
Trump freed to pursue even more of his agenda after Supreme Court win on injunctions
If President Donald Trump has wielded his executive power like a Mack Truck over the last months, plowing ahead with a velocity unseen in his recent predecessors, his win at the Supreme Court on Friday could act as high-octane fuel in his tank.
By setting new limits on federal judges using nationwide injunctions, the court freed Trump's hand to pursue his already sweeping view of presidential power in ever more expansive ways. The morning decision punctuated what has been an extraordinary week for the president, both at home and abroad, as he approaches the six-month mark of his second administration.
For a president who continually rails against unelected judges exceeding their mandate by blocking his policies, Friday's Supreme Court ruling amounted to a form of vindication.
And after a string of presidents chafed against judges who blocked their policies from taking effect, Trump now finds himself freed from some of the burdens his predecessors faced.
'In practice, he has now become a more powerful executive than he was before this decision came down,' said Shira Scheindlin, a former US District Court judge. 'But I will say that many presidents have been very unhappy with these national injunctions. It started under George W. Bush, then Obama, then Biden, and of course, Trump,' she said. 'It depends whose ox is being gored.'
White House officials were quick to cite a line in Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion as bolstering Trump's criticism of judges he thinks rule beyond their remit.
'When a court concludes the executive branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power too,' wrote Barrett, whom Trump appointed during his first term but had recently been the subject of his frustration — at least before Friday's ruling.
The ostensible issue at hand in the ruling was birthright citizenship, and there could be immediate repercussions on who is eligible to become a citizen in at least some states. Some Democrats and immigrant rights groups warned of pending bureaucratic chaos, where a baby's birth state would determine whether they qualified for US citizenship.
But the citizenship issue itself won't be decided by the court until later. And when Trump emerged in the White House Briefing Room on Friday morning, the matter appeared almost secondary to the larger win that erases one of the checks on his executive authority.
'Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis,' an ebullient Trump said from the White House podium.
Aside from the birthright citizenship issue, he listed ending funding for 'sanctuary cities,' suspending refugee resettlement, freezing federal funding and blocking taxpayer funds for transgender medical care as examples of areas where the administration now plans to use the ruling to unblock Trump's orders.
'We have so many of them,' Trump said. 'I have a whole list. I'm not going to bore you.'
There are other avenues plaintiffs could pursue to block Trump, including class action lawsuits. And while Friday's ruling could slow his orders from being blocked, many may still ultimately end up before the Supreme Court.
But at least for Friday, Trump was in a celebratory mood.
The president not only took great delight in the court's ruling, but in the court itself. He walked into the briefing room wearing a smile of satisfaction, the capstone of one of the most remarkable weeks since returning to power.
His hourlong news conference played out as a victory lap not only for his birthright citizenship executive order but also for his decision to launch military strikes on Iran, despite not knowing the ultimate outcome of either.
The court has yet to rule on the merits of the immigration question and the long-term fate of the Iranian nuclear program is still in question.
'Well,' Trump said Friday as he stepped to the lectern, 'this was a big one, wasn't it?'
He was referring to the Supreme Court opinion handed down less than two hours earlier, but the words also served as a metaphor for the past weeks of his presidency, one that is forever shaped by his first term in office.
Not only does Trump enjoy the luxury of an obedient Republican Party, he also has the enviable benefit of a high court majority shaped by his hand.
Trump is only the latest occupant of the Oval Office to test the powers of the executive branch of government. The court's ruling on Friday will almost certainly be applauded by future presidents of either party.
'These injunctions have allowed district court judges to be emperors,' Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi, standing alongside the president, said Friday. 'They vetoed all of President Trump's power, and they cannot do that. This has been a bipartisan problem that has lasted five presidential terms. Five different presidents and it has ended today.'
But the fact that he had the good fortune of nominating three Supreme Court justices in his first term and is back to see the fruits of their conservative labors makes him somewhat distinct from nearly all presidents who have come before him.
'I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very big and complex problem, and they've made it very simple,' Trump said. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Thomas. Great people.'
That is not how he was describing Barrett in private over the last several months. Behind the scenes, the president had griped about some of the Supreme Court justices he appointed during his first term, believing they were not sufficiently standing behind his agenda.
In private, some of Trump's allies have told him that Barrett is 'weak' and that her rulings have not been in line with how she presented herself in an interview before Trump nominated her to the bench in 2020, according to sources. Many conservatives were apoplectic in March when Barrett voted to reject Trump's plan to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid.
'It's not just one ruling. It's been a few different events he's complained about privately,' a senior administration official told CNN in June.
Now, however, Barrett — along with the court's other five conservatives — handed Trump a win in the most prominent case of the term.
As another Supreme Court term comes to an end, questions will inevitably rise about potential retirements on the bench. The prospect of Trump gaining another appointment is far from certain, but hardly out of the question. White House lawyers have developed an early roster of contenders should a vacancy occur, a standard practice for all administrations.
The president decided to forego a trip Friday to his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey, opting to spend a rare weekend at the White House as Senate Republicans work through an impasse over a monumental tax-and-spending bill that contains virtually all of Trump's domestic agenda. He once again called out those who are raising concerns about the measure, describing them as 'grandstanders,' and although he initially suggested his July 4 deadline was not 'the end-all,' he later upped the pressure on Truth Social.
'The House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th — We can get it done,' he posted.
As Trump turns toward the second half of his first year in office, myriad challenges await him and his party as the early stages of the midterm election campaign begin taking shape.
Republican pollsters have privately warned party leaders of the potential political fallout from the megabill, particularly the proposed deep cuts to Medicaid and other social safety-net programs to help pay for the extension of Trump's tax cuts. The president has repeatedly pledged to not touch Medicaid, a promise that may well be litigated in the 2026 campaign.
But Trump offered no signs of anxiety that many of his fellow Republicans in Congress have expressed – particularly about funding for rural hospitals – arguing again Friday that his bill would be beneficial to all Americans.
'It's a great bill. It's a popular bill,' Trump said. 'But we'll get no Democrats, only because they don't want to vote for Trump.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Tim Walz gives eulogy for former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman's funeral
Democratic former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman was honored for her legislative accomplishments and her humanity during a funeral Saturday where former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris joined the over 1,000 mourners.


Gizmodo
29 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Trump and His Online Alpha Males Have a Meltdown Over NYC's Newest Socialist Star
Zohran Mamdani has managed to do something rare in today's fractured political climate: he has united a faction of the Democratic establishment with an army of online alpha males in shared outrage. Since his victory in the Democratic primary for mayor of New York on June 24, the socialist assemblyman has been subjected to a relentless and violent online onslaught, particularly from the influencers of the self described manosphere. For these men, who view feminism, wokeness, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion as existential threats, the attacks are constant. Through a torrent of posts, memes, and reposts, their message boils down to two simple lines: Mamdani, 33, is 'dangerous' because he is a 'socialist,' and he will ruin New York. He must be stopped at all costs. This campaign has taken on a special urgency given that in deep blue New York City, the Democratic candidate is heavily favored to win the mayoralty. The operation to stop Mamdani received its kickoff from the highest level of the Republican party. 'The Democrats have crossed the line,' President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on June 25. 'Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Democratic Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor.' Trump's post signaled the start of a coordinated effort. Realizing a Republican victory would be difficult, if not impossible, pro-Trump billionaire Bill Ackman is offering to fund a 'centrist' candidate willing to challenge Mamdani in the November election. He framed this as a heroic mission to save New York from impending doom. 'New York City under Mamdani is about to become much more dangerous and economically unviable,' Ackman wrote in a lengthy post pinned to his X profile on June 26. 'If someone is ready to raise their hand, I will take care of the fundraising,' he offered, attempting to entice a challenger. 'This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for the right candidate. More importantly, it is an opportunity to save our City and be a superhero. Life is short and you must dare to be great.' I awoke this morning gravely concerned about New York City. I thought 'What has NYC become that an avowed socialist who has supported defunding the police, whose solution to lowering food prices is city-owned supermarkets, who doesn't understand that freezing rents will only… — Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) June 26, 2025Mamdani is a 33‑year‑old Ugandan‑born, naturalized Muslim American state legislator whose progressive platform—fare‑free buses, public child care, rent freezes, wealth taxes—has energized grassroots support. His upset win over Andrew Cuomo represents both a generational and ideological shift within the Democratic Party. His ascent has particularly inspired Muslim, South Asian, and immigrant communities, even as it triggers alarm among conservative and establishment circles Within the core manosphere, sometimes known as the red pill community, which often spreads ideas of white supremacy under the guise of protecting Western civilization, Mamdani is described as an anti white racist. 'Mamdani has been posting racist, anti white musings for over a decade,' conservative activist Charlie Kirk posted on X on June 27. Kirk resurrected a 2013 tweet from Mamdani that quoted comedian Hari Kondabolu criticizing systemic inequality. 'I guess white New Yorkers hate themselves so much they'll vote for him anyway. Sad!!' Kirk deduced. His post quickly generated over half a million views, flooded with comments calling for Mamdani's deportation. Mamdani has been posting racist, anti-white musings for over a decade. I guess white New Yorkers hate themselves so much they'll vote for him anyways. Sad!! — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 27, 2025The quote in question reads, 'The invisible hand of the market, my ass. That hand is white and wearing a ring with a conflict diamond in it.' The line, which Mamdani posted on December 19, 2013, is a satirical critique of capitalism. It riffs on Adam Smith's famous concept of the 'invisible hand' to suggest that markets are not as neutral as claimed, especially for marginalized communities. But in the manosphere, reality and nuance are words that rarely find purchase, especially when they might disrupt a narrative. Other prominent commentators have joined the pile on. Ben Shapiro shared a meme anticipating an exodus of the wealthy from New York to Florida because 'maniacs' have 'blew' the city up. Conservative pundit Matt Walsh claimed Mamdani's victory is tantamount to New York's destruction, making sure to point out that Mamdani is 'Muslim.' 'New Yorkers Embrace The Destruction Of Their City By Voting For Socialist Muslim Mayor,' Walsh posted on X. He has since accused Mamdani of wanting to 'castrate children with tax money, nationalize grocery stores, and abolish the police in the name of 'queer liberation.'' Walsh also attacked Mamdani's citizenship. 'Mamdani became a US citizen in 2018,' he posted. 'Two years later, he was already working to tear down monuments to our historical icons. The incredible arrogance and entitlement of this whiney, ungrateful brat.' Mamdani became a US citizen in 2018. Two years later he was already working to tear down monuments to our historical icons. The incredible arrogance and entitlement of this whiney, ungrateful brat. — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) June 27, 2025The attacks are not limited to culture warriors. 'The problem with socialism: eventually you run out of other people's money,' charged Congressman Mike Lawler, a New York Republican. 'New York City is headed for disaster if Zohran becomes Mayor.' The problem with socialism: eventually you run out of other people's money. New York City is headed for disaster if Zohran becomes Mayor. — Mike Lawler (@lawler4ny) June 27, 2025Even prominent liberals have joined the hunt, attacking Mamdani's platform. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers took aim at his housing policy. 'Rent control is the second best way to destroy a city, after bombing,' he criticized, adding, 'I think this is likely to exacerbate rather than improve issues around housing affordability in New York. This would be a gross policy error by @ZohranKMamdani.' Rent control is the second-best way to destroy a city, after bombing. And, because of what it leads to in terms of under investment in repairing, maintaining, constructing new apartments, I think this is likely to exacerbate rather than improve issues around housing affordability… — Lawrence H. Summers (@LHSummers) June 27, 2025Meanwhile, conservative journalist Daniel Greenfield questioned Mamdani's appearance in 'a terror mosque that prayed for Hamas to win, cursed Jews and Christians, and teaching urged their children to hate everything about America,' implying Mamdani is an anti-Semitic, anti-American radical. Zohran Mamdani tweeted about his appearance at a terror mosque that prayed for Hamas to win, cursed Jews and Christians, and urged teaching their children to hate everything about America /1 — Daniel Greenfield – "Hang Together or Separately" (@Sultanknish) June 28, 2025For his part, Mamdani campaigned on the high cost of living in New York. His victory upsets the balance within a Democratic Party still finding its footing after the last presidential election. As November approaches, the attacks will only intensify. The lines of assault are clear: he is dangerous because he is Muslim; he will drive away the rich because he is a socialist; and he is an anti Semitic, anti white radical. The manosphere and its allies are using a potent combination of anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant tropes to try and bring him down.


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
All times eastern Fox Report with Jon Scott FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'