logo
Trump eyes Tesla subsidies, Musk says 'cut it all'

Trump eyes Tesla subsidies, Musk says 'cut it all'

Perth Nowa day ago
US President Donald Trump has suggested the government efficiency department should review the subsidies to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies to save money, reigniting a war of words between arguably the world's most powerful person and its richest.
Trump's remarks came after Musk, a Republican mega-donor, renewed his criticism of the sweeping tax cut and spending bill and vowed to unseat lawmakers who supported it despite campaigning on limiting government spending.
Tesla shares fell more than six per cent before the market open as the feud could add fresh hurdles for the business empire of Musk, whose main source of wealth, the electric car maker, is betting on the success of robotaxis being tested in Texas.
The US Transportation Department regulates vehicle design and will play a key role in deciding if Tesla can mass-produce robotaxis without pedals and steering wheels, while Musk's rocket firm SpaceX has about $US22 billion ($A33 billion) in federal contracts.
"Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump said in a Truth Social post.
"No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!," he said, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency.
In response, Musk said on his own social media platform X, "I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now."
Trump said Musk was upset because he lost the EV mandate in the recent tax and spending bill and warned the Tesla CEO "could lose a lot more than that".
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also pushed back on Musk's criticism that the bill would balloon the deficit, saying, "I'll take care of" the country's finances.
Trump had in early June threatened to cut Musk's government contracts when their relationship erupted into an all-out social media brawl over the tax-cut bill, which non-partisan analysts estimate would add about $US3 trillion to the US debt.
The rift had resulted in Tesla shares erasing $US150 billion in market value as investors feared a tougher regulatory road for the self-driving robotaxi that underpin much of the company's valuation.
The stock recovered after Musk walked back some of his jabs, saying he had gone "too far".
"Musk cannot stop himself. He is getting on Trump's bad side again. Tesla international sales have fallen significantly and if he loses US subsidies, US sales are likely to fall as well," said Stock Trader Network Chief Strategist Dennis Dick, who holds Tesla shares.
"Musk needs Trump, Trump does not need Musk," he said.
Tesla sales have dropped for a sixth straight month in Sweden and Denmark in June, data on Tuesday showed, but they rose in Norway and Spain during the same month.
Analysts expect the company to report a drop in second-quarter delivery figures on Wednesday.
After weeks of relative silence, Musk rejoined the debate on Saturday as the Senate took up the package, calling it "utterly insane and destructive" in a post on X.
On Monday, Musk said lawmakers who campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill "should hang their heads in shame!"
"And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this earth," Musk said.
He also called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated "that we live in a one-party country - the PORKY PIG PARTY!!"
The criticism marked a dramatic shift after the billionaire spent nearly $US300 million on Trump's re-election campaign and led the administration's DOGE initiative.
Musk has argued that the legislation would greatly increase the country's debt and erase the savings he says he achieved through DOGE.
It remains unclear how much sway Musk has over Congress or what effect his opinions might have on the bill's passage.
But Republicans have expressed concern that his on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Third-tier alliance partner': Australia's relationship with US in ‘shabby' condition says foreign affairs expert as rift deepens
‘Third-tier alliance partner': Australia's relationship with US in ‘shabby' condition says foreign affairs expert as rift deepens

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Third-tier alliance partner': Australia's relationship with US in ‘shabby' condition says foreign affairs expert as rift deepens

Australia is taking all the wrong steps to revitalise its strategic relationship with the US according to a leading foreign affairs expert as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese plays down concerns of a deepening rift between the two nations. Foreign Minister Penny Wong met with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday in Washington DC in addition to other Quad partners including India and Japan. Ms Wong conveyed confidence in the strength of Australia's alliance with the United States and said that Mr Rubio had 'expressed his regret' after Mr Albanese's meeting with the US President at the G7 summit abruptly fell through. She also acknowledged the government's 'differences with the Trump administration,' while Mr Albanese dismissed reports of an emerging rift and said he and the President had a 'respectful' relationship. However, the foreign editor of The Australian newspaper Greg Sheridan blasted the Prime Minister for downplaying the severity of the situation and said that Australia's place as a core ally and strategic partner of the United States had all but vanished. 'We've moved from being a first-tier alliance partner to a third-tier Alliance partner,' Mr Sheridan told Sky News host Steve Price. 'So Trump has been elected for eight months, and Albanese hasn't seen him. Albanese was stupid not to go there before the inauguration because everything with Trump is a personal relationship.' Despite stating that the alliance was in the interest of both countries, Mr Sheridan reiterated that the US President's decision to meet with a litany of other global leaders apart from Mr Albanese was calculated and spurred by actions made by the Albanese government. 'You can be sure that the Americans know just what they're doing in the way they're snubbing Albanese. And Albanese has nothing of interest to say to them.' Mr Sheridan said Australia's refusal to increase its lagging defence budget, a decision to seek legal advice on the US strikes against Iran and its move to sanction hardline Israeli ministers among other factors had damaged Australia's reputation in Washington DC. 'We've got an anaemic, hopeless, pitiful defence budget. We got an economy that's going backwards, negative productivity, negative per capita living standards growth.' 'We have got the smallest manufacturing sector in the OECD, the least complex economy and Albanese is a man from the left who channels every bit of politics that Trump hates. So, there's no positive agenda there.' The international relations specialist also said defence spending was a significant point of tension in the feud and stated that Australia should follow in the direction of NATO member states and bolster its defence capacities in line with the expectations of the US. 'It's just a joke. Every European NATO partner has agreed to spend three and a half percent of their GDP on defence. We spend just over two percent. It was two percent when Albanese first came into office, it's still two percent.' 'They tell us we're facing the most dangerous strategic circumstances since World War Two. Now the Americans won't cut us adrift simply because our geography is very useful, but we are contributing nothing to the Alliance. They contribute... Everything to the alliance.' With the US recently launching a review into the landmark AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, Mr Sheridan cast serious doubt over the tenability of the agreement and said there were no concrete assurances for the Americans to follow through on their commitments. 'We're giving them 800 million and are going to give them $5bn Australian, $3bn US over several years and this is designed to get them keeping talking nice to us.' 'That's to allegedly to enhance their industrial capacity so they'll build subs more quickly. But the agreement says not until 2031 does a President have to decide whether he actually sells one to us.'

