logo
Insurance broker spared jail and record after smoke alarm triggered on flight to Dublin

Insurance broker spared jail and record after smoke alarm triggered on flight to Dublin

BreakingNews.ie13-06-2025
An insurance broker who triggered a smoke alarm on a London Stansted—Dublin flight after aggressively ignoring cabin crew just before takeoff has been spared jail and a criminal record.
Father of two, William Horn, 29, of Stone Rings Lane, Harrowgate, England, pleaded guilty on June 2nd to charges under the Air Navigation and Transport Act following his arrest the previous day at Terminal 1, Dublin Airport.
Advertisement
Judge John Brennan had said that if Horn donated €500 to a Dublin charity which has assisted people affected by homelessness and addiction, he would be spared a criminal record.
The judge warned that failure to pay would result in recorded convictions and fines totalling €800.
Horn was released on €300 bail and excused from attending when the case resumed.
Judge John King noted his colleague's order and was shown a receipt of payment by defence solicitor Edward Bradbury.
Advertisement
He applied the Probation of Offenders Act.
Earlier, airport-based Garda Sandip Shrestha said he charged the accused with offensive behaviour on the Ryanair flight and setting off the smoke alarm, and the accused replied, 'You are chatting shit'.
Judge John Brennan heard that Horn came to Ireland for a birthday party, which he missed by being held for the night in Garda custody before his court hearing.
Garda Shreshta said on June 1st, he received a call from cabin crew about 'a disruptive passenger' on the flight. Garda Shreshta learned that Horn was in the toilet, and 'a plume of smoke set off the smoke alarm inside the plane'.
Advertisement
The captain also confirmed to the garda that the alarm was also activated in the cockpit.
Judge Brennan heard that it started in Stansted when the aircraft was taxiing to the runway.
The seatbelt signs were activated, but Horn 'ignored the cabin crew's instructions and went to the toilet, and walked by the cabin crew in an aggressive manner'.
Defence solicitor Edward Bradbury told the court his client, who remained silent during the hearing, was pleading guilty and from his perspective, it had been 'somewhat an ordeal and in his own mind a misunderstanding'.
Advertisement
The garda agreed with Mr Bradbury that the aircraft was about to take off when Horn decided to go to the toilet.
The accused had no prior convictions in Ireland.
Ireland
Shop assistants plead guilty to major fraud at Co...
Read More
Mr Bradbury said his client has been 'chastened' by this ordeal.
The court heard there was no evidence of intoxication, and Horn insisted he was not smoking in the toilet. However, the solicitor acknowledged that, at the very least, the issue had a smattering of recklessness all over it.
The solicitor said it happened when the aircraft was taxiing for take-off, which was aggravating circumstances for the flight attendants.
Judge Brennan had said it happened in a confined environment where people were vulnerable, but on the scale of these offences, it ranked at the lower end.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air India crash: Authorities claim victims in 'DNA mix-up' treated with 'utmost professionalism'
Air India crash: Authorities claim victims in 'DNA mix-up' treated with 'utmost professionalism'

Daily Mirror

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Air India crash: Authorities claim victims in 'DNA mix-up' treated with 'utmost professionalism'

