
Gov. JB Pritzker is running for reelection. Who will he pick as his No. 2?
As the governor begins campaigning for his third term, the question of who will be the chief executive's second-in-command is the biggest in Illinois' political world this summer.
The job will become vacant with the state's two-term lieutenant governor, Juliana Stratton, running to succeed retiring U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin.
'They've got to be somebody who can do the job — if something happens and they had to take over,' Pritzker said, describing his ideal running mate to reporters Thursday in Chicago. 'And I think just as importantly, somebody who really has a heart for the people of the state of Illinois. That's not in everybody, right? But you got to have somebody who actually cares about all parts of the state.'
Whoever takes on the job will not only need to jibe with the governor in the traditional duties of the office, but also prepare to take on a greater role than most lieutenant governors have historically due to Pritzker's presidential interests.
Should Pritzker win the presidency, the lieutenant governor would take over the final two years of the governor's four-year term and be expected to pursue the work Pritzker has initiated. And although a lieutenant governor — a position that's derisively been called 'lite gov' because the office's powers are so minuscule — has no more responsibility running state government when the governor is out of state, the next such officeholder may be be expected to step up more than predecessors, should Pritzker spend considerable time campaigning across the country.
Pritzker, who announced his bid for a third term as governor on Thursday, has repeatedly said he loves the job. But the billionaire governor's kickoff last week repeatedly hit on national themes, and Pritzker continued to hammer President Donald Trump, which only amplified the view that Pritzker would make a bid for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, potentially handing the state of Illinois to a successor.
As with any politician who chooses a running mate, Pritzker will have to weigh his own political considerations and the aspirants' governing qualifications. And this year, he may have an eye on both the 2026 Illinois election and Democratic voters nationwide who will examine his record two years down the road.
'I imagine he's looking for the same thing he did before: someone who would be a good partner and ultimately could take the reins if they needed to,' said Aviva Bowen, a Democratic political consultant at The Strategy Group in Chicago.
The Tribune spoke to five strategists and Democrats close to the administration for their insights on Pritzker's likely thinking on picking a running mate. Most who spoke to the Tribune declined to be identified in discussing which individuals the governor might choose because they couldn't speak for the campaign.
Among those who likely top the list are Andy Manar, the former downstate state senator and Pritzker's current deputy governor on budget issues; Christian Mitchell, a former state representative from Chicago and ex-deputy governor for Pritzker; state Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth of Peoria, who was previously a lead budget negotiator in the House; and state Rep. Elizabeth 'Lisa' Hernandez of Cicero, chair of the Illinois Democratic Party.
None of those potential contenders returned requests for comment.
Sources emphasized that those four didn't constitute a complete list and noted the governor has deep ties to the private and philanthropic sectors, as well as across government. The governor himself remained mum last week on whom he might select from Illinois' Democratic bench.
The key factors observers said candidates will need to bring: the ability to run the state and carry on Pritzker's legacy if circumstances call for it and the 'je ne sais quoi' compatibility that makes a good work partner. Loyalty to the governor, life experiences different from Pritzker's and a lack of perceived ambition to use the office as a steppingstone could also be attractive qualities, several of the sources said.
In Springfield Thursday night, Pritzker said he'd likely make a decision by the end of July — prior to the first day that candidates in 2026 can begin circulating candidacy petitions to appear on the March primary ballot.
Lieutenant governors in Illinois are constitutional officers with few constitutionally ordained duties, the most important of which is to take over for a governor who is incapacitated, deceased, quits or is removed from office.
They can make the role their own, given their background and interests, which allows them to elevate specific issues; however, policy areas are also split under Pritzker's current structure among four deputy governors.
When she was selected, Stratton had a background in public safety and criminal justice, having served as an attorney and one-term member in the General Assembly.
Pritzker, at his Chicago campaign announcement Thursday, described Stratton as a 'state representative and discerning policy wonk who had slayed a pro-Rauner Democrat and was endorsed by Barack Obama.' In 2016, Stratton earned the backing of President Barack Obama over incumbent Rep. Ken Dunkin of Chicago, who received campaign help from allies of Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner and had assisted Rauner in his budget battles with Democrats.
'Juliana Stratton is a fighter for children and working families, and is now the first Black lieutenant governor of the state of Illinois,' he said, adding later to reporters that her successor has 'got to live up to the standard that's already been set by the best lieutenant governor our state's ever had.'
Pritzker, who was himself vetted as a potential running mate for Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential race, may also consider race and gender diversity on the ticket for the upcoming election, several of the strategists said.