Democrats call payout a ‘bribe in plain sight' as Paramount settles lawsuit while seeking government approval for mega-merger
Democrats call payout a ‘bribe in plain sight' as Paramount settles lawsuit while seeking government approval for mega-merger

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Democrats call payout a ‘bribe in plain sight' as Paramount settles lawsuit while seeking government approval for mega-merger

Paramount Global, the parent company of US broadcaster CBS, has agreed to pay US President Donald Trump $US16 million (over $24 million) to settle a lawsuit over an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, aired on its flagship program 60 Minutes. The settlement has reignited accusations of political interference, with senior Democrats making wild calls for federal investigators to probe whether the payout amounts to a 'bribe'. Mr Trump sued CBS in October, alleging that the Harris interview had been deceptively edited to favour the Democratic Party ahead of the 2024 presidential election. The network aired two versions of the interview in which Ms Harris appeared to give conflicting responses to a question on the Israel–Hamas war. CBS and several industry groups defended the edit as standard television practice. Paramount said the settlement would be allocated to Mr Trump's future presidential library. 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret,' the company said. However, Mr Trump's legal team declared the outcome a success. 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people,' a spokesperson said. The fallout was immediate. Shares in Paramount dropped 1.2 per cent on Wednesday, and the political reaction was swift and severe. Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren raised the alarm over potential corruption. 'With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight,' she said. 'Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken.' She also announced plans to introduce legislation aimed at restricting donations to sitting presidents' libraries. Senator Ron Wyden said: 'Paramount just paid Trump a bribe for merger approval. State prosecutors should make the corporate execs who sold out our democracy answer in court, today.' FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, said the lawsuit was 'entirely meritless' and condemned Paramount's decision to settle. 'It casts a long shadow over the integrity of the transaction pending before the FCC and marks a dangerous precedent for the First Amendment,' she said. Senator Bernie Sanders warned: 'Paramount's decision will only embolden Trump to continue attacking, suing and intimidating the media which he has labelled 'the enemy of the people.'' Paramount co-CEO George Cheeks addressed the matter at the company's annual shareholders meeting, explaining the reasons for the settlement. He cited the 'somewhat unpredictable cost' of mounting a legal defence, the potential for 'significant financial as well as reputational damage' and the 'disruption of an ongoing legal battle'. The case entered mediation in April, after Mr Trump increased his damages claim to $20 billion in February. As part of the settlement, 60 Minutes agreed to release transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates once aired, subject to redactions for legal or national security reasons. The lawsuit, filed under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, is part of a broader pattern of legal challenges Mr Trump has launched against the media. In recent months, ABC News settled a separate case by donating $15 million to Mr Trump's presidential library and issuing a public apology over inaccurate on-air statements. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, paid $25 million to settle a lawsuit related to suspending Mr Trump's accounts following the January 6 Capitol riot.

Hamas reviews President Trump's ceasefire deal with Israel
Hamas reviews President Trump's ceasefire deal with Israel

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Hamas reviews President Trump's ceasefire deal with Israel

Hamas has claimed it is reviewing US President Donald Trump's proposal for a ceasefire between Gaza and Israel. President Trump claims Israel has agreed to the conditions of a 60-day ceasefire. Delegations are expected to take place today in Cairo with mediators. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said any peace agreement would banish Hamas from Gaza and permanently free all hostages currently held in Gaza. Trump and Netanyahu are expected to meet at the White House on Monday to discuss this further.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store