily Eavis, watching. In a two-star review for The Independent , critic Mark Beaumont compared him negatively to headliner Neil Young, commenting: 'The overall sense of the set is of the wringing out the dregs of a career. Far more than Neil Young last night, Stewart's show suggests that the old guard's time has well and truly passed, and that in future all legend slot bookings need to involve a fresh audition tape.' Rod Stewart performing on the Pyramid Stage (Yui Mok/PA) (PA Wire) Reactions to Olivia Rodrigo's closing headline set were considerably more glowing. In a five-star review for The Independent , Kate Solomon said the pop star had the crowd 'so deeply in their feelings that it feels like any deadbeat ex in the vicinity would burst directly into flames Glastonbury organisers have disclosed that 2026 will mark the festival's traditional fallow year, in which the grounds where the festival is held are given time to recover. After a year so fraught with political tension, the Eavis family might need some time too.
