
Freed from Pakistan's Shackles: India's Time to Bring Gilgit-Baltistan Home
Even though Gilgit-Baltistan is a beautiful tourist destination, its serious internal problems are often hidden behind the scenic views. Sadly, every government has ignored the real needs of this region. Instead, Gilgit-Baltistan has mostly been used as a buffer zone, a strategic location, a vote bank for the Kashmir dispute, and a military base because of security concerns. Many people feel that Pakistan values the land of Gilgit-Baltistan more than its people—treating the land as an asset and the people as a burden. It's difficult to cover all the issues in just one article, but a few major problems do need immediate attention.
Firstly, education in Gilgit-Baltistan has been largely ignored. Some might say the region has a good literacy rate, but that is only partly true. While literacy levels have improved, it mainly happened because of the efforts of NGOs and private schools. The government has played almost no role in this progress.
More importantly, it is a sad fact that Gilgit-Baltistan does not have a medical college, an engineering university, or any top-quality higher education institution. This is especially worrying because today's world is a 'knowledge-based society,' where having knowledge means having power.
However, the government is not doing enough to fix this problem. Students are forced to travel to distant places to get higher education, which is expensive and difficult—especially for girls and students from poor families. Because of these challenges, many talented students are unable to continue their studies.
Secondly, another big problem is finding a good and respectable job after completing education. Even though students work hard during their studies, they often do not get jobs that match their talent and Efforts. For example, the current government recently cut the federal job quota (jobs in national-level government departments) for Gilgit-Baltistan from 4% to just 1% (including women and minorities). This tiny 1% quota in the Federal Public Service and Central Superior Services is not enough and has shut the doors for many young people who have been waiting for opportunities.
Also, government jobs in Gilgit-Baltistan are often given based on sect, ethnicity, or political connections, instead of merit. This has completely destroyed fair hiring in the region. On top of that, there are no big companies, factories, or private businesses to create jobs, and the agriculture sector is almost non-existent. As a result, many people are stuck in underemployment or have no jobs at all. This is likely to increase poverty and widen the gap between rich and poor. As Marcus Aurelius (a Roman emperor and philosopher) said, 'poverty is the mother of all evils.' Without enough jobs, social problems and class conflicts will grow, making the situation even worse.
Thirdly, there is a major problem with electricity in the region. Power cuts are very common. For example, in Gilgit City, the capital of Gilgit-Baltistan, there is no electricity for about 12 hours every day. People usually get electricity for two hours, followed by two hours of power cut, and this cycle continues throughout the day.
However, the situation is even worse in the more remote areas, where people sometimes have to go without electricity for days or even weeks if a technical problem occurs. It is surprising to know that Gilgit-Baltistan has the potential to generate 40,000 MW of power. Sadly, the repeated negligence of different governments has made things worse. Even though we are living in the 21st century, where most tasks are carried out electronically, the people of Gilgit-Baltistan are forced to live like they are still in the stone age, far removed from the modern, connected world.
Gilgit-Baltistan, covering 72,496 square kilometers, was once part of Jammu and Kashmir until India lost control of it in 1947. After Maharaja Hari Singh decided to join India, a British officer named Major William Brown led a rebellion with the Gilgit Scouts. They arrested the governor and handed the region over to Pakistan on November 1, 1947. Major William Brown was a British officer who commanded the Gilgit Scouts, a local force. He believed that since most people in Gilgit were Muslims, the region should join Pakistan, not India. On October 31, 1947, he planned a quick coup, arrested the Maharaja's governor, Ghansara Singh, and declared Gilgit's accession to Pakistan. His actions helped Pakistan take control, but India sees this as an illegal act that took away part of Jammu and Kashmir. Skardu, an important town and the main gateway to the high mountains of the Karakoram range, also fell later into Pakistan's hands. Pakistan then tightened its hold on the region, while India, due to military and political mistakes, could not regain control. Today, Skardu hosts a military airbase used by Pakistan, underscoring its strategic significance.
Today, Gilgit-Baltistan remains neglected. Its 1.7 million people still lack basic rights, opportunities, and essential services. Although its beautiful landscapes attract many tourists, the hardships faced by locals are ignored. Since its self-declared independence in 1948, Pakistan has kept the region sidelined, leaving its people feeling abandoned.
Now is the right time for India to take action and reclaim this important region. Its closeness to China, Afghanistan, and the Karakoram Highway makes it vital for India's security. If ignored, non-state groups or enemy countries could take advantage of the unrest, putting India's unity and safety at risk. India must work towards developing and properly integrating Gilgit-Baltistan before it is too late.
Quick note: Skardu is important because it is not just any town — it is the administrative center of Baltistan and close to key mountain passes and strategic locations.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
3 days ago
- News18
Eknath Shinde invokes Nero to target Uddhav
Agency: PTI Last Updated: Thane, July 20 (PTI) Maharashtra's Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde on Sunday invoked Roman emperor Nero and the popular legend associated with him to target Shiv Sena (UBT) president Uddhav Thackeray. He also questioned the 'selective" criticism of the Election Commission when the opposition loses polls. 'It is strange that some individuals are celebrating when people leave their party (Shiv Sena-UBT). We haven't seen this kind of behaviour before. 'While Rome was burning, Nero was playing the fiddle'," Shinde, who heads Shiv Sena, said without naming Uddhav. He said instead of introspection, some leaders are only indulging in blame games and cursing others. 'When they got desired results in the Lok Sabha elections, they consider the Election Commission good, but when things do not go their way, they blame the system," Shinde said while addressing an event to felicitate medical entrepreneurs in Thane. He highlighted the Mahayuti government's achievements, particularly schemes for women. 'We've created historic schemes for 2.5 crore sisters. Many tried to consolidate power and booked five-star hotels and ministries in advance. But the people, especially our sisters, shattered those dreams and brought Mahayuti back to power (in 2024 elections)," he said, adding that he identifies himself as a party worker who is available 24 hours a day. Shinde also lauded the role of doctors in society, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Alluding to attacks on doctors, Shinde said the medical fraternity is the pillar of society and deserves deep respect. 'At times, unfortunate incidents occur, and despite the doctors' best efforts, lives cannot be saved. In such moments, society must act responsibly instead of targeting medical professionals", he added. Shinde recalled the struggle to arrange for Remdesivir from various places, including from abroad. PTI COR NSK view comments First Published: July 20, 2025, 23:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Mint
13-07-2025
- Mint
Manu Joseph: The defeat of English is the defeat of Amateur Indians
A few weeks ago, Home Minister Amit Shah said at the launch of a book of Hindi poems, 'In our lifetime, we will see a society in which those speaking English will feel ashamed…" He also said, 'A complete India cannot be imagined through half-baked foreign languages." Later, facing some sort of lament from political opponents, he said that he is not against 'foreign languages." About the shame bit, he has a point. I do not believe English is a 'foreign' language anymore in India. Apart from all the obvious reasons, Bollywood operates mostly in English; not only are most screenplays in English, the Hindi dialogues too are written in the Roman script. Very few stars can read Hindi or read it fast. Most people who read this column may not be able to read their mother tongue. I can't either. This could and should bloom into shame. Also Read: Only English please: Trump's language order isn't just symbolism Despite its stature, English has failed in India. Its ubiquity is a residue of its past privilege, like the vast assets of a sinking aristocrat. The class whose world is framed in English, in my view, can be called amateur Indians. And their world is dying. In fact, the death of Indian English is closely tied to the defeat of the Amateur Indian, a person whose pantomime of Western sophistication makes him a cultural misfit in his own nation. In time, the use of English may become an overt sign of being amateur Indians—those people who speak of history and culture but can hardy converse in their own mother tongue, those who cannot navigate their own nation, or communicate with a government clerk, or with a cop or a thug; in many ways, they are 'foreigners' in their own nation and foreigners elsewhere too, even if they give romantic names to this orphanhood and take discreet pride in it. In response to Shah's observation, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi pointed out that English is a language of aspiration.I am not certain anymore that this is true, or at least as indisputable as it was a generation ago. A consequence of progress is that symbols of prestige are exposed as elitist clubs that are useless once the common man gains access to them. Prestige is not prestigious if ordinary people gain access to it. Also Read: As it spreads across the world, who owns English? Once, English was the language of the people who ran India. It was a time when class and money meant the same thing. India has changed. Even though English still has some prestige, its influence is waning because the influence of prestige itself is waning. English now belongs to a confused minority: Upper-middle class. India might be the only society in the world whose educated upper-middle class does not speak any language with complete mastery. Many of us are stranded in English and we speak our mother tongues—or the languages that raised us—very poorly. For instance, many of us cannot read high prose or even give a formal speech in an Indian language. Across India, the mother tongue has risen in prominence, aided by technology. The primary language of the new sahib is not English, but his mother tongue. His poor hold over English doesn't embarrass him. Mastery of English is not a sign of wealth anymore. Also Read: Our literary fiction written in English has lost its spark And class is not as alluring as money anymore. The world of India's new economic and cultural elite is framed in Indian languages. In most of North India, the power of Hindi is almost total. In all southern states, the cultural influence of their independent languages is nearly total. As a result, there is an emotional connection between the poor and the new icons—a bond that the average Indian used to share only with politicians, sportspeople and actors. This has a significant social outcome. Today's rich are able to influence, persuade and co-opt the poor in more efficient ways. The most influential news channels now broadcast in Indian languages. Over-the-top streaming platforms for entertainment are increasingly going lowbrow in Indian languages. They have created a new genre of heartland dramas. That is where 'Bollywood' too is headed in its fight for survival. The reason they fail is that the people who decide what 'the masses' want are still people who think in English, who have only recently begun shedding their cultural amateurishness. Just as wokes are people who have to make bad guesses at what it means to be decent, the new Indian 'heartland drama' is conceived by people who have to make guesses about what the heartland is. Also Read: Three-language formula: Chhattisgarh offers an education case study What is going on in new India is that a true pop culture is emerging that is unifying all classes, except those who are Westernised, who in any case have either migrated or vanished in other ways. This unification does not require a single Indian language; it only requires the absence of an anglicized worldview. A bit of the prophecy of shame is already true and has been for some time. When I was growing up in Madras, a guy who spoke excessively in English was called Peter. And 'delivering Peter"—a weird translation from Tamil—was a way to insult a posh guy who spoke in English. And it was ridiculous even then to see 'national' leaders, meaning people from Delhi, touring Tamil Nadu and speaking to some of the world's poorest people in English. Speaking Hindi carried a political stigma in the state. But then, Hindi films ran to full houses and Hindi was tied to such an advanced economy compared to Tamil Nadu's that one of its most famous men, Rajinikanth, played a sidekick to a Bollywood hero in more than one Hindi film. Even today, political leaders from Delhi who visit Tamil Nadu speak to the masses there in English. They need not anymore. The author is a journalist, novelist and screenwriter. His book, 'Why the poor don't kill us', will release in August.