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner had been bound for London Gatwick when it ploughed into a medical college close to Ahmedabad Airport in India. More than 240 people died in the crash Grieving families allegedly given the wrong remains of Air India crash victims have been told their loved ones were treated with "utmost professionalism" despite the mix-up. ‌ The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on June 12, killing 241 people on board. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed, making it one of the deadliest plane crashes in terms of the number of British fatalities. ‌ Aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt, whose firm Keystone Law is representing more than 20 British families who lost loved ones in the disaster, said relatives of one victim found out a casket contained 'co-mingled' remains, while a different family were told a coffin contained the body of someone else entirely, not their loved one. ‌ The Indian Interior Ministry has responded to the claims, stressing that the handling of the remains was done with the "utmost professionalism and respect". Mr Healy-Pratt, who is a partner at the firm, said the mistakes emerged after the 'sterling efforts' of senior coroner for Inner West London, Dr Fiona Wilcox, who 'picked up DNA anomalies' at the beginning of the repatriations. 'In the first two caskets that were repatriated, in one of the caskets, there was co-mingling of DNA which did not relate to the deceased in that casket or the casket that accompanied it and so that's what alerted her and her team to the fact there was a serious problem,' he told the PA news agency. 'My understanding was that the co-mingling was at the very beginning, which alerted Dr Wilcox to the fact that she had to be 100% assiduous about checking the identification of the incoming remains. ‌ 'She was then able to determine that one particular loved one was not at all who the family thought they were.' The Indian ministry spokesperson, Shri Randhir Jaiswal said: "We have seen the report and have been working closely with the UK side from the moment these concerns and issues were brought to our attention. In the wake of the tragic crash, the concerned authorities had carried out identification of victims as per established protocols and technical requirements. "All mortal remains were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased. We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue." ‌ The family of three British victims who were buried in India after the crash said there was a 'clear lack of transparency and accountability' in how the identification and repatriation of victims was handled. Relatives of Akeel Nanabawa, his wife Hannaa Vorajee and their four-year-old daughter Sara Nanabawa said in a statement: 'Recent developments have only confirmed what many feared: that serious mistakes may have been made, and that the dignity and rights of victims and their families were not safeguarded as they should have been. ‌ 'In our case, we are confident that we received the correct bodies, based on the hospital's assurances, autopsy reports, their clothing and the personal belongings we recovered. 'But our concern now is not limited to ourselves. We are deeply troubled by what this means for other families who may still be searching for certainty and closure. 'This isn't just a personal tragedy; it is a collective one. And the mishandling of such a sensitive process speaks to a wider failure between the British and Indian authorities to act with care, co-ordination and respect.' It is understood no blame is being put on any UK agency for the blunders, Mr Healy-Pratt told the PA news agency. ‌ 'We know that they were not allowed anywhere near the DNA identification chain of custody link to the caskets,' he said. 'That was the Indian authorities, that's what we understand. 'But nobody's actually laid that out formally for families to look at and review, and that's what we want – explanations by the Indian government about who was in charge of that chain of custody, why were there the massive mistakes that were made and, the important thing, how do the families know that there aren't other remains of their loved ones in a fridge in an Indian hospital?' ‌ The lawyer said he believes the mistakes will be on the agenda for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer 's talks with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi on Wednesday and Thursday. Mr Healy-Pratt added: 'Somebody has to take responsibility in India for this massive screw up and then they actually have to ensure that they can give proper assurances to the families that the job has been completed and done properly. 'The hierarchy of needs of these families in air crashes, it's always the same. The first thing they want is their loved ones back so they can say goodbye to them; the second thing is they want to know how their loved ones died; third thing, they want to prevent further deaths so that all depends on getting number two right; and then number four, it will be some form of financial justice.' ‌ His firm has demanded a written explanation from Air India, including on the involvement of their contractors Kenyon International Emergency Services. PA has approached Air India's parent company, the Tata Group, and Kenyon Emergency Services for comment, as well as No 10 and the Foreign Office. ‌ Mr Healy-Pratt understands 12 bodies have been repatriated to the UK. He is investigating the identification mistakes but is also tasked with representing families at inquests, investigating the causes of the accident, taking High Court legal action in England against Air India and taking action against Boeing in the US courts. Besides those on board AI171, another 19 people also died and 67 were seriously injured. The only surviving passenger on the plane was Briton Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, who previously told The Sun it was a 'miracle' he was alive but felt 'terrible' he could not save his brother Ajay. A preliminary report into the incident from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau found both of the plane's fuel switches moved to the 'cut-off' position 'immediately' after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine. It has sparked questions over whether the crash was deliberate.

