Pro-Palestine protesters halt London Pride parade by hurling paint & blocking roads after terror ban
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
PRO-Palestine protesters have brought the London Pride parade to a standstill by hurling paint and blocking roads.
Youth Demand disrupted the event at around 2pm targeting the float of technology firm CISCO - a sponsor of London Pride.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Pro-Palestine protesters from Youth Demand throw red paint and glue themselves to the lead float during the annual Pride parade in London
Credit: EPA
3
Metropolitan Police officers speak to 83-year-old Reverend Sue Parfitt during a protest in support of Palestine Action
Credit: PA
3
A protest organised by the Defend Our Juries group in front of the Mahatma Gandhii statue in Parliament Square
Credit: PA
Meanwhile arrests have been made at a protest in London being held in support of Palestine Action after a ban on the group came into force on Saturday, police said.
Campaign group Defend Our Juries said it planned to gather in Parliament Square holding signs supporting Palestine Action.
The Metropolitan Police posted on X on Saturday afternoon saying officers are responding to the protest in Parliament Square and making arrests.
Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight.
The designation as a terror group means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The force posted on X saying: "Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square.
"The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence.
"Arrests are being made. Further updates will be shared here."
It comes as the Home Office welcomed the ban on Palestine Action after the group failed to block its proscription with a late-night legal bid.
The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening, which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight.
A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday: "We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group.
"The Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens."
The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7million of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was "disgraceful" and that the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage".
MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday.
Four people - Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 - have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton.
They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Police arrest 29 protesters on suspicion of terror offences after Palestine Action banned
Police have arrested 29 protesters on suspicion of terror offences after a ban on the Palestine Action group came into effect. The protest group was officially proscribed as a terrorist organisation from midnight on Saturday after a last-minute legal challenge at the Court of Appeal to delay it failed. The Metropolitan Police said on Saturday afternoon that the protesters had been held on suspicion of committing offences under the Terrorism Act 2000 following a protest in London's Parliament Square. "The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence," the force added. "Arrests are being made." MPs overwhelmingly voted in favour of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to ban the protest group under the legislation on Wednesday and the House of Lords approved the move the following day. The law change adds Palestine Action to the list of banned organisations along with the likes of al Qaeda, ISIS and Hezbollah, and makes membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Even wearing a T-shirt or badge with the group's name on attracts a maximum six-month sentence. On Saturday, a large number of Metropolitan Police officers circled around dozens of protesters carrying placards that said: "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." Israel has strongly denied any allegations of genocide. Campaign group Defend Our Juries said demonstrators were set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action. Officers who attended the protest were met with cries of "Met Police you are puppets of the Zionist state" and "leave them alone". Others were heard shouting, "British police off our streets", and "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free". Chants of "shame" were directed at police. A woman seen lying on the floor in handcuffs was carried away by officers and put in a police van. She was heard saying: "Free Palestine, stop the genocide, I oppose genocide, I support the rights of the Palestinian people, I support freedom of speech, I support freedom of assembly." A large group of people crowded around to film the scene. Officers placed her in a vehicle before returning to the square's Mahatma Gandhi statue. The protest started at about 1.10pm and officers were seen taking people away shortly after 1.30pm. Most of the officers dispersed at around 2.10pm. 'Creeping totalitarianism' Leslie Tate, 76, a Green councillor from Hertfordshire, said the group is not a violent organisation, and the proscription is wrong, adding the protest was "necessary to defend our democracy, and this is the creeping edge of totalitarianism". Among those removed by police was Reverend Sue Parfitt, who is 83. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action after two Voyager aircraft were allegedly damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on 20 June, which police said caused around £7m worth of damage. T-shirt could bring six-month jail term Even wearing a T-shirt or badge with the group's name on attracts a maximum six-month sentence. On Friday, the High Court heard the decision to ban the group was taken before the aircraft were allegedly damaged and as early as March this year. Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, is seeking to bring a legal challenge against the Home Office with a hearing for permission to bring a judicial review set to take place during the week of 21 July. On Friday, her lawyers applied for "interim relief" to temporarily block the legislation from coming into force until that hearing, arguing the Irish author Sally Rooney, who wrote Normal People, was among supporters who fear the "ramifications". But three judges, including the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, refused a bid to pause the ban coming into effect pending any Supreme Court bid at about 10.30pm on Friday, less than two hours before the ban was due to come into force. In their judgment, the judges said: "The role of the court is simply to interpret and apply the law.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Harvey would say, we're on the brink': why conservatives are coming for a gay rights hero
As San Francisco's pride festivities came to a close last week, a cloud hung over the otherwise joyful celebrations as the city's LGBTQ+ community learned that the US government had stripped a naval ship of its name honoring the gay rights pioneer Harvey Milk. Donald Trump's defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, claimed the action showed the administration's commitment to 'taking the politics' out of military naming conventions. San Francisco's queer community saw things differently. For many, the move was yet another example of Trump taking a swipe at progressive values. To others, the decision to remove Milk's name from the frigate represented something more sinister: an intention, on the part of an emboldened administration, to take the LGBTQ+ community out of public view and to strike their accomplishments from the historical record. 'On its own, it is not the most significant offense that we've witnessed in the past six months,' said Marc Stein, a professor of history at San Francisco State University who researches sexuality and politics. 'But when combined with so many other things, it sends a powerful message.' Hegseth's announcement is the latest attack on Milk's legacy from conservatives in California and on the national stage. In 2023, the southern California city of Temecula made news when its school board attempted to remove references to Milk from elementary school textbooks. Before that, it was revealed that Tucker Carlson, while a college student, had apparently been connected to a society celebrating Milk's murderer. Since Trump took office, the rollback of LGBTQ+ rights and visibility has only accelerated, from a directive to purge the military of transgender service members, to a supreme court decision allowing K-12 students to opt out of reading materials with LGBTQ+ themes. Taken together, LGBTQ+ advocates and community members fear that much of the progress made to secure their rights since Milk's assassination in 1978 is in peril. 'The renaming of the ship is part of a broader pattern wherein the Trump administration and its allies are trying to roll back the advances of the last several decades,' said Stein. At the Cinch Saloon, a historic gay bar in San Francisco's Castro district, June's Pride month celebrations were held against a backdrop of conversations about the fate of the community. Bartender Eric Berchtold expressed fear that the administration is working up to rescind the right to same-sex marriage. 'It's blatant malice,' Berchtold said. 'They want to erase us and eradicate our history like we don't exist.' Suzanne Ford, executive director of San Francisco Pride, said that fears of rolling back progress have been felt most acutely by older members of the community who were part of the gay liberation movement in the 1960s and 70s. Among those affected people are Cleve Jones, an activist and friend of Milk's who worked in Milk's office when he was city supervisor. 'I can remember when we were criminalized, when we were routinely beaten and fired, when you could not have a job if you were known to be gay,' said Jones. When Milk was elected as city supervisor in 1977, he was the country's first openly gay politician. Two decades prior, he had been forced to resign from the navy due to his sexuality. That's why publicly displaying Milk's name on a military vessel represents much more than a public gesture, explained Craig Loftin, professor of American studies at California State University, Fullerton and a scholar of LGBTQ+ history. 'In the big-picture history of LGBTQ people, the quest for public visibility and recognition is at the core and center of that narrative,' he said. '[Milk] was a leader in this idea of not hiding in the shadows.' That isn't to say that the quest for gay liberation has been linear. While the gay liberation movement made enormous strides on the fronts of decriminalization and visibility in the 1960s and 70s, the rise of the religious right as a powerful political bloc in the 80s paused progress. That coincided with the onset of the Aids pandemic, which devastated gay communities across the country – nowhere more acutely than in San Francisco. In response to silence on the part of the federal government and the Reagan administration, a new wave of activism was spurred that demanded research into treatment and condemned homophobic discrimination. 'It's waxed and waned,' said Loftin. 'It took several years before we had activist groups like Aact Up channeling their rage in a strategic, focused way that yielded significant results and moved gay culture further than where it had been,' Loftin said. In the decades that followed, the community saw same-sex marriage legalized, the military's 'Don't ask don't tell' policy repealed, and, most recently, a surge of visibility for trans Americans. 'There is a pendulum quality to a lot of history, but especially LGBT history.' Knowing this, Loftin is hopeful that the community will come together and fight back with vigor. 'My optimistic thought is that because they're hitting us so hard and so fast, the pendulum will swing back the other direction, hopefully harder and faster,' he said. '[Trump] is awakening a dragon.' Berchtold, the Cinch Saloon bartender, said he saw a lot more activism among patrons today than he did when he started working at the bar 22 years ago. Jones is more fearful. To him, there is a gulf between an older generation that remembers the traumas of past decades, and a younger cohort that takes the advances for granted. 'Younger ones never watched everyone they knew die,' said Jones. 'I carry those memories with me as I interact daily with young people who are completely oblivious to that reality.' To Stein and others, what is most jarring about the renaming of USNS Harvey Milk is that it lifts the veil on which groups the administration plans to target. Until now, policy decisions have primarily focused on restricting the rights of trans Americans – which advocates say has had the effect of making cisgender members of the LGBTQ+ community complacent. 'It is a lie that the administration is only going after trans people,' said Stein. 'They are especially targeting trans people … but [cis] gay and lesbian people should not feel like they are going to be safe from what's happening.' Jones echoed: 'There is a significant number of gay and lesbian men and women who may think this is going to stop with trans people. That's just foolishness.' Advocates and scholars also see attacks on the LGBTQ+ community as connected to the administration's larger ambitions to curb civil liberties, including those of women and immigrants. 'There is going to be great variation depending on … where you live,' said Stein, drawing a thread between disparities in access to gender-affirming care, abortion rights and immigrant protections. 'Those of us who are in San Francisco and California are protected in some respects from the worst of what's going on, but we also live in a nation with a powerful federal government. 'Everything is very fragile at this moment,' added Ford. 'You can't take for granted that they're not going to try to take your rights.' Jones says that if he were alive today, Harvey Milk would agree. A Jewish American who came of age during the second world war, he would have seen the government's actions as indicative of an unhealthy democracy and sounded the alarm. 'He would say, 'Watch out. We are on the brink. It is happening again. It is unfolding all around us.''
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
LGBTQ+ figures criticise supreme court's gender ruling at London Pride
Thousands of people gathered in London for Pride on Saturday, but prominent LGBTQIA+ figures at the event voiced concern that transgender people are being 'villainised more than ever'. Singer and actor Olly Alexander and writer Shon Faye were among those to criticise a UK supreme court ruling on the definition of a woman at London's annual celebration of LGBTQI+ communities. Alexander, the Eurovision 2024 contestant, told the PA news agency: 'Trans people right now, they need our support and love more than ever, they're being villainised, demonised in the press, by a lot of the media, and trans people they're just like us … they're you, they're me. 'They deserve the same respect, the same rights, the same privileges, same opportunities, and that's why Pride is so important this year.' In April the supreme court ruled the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Before the march, Faye, author of Love in Exile and The Transgender Issue, said 'we've just seen an unprecedented attack on queer rights and trans rights across the world'. She told PA: 'For the trans community in particular here in the UK, we've seen an onslaught of misinformation, attacks in the media, and unfortunately the roll back of human rights in the courts. 'I think (Pride) is more important than ever – I think a lot of trans people have been made to feel afraid in public space and pride this year is about taking back public space, and showing what we're not going to be silenced, and we're not going to be intimidated.' US pop singer Chaka Khan is headlining a concert in Trafalgar Square after the march, at which about 500 organisations filed from Hyde Park Corner, through Piccadilly Circus and on to Whitehall Place. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: 'It was an honour and a privilege to again walk at the front of London's world-famous Pride parade as huge crowds of Londoners and visitors joined together for an incredible show of love, unity and solidarity with our LGBTQI+ communities. 'The fantastic parade and celebrations across central London have shown once again that our capital is a beacon of inclusivity and diversity. 'This year's event was also a defiant reminder that we must keep fighting for equality and take a stand against those seeking to roll back hard-won rights.' A YouGov poll released before the event found 67% of people in the UK believe the country is inclusive to LGBTQ+ people, and 60% would not welcome a shift towards more negative attitudes. Simon Blake, chief executive of charity Stonewall, which commissioned the survey, said, despite the findings, 'we know many LGBTQ+ people do not feel this in their neighbourhoods and workplaces'.
