Proteomics banks $4.5M to fast-track novel diagnostic test launches
The Perth-based biotech is known for its pioneering work in predictive diagnostics through the large-scale study of proteins.
Its new funds will propel the launch of three first-in-class blood tests, the PromarkerD for diabetic kidney disease, PromarkerEso for oesophageal cancer and PromarkerEndo for endometriosis.
The placement was priced at 37 cents per share with one free-attaching option for every two shares and was snapped up at a nearly 18 per cent discount on the company's recent trading price.
Directors and key management also jumped on board, pledging a further $500,000 subject to shareholder approval. A $1M share purchase plan is also on the table, giving existing investors a shot at the action.
'The funds will drive the US and Australian launch of our suite of diagnostic tests.'
Proteomics International Laboratories managing director Dr Richard Lipscombe
The first-of-its-kind PromarkerD predictive blood test can detect the likely risk of a diabetic patient developing chronic kidney disease up to four years before symptoms appear. It is now being rolled out in the US.
PromarkerEso tackles a notoriously difficult-to-detect cancer by picking up those patients at risk because of chronic acid reflux. Trials have shown the test has a remarkable 94 per cent accuracy in diagnosing oesophageal cancer in patients. The test is now ready for public sale.
Proteomics is also set to launch PromarkerEndo for early endometriosis detection between June and September this year when patents are locked in across all the major markets. The test offers a simple blood test for a condition that is currently chronically underserviced and can take an average of seven years to diagnose.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'No offsets, no excuses': the pursuit of real zero
Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets. Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises. "It's very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it's actually much harder to achieve it," according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science. Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise. Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their "real zero" leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels. Distinct from "net zero", which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, "real zero" refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies - no offsets allowed. Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere. While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik "carbon neutral" products. For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities. While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments. Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead. "What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old," she told AAP. The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track. More ambitious is its long-term "absolute zero" plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials. Cutting out what's known as "embodied carbon" from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it's outside the company's direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines. "They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally," she said. Ms Harris reported "green shoots" across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals. "No offsets, no excuses," she said. Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters. Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having "very low to moderate impact on emissions" based on the latest data. She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. "Unless they're mandatory, we're not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it." Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations. The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 - that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies - is key to achieving Australia's temperature goals. Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets. Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises. "It's very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it's actually much harder to achieve it," according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science. Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise. Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their "real zero" leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels. Distinct from "net zero", which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, "real zero" refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies - no offsets allowed. Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere. While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik "carbon neutral" products. For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities. While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments. Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead. "What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old," she told AAP. The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track. More ambitious is its long-term "absolute zero" plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials. Cutting out what's known as "embodied carbon" from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it's outside the company's direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines. "They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally," she said. Ms Harris reported "green shoots" across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals. "No offsets, no excuses," she said. Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters. Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having "very low to moderate impact on emissions" based on the latest data. She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. "Unless they're mandatory, we're not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it." Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations. The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 - that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies - is key to achieving Australia's temperature goals. Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets. Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises. "It's very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it's actually much harder to achieve it," according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science. Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise. Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their "real zero" leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels. Distinct from "net zero", which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, "real zero" refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies - no offsets allowed. Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere. While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik "carbon neutral" products. For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities. While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments. Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead. "What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old," she told AAP. The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track. More ambitious is its long-term "absolute zero" plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials. Cutting out what's known as "embodied carbon" from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it's outside the company's direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines. "They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally," she said. Ms Harris reported "green shoots" across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals. "No offsets, no excuses," she said. Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters. Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having "very low to moderate impact on emissions" based on the latest data. She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. "Unless they're mandatory, we're not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it." Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations. The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 - that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies - is key to achieving Australia's temperature goals. Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets. Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises. "It's very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it's actually much harder to achieve it," according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science. Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise. Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their "real zero" leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels. Distinct from "net zero", which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, "real zero" refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies - no offsets allowed. Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere. While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik "carbon neutral" products. For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities. While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments. Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead. "What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old," she told AAP. The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track. More ambitious is its long-term "absolute zero" plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials. Cutting out what's known as "embodied carbon" from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it's outside the company's direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines. "They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally," she said. Ms Harris reported "green shoots" across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals. "No offsets, no excuses," she said. Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters. Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having "very low to moderate impact on emissions" based on the latest data. She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. "Unless they're mandatory, we're not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it." Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations. The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 - that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies - is key to achieving Australia's temperature goals.
