logo
Humans' love of booze comes from ape ancestors who ate fermented rotten fruit, major study finds

Humans' love of booze comes from ape ancestors who ate fermented rotten fruit, major study finds

The Sun4 days ago
HUMANS' love of booze comes from ape ancestors who ate fermented rotten fruit in the jungle, a study suggests.
Scrumping by past primates explains why we evolved to be so 'astoundingly good at digesting alcohol ', researchers believe.
They say evidence from modern apes sheds a light on humans' fondness for alcohol — first produced deliberately in China about 9,000 years ago.
Experts point out that today's apes polish off up to 10lb of mouldy jungle floor fruit a day which ferments and becomes alcoholic as it breaks down.
It means the chimpanzees and gorillas end up spending a lot of their time tipsy.
Researcher Professor Nathaniel Dominy, from Dartmouth College, US, said: 'Scrumping by the last common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees and humans about ten million years ago could explain why humans are so astoundingly good at digesting alcohol.
'We evolved to metabolise alcohol long before we ever figured out how to make it.'
He added: 'Making it was one of the major drivers of the Neolithic Revolution that turned us from hunter-gatherers into farmers and changed the world.
"Primatologists observe this pretty regularly but there has been an absence of a word for it.'
The team used the word 'scrumping' — normally meaning stealing fruit — in the journal BioScience.
Study co-author Professor Catherine Hobaiter, from the University of St Andrews in Scotland, added: 'A fundamental feature of our relationship with alcohol is our tendency to drink together, whether a pint with friends or a large social feast.'
1
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Criminal gangs fake science papers for money
Criminal gangs fake science papers for money

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Criminal gangs fake science papers for money

Fraudulent science papers produced by criminal gangs for money are starting to outpace legitimate studies, experts have warned. Academics at Northwestern University, in Illinois, US, warned that scientific journals could soon become 'completely poisoned' by fake reports that damage public trust and are potentially medically harmful. The problem is driven by illegal 'paper mills', largely based in Russia, China and India, which produce sham research and invite new and struggling academics to pay thousands of pounds to have their name listed as an author. In many countries, the number of published papers and citations is critical for scientists to achieve promotion and win funding grants. For the new study, researchers carried out a large-scale analysis of scientific journal data and discovered 'sophisticated global networks of individuals and entities, which systematically work together to undermine the integrity of academic publishing'. They estimated that the number of fraudulent articles was doubling every 18 months, compared to legitimate articles, which were doubling every 15 years. The problem is so widespread that the publication of fraudulent science is 'outpacing the growth rate of legitimate scientific publications', academics found. 'Distressing to see others engage in fraud' 'This study is probably the most depressing project I've been involved with in my entire life,' said Luís Amaral, Professor of Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics. 'Since I was a kid, I was excited about science. It's distressing to see others engage in fraud and in misleading others. 'If we do not create awareness around this problem, worse and worse behaviour will become normalised. At some point, it will be too late, and scientific literature will become completely poisoned.' The problem has become so widespread that more than 10,000 scientific papers needed to be retracted by academic journals last year alone, with experts warning that many more go undetected. The findings show that in some journals, certain editors were linked to a suspiciously high number of retracted articles, suggesting they were complicit in allowing them to be published. Paper mills churn out large numbers of manuscripts, which they then sell to academics who want to quickly publish new work. They often feature fabricated data, manipulated or even stolen images, plagiarised content and sometimes nonsensical or physically impossible claims, the researchers said. Experts say that the papers are often used in bigger databases or meta-analyses, which could invalidate or slow down drug discoveries or medical breakthroughs. 'Launder a reputation' Sometimes fraudsters hijack defunct journals, taking over the identity of a publication that is no longer operational to place articles, something that happened to the UK journal HIV Nursing. After it fell out of use, an organisation bought the domain name and started publishing thousands of papers on subjects completely unrelated to nursing. Dr Reese Richardson, a fellow in Amaral's laboratory, said: 'Paper mills operate by a variety of different models, so we have only just been able to scratch the surface of how they operate. 'But they sell basically anything that can be used to launder a reputation. They often sell authorship slots for hundreds or even thousands of dollars. A person might pay more money for the first author position or less money for a fourth author position. 'People also can pay to get papers they have written automatically accepted in a journal through a sham peer-review process.' The authors said that the findings should serve as a wake-up call to the scientific community, which needed to act before the public lost confidence in the scientific process. 'These networks are essentially criminal organisations, acting together to fake the process of science,' added Prof Amaral. 'Millions of dollars are involved in these processes.'

Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol
Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol

Research suggests that the dietary habits of ape ancestors, particularly their consumption of fermented fruit, could explain why humans are so adept at digesting alcohol. The term 'scrumping' refers to apes eating fermented or fallen fruit, a practice that may have led to a 40-fold increase in alcohol metabolism in the last common ancestor of humans and African apes around 10 million years ago. Studies analysing the dietary habits of various primates found that African apes regularly engage in 'scrumping,' unlike orangutans, whose primary enzyme for metabolising ethanol is less efficient. This enhanced metabolic ability allows African apes to safely consume up to 10 pounds of fermented fruit daily, indicating that ethanol exposure was a significant factor in their lives and a major force in human evolution. The findings suggest that humans may have retained the social aspects associated with shared feeding on fermented fruits, prompting further research into how this influences social relationships in other apes.

Scientists reveal reason behind 'steep' increase in colon cancer cases among young people
Scientists reveal reason behind 'steep' increase in colon cancer cases among young people

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scientists reveal reason behind 'steep' increase in colon cancer cases among young people

Colon cancer incidence rates in the US shot up by almost 50 percent in a year, a new study has revealed. An investigation by the American Cancer Society (ACS) found that after a stable 15-year trend, diagnoses of local-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) rose steeply in adults aged 45 to 49 years old between 2019 and 2022 in the US. From 2021 to 2022, there was a 50 percent relative increase in diagnoses from 11.7 to 17.5 cases per 100,000 people. Local or early stage indicates the cancer is confined to the original site where it started, has not spread to other areas of the body and usually has no symptoms. If colon cancer is detected and treated in its early stages, the five-year survival rate is approximately 90 percent, while it is around 60 percent if it is diagnosed in its advanced stages. The cost of treatment also dramatically increases, with early-stage colon cancer costing around $40,000 to treat, while advanced stages can exceed $300,000. The study's lead author Elizabeth Schafer put the rise in early-stage colon cancer cases down to recommendations for younger average-risk adults to begin testing for earlier. While the disease is known to be linked to obesity, experts have noted that the disease also seems to also be occurring in fit and healthy patients. Some experts believe the explanation must lie in environmental factors young people have been exposed to more than previous generations. While no 'smoking gun' has been found, there are multiple theories. These include modern chemicals in diets, microplastics, pollution, and one recent study even pinned the surge on exposure to E. coli in food. The recommended age to begin CRC screening was lowered from 50 to 45 years by ACS in 2018 and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) followed suit in 2021. The US already has a lower colon cancer screening age than some other Western nations, including Canada — where it is set at 50 years — and England — which lowered the age from 60 to 50 years in 2021. Early onset colorectal cancer has become the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men under 50 and the second-leading cause for women under 50 in the US. Over 50,000 Americans are expected to die from colorectal cancer this year, while 150,000 are predicted to be diagnosed with the disease. For the recent ACS study, published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers analyzed CRC cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2022 among adults 20 to 54 years old in the 21 geographic areas of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Cases were sorted by age, where the cancer was located, and stage at diagnosis. Results showed that CRC incidence increased steadily by 1.6 percent annually since 2004 among adults 20 to 39 years old and by two percent to 2.6 percent per year since 2012 among adults 40 to 44 and 50 to 54 years old. However, in people 45 to 49 years old, an increase of one percent annually during 2004 to 2019 accelerated to 12 percent per year from 2019 to 2022. This steep increase was driven by the detection of early, local-stage tumors, which increased from 2019 to 2022 by 19 percent per year for colon cancer after previously stable rates and by 25 percent per year for rectal cancer after declining rates. Advanced-stage disease has continued to increase steeply over the past two decades. Incidence of advanced CRC increased from 1.7 to 2.9 percent annually since 2004 among adults under 45 years old and even more rapidly during the past decade in ages 45 to 54. In support of these findings, another ACS led study also published today in JAMA reports that CRC screening among US adults 45 to 49 years of age increased by 62 percent from 2019 to 2023. 'It's not only thrilling to see the increase in colorectal cancer screening among younger adults, but also how it likely ties into rises in earlier stage diagnosis as noted in the other ACS led paper,' said lead author Jessica Star, an associate scientist of cancer risk factors and screening surveillance research at the ACS. 'However, we still have a long way to go. Screening for colorectal cancer in ages 45-49 remains suboptimal and has not increased equitably by both educational attainment and insurance status.' For this study, scientists analyzed the data of more than 50,000 individuals from the National Health Interview Survey, comparing changes in CRC screening from 2019 to 2023 within age groups 40 to 44; 45 to 49; 50 to 54; 55 to 64; and 65 to 75 years old. The data were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and region. The researchers found up-to-date CRC screening was up 20 percent in 2021 and 37 percent in 2023. The study results showed that among 45- to 49-year-olds, colonoscopy screening increased by 43 percent and stool-based testing increased more than five-fold from 2019 to 2023. Screening increased significantly from 2019 to 2023 in every racial and ethnic group, but remained unchanged among individuals with less than a high school education and those who were uninsured. 'These studies further demonstrate the importance of people having access to comprehensive health insurance, which covers evidence-based preventive services,' said Lisa A. Lacasse, president of ACS's advocacy affiliate, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN). 'With more than 2 million people in America expected to be diagnosed with cancer in 2025, it's more important than ever to make sure that everyone can access necessary screenings. 'ACS CAN will continue to advocate at the state and federal level to expand access for all because it isn't just good policy, it's lifesaving.' Doctors say people with symptoms of colon cancer or those who are concerned about the disease and are under 45 years old may still be able to get screened on their health insurance. Insurance would consider screening tests for this group as diagnostic screenings - a test to investigate specific symptoms - rather than a preventative screening - a test done on someone without symptoms to catch a disease early. Out-of-pocket, a colonoscopy costs between $1,250 and $4,800 — although this varies significantly by state.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store