
Completion of Reading High School Innovation Academy in jeopardy
The U.S. Department of Education in March revoked more than $51 million in previously approved federal funds designated for the project, the district said in a news release, noting the significant funding gap could delay or jeopardize construction of the academy.
'It has been recommended that we stop progress on the Innovation Academy,' Dr. Jennifer Murray, district superintendent said Wednesday at the school board's voting meeting.
The new facility, underway at Ninth and Douglass streets, is designed to reduce overcrowding at Reading High and expand science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, academic opportunities for students.
'Our community has made tremendous progress, and this facility is critical to continuing that upward trajectory,' Murray said in a statement. 'To lose these funds now would not only harm our students, but it would also reverse years of work to provide them with the opportunities they deserve.'
The district is working with its solicitor, the state Department of Education, state and federal legislators, representatives of Gov. Josh Shapiro's office and others, Murray said.
'Anybody who will listen to us,' she noted. 'We are waiting for guidance.'
Earlier this month, Gov. Shapiro joined a multistate lawsuit with 15 other states and the District of Columbia challenging the Trump Administration's decision to abruptly revoke $185 million in funding owed to Pennsylvania, much of which the U.S. Department of Education had already approved for distribution.
These funds include $183.6 million owed to 116 Pennsylvania school districts, charter schools, intermediate units and career and technical centers, and $1.8 million owed to the Pennsylvania Department of Education, according to the state website.
Last week, local and state leaders, including U.S. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan and state Sen. Judy Schwank, toured the partly built academy to observe construction progress and meet with district leaders.
Houlahan praised the facility's potential but expressed concern about the loss of federal support, the district said.
'Let me be clear: our government must stand by its word,' Houlahan said in a statement. 'These federal funds, secured by the American Rescue Plan Act that I proudly voted for in 2021 and duly appropriated by Congress, must be distributed as promised. For President Trump and his administration to claw back Congressionally approved and appropriated funding is illegal.'
Houlahan said she fully supports Gov. Shapiro's lawsuit to challenge this decision in court.
'If these funds are not delivered as promised, the people of Reading will suffer financial consequences and that's not right,' Houlahan said.
The students of Reading want and deserve a high school to prepare them for the competitive jobs of the 21st century, she said.
'That's exactly what they will gain with a STEM education,' Houlahan said. 'There's nothing efficient about a halfway built school. The Trump administration's decision is absolutely punitive and foolish.'
The district was originally awarded more than $104 million in American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, or ARP ESSER, funds. Of that, approximately $77 million has been spent or committed to the academy and other construction projects, including heating, ventilating and air conditioning improvements across the district.
The initial deadline for expenditure of the funds was September 30, 2024, with additional 90 days to distribute all the funds, but the district was granted an extension for another 14 to 18 months to complete the project, Murray said Wednesday at a meeting of the school board.
The extension was needed primarily due to the unexpected discovery of bedrock that required blasting at the academy site, she said, and post pandemic issues with obtaining adequate building supplies.
U.S. D.E.P. has now reversed its earlier decision on the extension, citing regulatory timelines and a shift in federal priorities post-pandemic.
As a result, Murray said, the district risks losing more than $51 million in total. This includes $23.8 million already spent but not yet reimbursed, and another $27.5 million in pending obligations.
'We followed every guideline and were granted an extension that aligned with our project timeline,' said Wayne Gehris, district chief financial officer. 'Now we've told those funds are no longer available. This puts the future of the Innovation Academy in question and creates a financial challenge we haven't seen in more than a decade.'
Despite the challenge, district leaders say they are committed to exploring every available option to close the funding gap.
The district said it is also evaluating potential legal options.
'Our students deserve access to state-of-the-art learning environments, just like students in other communities,' said Gehris. 'We're doing everything we can to ensure this building is completed.'
For updates on the RHS Innovation Academy project, visit https://www.readingsd.org/.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Florida PTA sues for frozen federal education funds. What that means for Miami-Dade
School districts across the country have filed different lawsuits to try to get the U.S. Department of Education to release funds that had been frozen by the Trump administration. On Monday, Florida finally became a party to one of the cases. The Florida Parent Teacher Association and the Florida Education Association joined a national lawsuit to reverse the U.S. Department of Education's decision to block $396 million in federal education funding. Miami-Dade County Public Schools, the state's largest district, currently has about $35 million in federal funds frozen. Broward County has about $30 million on hold. The freeze had districts scrambling to try to find a path forward just weeks before the start of the school year. Last week in a committee meeting, Miami-Dade schools superintendent Jose L. Dotres told board members that he had no plans for the school district to join as a party to a lawsuit, preferring instead to lobby lawmakers in Tallahassee and Washington, D.C. In a school board meeting on Wednesday, board member Luisa Santos expressed her thanks to the Florida Parent Teacher Association for their initiative. The lawsuit, filed in Rhode Island federal court, seeks a preliminary injunction to immediately reinstate the funds, which had previously been approved by Congress. The case was brought by several school districts, parent teacher organizations and teacher's unions from Rhode Island, Texas, Ohio, Illinois, California and Pennsylvania along with the two Florida organizations. Programs at risk of losing funding include teacher training, English language learner (ELL) services, migrant education, after-school tutoring partnerships with groups like the Boys & Girls Clubs, and food assistance initiatives that help feed low-income students and families. During Wednesday's school board meeting in Miami-Dade, Santos said the frozen funds pay for at least 1,000 employee positions within the district and affect the district's almost 83,000 English language learners. Superintendent José Dotres told the board he is working on creating clearer documentation to show how each federal grant is used, in an effort to raise awareness about the importance of the funding. Many of these enrichment dollars are used to support bilingual education and help students understand emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence. Read more: Miami-Dade schools superintendent presses lawmakers for $35M in frozen funds Board member Roberto Alonso emphasized the importance of federally funded teacher preparation and training programs. Jude Bruno, president-elect of the Florida PTA, told the Herald that the organization moved forward with the lawsuit because there is currently no legislative session underway to address the issue. 'With the start of school just days away, we thought this was our only option,' Bruno said. He added that he's concerned about a shortfall in personnel and school districts' ability to purchase new textbooks and supplies for the upcoming school year. Other affected districts include Orange County ($22 million), Leon County ($12.5 million), and Pinellas County ($9 million). 'Districts are being forced to make last-minute decisions that threaten student support, staffing, and stability. These are not abstract concerns. The impact will be felt immediately in classrooms, particularly in schools that serve the highest-need communities,' said Maxine Ann-Marie Lewers, president of the Florida PTA, in a statement.


Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Senator says U.S. tariffs from Trump White House damaging for Washington state
Opponents from Washington state of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats against Canada are vowing to fight, saying the ongoing trade war has delivered a heavy blow to American border communities. In a conference call led by Democrat U.S. Senator Patty Murray that included British Columbia Premier David Eby, Murray said regions such as Whatcom County bordering Canada get about 12 per cent of taxable retail income from Canadian consumers. Murray said the drop in Canadian tourists visiting her state has also resulted in economic uncertainty among ferry operators and in Point Roberts, where residents cannot access the U.S. mainland without travelling through Canada. Eby said it is difficult to continue asking British Columbians to keep their money in Canada but the U.S. boycotts are necessary in the trade war despite circumstances being 'miserable' on both sides of the border. Earlier this week, Eby responded to statements by the U.S. Ambassador to Canada who called Canadians mean and nasty over their travel and alcohol boycott, saying Canadians would be 'proud' to be considered mean for standing up for their sovereignty. Edmund Schweitzer, founder of Washington-based digital device maker Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, said during the conference call that his company is predicting the tariffs will cost it US$100 million in 'unanticipated federal taxes.' Schweitzer said that means each of the 7,000 employees who co-own the company will take a financial hit of US$14,000 from the tariffs. 'President Trump seems to have created the 51st state that he was talking about, which is the great state of uncertainty,' he said Wednesday. 'And this is affecting all of us.' Murray said she is working in the U.S. Congress to bring Democrats and Republicans to join in the fight to wrestle back the power to set tariffs from the White House and urges other Americans to join the cause. 'Who is responsible for this, and we all need to remember this, is the president of the United States who started this,' Murray said. 'We are raising our voices to say, 'Enough is enough … stop this.' B.C. is among several Canadian provinces that banned the sale of U.S. alcohol from government-run stores after the trade war began, and industry groups say such sales in Canada have fallen sharply in March and April. Statistics Canada figures show the number of Canadians returning home by car from south of the border fell to just over 33 per cent in June compared with the same period last year, and return trips by air fell to just over 22 per cent during the same period. 'No one wants this,' Murray said of the falling numbers and economic uncertainty. 'We did not ask for this. It's been imposed on us. And I think that the premier is making it clear he has to make it painful for the United States. 'That doesn't change our relationship with British Columbia. We've always been friends, allies. We have had challenges in the past, but we talk to each other. We work through it, and that's what we both want at the end of this.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025.


CNBC
12 hours ago
- CNBC
Student loan forgiveness paused under a popular repayment plan. Here's what to know
The U.S. Department of Education has temporarily paused debt forgiveness under a popular repayment plan for student loan borrowers. In an FAQ on the department states that loan forgiveness for borrowers enrolled in the Income-Based Repayment plan is on hold while it responds to court orders. IBR is one of the department's income-driven repayment plans, also called IDRs. Congress created the first IDR plans back in the 1990s to make student loan borrowers' bills more affordable. The plans cap people's monthly payments at a share of their discretionary income and cancel any remaining debt after a certain period, typically 20 years or 25 years. More from Personal Finance:Trump's 'big beautiful bill' slashes CFPB funding78% say Trump's tariffs will make it harder to deal with debtTax changes under Trump's 'big beautiful bill' — in one chart IBR will be one of only a few repayment options left to millions of borrowers, after recent court actions and the passage by Congress of President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill." That legislation phases out several income-driven repayment plans. Here's what to know about the delay in debt relief for IBR borrowers. Student loan forgiveness is paused for IBR borrowers because of court actions involving the Biden-administration-era SAVE, or Saving on a Valuable Education, plan, the department said. Former President Joe Biden touted SAVE as the most affordable income-driven repayment plan in history, but its generous terms soon became a point of controversy for Republicans. In February, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with GOP-led states that sued to block the SAVE plan rule, which had sweeping impacts on student loan repayment. For example, under the rule, certain periods during which borrowers postponed their payments would count toward their forgiveness timeline. With SAVE blocked, borrowers no longer get credit during those forbearances. "So the U.S. Department of Education will need to make changes to the qualifying payment counts," said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. Ellen Keast, deputy press secretary at the Education Dept., said IBR discharges would resume "as soon as the Department is able to establish the correct payment count." The hold on IBR discharges shouldn't impact student loan borrowers who are still years away from debt forgiveness, experts said. However, they may not receive credit for any periods during which their bills were paused. If you're pursuing debt erasure under IBR, your payments made under the plan (or another income-driven repayment plan) will still be bringing you closer to debt cancellation, as long as you are enrolled in IBR when you become entitled to that relief. If you expected your debt to be forgiven shortly, you should continue making payments, Kantrowitz said. You don't want to be flagged as late. "Any excess payments will be refunded," Kantrowitz said.