logo
Climate goals vs. computing growth: How tech can expand data centers and support clean energy

Climate goals vs. computing growth: How tech can expand data centers and support clean energy

Geek Wire19-05-2025
Sustainability: News about the rapidly growing climate tech sector and other areas of innovation to protect our planet. SEE MORE
An Amazon data center in Oregon. (AWS Photo)
Can tech companies' appetite for more energy-hungry data centers coexist with the Pacific Northwest's ambitious climate goals?
Researchers at Sightline Institute, a Seattle-based think tank, say it's possible.
A new report titled 'A Climate Hawk's Guide to Northwest Data Centers' explores regulations and predicts how growing power demand from data centers, as well as electric vehicles and other electrification efforts, could impact the region.
Key findings include:
Oregon and Washington laws prevent new coal or natural gas plants from being built, but demand could delay the retirement of the 17 gas plants operating in the two states.
Neighboring states without stringent energy laws, such as Idaho and Montana, could decide to build new fossil fuel power plants to meet growing demand. The data centers could claim the clean energy that the states produce, leaving dirtier power for other sectors.
Washington and Oregon as well as data center giants Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Meta are aligned in working toward ambitious carbon reduction targets. But state budget shortfalls, economic pressures and shareholder demands complicate progress in meeting those goals.
The two West Coast states are each already home to more than 100 data centers. In Oregon, the computing muscle behind cloud services gobbles 11.4% of the state's energy production, while the centers consume 5.7% of the power produced in Washington, the report states.
Portland and Eastern Oregon rank second in U.S. data center capacity, trailing Virginia, which is billed as the world's largest data center hub.
And data center growth continues.
The surge is driven by growing demand for artificial intelligence, which requires extensive computing power. While some tech companies have tempered their expansion projections, more energy-intensive facilities are on the horizon.
Sightline, a nonpartisan nonprofit that promotes clean power use, suggests strategies that allow for data center expansion while bringing new renewable energy sources online.
'[T]ech companies, with their deep pockets and corporate climate commitments, alongside their eagerness to ensure a robust energy supply to power their business plans, may be ideal underwriters of Oregon and Washington's clean energy transition,' write Emily Moore, Sightline's director of climate and energy.
Potential solutions include policies with a combination of incentives and requirements that lead tech giants to support clean energy deployment and electrical grid improvements. That includes:
Tax breaks for data centers that use clean energy sources
Charging data centers higher electricity rates to help fund grid and clean energy improvements
Crafting policies enabling data center operators to build and use their own clean power
Creating a new entity to help deploy renewable power in the Pacific Northwest (A report last week from Oregon Public Broadcasting and ProPublica identified the Bonneville Power Administration, the regional federal agency overseeing grid upgrades and getting new power online, as a major bottleneck.)
'Data centers are the first test of the Northwest's climate ambitions,' Moore writes. 'How leaders respond may chart the course for the rest of the economy's clean energy transition.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's why everyone is using YouTube Music — even if they don't love it!
Here's why everyone is using YouTube Music — even if they don't love it!

Android Authority

time18 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Here's why everyone is using YouTube Music — even if they don't love it!

