logo
Syria government says women must wear burkinis at public beaches

Syria government says women must wear burkinis at public beaches

Yahoo11-06-2025
Syria's Islamist-led interim government has decreed that women must wear burkinis - a swimsuit that covers the body except for the face, hands and feet - or other "decent" clothes at public beaches and swimming pools.
The regulations, issued by the tourism ministry, were "aimed at enhancing public safety standards and preserving public decency", Syrian state news channel Al-Ikhbariyah al-Suriyah reported.
Private beaches, clubs and pools, as well as hotels with more than four stars, are exempt, the directive said.
Women often dress modestly on public beaches in Syria, but some women do opt for more Western styles of swimwear. The new government previously pledged to govern inclusively.
Under the new directive, beachgoers and visitors to public pools must wear "more modest swimwear", specifying "the burkini or swimming clothes that cover more of the body".
The decree added that women should wear a cover-up or loose clothing over their swimwear when they move between swimming areas.
"Travelling in swimwear outside the beach without appropriate cover is prohibited," it said.
Men should also wear a shirt when they are not swimming, and are not allowed to be bare-chested outside swimming areas.
The statement said "normal Western swimwear" was generally allowed in exempted places "within the limits of public taste".
More generally, people should wear loose clothing that covers the shoulders and knees and "avoid transparent and tight clothing", the decree added.
The directive did not say whether those who fail to follow the rules would be penalised or how the rules would be enforced. But it did say lifeguards and supervisors would be appointed to monitor compliance on beaches.
It also included other safety regulations around pools and beaches.
Reacting to the new rule, one woman from Idlib in the north-west of the country told the BBC's World Service that, while she could see both sides of the argument, "I do think there is a positive to this, from a moral and respectful point of view".
Celine said: "Some people and families don't feel comfortable seeing or wearing too much exposed skin and I believe that is a valid perspective."
But another woman, Rita, who lives in the capital, Damascus, said she was "not comfortable" with the new rule, "especially as we are not used to such laws".
"In the coastal area, different ladies from different religions all have been going there and until now, we wore what we wanted," she said. "Religious people could avoid those in bikinis. But this law makes us scared of where to go."
She added: "We have no problem with the burkini itself, but it's a problem with the concept that the government are controlling this."
In December last year, Islamist rebel forces led by Ahmed al-Sharaa toppled Bashar al-Assad's regime, bringing years of civil war to an end.
Since then, al-Sharaa, now the country's interim president, has promised to run the country in an inclusive way.
In an interview with the BBC shortly after he took power, he said he believed in education for women and denied that he wanted to turn Syria into a version of Afghanistan - which has severely curtailed women's rights.
In March, Sharaa signed a constitutional declaration covering a five-year transitional period.
The document said Islam was the religion of the president, as the previous constitution did, and Islamic jurisprudence was "the main source of legislation", rather than "a main source".
The declaration also guaranteed women's rights, freedom of expression and media freedom.
Rubio warns Syria could be weeks away from 'full-scale civil war'
Trump expected to meet Syrian leader after announcing he will lift sanctions
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are the Epstein files? All you need to know
What are the Epstein files? All you need to know

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

What are the Epstein files? All you need to know

Calls for the Trump administration to release the remaining Epstein files are growing. The big picture: Attorney General Pam Bondi released in February more than 100 pages of documents that she described as the "first phase of the declassified Epstein files," but she faced scrutiny over why the lack of significant new revelations — something she blamed on the FBI. The Department of Justice's handling of evidence in the case has triggered a rare conflict between President Trump and his MAGA base — and prompted a Republican-led House committee to pass a Democrat's motion to subpoena the Justice Department on the Epstein files. What are the Epstein files? The Epstein files are the evidence gathered by law enforcement working on investigations into the late financier and convicted child sex offender, and his associates. That includes Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence in Florida after being found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges in 2021. This collection of materials are referred to as the Epstein files, which includes the documents released by Bondi. Among the documents that Bondi released were flight logs, a redacted contact book and masseuse list and an evidence list, but other records remain under seal. More than 1,000 pages of documents were already unsealed by a federal court in January 2024. Does the Epstein client list exist? Bondi was asked on Fox News in February about whether the DOJ would release a list of Epstein's clients. "It's sitting on my desk right now to review," she replied. "That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that." However, the DOJ and FBI announced this month they have no evidence he blackmailed powerful figures, kept a "client list" or that he was murdered, as many in MAGA circles have speculated. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino, who as a podcaster questioned official findings that Epstein died by suicide in his New York cell while awaiting charges of sex trafficking minors in 2019, clashed with Bondi over the handling of the files and took a day off work in response. What is Trump's connection to Epstein? Trump was photographed with Epstein on multiple occasions and called him a "terrific guy" in a 2002 interview, but the Washington Post reported they had a falling out two years later over a foreclosed oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, after the president outbid him for the property. "I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you," Trump said after Epstein was arrested in 2019. Trump has not been implicated in any of Epstein's illegal behavior. The latest: Bondi notified Trump months ago that he was named in the Epstein files, multiple outlets reported this week. But the DOJ called the reports false. The AG and deputy attorney general Todd Blanche allegedly told the president this spring that his name, as well as those of other high-profile individuals, appeared as they re-examined documents related to the case that hadn't been made public, per the New York Times. "This is a collection of falsehoods and innuendo designed to push a bulls**t narrative and drive clicks," DOJ spokesperson Gates McGavick said about the reports. It was not immediately clear what the documents were, or in what context Trump's name was raised. What has Trump's reaction been? The president has faced pressure from MAGA circles since the conclusion of his administration's review of the case and tried to move his base on from Epstein. "Are people still talking about this guy, this creep?" Trump said in response to a reporter's question on his administration's handling of the files earlier this month. "This guy's been talked about for years. That is unbelievable." Days later, he denounced "PAST supporters," whom he described as "weaklings," for their focus on what he called the "Jeffrey Epstein Hoax." Trump maintains any documents linking him to Epstein are a "hoax" cooked up by the same forces behind the Russia investigation. The president announced last week he had directed Bondi to release all relevant grand jury testimony in the Epstein case, subject to court approval. Zoom in: Trump sued the Wall Street Journal last week over a story describing a "bawdy" birthday letter bearing his name that the outlet says was given to Jeffrey Epstein. The president said he personally warned the WSJ and owner Rupert Murdoch "that the supposed letter" was "a FAKE."

Detentions of DACA recipients show they're not shielded from Trump's mass deportations
Detentions of DACA recipients show they're not shielded from Trump's mass deportations

NBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Detentions of DACA recipients show they're not shielded from Trump's mass deportations

Missing an exit while driving on a San Diego freeway upended the life of Erick Hernandez, a DACA recipient who is now at risk of being deported to El Salvador, a country he hasn't seen in 20 years. Hernandez, 34, was giving two passengers a ride from Los Angeles to San Ysidro, known as the " most southern community in California" because it is so close to the Mexican border, on June 1 as a driver for a ride-share service. But he accidentally ended up in Tijuana, Mexico, after missing an exit, NBC San Diego reported this week. Because DACA recipients are not allowed to leave the country without prior approval, federal immigration authorities took Hernandez into custody when he tried to return to the U.S. Hernandez's case is one of the most recent showing how fears of possible deportation are becoming a reality for some undocumented young adults with legal permission to work and study in the U.S. under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA. "His attempt to come back to the United States and say, 'This was a mistake. It was an accident. I was not trying to leave the United States,' was ignored," Hernandez's attorney, Valerie Sigamani, told NBC San Diego. 'When that happened, he lost everything." 'A growing pattern' Javier Diaz Santana, a DACA recipient who is deaf and mute, was detained in June when immigration authorities raided the car wash where he worked. And this month, a 36-year-old DACA recipient from Florida was among the first to be detained in the state's new immigrant detention center dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz." Anabel Mendoza, director of communications at United We Dream, the nation's largest immigrant youth-led network, told NBC News the organization is starting to notice a "growing pattern that is exposing the vulnerabilities" DACA recipients face under Trump's immigration crackdown. McLaughlin said that "a DACA recipient may be subject to arrest and deportation." But DACA recipients are not breaking the law by being in the U.S. A court ruling this year determined that all current DACA recipients can keep their deportation protections and work authorizations aslong as they meet their requirements and renew their status. The court ruling was issued as part of a seven-year legal challenge from the first Trump administration and nine Republican-led states seeking to end DACA, which was started in 2012. Support for 'Dreamers' — but a crackdown instead Trump's efforts to end DACA in his first term and Republican legal challenges shut out an estimated 600,000 DACA-eligible teenagers and young adults from the program, which hasn't been open to new applications because of ongoing lawsuits. Polls and surveys have consistently shown that most U.S. adults favor granting permanent legal status and a pathway to citizenship for "Dreamers" — young people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children. In December, Trump told NBC News' 'Meet the Press' he would work on a plan 'to do something about the Dreamers.' But last month, a White House spokesperson told NBC News this wasn't a priority for the president, who is instead focusing on 'deporting criminal illegal aliens.' The recent detentions of DACA recipients and the administration's comments that DACA doesn't 'confer legal status' highlight the need to pass permanent protections that include a pathway to citizenship for the nearly 530,000 people in the DACA program, Mendoza said. Meanwhile, DACA recipients continue to stress their ties to the U.S. and that they've abided by the law. 'To qualify for DACA, we have to pass [background] checks, have a clean criminal record, and be good people,' said Evenezer Cortez Martínez, a DACA recipient who was recently denied re-entry into the U.S. and deported despite having secured permission to go on a trip to Mexico; he was able to return after two weeks. 'It was very stressful. I thought I had lost everything,' Cortez Martínez told NBC News following his return home in April. When Diaz Santana was confronted by immigration authorities on June 12 during a raid at his workplace, the deaf and mute DACA recipient showed them his Real ID driver's license. Diaz Santana believed he would be safe, according to the Los Angeles Times, which first reported the story. After all, he has DACA status, no criminal history and a valid identification. Still, he was taken into custody and spent a month in a detention center in Texas. Diaz Santana was released two weeks ago on a $1,500 bond, the lowest amount possible. He is at home in California with a GPS ankle monitor that allows immigration officials to keep tabs on his whereabouts, the Los Angeles Times reported. "This individual is an illegal alien. This Administration is not going to ignore the rule of law," McLaughlin said, though Diaz Santana has legal permission under DACA. In Florida, a 36-year-old DACA recipient was detained after missing a court date for driving with a suspended license, WESH-TV, NBC's affiliate in Orlando, reported. Josephine Arroyo, his attorney, told NBC News on Wednesday her client has no criminal convictions and has not been formally charged with any infractions. He has a "great job," she previously told WESH, adding that his employer had written a letter on his behalf. The DACA recipient has spent the past two months in immigration detention, including about two weeks in Alligator Alcatraz, which is facing allegations for keeping detainees in torturous conditions. Arroyo said she was able to get her client relocated to the Glades County Detention Center this week. When she visited him on Monday, her client said he was desperate to see his family. "He is still shocked and surprised this happened to him," despite having DACA, said Arroyo, who requested that her client be granted anonymity because of the sensitivity of his case. In California, Hernandez is being held in the Otay Mesa Detention Center. He has no criminal history, his attorney and family told NBC San Diego. Sigamani, his attorney, said immigration authorities at the border asked Hernandez for an $800 bribe in exchange for letting him return to the U.S. after mistakenly ending up in Mexico. After declining, according to the attorney, Hernandez was placed in expedited removal proceedings, making him ineligible for bond and unable to witness the birth of his son next month. 'I'm just worried that if he gets deported," Hernandez's pregnant wife, Nancy Rivera, told NBC San Diego, "how I'm going to manage everything by myself?" Sigamani said she filed a complaint with the FBI, hoping her client will be shielded from deportation if he is asked to cooperate in an investigation into his detention. McLaughlin said that the Office of Professional Responsibility at Customs and Border Protection is conducting a review of the allegations. She also characterized Hernandez's wrong turn while driving as a self-deportation and his attempt to return as an illegal re-entry. 'A little mistake should not upend your entire life," said Mendoza, of United We Dream.

