Water bills are set to sky rocket despite shake-up to fix 'broken' system
Steve Reed is expected to unveil plans today to abolish industry regulator Ofwat as part of a 'revolution' designed to fix the 'broken' system.
He said reforms would lead to sewage deposited in lakes and rivers being halved by 2030 – and pledged to quit if the target is not met.
The package will also include the creation of a water ombudsman with legal powers to resolve disputes on behalf of customers.
Mr Reed dropped heavy hints that he will scrap Ofwat when he unveils a report on the future of the water sector today.
He said: 'The regulator is clearly failing. It's failed everybody. It's failed customers, we saw those huge bill rises. It's failed the environment, we see the state of iconic lakes, like Windermere, beaches like the beach of Bournemouth.'
But Mr Reed refused three times to rule out future above-inflation increases in water bills, which are already set to rise by an average of 36 per cent by 2030 to 'fund improvements'.
He said the Government had 'secured' a record £104billion of private sector investment to help fix leaking pipes, build reservoirs and cut sewage discharges.
But he claimed he was 'furious' about the huge bill increases which will pay for it and wanted to see costs kept 'as low as possible'.
The future of the water sector report is also expected to recommend 'social tariffs' for people on low incomes. The subsidies would be funded by high charges on middle-class families.
Tory housing spokesman Kevin Hollinrake warned against the idea. He said families were 'already facing soaring water bills under Labour... We can't just keep increasing taxes and charges'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
24 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Overhaul water regulators into one single body, landmark review recommends
The system for regulating water companies should be overhauled and replaced with one body for England and one body for Wales, a landmark review of the sector has advised. The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry. The Government-commissioned team was tasked to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses, although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. The report, published on Monday morning, recommended far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as it called the current landscape 'fragmented and overlapping'. For England, proposals include abolishing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, and the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI), which ensures that public water supplies are safe. The report also advises removing the regulatory roles of the Environment Agency and Natural England, which monitor the sector's impact on nature, such as companies illegally dumping sewage into waterways. Instead, a 'joined-up' and 'powerful' single integrated water regulator should be established, according to the recommendations. In Wales, Ofwat's economic responsibilities would be integrated into Natural Resources Wales, the review said. The current system has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years they paid out shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Other recommendations from the commission include stronger consumer advocacy, nine new regional water authorities to deliver on local priorities, significant improvements to environmental regulation and tighter oversight of company ownership and governance. The regional authorities – eight in England and one national authority in Wales – would see current planning responsibilities devolved and resources from regulators transferred to ensure investments reflect local priorities and voices. Author Sir Jon said the review has 'tried to attack the problem from all sides' but warned that bills are going to rise by 30% over the next five years. 'There are some inescapable facts here,' he said. 'The cost of producing water and dealing with our wastewater is going up.' He later told Times Radio that regulators have failed to work together to make the sector deliver and blamed the Government for not giving clear direction. 'It's the failure of Government to balance out all the different pressures on water,' he said, adding that firms 'need to perform better' and 'be funded to invest'. The Government backed the commission's findings, with water minister Emma Hardy saying consumers have been 'failed time and time again'. Speaking on Times Radio, she said 'root-and-branch reform' is needed to fix the crisis and told listeners the Government is considering a piece of primary legislation to deliver many of the proposed changes. Ms Hardy also described trust in the water industry as at 'the lowest ever level' and criticised executives for handing out pay rises and bonuses. 'Everyone knows the system is broken,' she said. 'And they give themselves huge pay rises.' However, the minister also ruled out supporting Government intervention to cap pay in the private sector. Ms Hardy said: 'I don't think as Government we should say what private companies should pay. 'But I will say – read the room. Look how angry and furious people are.' Other key recommendations in the review include: – Expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water (CCW) into an ombudsman to give stronger protection to customers and a clearer route to resolving complaints. – Significant improvements to environmental regulation, including the process where companies collect and analyse wastewater discharges they make into waterways, by introducing more digitalisation, automation, third-party assurance and inspections. – Tightening oversight of water company ownership and governance through measures such as new regulatory powers to block changes to water company ownership and 'minimum capital' requirements so that companies are less reliant on debt. – Introducing legislative reforms to better manage public health risks in water, recognising the many people who swim, surf and enjoy other water-based activities. – Fundamentally resetting economic regulation, including a new 'supervisory' approach that supports tailored decisions and earlier interventions in water company oversight. Elsewhere, the report shared proposals on implementation, including which reforms can be delivered in the short term and which require new primary legislation. In a speech responding to Sir Jon's report later on Monday, Environment Secretary Steve Reed will welcome the commission's recommendations to ensure 'the failures of the past can never happen again'. Mr Reed is also widely reported to be preparing to abolish Ofwat and is set to commit to the creation of a new, legally binding water ombudsman through the role of the CCW. Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have said that water regulation needs to change. Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey called for the creation of a Clean Water Authority that could 'hold these water companies to account' and 'fine them when they fail'.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Water regulation should be overhauled, review recommends