Joe Maring / Android Authority Not many years ago, if you mentioned YouTube Music in a room full of long-time Google Play Music users, you could probably hear their collective sigh from space. Google retired its beloved service in 2020 and replaced it with something that, at the time, felt underbaked to be a true music player. Fast-forward to 2025, and while the groans haven't completely died down, nearly everyone we know, including our readers, is using YouTube Music. This revelation came straight from an open discussion we're currently running on Android Authority. With over 8,000 votes and counting, the majority of respondents say that YouTube Music is their music streaming service of choice, not Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, or anything else. YouTube Music has emerged as the king, albeit not the most elegant ruler, but a practical one that people appreciate for its convenience. What is your current music streaming platform? 8532 votes YouTube Music 79 % Spotify 12 % Apple Music 3 % Deezer 1 % Tidal 2 % Amazon Music 1 % Pandora 1 % Another service (mention in the comments) 1 % The numbers make sense Joe Maring / Android Authority You have to admit that making YouTube Music a part of the YouTube Premium subscription was a genius move by Google. We definitely expected some strong opinions when we asked our readers about their preferred streaming service, but what we didn't expect was an overwhelming pattern that emerged. People aren't picking YouTube Music because of its vast music library or algorithmic genius. They're picking it because it makes the most sense economically. 'YT Music does everything I want and more at an affordable price (which includes YouTube Premium),' remarked another, in a long list of comments that echo the same sentiments. The YouTube Premium family plan is the real hook 'Can't beat the cost of YTM when you have a family plan,' a reader said. Cost-efficiency is one of the top reasons why people pick YouTube Music over other music streaming services. Not only does a YouTube Premium plan give you free access to millions of YouTube Music songs ad-free, offline, and while your screen is locked, but the YouTube Premium family plan is the real hook. For $22.99 per month, you can use YouTube Music without ads on up to five accounts! That's a tough one to beat for the likes of Spotify, which also offers a family plan, but one that doesn't come with a tasty side of YouTube Premium. It's not love, it's logistics Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority For many YouTube Music users, the journey began with Google Play Music's forced retirement, followed by the chaotic migration to YouTube Music. Playlists were moved, preferences were ported (sometimes badly), and the new interface took a lot of getting used to. In fact, some folks never got used to it at all. And yet, they stayed. That's because years of their accumulated music on Google Play Music moved to YouTube Music. One of our readers said, 'I use it because it's where all my music from Google Play Music went. I absolutely detest any algorithm for music. The vast majority of what I listen to is music I have bought or the 500 CDs I own and uploaded to GPM.' Clearly, when Google Play Music was migrated to YouTube Music, people didn't just want to lose all their valuable collections painfully built over time, so they stuck with YouTube Music and have been hanging on ever since. YouTube Music: The unofficial king of local, live, and forgotten content Joe Hindy / Android Authority A big advantage YouTube Music has over most global streaming giants is the availability of regional, live, obscure, and old music. The streaming service decidedly excels at it. Android Authority readers (including yours truly) acknowledge how nearly impossible it is to find specific live music, covers, local songs, old, forgotten tracks, and music from smaller countries on Spotify or Apple Music. You know where those songs almost always do exist? YouTube Music. 'One area where YouTube Music really stands out is the sheer volume of original albums available. My primary interest is the original rock era of 1964-1980. YouTube Music has virtually every original studio album from that era, by artists that matter,' said a reader. YouTube Music is a treasure trove for indie music lovers. Because YouTube Music pulls directly from YouTube's massive video library, including fan uploads, niche recordings, and regional hits, it becomes a treasure trove for indie music lovers. If someone in your country uploaded a remix of an old classic? You'll probably find it on YouTube Music. 'All the services have at least one thing where they excel over others; it just depends on what value you place on the differing features. In YTM's case, it's the ability to find live versions of tracks that I like the most. Other platforms will outperform it in other areas (such as streaming quality), but I place a high value on listening to live music, so it's the best option for me (that, plus I already pay for YT Premium anyway),' noted another reader. This is where the platform quietly wins hearts. Not with fancy recommendations or slick design, but with simple access to stuff that actually matters to you. So why aren't people raving about YouTube Music? Despite all this, very few people claim to actually really 'love' YouTube Music. It's not the darling of Reddit discussions. It doesn't drop surprise features that get headlines (unless you're into AI-generated playlists). Its recommendations algorithm, streaming quality, and UI still spark debates. And yes, some erstwhile Google Play Music users still feel stuck, with no other alternative. If you're a die-hard Spotify fan or an Apple Music lover, we get it. These platforms offer polish, clever integrations, better connectivity, and great personalized recommendations. But YouTube Music is everyman's streamer, and it's only getting better. It's the 'eh, might as well' option that just so happens to make sense financially, culturally, and practically.

Crest 3D Whitestrips are under $28 ahead of Amazon Prime Day ✨
Crest 3D Whitestrips are under $28 ahead of Amazon Prime Day ✨

Indianapolis Star

time18 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Crest 3D Whitestrips are under $28 ahead of Amazon Prime Day ✨

Guess what? The fan-favorite Amazon deal on Crest teeth whitening strips that everyone loves officially returned today! Ahead of the long 4th of July weekend, Amazon dropped tons of early Prime Day deals so you can score some star-spangled savings on several top-selling brands, including Crest. Before Prime Day 2025 starts on Tuesday, July 8, you can get the best-selling Crest 3D Whitestrips for 44% off and ring up for less than $28 with this early Prime Day deal. This matches the lowest price we've seen all year. With this top-rated teeth whitening product, you can get brilliant results from the comfort of your own home and achieve a brighter smile in 24 days. Best of all, these easy Crest Whitestrips are enamel-safe, dentist-recommended and affordable! Shop the sparkly Amazon deal below, plus more Crest products on sale! Save 44% on the super popular Crest 3D Whitestrips with this best-selling early Prime Day deal and ring up at under $28. Save 44% at Amazon Simply apply the Crest 3D whitening strips to your top and bottom teeth for 60 minutes a day. This pack includes 22 daily treatments and two bonus 1-Hour Express treatments to help boost your results. Shop our favorite Amazon finds Save 40% on 18 treatments of these Crest 3D Whitestrips formulated for sensitive teeth at Amazon right now. Save 40% at amazon Shop Crest Whitestrips The July 2025 Amazon Prime Day sale officially begins on Tuesday, July 8 and will end on Friday, July 11. This is the first year the sale has been extended from two days to four days, offering even more opportunities to shop and save! USA TODAY Shopping will be covering all the best, most popular and limited-time deals throughout the entire summer sale, so be sure to stick around for all the must-shop finds! → Amazon Prime for Young Adults is back! Do you qualify for the discount? Find out here Yes, Prime Day deals are only available to Amazon Prime members. The July Prime Day sale offers incredible Prime member-exclusive discounts on select products that can help members save more than anyone else. Plus, joining Prime helps guarantee you get other perks like fast shipping all year long! Sign up for an Amazon Prime membership to get exclusive perks and benefits all year. Join Amazon Prime New members can try one week of Amazon Prime benefits for just $1.99. After that, Prime costs $14.99 per month or $139 per year.

Wear OS 6 fixes the most annoying thing about always-on displays, and I couldn't be more excited
Wear OS 6 fixes the most annoying thing about always-on displays, and I couldn't be more excited

Android Authority

time26 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Wear OS 6 fixes the most annoying thing about always-on displays, and I couldn't be more excited

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority After years as a power-draining setting with significant limitations, the always-on display on Wear OS smartwatches is finally getting a glow-up. Hitting wrists via Wear OS 6, a redesigned always-on display (AOD) will now offer more functionality, adding key controls to the screen. As someone who spends way too much time flicking my wrist just to perform basic actions, I couldn't be happier. How important is an improved always-on display experience for you? 0 votes Very, I can't wait. NaN % Not very, I dont mind it the way it is. NaN % I dont use the AOD. NaN % In its developer documentation, Google confirmed that Wear OS 6 will 'consolidate existing solutions to deliver a more consistent always-on experience across devices.' In practice, that means Wear OS watches will continue to display important details even when your wrist is down. The display will retain control screens, instead of fading into a basic clock face, and honestly, it's about time (no pun intended). This might sound like a small UI tweak, but it's actually a fundamental shift in how I'll be able to use my go-to wearables. Google is baking more AOD usability directly in as a standard feature, and the example the company provided is one of the best use cases I can think of: tappable media controls visible on the ambient screen (displayed using a low-power outline design that fits the aesthetic). That means no more exaggerated arm raises trying to skip a track mid-workout, and tipping my balance on the treadmill precariously. No more wrist flicks in frustration in the middle of the road when I want to check something mid-ride. I've honestly lost count of how many times I've glanced at my watch while cooking, hoping to quickly pause my audiobook while I check a recipe note, only to be met with a static screen. I'm elated that Google is baking more AOD functionality directly into Wear OS 6. Of course, the update also goes beyond media controls. I'm also excited about the ability to use my watch's AOD more broadly as a glanceable and interactive interface, not just a low-power placeholder. Google confirmed that users' top activity will remain visible and 'in a resumed state' during ambient mode, suggesting the watch will offer more functionality right on the always-on screen. For me, this would make enabling always-on a much more worthwhile battery life trade-off. This isn't some flashy, headline-grabbing update, but it's exactly the kind of thoughtful polish I hope for as each launch season approaches. Large-scale, sweeping changes are one thing, but tiny, thoughtful user experience improvements are equally appreciated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store