Paris's Iranian diaspora debates war, mullahs and 'what comes next' at city bookshop
"All Iranians who follow politics expected the American attack, but based on reactions expressed in Iran on social media, supporters of the regime did not. They are in shock," said the Iranian Tinouche Nazmjou, a theater director, editor and founder of the Parisian bookshop Utopiran. Le Monde spoke to him by phone just hours after the sudden strike carried out by the United States against Iran on June 21.
Nazmjou launched a series of debates titled "Debates Before the Fall," the second session of which is scheduled for June 26 at the bookshop. The discussions were filmed and broadcast on a Telegram channel followed by 100,000 people, most of them in Iran. Bamdad (who did not wish to give his last name), 45 years old and the son of a communist opponent, is a regular.
"After America's attack, we're getting closer to a scenario like Iraq or Libya. I don't support the mullahs, but I'm even more afraid of the chaos that would come from a power vacuum," he explained by phone.
On June 20, before the Israel-Iran war took a turn with America's intervention, Bamdad and about 40 other Iranians – some recently arrived in France, others who have been here for more than 40 years since the fall of the shah – gathered at the bookshop in Paris's 15 th arrondissement. On the counter, a granita machine was churning out yakh dar behesht, or "ice in paradise," a saffron-colored dessert that reminded them of home.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Trump delays TikTok ban again, grants app 90-day extension to find US buyer
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday, June 19, he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration. The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," said a statement issued by the platform. Digital Cold War? Trump said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump has repeatedly downplayed risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business. The White House had announced Monday that Trump would throw the wildly popular video-sharing app, which has almost 2 billion global users, another lifeline. During this new grace period the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," the administration said in a statement.
France 24
9 hours ago
- France 24
Iran could resume uranium enrichment 'in a matter of months', UN nuclear watchdog says
UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi says Iran likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium"in a matter of months," despite damage to several nuclear facilities from US and Israeli attacks, CBS News said Saturday. Israel launched a bombing campaign on Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, saying it was aimed at keeping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon – an ambition the Islamic republic has consistently denied. The United States subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic program. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is "serious", but the details are unknown. US President Donald Trump insisted Iran's nuclear program had been set back "decades". But Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said "some is still standing". "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi said Friday, according to a transcript of the interview released Saturday. Another key question is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6-kilo (900-pound) stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks. The uranium in question is enriched to 60 percent – above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. Grossi admitted to CBS: "We don't know where this material could be." "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification," he said in the interview. For now, Iranian lawmakers voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA and Tehran rejected Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites, especially Fordo, the main uranium enrichment facility. "We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened," Grossi said. In a separate interview with Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" programme, Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved. "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice," he said, according to excerpts of the interview. "They didn't move anything." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday underscored Washington's support for "the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran," commending Grossi and his agency for their "dedication and professionalism". The full Grossi interview will air on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Sunday.
Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran holds state funeral for killed military leaders and scientists
Hundreds of thousands of people attended a mass state funeral in Tehran on Saturday for the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and other top military commanders, as well as nuclear scientists killed during the latest 12-day conflict with Israel. The caskets of IRGC's Chief General Hossein Salami, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh and others were driven through the city's Azadi Street. Coffins were draped in the Iranian flag with large portraits of those killed attached. Both Salami and Hajizadeh were killed on the first day of the conflict on 13 June, when Israel launched a war it claimed was intended to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. State media reported that the state funerals were for 60 people, including four women and four children, and that more than 1 million people turned out for the procession, though the latter cannot be independently verified. The funeral procession did have a large turnout, which saw mourners line the street waving flags as they chanted "Death to America" and "Death to Israel". Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was not present at the funeral. Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, was present, alongside other high-profile Iranian military leaders. The IRGC was established after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which led to the overthrow of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the country's last monarch. First established as a domestic security force, the IRGC has now evolved into a transnational actor aiding Tehran's allies in the Middle East and has control over the country's arsenal of ballistic missiles. The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June, when Israeli airstrikes began targeting nuclear and military sites in Iran. Tensions soared when the US got involved last week when it bombed three key nuclear sites. A US-brokered ceasefire was then declared on Tuesday. Iran has always insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful and civilian purposes only. However, Israel views it as a threat and claims its military campaign was necessary to prevent Iran from building a nuclear bomb.