Why are Gazans not getting sorely needed aid?
Why are Gazans not getting sorely needed aid?

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why are Gazans not getting sorely needed aid?

Gazans are in desperate need of essentials after more than 21 months of war, but efforts to get aid into the Palestinian territory -- and to its hungry residents -- face major obstacles. UN agencies and aid organisations cite Israeli restrictions, safety issues and the establishment of a US- and Israeli-backed mechanism that has sidelined the humanitarian system in place. Israel says international organisations have failed, and that the previous UN-led system had allowed Hamas militants to loot aid trucks. On the ground, meanwhile, more than 100 aid and human rights groups warned this week that "mass starvation" was spreading. - GHF: few sites, deadly incidents - Israel's chosen aid distributor, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), began operations on May 26 after a more than two-month total aid blockade. Now the main channel for distributing food to Gaza's more than two million people, GHF has faced chaos and deadly violence at its few distribution points. The United Nations and aid groups have refused to work with GHF, saying it was created to serve Israeli military interests. "They are not a humanitarian organisation... You don't deliver humanitarian aid in areas that have been completely flattened and militarised," said Arwa Damon, founder of INARA, a US-based NGO offering medical and mental health support to children. She noted the GHF's site locations -- along two military corridors in southern and central Gaza -- rather than being spread out across the territory. With only four GHG sites and huge crowds trying to reach them, there have been repeated reports of deadly fire near them. According to UN figures, Israeli forces have killed some 800 Palestinian aid-seekers near GHF sites since late May. Israel has rejected calls to restore the UN-led system, citing concerns that Hamas looted trucks and resold aid meant to be distributed free of charge. - Aid organisations sidelined - International aid groups say vast quantities of aid are stockpiled outside Gaza but require Israeli military clearance to enter. Inside Gaza, coordination with the military is also essential, as fighting and air strikes rage on. Damon accused Israel of preventing aid delivery by refusing to coordinate with NGOs to grant safe passage through combat zones. "Getting that coordination approved is incredibly challenging," she told AFP. "Not to mention Israel's lack of willingness to provide humanitarian organisations with a safe route to be able to ensure a secure pickup." The UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, said on Wednesday it had "thousands of trucks in neighbouring countries waiting to enter Gaza –- banned by Israeli authorities from entering since March". - 'Encountered death' for flour - Israel screens all goods entering Gaza, but COGAT, the Israeli defence ministry body overseeing civil affairs in the Palestinian territories, denies limiting the number of humanitarian trucks. On Thursday it said "around 70 food trucks were unloaded at aid crossings, and over 150 were collected by the UN and international organisations from the Gazan side". But more than 800 trucks remained uncollected, and Israel's military posted footage online of hundreds of trucks loaded with food aid "sitting idle inside Gaza". UN agencies and international NGOs reject Israeli claims that they lack the capacity to distribute food. They note that aid was distributed effectively in the past, including during the last ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war that ended in March. In Khan Yunis, in Gaza's south, resident Yousef Abu Shehla said this week he had "encountered death" to get his hands on a bag of flour for his family. "We shall feed our children even if we die," he told AFP. glp/phz/acc/ami/dv Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store