Industry's PAC Keeps Seeking to Add Allies as Congress Hashes Out Crypto Legislation
The candidate favored by the industry's chief political action committee, James Walkinshaw, won the Democrats' so-called firehouse primary over the weekend, in which the party conducted its own polling to determine its chosen candidate among a field of nine. The general election to formally select the Fairfax County region's next member of Congress is set for Sept. 9, though the Democrat incumbent took about two thirds of the vote in the regular election last year, giving Walkinshaw a heavy advantage.
"We look forward to James joining the growing, bipartisan coalition in Congress that understands the importance of securing America's leadership in the next generation of technology," said Josh Vlasto, a Fairshake spokesman, in a statement. He argued that the race again demonstrated that the electorate isn't moved by critics who attempt to tarnish candidates who show support for the sector and are backed by its campaign resources, as at least one of Walkinshaw's opponents sought to do.
Fairshake (and its affiliate super PACs, Defend American Jobs and Protect Progress) rose into prominence in the 2024 congressional elections as it amassed a huge war chest from major digital assets businesses, including Coinbase, Ripple and a16z. It devoted its campaign spending in outsized chunks that in some cases dwarfed what was spent by the opponents of the group's chosen candidates. As a result, Fairshake added a long list of winners to the ranks of Congress' crypto supporters in those elections, but it has continued its strategy in special elections as one-off contests seek to fill vacated seats such as Connolly's.
In the case of Walkinshaw, Connolly's former chief of staff, the spending came from Protect Progress, which focuses on Democrat candidates. While his former boss had voted routinely against crypto issues, Walkinshaw's campaign site says the candidate favors an "embrace of the next generation of technology," including blockchain, which the campaign said "can reduce administrative costs for businesses and lower fees for consumers."
"Congress should establish modern, risk-based regulatory frameworks that support responsible innovation and prevent abuse," according to Walkinshaw's website.
The super PAC still has about $116 million on hand as the 2026 congressional election cycle approaches next year, Vlasto said. Current members of Congress it supported in the past round are already at work on major crypto bills that have been advancing this year.
Fairshake makes massive "independent expenditures" in political races, meaning their outside money buys advertising without approval or communication from the candidate. Though it represents crypto interests, the advertising purchased by the group almost never mentions the topic of digital assets, instead focusing on whatever political points are most likely to garner a win.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
7 minutes ago
- CBS News
House passes "big, beautiful bill," sending it to Trump's desk in 218-214 vote
Washington — The House on Thursday passed the signature piece of legislation of President Trump's second term, approving a massive bill that includes trillions of dollars in tax and spending cuts while ramping up funding for defense and the administration's immigration agenda. The lower chamber voted 218 to 214 to approve the measure, with two Republicans — Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania — joining all Democrats in opposing the bill. The Senate passed the legislation, dubbed the "big, beautiful bill," earlier this week. The House vote tees up President Trump to sign the bill as early as Friday, coinciding with the July 4 holiday. The vote came after a marathon overnight session that saw GOP leaders overcome internal opposition to advance the bill, paving the way for final passage. Republican members who balked at many of the changes the Senate made to the legislation eventually relented and voted to pass it. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries tried to delay the inevitable by speaking on the floor for 8 hours and 44 minutes, setting the record for the longest House speech in U.S. history. He called out Republicans for the bill's deep cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs, highlighting the Americans who he said would suffer because of the bill. Before the vote, Speaker Mike Johnson said the bill will "make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before, and every American is going to benefit from that." "We've had spirited debate, we've had months of deliberation, and now we are finally ready to fulfill our promise to the American people," Johnson said. "That's what we are doing today." The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would add $3.4 trillion to federal deficits over the next 10 years and leave millions without health insurance, due to the cuts to Medicaid and programs under the Affordable Care Act. It would also dramatically increase funding for immigration enforcement, a key priority for Republicans and the president. GOP opposition melts away House members vote on President Trump's tax bill at the Capitol on July 3, 2025. ALEX WROBLEWSKI/AFP via Getty Images The final vote came after House GOP leadership scrambled Wednesday and into the wee hours Thursday to shore up support for the measure ahead of a key procedural vote. Although Johnson spent weeks pleading with his Senate counterparts not to make any major changes to the version of the bill that passed the lower chamber by a single vote in May, the Senate made a number of tweaks that irked House members on a number of fronts — from its cuts to Medicaid to its impact on the deficit. Johnson acknowledged that the Senate bill's changes "went a little further than many of us would've preferred," though he repeatedly urged that the final product was largely what the House had signed off on in May. The Senate-passed bill includes steeper Medicaid cuts, a higher increase in the debt limit and changes to the House bill's green energy policies and the state and local tax deduction. Other controversial provisions that faced pushback in both chambers, including the sale of public lands in nearly a dozen states, a 10-year moratorium on states regulating artificial intelligence and an excise tax on the renewable energy industry, were stripped from the Senate bill before heading