Apple Is Pushing AI Into More of Its Products—but Still Lacks a State-of-the-Art Model
Apple continued its slow-and-steady approach to integrating artificial intelligence into devices like the iPhone, Mac, and Apple Watch on Monday, announcing a raft of new features and upgrades at WWDC. The company also premiered the Foundation Models framework, a way for developers to write code that taps into Apple's AI models.
Among the buzzier AI announcements at the event was Live Translation, a feature that translates phone and FaceTime calls from one language to another in real time. Apple also showed off Workout Buddy, an AI-powered voice helper designed to provide words of encouragement and useful updates during exercise. 'This is your second run this week,' Workout Buddy told a jogging woman in a demo video. 'You're crushing it.'
Apple also announced an upgrade to Visual Intelligence, a tool that uses AI to interpret the world through a device's camera. The new version can also look at screenshots to do things like identify a product or summarize a webpage. Apple showcased upgrades to Genmoji and Image Playground, two tools that generate stylized images with AI. And it showed off ways of using AI to automate tasks, generate text, summarize emails, edit photos, and find video clips.
The incremental announcements did little to dispel the notion that Apple is playing catch up on AI. The company does not yet have a model capable of competing with the best offerings of OpenAI, Meta, or Google, and still hands some challenging queries off to ChatGPT.
Some analysts suggest that Apple's more incremental approach to AI development is warranted.
'The jury is still out on whether users are gravitating towards a particular phone for AI driven features,' says Paolo Pescatore, an analyst at PP Foresight. 'Apple needs to strike the fine balance of bringing something fresh and not frustrating its loyal core base of users,' Pescatore adds. 'It comes down to the bottom line, and whether AI is driving any revenue uplift.'
Francisco Jeronimo, an analyst at IDC, says Apple making its AI models accessible to developers is important because of the company's vast reach with coders. '[It] brings Apple closer to the kind of AI tools that competitors such as OpenAI, Google and Meta have been offering for some time,' Jeronimo said in a statement.
Apple's AI models, while not the most capable, run on a personal device, meaning they work without a network connection and don't incur the fees that come with accessing models from OpenAI and others. The company also touts a way for developers to use cloud models that keeps private data secure through what it calls Private Cloud Compute.
But Apple may need to take bigger leaps with its use of AI in the future, given that its competitors are exploring how the technology might reinvent personal computing.
Both Google and OpenAI have shown off futuristic AI helpers that can talk in real time and see the world through a device's camera. Last month OpenAI announced it would acquire a company started by the legendary Apple designer, Jony Ive, in order to develop new kinds of AI-infused hardware.
Even if Apple still lags behind in terms of building advanced AI, the company is publishing AI research at a steady clip. A paper posted a few days before WWDC points to significant shortcomings with today's most advanced AI models—a convenient finding, perhaps, if you are still getting up to speed.
The paper finds that the latest models from OpenAI and others, which use a simulated form of reasoning to solve difficult problems, tend to fail when problems reach a certain level of complexity. The Apple researchers asked various models to solve increasingly complex versions of a mathematical puzzle known as the Tower of Hanoi, and found that they succeeded up until a point, then failed dramatically.
Subbarao Kambhampati, a professor at Arizona State University who previously published similar work on the limits of reasoning models, says Apple's research reinforces the idea that simulated reasoning approaches may need to be improved in order to tackle a wider range of problems. Reasoning models 'are very useful, but there are definitely important limits,' Kambhampati says.
But even if the work suggests that a more cautious approach to AI is warranted, Kambhampati does not believe Apple is being complacent. 'If you know what's going on inside Apple, they're still pretty gung-ho about LLMs,' he says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel announces more job cuts and drops projects in Europe in plan to save the company
Intel Corp. is shedding thousands of workers and cutting expenses as its new CEO works to revive the fortunes of the struggling chipmaker that helped launch Silicon Valley but has fallen behind rivals like Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. In a memo to employees Thursday, CEO Lip-Bu Tan said Intel plans to end the year with 75,000 "core" workers, excluding subsidiaries, through layoffs and attrition. That's down from 99,500 core employees at the end of last year. The company previously announced a 15% workforce reduction. "I know the past few months have not been easy. We are making hard but necessary decisions to streamline the organisation, drive greater efficiency and increase accountability at every level of the company," Tan wrote. In addition, Intel will scrap previously planned projects in Germany and Poland and also move assembly and test operations in Costa Rica to larger sites in Vietnam and Malaysia. Costa Rica will remain a "home to key engineering teams and corporate functions," Tan said in the memo. Related Nvidia to sell H20 chips to China again after US gives export approval ASML sees share price drop as Trump's tariffs darken outlook In the US, the company said it will "further" slow construction of a semiconductor plant in Ohio. Founded in 1968 at the start of the PC revolution, Intel missed the technological shift to mobile computing triggered by Apple's 2007 release of the iPhone. Intel's troubles have been magnified since the advent of artificial intelligence — a booming field where the chips made by once-smaller rival Nvidia have become tech's hottest commodity. The Santa Clara, California-based company's market cap was $98.71 billion (€84bn) as of the market close on Thursday, compared with Nvidia's $4.24 trillion (€3.61tr). Tan said Intel is focusing on its "core product portfolio" and artificial intelligence offerings to serve customers better. "There are no more blank checks," Tan wrote. "Every investment must make economic sense." For the second quarter, Intel reported a loss of $2.9bn (€2.47bn), or 67 cents per share, down from a loss of $1.6bn (€1.36bn), or 38 cents per share, a year earlier. Excluding one-time items, the company posted a loss of 10 cents a share. Revenue was flat at $12.9bn (€10.1bn). Analysts, on average, were expecting adjusted earnings of 1 cent per share on revenue of $12bn (€10.2bn), according to a poll by FactSet. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures climb as Trump downplays Powell tensions
US stock futures climbed after President Trump visited the Federal Reserve and Wall Street digested the latest batch of corporate earnings. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) fluttered up 0.2%. Trump visited the Fed on Thursday afternoon to take a tour of its $2.5 billion renovation project, led by chair Jerome Powell. The president has spent weeks criticizing the project as too expensive, sparking speculation he might use it as a pretext to try to fire Powell for alleged mismanagement. During the tour, however, Trump indicated he wasn't considering firing the Fed chair. "To do that is a big move, and I just don't think it's necessary," he said. The president also downplayed his disagreements with Powell over interest rates, saying he believes the chair will "do the right thing." "I'd love him to lower interest rates," the president reiterated. Intel reported its earnings after the bell Thursday, beating Wall Street expectations on revenue. The company's stock turned negative, however, as CEO Lip-Bu Tan discussed layoffs and the cancelation of some factory plans. In day trading, the S&P 500 scored its fourth consecutive record high in a row as Google (GOOG) earnings boosted optimism about the promises of AI. Wall Street also continued to hope that the Trump administration will strike more trade deals before the president's Aug. 1 deadline, even as the risk of higher-than-expected baseline tariffs grows. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs This week, Wall Street has largely shrugged off trade tensions as Big Tech earnings roll in. Next week brings more market-moving results from members of the "Magnificent Seven," including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Meta (META), and Amazon (AMZN). Oil prices climbed overnight Thursday, driven by renewed optimism over global trade negotiations, which bolstered confidence in economic growth and energy demand. The wave of positivity managing to overshadow concerns about a possible increase in Venezuelan oil supply. Reuters reports: Read more here. Oil prices climbed overnight Thursday, driven by renewed optimism over global trade negotiations, which bolstered confidence in economic growth and energy demand. The wave of positivity managing to overshadow concerns about a possible increase in Venezuelan oil supply. Reuters reports: Read more here. Oil prices climbed overnight Thursday, driven by renewed optimism over global trade negotiations, which bolstered confidence in economic growth and energy demand. The wave of positivity managing to overshadow concerns about a possible increase in Venezuelan oil supply. Reuters reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
36 minutes ago
- Fast Company
iPadOS 26 is way more Mac-like. Where does that lead?
Greetings, everyone, and welcome back to Fast Company 's Plugged In. It was one of the best-received pieces of Apple news I can recall. At the company's WWDC conference last month, it announced that its iPadOS 26 software upgrade would give the iPad a powerful new interface closely modeled on the one offered by the Mac. The response can be fairly summarized as finally. 'It's over: Apple has fixed multitasking on the iPad, mimicking the experience on the Mac,' tweeted Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who had earlier reported such a move was imminent. 'We won!' The move is Apple's most comprehensive answer to a long-simmering conundrum: How can it make the iPad—which packs some of its most powerful hardware—into a professional-strength computing tool? Starting now, it's inviting iPad users to judge the results for themselves. After four rounds of iPadOS 26 developer betas since WWDC, the company is releasing its first public beta version of the software, along with corresponding ones for the iPhone, Mac, and Apple Watch. Final versions are scheduled to ship this fall. There's quite a lot in iPadOS 26 I like a lot, starting with the translucent-y new Liquid Glass aesthetic —rough around the edges in spots, but satisfying eye candy overall. Apple has brought the Mac's Preview app to iPad, beefed up the iPad Files app to more closely resemble the Mac's Finder, added better support for background tasks such as video processing, and made it possible to put folders in the Dock—all of which makes the iPad feel more like a full-powered productivity machine. Without making a big deal out of it, the company also improved iPadOS's support for web apps, a boon for any piece of software whose browser-based version is better than its native iPad experience. However, as someone who's used an iPad as my main computer for almost 14 years, I can't join the chorus of unbridled enthusiasm for iPadOS 26's embrace of Mac conventions such as floating, overlapping windows and a menu bar at the top of the screen. Apple may well be making the right decision to please the largest pool of people who want to get work done on its tablet. But it's also moving decisively away from some of the philosophies that attracted me to the platform in the first place, and I'm trepidatious about where that might lead. (My Fast Company colleague Jesus Diaz expressed similar qualms right after the WWDC keynote.) Fifteen years ago, when the iPad was new, it wasn't Mac-like at all. Instead, it was often described as a 'giant iPhone'—depending on your perspective, either high praise or a damning indictment. Soon enough, that changed. Apps arrived that let you accomplish tasks that were previously the domain of Macs and Windows PCs; accessory makers started shipping keyboard cases that turned the iPad into a mini-laptop. Apple doubled down on these trends with 2015's original iPad Pro, a bigger-screen version with optional Smart Keyboard. Ever since, the company has made new iPads —not just the Pro, but other models such as the iPad Air—more and more capable of serious work. That included adding trackpad support in the Magic Keyboard, a classic Mac feature that made the transition to the iPad with aplomb. At the 2015 iPad Pro launch event, Apple CEO Tim Cook declared, 'The iPad is the clearest expression of our vision of the future of personal computing.' Over the past decade, however, it's become obvious that the hardware aspect of this proposition has been easier to figure out than the software. The company has made several stabs at features for letting users juggle multiple apps, all designed with touch-friendliness in mind, and seemed determined not to simply clone the Mac's way of doing things. However, it never felt like the platform had solved productivity or even made steady progress in one direction. Sometimes, it felt stuck in limbo. In January 2020, Daring Fireball 's John Gruber smartly analyzed why the iPad's user interface could baffle the uninitiated. His critique remained relevant for every iPadOS version until iPadOS 26: To launch the first app, you tap its icon on the homescreen, just like on the iPhone, and just like on the iPad before split-screen multitasking. Tapping an icon to open an app is natural and intuitive. But to get a second app on the same screen, you cannot tap its icon. You must first slide up from the bottom of the screen to reveal the Dock. Then you must tap and hold on an app icon in the Dock. Then you drag the app icon out of the Dock to launch it in a way that it will become the second app splitting the display. But isn't dragging an icon out of the Dock the way that you remove apps from the Dock? Yes, it is—when you do it from the homescreen. So the way you launch an app in the Dock for split-screen mode is identical to the way you remove that app from the Dock. Yet once I mastered these maneuvers, and learned you could also add a second app from iPadOS's Spotlight search, they became embedded in my muscle memory. More importantly, I loved that the iPad maxed out at two on-screen apps, or three if you counted the SlideOver feature. Floatable, draggable, overlappable windows of the sort that help define the Mac and Windows had always struck me as simulating a desktop—but a messy one. Any time I invested in rearranging them felt like wasted cognitive overload. Similarly, I cherished the iPad's abandonment of Mac/Windows-style menus, which felt like a card catalog overwhelmed by features I didn't need at that particular moment, if ever. By forcing iPad developers to think harder about how to engineer their interfaces for maximum efficiency, Apple gave them the opportunity to transcend the cruft of older interfaces. Many rose to the challenge. While Apple has given iPadOS 26 a full-screen-only mode for people who are just as happy using it as, well, a giant iPhone, it hasn't tossed many bones in the direction of those who liked the Split View and SlideOver features, which it has now retired. Even the fastest methods of filling the screen with two apps now take more steps and feel like work. Meanwhile, using the menu bar remains optional, though I worry that developers will begin to see it as the primary interface, not an alternative one. To me, the least successful Mac import is iPadOS 26's 'traffic light' system for closing, minimizing, maximizing, and tiling apps. The buttons are located in the menu bar for full-screen apps and in the upper left-hand corner of partial-screen ones, imposing a mental tax as you remember where they are. And since they're too dinky to touch with adequate precision, they expand when you engage with them, requiring you to reposition your finger or cursor. It's tough to imagine Apple coming up with them for the iPad if they weren't already a Mac staple. If making the iPad more like a Mac was a potentially crowd-pleasing approach all along, why didn't Apple do it long ago? In an interview with MacStories ' Federico Viticci, software chief Craig Federighi said it's only recently that the company has been able to engineer a full-blown windowing system that runs well on a range of iPad models. The interview is the best explanation of Apple's iPadOS 26 thinking I've seen, and I encourage you to read it if you're as interested in this stuff as I am. Still, understanding why Apple gave the iPad a Mac-esque makeover doesn't clarify its long-term strategy. Will the next few years of iPadOS releases be about bringing the platform in even closer alignment with its elder sibling? Or is there still room for them to diverge—even sharply, if appropriate? What happens if AI transforms how all computing devices work in ways nobody yet understands? Also: Are we any closer to being able to run Mac apps on an iPad—not a prospect that makes me giddy, but one certain users have long craved? (As quoted by Viticci, Federighi said the iPad shouldn't run MacOS, but he said nothing about Mac apps.) As I write, the first hands-on evaluations of iPadOS 26 in its public beta form are popping up online. So far, so good: 'Not to put too fine a point on it, this is the best iPad has ever been,' says Gizmodo 's Kyle Barr. 'It's like a weight has been lifted from the soul of the iPad,' writes Six Colors ' Jason Snell, a pretty dedicated user of the tablet himself. Right now, I'm feeling a tad weighed down by some of the update's changes. Here's hoping they grow on me, and that iPadOS 27 and beyond reflect Apple's future vision of computing rather than merely continuing to catch up with its past.