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
'No offsets, no excuses': the pursuit of real zero
Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets. Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises. "It's very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it's actually much harder to achieve it," according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science. Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise. Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their "real zero" leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels. Distinct from "net zero", which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, "real zero" refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies - no offsets allowed. Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere. While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik "carbon neutral" products. For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities. While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments. Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead. "What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old," she told AAP. The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track. More ambitious is its long-term "absolute zero" plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials. Cutting out what's known as "embodied carbon" from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it's outside the company's direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines. "They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally," she said. Ms Harris reported "green shoots" across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals. "No offsets, no excuses," she said. Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters. Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having "very low to moderate impact on emissions" based on the latest data. She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. "Unless they're mandatory, we're not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it." Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations. The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 - that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies - is key to achieving Australia's temperature goals.
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
'No offsets, no excuses': the pursuit of real zero
Five years ago, companies of all shapes and sizes were setting net zero targets. Reality has since caught up with a number of them, with Climate Integrity director Claire Snyder of the view some had little intention of ever following through on their promises. "It's very easy to set a net zero commitment target, it's actually much harder to achieve it," according to the head of the national advocacy organisation founded in 2024 to promote transparency, accountability and adherence to climate science. Still, not all businesses are treating climate pledges as a marketing exercise. Lendlease, IKEA and Fortescue have all been singled out by the not-for-profit research group for their "real zero" leadership, with the latter the only heavy-emitting industrial company in the world targeting no fossil fuels. Distinct from "net zero", which allows companies to neutralise emission by sinking money into growing trees and other carbon-cutting projects, "real zero" refers to decarbonisation through clean technologies - no offsets allowed. Originally intended as a last-resort for sectors with no emissions-free tech options, offsets have since become a way for companies to make little effort to decarbonise while throwing money at green projects elsewhere. While proponents argue offsets funnel funds into clean energy and revegetation, a host of reliability and permanence concerns have come to light and EnergyAustralia has recently been forced to apologise to customers for using them to spruik "carbon neutral" products. For Ms Snyder, elevating climate leaders was pivotal at a time of ambition backsliding concentrated in the US where businesses are experiencing political and legal pressure to ditch environmental policies and activities. While not entirely immune, she said Australian-based firms were able to create some distance and had produced fewer abandoned or watered-down climate commitments. Lendlease head of sustainability Cate Harris said for her company, which has been chipping away at its decarbonisation targets for years, it was full-steam ahead. "What sort of insulates us a little, particularly across our sector, is that the green building movement is now over 20 years old," she told AAP. The construction and real estate giant has an interim net zero carbon target by 2025 for scope 1 and 2 emissions, an offset-reliant commitment that is on track. More ambitious is its long-term "absolute zero" plan, which will see the real estate giant eliminate emissions without offsets, including those produced in the making of building materials. Cutting out what's known as "embodied carbon" from steel, concrete, glass and aluminium remains a major challenge as it's outside the company's direct control and relies on suppliers investing in green production lines. "They are actually probably four of the harder-to-abate sectors globally," she said. Ms Harris reported "green shoots" across all four materials and was confident the real estate company could meet its 2040 decarbonisation goals. "No offsets, no excuses," she said. Ms Snyder said the corporate pursuit of emissions reductions remained a largely opt-in and voluntary affair, with the exception of the safeguard mechanism for big polluters. Even that was dominated by offset use rather than actual decarbonisation, she said, and having "very low to moderate impact on emissions" based on the latest data. She said regulatory regimes clamping down on greenwashing and climate information transparency should be compulsory. "Unless they're mandatory, we're not going to see the change that we need to see at the pace that we need to see it." Originally set up as a government-level commitment under the international Paris climate pact to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C, net zero was never intended to be adopted by corporations. The pursuit of carbon neutrality by 2050 - that is, cutting emissions wherever possible and then countering sectors with no legitimate options for decarbonisation with reliable carbon dioxide removal strategies - is key to achieving Australia's temperature goals.
