logo
From apartheid silence to today's hatred – shame on the politicians

From apartheid silence to today's hatred – shame on the politicians

Daily Maverick22-05-2025
Kaax supports the families seeking justice for apartheid-era crimes. Justice and truth are necessary for building a better and fairer South Africa.
Today, we are witnessing a toxic resurgence of hatred in our society. On social media platforms, in public discourse and in township struggles, the violence of apartheid appears to be resurrected in the manner in which we demonise the poor, predominantly black migrants through institutionalised xenophobia and open hatred.
This must be located in the global context of the re-election of Donald Trump as president of the US. What appears to be a mobilisation of fascist right-wing racist politics provides fodder for the toxic hatred that is shared on social media platforms.
At the same time, in the South African context, the Foundation for Human Rights, an active founding member organisation of Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia (Kaax), is standing firmly in support of four families, demanding that the state account for its failures, specifically of the anti-apartheid activists known as the Cradock Four, who were abducted, tortured and murdered by the apartheid state.
On 27 June 1985, Matthew Goniwe, Sicelo Mhlauli, Fort Calata and Sparrow Mkonto, on their way back to Cradock from Port Elizabeth, were arrested at a roadblock set up by the security forces.
Their deaths shocked the nation and became a symbol of institutionalised racism, the violence of apartheid and its legal implementation, as well as how easily governments can turn ordinary people into enemies of the state.
Chilling echoes
Today, we see chilling echoes of that logic in how South African leaders speak about migrants, and the criminalisation of migrants, predominantly black African migrants.
Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi's recent comment on undocumented foreign nationals, in an address to an ANC gathering, raises grave concerns. He made the completely unverified and unsubstantiated claim that, 'over 65% of the residents (of informal settlements in Gauteng) are foreign nationals'. This is not leadership, it is scapegoating.
The premier's words follow a well-worn path: define a group, isolate it and incite public disdain. The responses on social media, amplified by news coverage, show just how effectively this tactic works. But we have been here before. Under apartheid, the state targeted individuals and communities in the name of order. Bureaucratic phrases like 'removal from society' masked brutal, often fatal, intentions.
The Cradock Four were not criminals. They were community leaders. But the apartheid state deemed them threats because they dared to challenge injustice.
Today, migrants are cast in a similar role: blamed for poverty, poor services and unemployment – not because the evidence supports it, but because it is politically convenient and politically expedient in that this will win votes for the ANC and many other political parties of the same ilk. But it is full of propaganda and lies. Just like the apartheid state's existence depended on the demonisation of black people, across the globe today, states demonise migrants to detract from their failure to address inequalities and systemic unemployment, as is the case in South Africa.
Honour the legacy
The solution is not to criminalise the poor or to echo the apartheid tactic of dehumanising others to deflect from government failures.
Instead of repeating history's mistakes, we should honour the legacy of those like the Cradock Four—people who believed in dignity, equality and justice across borders. They fought for a South Africa that welcomed all who sought peace and opportunity, not one that turned on the vulnerable.
We cannot afford the luxury of forgetting. When leaders use language that divides and targets, they do more than fail the vulnerable, they betray the very spirit of our hard-won democracy.
The Cradock Four were murdered because a government feared the power of organised, principled resistance. But history teaches us: no amount of scapegoating can solve structural injustice. It only deepens the wound.
South Africa must choose: do we repeat the sins of our past, or do we finally build the inclusive future so many died fighting for?
Let us be clear: apartheid was not just a crime against humanity – it was a system built on the dehumanisation of black people. It was a project of racial capitalism, structural violence and state-sanctioned hatred and brutal forms of repression. For years, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) offered this country a fragile promise: that truth would lead to justice. But more than 300 cases recommended for prosecution were shelved — not by accident, but by political choice. That choice now has a name.
Political expediency
Former president Thabo Mbeki and former minister of justice Bridgette Mabandla were at the helm of government during a critical period when this country had the opportunity to honour the dead and repair the living. Instead, the pursuit of justice was smothered in the name of political expediency. That they now oppose a court case seeking to right that wrong is not only selfish — it is shameful.
Xenophobia — much like racism — is the convenient narrative of those in power who refuse to confront structural inequality.
Xenophobic violence and hatred are a result of deliberate lies and misinformation spewed by opportunistic politicians blaming migrants in response to the cries of the neglected, the dispossessed, the betrayed working class and the poor in South Africa, the majority of whom are black. This is the reality of a country which continues to be the most unequal in the world and which refuses to address the root causes of inequality, which lie in the unfair privilege that the tiny white minority enjoyed for more than 300 years of colonisation and then apartheid rule.
These are the ills of apartheid that the Truth and Reconciliation process must expose. Instead, the current government uses its power to lie about the reality of poverty, state failure, exploitation, and then to blame migrants. Where is the pan African dream?
The betrayal of the TRC families is not separate from the abandonment of today's struggling communities. It is part of the same story: a nation unwilling to reckon with its history.
There is a blatant lack of political will by the government to use the power that the constitution gives it – the power to transform South Africa. This should be the redress that will speak to the injustice and unfair privilege enjoyed by both individuals and companies who made excessive profits through legalised forms of discrimination based on the colour of a human being's skin. This redress must take the form of a wealth tax that will enable this government to enforce a universal income grant.
Kaax supports the families seeking justice for apartheid-era crimes. This case is an important step in dealing with the past and making sure those responsible are held accountable. We encourage all civil society groups and the public to support this effort. Justice and truth are necessary for building a better and fairer South Africa. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SARB cuts interest rates bringing joy for South Africans in debt
SARB cuts interest rates bringing joy for South Africans in debt

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

SARB cuts interest rates bringing joy for South Africans in debt

The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) extended its longest easing cycle since 2019 with a 0.25% cut in the benchmark interest rate to 7% on Thursday, as the country braces for the economic impact of looming US trade tariffs. Governor Lesetja Kganyago announced the decision at a press briefing on Thursday, just one day before the deadline set by US President Donald Trump for nations to reach bilateral trade deals or face steep tariffs on exports to the US. The SARB's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), consisting of six members, were unanimous in making the decision The rate cut comes amid mounting concerns over the potential economic fallout from Trump's trade deadline, which could impose a 30% tariff on South African exports to the US. In a worst-case scenario, the SARB has estimated that such tariffs could reduce South Africa's GDP growth by as much as 0.6% and increase inflation by 0.4 percentage points. Kganyago has also warned that up to 100 000 jobs could be lost in key industries such as agriculture and automotive, which are particularly vulnerable to global trade disruptions. The SARB's decision to lower rates is seen as an effort to stimulate growth in light of South Africa's sluggish economy. The South African Reserve Bank's monetary policy committee meets every second month to announce changes – if any – to the country's repo and prime lending rates. The meetings in 2025 are scheduled to take place in January, March, May, July, September and November – and always on a Thursday at 15:00. Currently, the committee comprises of six people, with Lesetja Kganyago holding the position of governor of the SARB – and the deciding vote if necessary. The new repo rate now stands at 7% while the prime lending rate is 10.5%. Month Date Outcome January 30 January 25 basis point cut March 20 March No change May 29 May 25 basis point cut July 31 July 25 basis point cut September 18 September November 20 November The table below shows the current monthly bond repayments on various bond values over a 20-year period assuming no deposit and repayments at prime. It also shows the 'new' monthly bond repayments after the 25 basis point cut as well as what monthly saving will be. Bond Current New Saving R750 000 R7 614 R7 488 R126 R800 000 R8 122 R7 987 R135 R850 000 R8 629 R8 486 R143 R900 000 R9 137 R8 985 R152 R950 000 R9 645 R9 485 R160 R1 000 000 R10 152 R9 984 R168 R1 500 000 R15 228 R14 976 R252 R2 000 000 R20 305 R19 968 R337 R2 500 000 R25 381 R24 960 R421 R3 000 000 R30 457 R29 951 R516 R3 500 000 R35 533 R34 943 R590 R4 000 000 R40 609 R39 935 R684 R4 500 000 R45 685 R44 927 R758 R5 000 000 R50 761 R49 919 R842 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1

Cape Town's lost threads: How tariffs unravelled our clothing industry
Cape Town's lost threads: How tariffs unravelled our clothing industry

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Cape Town's lost threads: How tariffs unravelled our clothing industry

We remember the profound impact of tariff reductions had on Cape Town's clothing industry. Image: Wikipedia It's fascinating the way the world has suddenly latched onto the word "tariffs" since Donald Trump has once again become president. But for me, who grew up in Cape Town, that word carries a much heavier weight than just a headline. It brings back a flood of memories, tinged with a deep sadness for what we lost. Thirty years ago, when our own government started cutting tariffs, especially with China, we watched as the heart of Cape Town's clothing industry was ripped out. It was a lifeline for so many, and its destruction left scars that still run deep. Growing up in the Southern suburbs, my wardrobe was built almost entirely from the factory shops. Every clothing manufacturer had these "side doors" open to the public, overflowing with garments at a fraction of the retail price. It taught me a lifelong habit of never needing a clothing account because quality clothes were simply affordable for everyone. I remember the chaos of entering Venus, one of the biggest factory shops in Lansdowne, run by the Patel family. Huge wooden crates would be piled high with overruns of the latest fashion. Mrs. Patel, always in her silk sari and gleaming gold jewellery, would stand on a platform like a queen, barking orders at staff to repack the mountains of clothes. Then there was Beeline, more organised, almost like a proper retail shop, selling fashion items practically at cost. The real giant was the Seardel group They dominated underwear manufacturing, churning out Triumph underwear and Speedo swimsuits for export around the globe. Their factory shop was always buzzing with women searching for top-quality items at amazing prices. Aaron and Adele Searle the couple behind it, were some of Cape Town's real philanthropists, often seen in the Cape Times society pages for their charitable work. They started with a small factory in Salt River, making nurses' caps, and built an empire that became the largest clothing and textile producer on the African continent, employing over 10,000 people at its peak. Then came the tariff reductions in the mid-1990s, a consequence of South Africa joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and embracing trade liberalisation. Suddenly, cheap imports, particularly from China, flooded our markets. Local manufacturers, burdened by higher production costs, simply couldn't compete. The impact was devastating. The South African clothing and textile industry, once a significant employer, shed tens of thousands of jobs and saw countless factories close their doors. Seardel, that mighty empire, went into liquidation in 2018, unable to withstand the relentless pressure. Salt River Main Road, once lined with suit manufacturers like Rex Trufom, Fabiani, and Ralph Lauren Polo, which exported men's and women's business suits to high-end consumers worldwide, became a shadow of its former self. We used to buy a men's suit for less than half the retail price, and if it didn't fit, a seamstress on site would tailor it for a few extra rand. I recall being in Harrods in London and seeing a pair of khaki cotton Polo chinos for £150 (around R3,500). I hesitated, knowing I'd be back in Cape Town soon, and sure enough, I found the exact same chinos at Access Park for R150. Who could forget Ronald Sassoon jeans? In the 80s, they were a big deal, our South African answer to Guess Jeans, with iconic marketing campaigns shot in Cape Town, featuring glamorous models next to vintage cars. That brand, too, saw its journey changed by the tides of trade. It wasn't just Cape Town. In Durban, Clairwood, once the vibrant heart of South Africa's shoe manufacturing industry, became a ghost town, a direct result of the influx of cheap imported footwear. So, as tariffs once again hit the headlines, perhaps those countries with thriving local industries should pause and consider. Thirty years on, we in South Africa live with the stark reality of what trade liberalisation and reduced tariffs can truly do to local manufacturers and economies. It's a cautionary tale of the empty factories and lost livelihoods of our once-thriving clothing industry. IOL Lifestyle Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.

The R145bn Transnet back brace to fix the spine of the South African economy
The R145bn Transnet back brace to fix the spine of the South African economy

Daily Maverick

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

The R145bn Transnet back brace to fix the spine of the South African economy

A visit to the Port of Cape Town reveals the complex reality behind Transnet's recovery efforts, and why the state's massive financial intervention might just be the lifeline the South African economy needs. 'You can't take a picture of that (the liquid bulk terminal) because many of our laws were written under apartheid,' harbour master Captain Alex Miya explains as the tugboat cruises past. 'In those years, Umkhonto weSizwe would use those images to plan sabotage attacks on these kinds of things.' The irony hangs heavy in the salty air. Here we are, three decades into democracy, still governed by security regulations crafted to protect infrastructure from liberation movements that now form the government. It's a good metaphor for Transnet – an entity born from colonial mineral extraction, shaped by apartheid social engineering, hastily commercialised to secure economic futures for the outgoing politically connected, and now tasked with serving the very democracy it once helped to suppress. There's something unnerving about how essential this state-owned freight logistics company is to South Africa's economic survival, and how precariously it's hanging on after years of underinvestment, operational decline and management chaos. But there's also a fighting spirit – a recovery plan in motion, and billions being poured into equipment, concessions and new infrastructure. Creaking of the old bones Transnet's DNA can be traced to 1860, but it was the mineral revolution – first diamonds in Kimberley in 1867, followed by Transvaal gold – that transformed modest colonial railways into the backbone of a national economy. The Union of South Africa in 1910 necessitated economic consolidation, and the disparate railway systems were amalgamated into the South African Railways and Harbours (SAR&H), controlling 11,000km of track and all major harbours. The decision to operate these assets as a state-owned enterprise, rather than private businesses, was driven by fears that a single private owner could wield excessive power over the nascent economy. This created a foundational contradiction that would define the organisation for more than a century: expected to operate on 'business principles' while serving a broad, often unprofitable, developmental mandate. High-value industrial freight subsidised below-cost transport of agricultural products – a cross-subsidisation model that opened the interior for development, but created mounting financial pressures. Dark history Under apartheid, like most of the state infrastructure, it became an instrument of racial engineering. While black employees (47,157) outnumbered white employees (39,024) in 1924, this was dramatically reversed by 1929, with white employment swelling to 58,562. It became a stronghold of Afrikaner nationalism, with 'job reservation' policies that excluded black workers from skilled positions. The birth of Transnet in 1990 was out of survival in the face of the fiscal crisis from international sanctions and economic stagnation. SAR&H was commercialised through the Legal Succession Act of 1989. It was a strategic compromise: adopting corporate form to instil financial discipline and access capital markets while retaining 100% state ownership. A sum of its parts Today, Transnet operates through several distinct divisions, each facing unique pressures: Transnet Freight Rail (TFR): the division best known as Brian Molefe's piggy bank remains the cash cow, contributing 51% of fiscal 2024 revenue. But it's undergoing radical surgery – the creation of the Transnet Rail Infrastructure Manager (TRIM) in November 2023 aims to separate track ownership from operations, potentially opening doors to private investment. Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA): my host for the port tour serves as landlord to South Africa's ports, planning infrastructure and providing marine services. Notably, nine of Cape Town's 11 licensed terminal operators are private entities – a case study of successful public-private partnerships that could serve as a model for other divisions. Transnet Port Terminals (TPT) handles actual cargo movement, while Transnet Pipelines manages petroleum transport through regulated tariffs. Add Transnet Engineering, property, and the new LeaseCo rolling stock company, and you have a very complex logistics ecosystem. This complexity partially explains why rating agencies have grown increasingly concerned. S&P Global's July downgrade to 'B+' wasn't just about numbers; it reflected deeper structural issues. The agency cited 'persistent substantial negative free operating cash flow of approximately R13.5-billion annually' and an inability to meet regular capital expenditure and interest payments from earnings. Moody's kept Transnet on review for downgrade despite government guarantee commitments, underlining that even massive state support can't immediately fix operational realities. Rail volumes of 151.7 million tons in FY2024 fell well short of the 170-million-ton target for FY2025. One step at a time But these downgrades tell only part of the story. Standing in the boardroom of the TNPA, with an overhead photo of the Port of Cape Town and surrounds covering one of the walls, the recovery is visible. Ship turnaround times have plummeted from 103 hours in 2023/24 to just 65 hours in Q1 2025/26 – on track to undercut the 82-hour target by a significant margin. Marine operations delays dropped from 1.2% to 0.2%. These aren't marginal improvements; they're operational transformations reminiscent of the efficiency gains that first made these railways economically viable in the 1800s. The planned Culemborg Logistics Park represents transformational thinking rooted in historical precedent. This R2.5-billion, 30-hectare development aims to create 2,500 construction jobs and 25,000 indirect jobs by 2030, bringing logistics services closer to the port. It echoes the original railway strategy of reducing transport costs and travel times to unlock economic development. Infrastructure improvements at Container Terminal Phase 2B will expand capacity from one million to 1.4 million TEUs, with strengthened quayside infrastructure and improved rail connections. A dedicated truck staging area will remove 220 trucks from public roads – addressing congestion that has plagued the port since the original colonial designs proved inadequate for modern volumes. High-stakes roulette Nothing illustrates Transnet's economic importance quite like its relationship with Kumba Iron Ore. The mining giant recognised R942-million in penalty income from Transnet in the first half of this year due to logistics underperformance – a staggering figure that represents both the cost of failure and the value of getting things right. The government's crisis response has been unprecedented. Starting with a R47-billion guarantee facility in December 2023 (fully exhausted by March 2025), the state has progressively increased its commitment. The latest July 2025 announcement of an additional R94.8-billion brings total announced guarantees to R145.8-billion. Of Transnet's planned R127.7-billion capital expenditure over five years, R108.2-billion (84.7%) goes to sustaining capital – maintaining and refurbishing existing infrastructure. Without this investment, the system would deteriorate further, potentially triggering the kind of economic disruption the Union founders feared from private monopoly control. A new lease on life New equipment purchases tell the recovery story: a R240-million ship-to-shore crane for Port Elizabeth, 20 straddle carriers, and nine rubber-tyred gantries for Durban represent R3-billion in operational improvements. At Cape Town, shore tension units from Rotterdam have reduced the time the boats stay in the berth from 2,881 hours to 690 hours – technical solutions with a massive economic impact. The early signs from Cape Town are encouraging: operational improvements that translate directly into economic efficiency, private sector partnerships that leverage state investment and infrastructure developments that create jobs while enhancing capacity. The fog of frequent omissions is lifting over Cape Town harbour, revealing not just the port's operations, but perhaps a clearer vision of how this historical institution might finally evolve beyond its colonial and apartheid origins. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store