Remains of some British Air India crash victims wrongly identified, lawyer says
Remains of some British Air India crash victims wrongly identified, lawyer says

North Wales Chronicle

time40 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Remains of some British Air India crash victims wrongly identified, lawyer says

The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on June 12, killing 241 people on board. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed, making it one of the deadliest plane crashes in terms of the number of British fatalities. Aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt, whose firm Keystone Law is representing more than 20 British families who lost loved ones in the disaster, said relatives of one victim found out a casket contained 'co-mingled' remains, while a different family were told a coffin contained the body of someone else entirely, not their loved one. Mr Healy-Pratt, who is a partner at the firm, said the mistakes emerged after the 'sterling efforts' of senior coroner for Inner West London, Dr Fiona Wilcox, who 'picked up DNA anomalies' at the beginning of the repatriations. 'In the first two caskets that were repatriated, in one of the caskets, there was co-mingling of DNA which did not relate to the deceased in that casket or the casket that accompanied it and so that's what alerted her and her team to the fact there was a serious problem,' he told the PA news agency. 'My understanding was that the co-mingling was at the very beginning, which alerted Dr Wilcox to the fact that she had to be 100% assiduous about checking the identification of the incoming remains. 'She was then able to determine that one particular loved one was not at all who the family thought they were.' The family of three British victims who were buried in India after the crash said there was a 'clear lack of transparency and accountability' in how the identification and repatriation of victims was handled. Relatives of Akeel Nanabawa, his wife Hannaa Vorajee and their four-year-old daughter Sara Nanabawa said in a statement: 'Recent developments have only confirmed what many feared: that serious mistakes may have been made, and that the dignity and rights of victims and their families were not safeguarded as they should have been. 'In our case, we are confident that we received the correct bodies, based on the hospital's assurances, autopsy reports, their clothing and the personal belongings we recovered. 'But our concern now is not limited to ourselves. We are deeply troubled by what this means for other families who may still be searching for certainty and closure. 'This isn't just a personal tragedy; it is a collective one. And the mishandling of such a sensitive process speaks to a wider failure between the British and Indian authorities to act with care, co-ordination and respect.' It is understood no blame is being put on any UK agency for the blunders, Mr Healy-Pratt told PA. 'We know that they were not allowed anywhere near the DNA identification chain of custody link to the caskets,' he said. 'That was the Indian authorities, that's what we understand. 'But nobody's actually laid that out formally for families to look at and review, and that's what we want – explanations by the Indian government about who was in charge of that chain of custody, why were there the massive mistakes that were made and, the important thing, how do the families know that there aren't other remains of their loved ones in a fridge in an Indian hospital?' The lawyer said he believes the mistakes will be on the agenda for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's talks with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi on Wednesday and Thursday. Mr Healy-Pratt added: 'Somebody has to take responsibility in India for this massive screw up and then they actually have to ensure that they can give proper assurances to the families that the job has been completed and done properly. 'The hierarchy of needs of these families in air crashes, it's always the same. 'The first thing they want is their loved ones back so they can say goodbye to them; the second thing is they want to know how their loved ones died; third thing, they want to prevent further deaths so that all depends on getting number two right; and then number four, it will be some form of financial justice.' His firm has demanded a written explanation from Air India, including on the involvement of their contractors Kenyon International Emergency Services. PA has approached Air India's parent company, the Tata Group, and Kenyon Emergency Services for comment, as well as No 10 and the Foreign Office. Mr Healy-Pratt understands 12 bodies have been repatriated to the UK. He is investigating the identification mistakes but is also tasked with representing families at inquests, investigating the causes of the accident, taking High Court legal action in England against Air India and taking action against Boeing in the US courts. Besides those on board AI171, another 19 people also died and 67 were seriously injured. The only surviving passenger on the plane was Briton Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, who previously told The Sun it was a 'miracle' he was alive but felt 'terrible' he could not save his brother Ajay. A preliminary report into the incident from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau found both of the plane's fuel switches moved to the 'cut-off' position 'immediately' after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine. It has sparked questions over whether the crash was deliberate.