But as a two-term governor in a blue state, Pritzker has the luxury of not having to make a choice under the usual constraints of seeking a political advantage, said Robin Johnson, a governmental relations, public policy and political consultant.
'He can afford to be a little more focused on just preserving his legacy, versus what other considerations might be in a normal campaign cycle' such as race or geography, said Johnson, who also is an adjunct professor of political science at Monmouth College in far west central Illinois.
The potential contenders to become Pritzker's next lieutenant governor have a range of work and lived experiences.
Given his current role, Manar has a deep understanding of the state's finances and budgeting process. He's also from downstate Bunker Hill, which would balance the ticket with the Chicago-based governor. At the same time, selecting Manar, who is white, would mark a departure from racial diversity at the top of the ticket.
When Mitchell, who is Black, was a deputy governor, he was a lead strategist on energy issues, including the state's 2021 climate bill. Since 2023, he's worked at the University of Chicago, overseeing government relations and other offices. Last year, Pritzker appointed Mitchell to the board of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, which owns McCormick Place and Navy Pier.
Gordon-Booth, who represents the Peoria area, is an assistant House majority leader and last year was the top House negotiator for the state budget, though she was replaced this year by three other state lawmakers.
While appearing in Peoria for his reelection announcement Thursday, Pritzker was introduced by Gordon-Booth, and he referenced her when asked about whom he might pick as his running mate.
'There are some qualified people across the state. There's one right behind me,' Pritzker said in a nod to Gordon-Booth, according to WGLT.
'When you win, you gotta represent everybody and I know Jehan Gordon-Booth has done that in her job as state representative,' Pritzker said. 'Who would not want Jehan Gordon-Booth as a leader in this state?'
A west suburbanite, Hernandez, the first Latina chair of the state Democratic Party, is not a member of the administration but rose to lead Illinois Democrats with Pritzker's support.
Picking a downstater would be appreciated by regional Democrats, Johnson said. But it would not necessarily provide a big political boost for Pritzker as much of the region has shifted solidly Republican and leadership in some counties has pushed them to separate from Chicago and the suburbs.
Additionally, Johnson said he does not think Pritzker faces a political risk by selecting a white or male candidate to succeed Stratton, a Black woman, as his running mate.
'If anybody can do it, Pritzker can. I think he's shown in his appointments and his policies that he has helped the African American community and the Latino community quite a bit,' Johnson said.
Candidates for Illinois governor and lieutenant governor only recently began running as a team. For decades, candidates ran separately, at times creating some odd couplings.
In 1968, when Republican Richard B. Ogilvie was elected governor, voters separately elected future U.S. Sen. Paul Simon, a Democrat, as the state's No. 2. It was the first and only time that the top two positions were held by politicians of opposite parties when the offices were separately elected.
Four years later, Simon made an unsuccessful bid for the Democratic nomination for governor and backed future Attorney General Neil Hartigan as his running mate. Simon lost the bid for governor to Dan Walker, but Hartigan went on to win the lieutenant governor's post and served with Walker.
The last person to ascend from the lieutenant governor position to the governor's mansion was former Gov. Pat Quinn in 2009, after then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich was impeached and removed from office.
Under the old system, the two men ran in separate primaries. Quinn, a former state treasurer, won the lieutenant governorship in 2002 on his second try, four years after he lost a primary bid for the office to then-Kane County Coroner Mary Lou Kearns by fewer than 1,500 votes.
During Quinn's time as lieutenant governor, he and Blagojevich were not close, Quinn said in an interview last week.
Quinn himself signed the law in 2010 that changed the separate primary elections after a scandal in which primary voters paired Quinn with lieutenant governor nominee Scott Lee Cohen, a pawnbroker and political neophyte who had previously been accused of failing to pay child support and spending money on extramarital affairs. Cohen later dropped out of the race, making his announcement during the halftime of the Super Bowl.
Before the current governor's first term, Quinn said, he recommended to Pritzker two top qualities in a governing partner: 'Honest and competent.' And open to ethics reform, he added.
While there may be a more straightforward path for the upcoming lieutenant governor, Quinn, who went on to win a full term, said he did not think he was on the way to becoming governor when he ran for the lieutenant governor spot.