back to the House. Potential holdouts, including moderates and members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, met with Mr. Trump on Wednesday as the White House pressured House Republicans to vote for the bill. The vote on the key procedural hurdle began around 9:30 p.m. Wednesday and didn't wrap up until about 3:20 a.m. Thursday. Five House Republicans initially voted no on the vote setting the rules for debate on the measure, which would have been enough to tank the vote. But the vote remained open as GOP leaders worked to shore up support, allowing lawmakers to change from no to yes. Johnson told reporters that Mr. Trump was "directly engaged" with skeptical members to get them onboard. "Members wanted to hear certain assurances from him about what's ahead, what the future will entail, and what we're going to do next, and all of that," Johnson said. "And he was very, very helpful in that process." Mr. Trump ramped up the pressure over Truth Social as a handful of Republican holdouts didn't appear to be budging, declaring: "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" "What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!" Mr. Trump wrote shortly after midnight. The House ultimately voted 219 to 213 to advance the bill in a key victory for Republican leaders, who won the support of about a dozen GOP opponents to the rule. And when the vote finally came to an end, Fitzpatrick was the sole Republican opposed. He would also vote against final passage. Johnson told reporters that the breakthrough came amid help from the president, along with lengthy listening sessions with the bill's opponents, "making sure that their concerns were addressed." "A lot of people had to take the time to thoroughly go through the Senate's changes to our bill and that's fine," Johnson said. "That was necessary to get them to yes." , and contributed to this report.
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Why Republicans can't quit Medicaid cuts
Republicans also largely see the two programs as earned entitlements because they are funded with payroll taxes, whereas Medicaid is still viewed by many in the party as a handout, even though most recipients work, policy experts said. 'Social Security and Medicare also clearly have a beneficiary group of elderly who are politically active, but Medicaid is politically easier to go after because you're talking about kids and poor people and people with disabilities,' said Chris Howard, a professor of government and public policy at William & Mary in Virginia. With Social Security and Medicare off the table, Medicaid became one of the only targets for Republicans to find cuts of the size they needed to pay for Trump's policy priorities. 'When you have to pay for stuff in the federal budget, there are only a couple of programs they can look at,' said GOP health strategist Joel White, president and CEO of the consulting firm Horizon Government Affairs. 'The money lined up.' Messaging war Trump's remaking of the Republican Party aside, the rhetoric around the Medicaid debate was familiar to anyone who's paid attention to politics over the last several decades. Republicans said the Medicaid expansion had exploded the welfare state by allowing 'video-game-playing young men' too lazy to work to enjoy taxpayer-funded health care. Democrats said Republicans were shredding the social safety net to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated an earlier version of the bill would lead to a $1.1 trillion cut to health spending over the next decade and 11.8 million people tossed off coverage. The CBO does not have an updated score yet on the version of the bill that narrowly passed the House on Thursday after several health provisions were dropped, such as a penalty on states for coverage of undocumented immigrants. Recent polling shows that Democrats appear to be winning the messaging war. A poll released June 26 from Quinnipiac University found 55 percent of U.S. voters were opposed to the bill compared with 29 percent in support and 16 percent didn't have an opinion. Another poll from health research group KFF found 64 percent of U.S. adults opposed the bill and 35 percent were in favor. 'The combination of these deep cuts to food and health care, which most people strongly believe are important kinds of benefits, and the tax cuts for the rich — it's going to be very easy for Democrats to portray Republicans as the sort of heartless friends of the rich,' said Howard. White said Republicans have long had problems talking about health care, and lawmakers must keep to their message that the policy changes go after abuses. 'There are simple things they can say: 'If you are an able-bodied adult, you need to work or volunteer in your community and get educated,'' he said. White added that Republicans need to explain more clearly why the cuts are necessary to shore up the program for those truly in need and that those kicked off can obtain insurance through an employer or an Obamacare exchange. 'All members of Congress need to say what is at stake, which is the integrity and long-term stability of the Medicaid program,' he said.
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The Republican Budget Bill Is an Economy Killer
Congress passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' and is sending it to President Donald Trump for his signature so it can become law. Any hope that enough Republicans would have the courage to put the needs of the economy and America's fiscal position before tax cuts for the rich was met instead with callow cost fiddling. The damage this bill will inflict has been laid bare by the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office in its estimates for how much it will add to the country's already bulging debt and deficit while exposing the accounting gimmickry underpinning Republican forecasts. It's important to know that the methods used by the CBO for estimating the cost of any policy needs a counterfactual to compare against. It has always used the laws currently in force, such that a bill's cost equals revenue and spending under the current law less the revenue and spending under the proposed law. But Republicans say current law (which has the 2017 tax cuts expire) isn't right, current policy (in which the 2017 tax cuts are in place) is. And with that, the trillions of dollars the CBO says the bill would add to deficits in coming years just… disappeared!