John Torode responds to MasterChef sacking
John Torode responds to MasterChef sacking

Sky News

time43 minutes ago

  • Sky News

John Torode responds to MasterChef sacking

MasterChef presenter John Torode will no longer work on the show after an allegation he used an "extremely offensive racist term" was upheld, the BBC has said. His co-host Gregg Wallace was also sacked last week after claims of inappropriate behaviour. In a statement posted on Instagram, Torode said he had not "heard from anyone at the BBC" or the production company that makes MasterChef but confirmed the specials he filmed for Christmas "will be (his) last". "I'd hoped that l'd have some say in my exit from a show l've worked on since its relaunch in 2005, but events in (the) last few days seem to have prevented that," he wrote. On Monday, Torode said an allegation he used racist language was upheld in a report into the behaviour of Wallace. The report found more than half of 83 allegations against Wallace were substantiated. Torode, 59, insisted he had "absolutely no recollection" of the alleged incident involving him and he "did not believe that it happened," adding "racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment". In a statement on Tuesday, a BBC spokesperson said the allegation "involves an extremely offensive racist term being used in the workplace". The claim was "investigated and substantiated by the independent investigation led by the law firm Lewis Silkin", they added. "The BBC takes this upheld finding extremely seriously," the spokesperson said. "We will not tolerate racist language of any kind... we told Banijay UK, the makers of MasterChef, that action must be taken. "John Torode's contract on MasterChef will not be renewed." In his statement posted on Instagram, Torode repeated that he had "no recollection" of the alleged incident where he was said to have used racist language. He said he had "loved every minute working on MasterChef, but it's time to pass the cutlery to someone else". "I will watch fondly from afar as I now focus on the many other exciting projects that I have been working towards," he added. "My tummy will be grateful for a rest after 20 years of eating, but what a joy it has been. "Life is everchanging and ever moving & sometimes personal happiness and fulfilment lay elsewhere." Australian-born Torode started presenting MasterChef alongside Wallace, 60, in 2005. 1:11 Torode sacking appears to be desperate bid from Davie to lead from front It is a headline that almost writes itself. MasterChef's remaining presenter now also for the chop. John Torode had successfully distanced himself from claims relating to his former co-host's inappropriate behaviour, weathering the storm, still appearing on daytime shows like This Morning. But after identifying himself as appearing in the same report looking into his colleague's behaviour - the heat was turned up. Perhaps unfairly so if indeed, as he claims, the alleged incident did not happen. Timing is everything. And the writing was perhaps on the wall after director general Tim Davie said in a briefing on the corporation's annual report that MasterChef can survive its current scandal as it is "much bigger than individuals". From the streaming of Bob Vylan's Glastonbury IDF death chants, to Greg Wallace, and the fallout over the handling of a Gaza documentary - there have been a lot of eyes on what's happening in boardrooms at the BBC. With the DG's leadership being called into question after a slew of errors, he is now clearly keen to be seen as in control. His zero-tolerance approach to what Torode did or didn't do seems like more of a desperate attempt to be seen as leading from the front. A statement from Banijay UK said it "takes this matter incredibly seriously" and Lewis Silkin "substantiated an accusation of highly offensive racist language against John Torode which occurred in 2018". "This matter has been formally discussed with John Torode by Banijay UK, and whilst we note that John says he does not recall the incident, Lewis Silkin have upheld the very serious complaint," the TV production company added. "Banijay UK and the BBC are agreed that we will not renew his contract on MasterChef." Earlier, as the BBC released its annual report, its director-general Tim Davie addressed MasterChef's future, saying it can survive as it is "much bigger than individuals". 3:30 Speaking to BBC News after Torode was sacked, Mr Davie said a decision is yet to be taken over whether an unseen MasterChef series - filmed with both Wallace and Torode last year - will be aired. "It's a difficult one because... those amateur chefs gave a lot to take part - it means a lot, it can be an enormous break if you come through the show," he added. "I want to just reflect on that with the team and make a decision, and we'll communicate that in due course." Mr Davie refused to say what the "seriously racist term" Torode was alleged to have used but said: "I certainly think we've drawn a line in the sand." In 2022, Torode was made an MBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours, for services to food and charity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store