'There was always jokes about that,' he said last week, adding: 'I don't think I ever would have been picked by a governor candidate when I ran in 2002.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

12 minutes ago
175+ Democrats supporting NAACP suit against dismantling Department of Education
More than 175 Democratic members of Congress are filing an amicus brief on Thursday opposing the Trump administration's overhaul of the U.S. Department of Education. 'The law couldn't be clearer: the president does not have the authority to unilaterally abolish the Department of Education,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in a statement first obtained by ABC News, adding, 'Donald Trump is not a king, and he cannot single-handedly cut off access to education for students across this country.' Warren and Reps. Jamie Raskin, Bobby Scott and Rosa DeLauro -- the ranking members of the House's Education and Judiciary committees -- are leading the 15-page legal document. They're joined by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, more than 20 Senate Democrats, and more than 150 other members of the House Democratic caucus. The lawmakers' brief attempting to block the administration from abolishing the Department of Education is in support of the NAACP's suit against the government this past spring. In March, that case argued that downsizing the department through a workforce reduction that slashed nearly half the agency's staff -- among other measures like terminating statutory grant programs -- violates the separation of powers and lacks constitutional authority. The NAACP, the National Education Association (NEA), and a coalition of groups filed a preliminary injunction with the U.S. District Court in the District of Maryland this week, arguing the judge's consideration of this case is needed after the administration's recent decision to pause more than $6 billion in congressionally appropriated education programs ahead of the school year. 'The motion seeks a remedy for the serious harm that the Trump Administration has inflicted on students, educators, schools, and colleges and universities, and asks the Court to direct the Department to fulfill its statutory obligations to students nationwide,' according to a statement released by the NEA, which represents more than 3 million educators. Raskin condemned the administration's efforts to curb public education, contending President Donald Trump and Education Secretary Linda McMahon can't abolish the agency without congressional approval. 'Congress created the Department of Education to ensure that every student in America could obtain a high-quality, free public school education,' Raskin wrote in a statement. 'This is the right of every citizen and an essential democratic safeguard against political tyranny,' he said. 'No president has the authority to dismantle a federal agency created by law. We're going to court to defend not only congressional power but the department's national educational mission, itself a pillar of American democracy,' Raskin added. The power to reorganize the executive branch belongs to Congress and is underscored by the fact that when presidents have reorganized the executive branch, they have done so 'through legislation and subject to appropriate restraints,' according to the brief by the lawmakers. Their brief argues that only Congress has the authority to create, restructure, and abolish federal agencies, it has to be done through legislation, and the Department of Education can't be unilaterally abolished because it's statutorily mandated. Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colorado, told ABC News closing the department would strip 'vital support' from tens of millions of students and teachers. 'I'm proud to stand with my colleagues in the House and Senate to uphold Congress' responsibility to ensure every student has access to a quality education and to defend the essential work of the Department of Education,' Neguse said. Efforts to dismantle the department have been blocked by lower courts this spring. The Supreme Court is expected to weigh in on a Massachusetts case that could decide whether the firing of nearly 2,000 employees at the agency stands. McMahon has stressed the critical functions of the department remain and that services like students with disabilities, for example, could ultimately be moved to other agencies. The brief is part of Warren's larger Save Our Schools campaign that she started after Trump signed an executive order to diminish the Department of Education. "The federal government has invested in our public schools," Warren told ABC News in April. "Taking that away from our kids so that a handful of billionaires can be even richer is just plain ugly, and I will fight it with everything I've got." The senator has previously requested the agency's Office of Inspector General review the Department of Government Efficiency's alleged "infiltration" of the agency's internal federal student loan database. Prior to the Save Our Schools campaign, she investigated the firing of federal student aid employees and how a reduction in staff at the agency could have "dire consequences" for borrowers. The brief also comes after Raskin and several other House Democrats met with McMahon about the future of the agency. That meeting appeared to leave many with unanswered questions, like Rep. Frederica Wilson, a senior member of the House Education and Workforce Committee, who also signed on to the amicus brief. "For the Department of Education to be dismantled, it is going to bring a shock to this nation," said Wilson, a former principal and lifelong educator. "Schools are the bedrock of this nation. When schools are working, our country is, too."

Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
How Rhode Island finally pushed a partial assault weapons ban over the finish line
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — Passing a new law restricting assault weapons took Rhode Island lawmakers more than 10 years, but it may offer a road map to other states looking to ease the proliferation of such firearms. For advocates, the fight is a prime example of the current challenges to passing gun control measures in the U.S., particularly surrounding semiautomatic rifles that have become the weapon of choice among those responsible for most of the country's devastating mass shootings. When Rhode Island's bill was signed into law by Democratic Gov. Dan McKee late last month, its sponsor, Democratic Rep. Jason Knight, told jubilant supporters: 'What was once the impossible became the inevitable.' How? Persistent advocacy, a change in legislative leadership and a last-minute overhaul to note the broader legal landscape. What did Rhode Island do? Rhode Island's ban, which goes into effect in 2026, prohibits the sale, manufacturing and distribution of certain high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide. The law does not prohibit possessing such weapons, a key distinction compared with other assault weapon bans enacted elsewhere in the U.S. Currently, only Washington state has a similar law. A leadership change helped propel momentum The assault weapons ban got a much-needed boost from Senate President Valerie Lawson, who secured the Senate's top spot in the middle of session after her predecessor, Sen. Dominick Ruggiero, died in April. Lawson turned to the bill's sponsors and others to find common ground between lawmakers in the House and Senate who remained split on how far the law should go. Lawson's endorsement was seen as critical to securing the bill's passage, whereas Ruggiero had previously deferred action, pointing instead to the need for Congress to act rather than a state Legislature taking the lead. 'There are issues at certain points that meet the moment,' Lawson said. 'I think it was the time for this.' Gun control advocates also acknowledged that banning assault weapons in Rhode Island hadn't previously been a top priority given that the state has largely been spared from national high-profile shootings that sometimes help propel legislative change. Assault weapons bans consistently face court challenges In the U.S., just 11 states and Washington D.C. have some sort of prohibition on certain high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide. Rhode Island's version is the only one not yet facing a constitutional challenge — though a lawsuit against it is all but assured. Certain state legal battles are on hold until others make their way through lower federal courts. To date, none of the lawsuits have been completely thrown out, but the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to have the final say. As Rhode Island lawmakers were in the middle of their gun debate, the high court declined to hear a challenge to Maryland's assault weapons ban — a move that some of the more conservative justices opposed. Justice Brett Kavanaugh even signaled that laws banning assault weapons are likely unconstitutional. 'Opinions from other Courts of Appeals should assist this Court's ultimate decision making on the AR–15 issue,' Kavanaugh wrote, referencing a popular style of high-powered rifle. Yet the legal focus on banning such weapons often hinges on possessing firearms such as AR-15-style rifles and AK-47s, rather than on the distribution process. Rhode Island lawmakers hope that by tailoring their assault weapons ban to sales, manufacturing and distribution, they might will bypass the thorniest legal questions raised by the Second Amendment. What other states are doingAttempts to expand Democratic-dominated Hawaii's assault weapons ban to rifles in addition to pistols stalled this year. In New Mexico, Democratic lawmakers who control the General Assembly adjourned without taking up an assault weapon ban. In Rhode Island, advocates say their work isn't over. 'It's progress,' said Melissa Carden, executive director of the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence. 'But we know that a true assault weapons ban includes an enforceable ban on possession as well.' Defenders of Rhode Island's law bristle that their version could be considered weak. They point out that residents looking to purchase an assault weapon from nearby New Hampshire or elsewhere will be blocked. That's because federal law prohibits people from traveling to a different state to purchase a gun and returning it to a state where that particular of weapon is banned. 'Some of my constituents have already called me and made comments about 'bad, bad bad, I'm going out and buying three and four of them now,'' said Sen. Louis DiPalma, the Senate sponsor of the statute. 'Okay, come July 1st next year, you will not be able to do that anymore.'


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Hakeem Jeffries' 'Magic Minute' Stretches Past an Hour
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' "magic minute" speech is still going after an hour as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act before a self-imposed July 4 deadline. While other members of the House of Representatives have time limits on the length of time they can speak during debates, party leaders receive a procedural perk known as the "magic minute." Precedent treats that minute as elastic and they may keep the floor indefinitely until they voluntarily yield. "Just took to the House Floor to speak in support of a country where everyone can afford to live the good life," Jeffries wrote on X, formerly Twitter, early Thursday. "And in strong opposition to Trump's One Big Ugly Bill that is devastating to everyday Americans. We will not be silenced." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) gives remarks during a press conference with House Democrats, denouncing the Senate-passed spending bill on the steps of the US Capitol Building in Washington DC, on Wednesday, July 2,... House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) gives remarks during a press conference with House Democrats, denouncing the Senate-passed spending bill on the steps of the US Capitol Building in Washington DC, on Wednesday, July 2, 2025. More Aaron Schwartz/Sipa via AP Images The Democrat began his speech at 4:53 a.m. ET. More to follow.