Time of India
13-07-2025
- Time of India
How Fred W Smith's logistics revolution changed global food
The Third Punic War, in which Rome destroyed Carthage, was famously fuelled by the delivery of figs. The orator Cato, addressing the Senate, produced fresh figs from Carthage, which he claimed reached Rome in just three days. This convinced senators about the threat from their North African rivals. In his essay 'Cato's African Figs', FJ Meijer analyses the logistics of Roman shipping and fig ripening to argue that the fruits could not have come from Carthage (now Tunisia) so soon. He suggests they came from fig trees from Carthage planted on Cato's Italian estate, which is three days' journey from Rome. Cato twisted words to get the war he wanted, knowing 'the approval fine country fruits would arouse among the senatorial gentlemen farmers'. Meijer had data because Rome stood at the centre of an amazing system to transport perishable foods. Trade networks had transported long-lasting foods, like spices and dried fruits, for centuries. Elites across the world were able to get special deliveries of perishable foods. In the early days of Tata Airlines, later Air India, its early supporters included maharajas who used the planes to send mangoes and paan leaves to their London homes. A remarkable example is the Inca system of casqui relay runners who could bring the king fresh fish from Peru's coast to the capital of Cuzco, 500 km away and 3,300 metres higher. Rome's networks brought foods to regular citizens, in the process changing the geography of the city. Monte Testaccio is an artificial hill in Rome made up of the broken amphorae, the earthen jars that brought vast amounts of olive oil from Spain to Rome. Transport also changed the nature of foods, particularly through the barrels used for carrying wine and spirits. The flavours of the barrel wood permeated the alcohol, adding tastenotes that people came to like so much that now barrelageing is part of the manufacturing process. Fred W Smith , the founder of FedEx, who passed away recently, didn't set out to deliver food, but he wouldn't have been surprised that fresh food deliveries became a potent symbol of the transport revolution he created. Smith's father operated both longdistance buses and one of the earliest quick-service restaurant chains. Chain logistics was in his blood and helped him conceptualise the hub-and-spoke system of logistics where, instead of point-to-point delivery, huge efficiencies are achieved by bringing cargo to a central point and then out again. Smith was an enthusiastic pilot and made dedicated cargo planes vital to the logistics system he set up, centred at Memphis, Tennessee. In Moveable Feasts , Sarah Murray's book on food logistics, she surveys the system through one of its most striking annual events: 'In the runup to Thanksgiving, turkeys by the thousands fly around the country, powered by jetengines, not wings and feathers.' Despite endless reminders to buy in advance, people still order last minute, depending on FedEx and other courier companies to ensure they get their birds in time, in a madly compressed period when much of the cargo through Memphis is meat. Air freight also created a global food craze. A basic logistics problem is ensuring cargo both ways, preventing expensive empty return trips. In the 1970s, as Japan's exports boomed, flights going back from Europe and the USA were running empty. Then someone noticed that bluefin tuna, much prized in Japan for eating raw in sushi and sashimi, was sold as cheap petfood in the West. Systems for flash freezing them from fishing boats were devised and the huge fish were flown to Japan. Sushi made from the rich, fatty fish became affordable, and a taste for it spread from Japan to other parts of the world. Bluefin tuna is now caught globally and flown to Tokyo's Tsukiji market, from where it goes back out to sushi lovers globally. It is a fish-focused version of Smith's hub-and-spoke system, a testament to the transformative power of transporting perishable foods.