The system for regulating water companies should be overhauled and Ofwat replaced, a landmark review of the sector has advised. The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry. The Government-commissioned team was tasked to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses, although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. Water minister Emma Hardy told broadcasters on Monday that the system is 'broken', but did not commit to how many of the 88 suggestions would be accepted by Whitehall. The report, published on Monday morning, recommended far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as it called the current landscape 'fragmented and overlapping'. For England, proposals include abolishing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, and the Drinking Water Inspectorate, which ensures that public water supplies are safe. The report also advises removing the regulatory roles of the Environment Agency and Natural England, which monitor the sector's impact on nature, such as companies illegally dumping sewage into waterways. Instead, a 'joined-up' and 'powerful' single integrated water regulator should be established, according to the recommendations. In Wales, Ofwat's economic responsibilities would be integrated into Natural Resources Wales, the review said. Ms Hardy told BBC Breakfast that ministers would be taking 'a proper look' at the paper 'all the way through the summer'. Asked if all the recommendations would be made law, she told the programme: 'What we'll do is we'll have a proper look at it all the way through the summer and the intention is that we're going to introduce a White Paper to spell out exactly what we're going to do on water reform.' Ms Hardy said that the Government would 'introduce a water Bill next year, which will change the law', but added: 'Exactly how many out of the 88 we're going to do or not going to do, then we'll work that out in the next few months.' The current system has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years they paid out shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Author Sir Jon said the review has 'tried to attack the problem from all sides' but warned that bills are going to rise by 30% over the next five years. 'There are some inescapable facts here,' he said. 'The cost of producing water and dealing with our wastewater is going up.' Sir Jon later told Times Radio that regulators have failed to work together to make the sector deliver and blamed the Government for not giving clear direction. 'It's the failure of Government to balance out all the different pressures on water,' he said, adding that firms 'need to perform better' and 'be funded to invest'. The Government backed the commission's findings, with Ms Hardy saying consumers have been 'failed time and time again'. Speaking on Times Radio, she said 'root-and-branch reform' is needed to fix the crisis and told listeners the Government is considering a piece of primary legislation to deliver many of the proposed changes. Ms Hardy also described trust in the water industry as at 'the lowest ever level' and criticised executives for handing out pay rises and bonuses. 'Everyone knows the system is broken,' she said. 'And they give themselves huge pay rises.' However, the minister also ruled out supporting Government intervention to cap pay in the private sector. Ms Hardy said: 'I don't think as Government we should say what private companies should pay. 'But I will say – read the room. Look how angry and furious people are.' Other key recommendations in the review include: – Expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water into an ombudsman to give stronger protection to customers and a clearer route to resolving complaints. – Significant improvements to environmental regulation, including the process where companies collect and analyse wastewater discharges they make into waterways, by introducing more digitalisation, automation, third-party assurance and inspections. – Tightening oversight of water company ownership and governance through measures such as new regulatory powers to block changes to water company ownership and 'minimum capital' requirements so that companies are less reliant on debt. – Introducing legislative reforms to better manage public health risks in water, recognising the many people who swim, surf and enjoy other water-based activities. – Fundamentally resetting economic regulation, including a new 'supervisory' approach that supports tailored decisions and earlier interventions in water company oversight.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
DWP reveals deadline for thousands of benefit claimants owed compensation after court battle
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has provided a new update for tens of thousands of benefit claimants still due a compensation payment this year. The payments are being made to people with disabilities who were moved from 'legacy benefits' such as Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) to universal credit in the years before transitional protections were introduced. These claimants were found to have lost the 'Severe Disability Premium' (SDP) in the move, with the DWP not doing enough to ensure their incomes were protected. Most of the 57,000 people affected by the issue have now received their compensation. However, the department has said it is working to clear approximately 13,000 cases which are more complex. Explaining the issue in its annual report, the DWP stated: 'Unfortunately, some underpayments may be owed to customers who no longer have an active ESA claim and restrictions in data make it difficult to identify, assess and correct these errors.' The department said it was working to complete the work on these errors by September. While agents are proactively contacting those eligible for compensation, anyone who thinks they may have been affected to make a claim. The department said it will assess claims on a case-by-case basis based on the evidence given. The repayment scheme follows two rulings by the High Court between 2018 and 2019, which found the government failed to ensure the benefit payments of affected claimants weren't reduced when they transitioned. In 2020, the DWP made a failed attempt to challenge these rulings at the Court of Appeal. It was found that the monthly loss of income in both cases amounted to around £180. Law firm Leigh Day – who brought the cases – estimates that compensation could be worth more than £5,000 per person. The DWP has confirmed that the total cost of the repayment exercise is £452m. A DWP spokesperson said: 'We are fully committed to identifying claimants that are owed arrears and providing the financial support to which they are entitled as quickly as possible, with the majority of these cases having already been resolved. "We are clear that errors like this one should not happen and have already taken action to avoid future errors.' Eligibility To be eligible for compensation, a claimant must be receiving (or had previously received) Universal Credit that includes a transitional SDP, or would have done, had it not been eroded. They must then have met one of three more conditions immediately before their move to Universal Credit: They were entitled to an income-based legacy benefit that included an Enhanced Disability Premium They were entitled to an income-based legacy benefit that included the Disability Premium They were entitled to an income-based legacy benefit that included the Disabled Child Premium, or Child Tax Credit which included the Disabled Child Element (non-severely disabled category) Payment rates There are five possible payment rates, which will be made for each month between the claimant's transition to Universal Credit and when new income protection regulations came into force in February 2024. These back payments will be calculated by giving claimants what they would have been entitled to had the new rules been in place when they transitioned. The monthly rates are:
