
No national security attacks recorded in Northern Ireland in 2024
The Northern Ireland-related terrorism threat level for the region remains at substantial, that an attack is likely, after being reduced from severe in 2024.
Dr Jonny Byrne (Liam McBurney/PA)
However the Independent Reviewer of National Security Arrangements in Northern Ireland was critical of a lack of discussion among politicians, policymakers and the community around the national security situation.
Dr Jonny Byrne, who was appointed to the role last year, said security statistics and the assessed threat level 'fail to adequately capture the transformation Northern Ireland has gone through since 1998'.
Secretary of State Hilary Benn made a statement on Tuesday on the latest annual report which reviews the relationship between MI5 and the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) in handling national security matters, and whether it is in compliance with the 2006 St Andrews Agreement.
Mr Benn's written statement quoted the main findings of the latest report, which covers the period from January 1 2024 to December 31 2024.
It found compliance in terms of the five key principles, including the PSNI having had sight and access to all Security Service Intelligence relating to terrorism in Northern Ireland and being informed of Security Service counter-terrorist activities relating to Northern Ireland.
The report also found that an 'overwhelming number' of 'what are considered national security Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHISs) in Northern Ireland continue to be run by PSNI officers under existing handling protocols'.
A police cordon at the scene in the Greenan area of west Belfast following the murder of Kevin Conway (Brian Lawless/PA)
It outlines general statistics, with the recording of one security-related death in 2024 in terms of the murder of Kevin Conway, compared with none in 2023, and six bombing incidents and 17 shooting incidents in 2024, compared with eight bombing and 33 shooting incidents in 2023.
There were also 23 casualties of paramilitary-style assaults, compared with 31 in 2023, and five casualties of paramilitary-style shootings, compared with 19 in 2023.
Meanwhile there were 67 security-related arrests under Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000, with nine persons subsequently charged, compared with 104 arrested in 2023 with 21 charged.
Dr Byrne expressed concern around an overreliance on these indicators.
'It is apparent that security statistics along with the approach to measuring the threat level, fails to adequately capture the transformation Northern Ireland has gone through since 1998,' he wrote in his report.
'Since 2010, the threat level has fluctuated (in a small part) between severe and substantial yet the policing and security landscape in 2024 is very different and significantly closer to one envisaged through the peace process.
'There is a risk that Northern Ireland is solely defined through these indicators and that they have a significant influence on current and future security-related policy.'
My concern is that we use the current security indicators and threat level to justify why we cannot 'move on' Dr Jonny Byrne
He said there is a 'lack of agreement among politicians, policy-makers and the community as to what constitutes a 'national security issue''.
'There is also a reluctance to engage on the issue in a public way as most people align it with the conflict and part of our past,' he said in his report.
'As a result, there are limited discussions about national security within the context of public health, the economy, climate change and the environment, migration and immigration, cyber threats and extremism.'
Dr Byrne urged a 'focused discussion as to what normalisation looks like and what security indicators are best placed to measure it and reflect the situation'.
'My concern is that we use the current security indicators and threat level to justify why we cannot 'move on', which makes any further move to normalisation challenging,' he said in his report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Fire destroys club shop and scoreboard at Lámh Dhearg GAA club
A scoreboard, shop and signage was destroyed in a fire at a GAA club in County Antrim.Lámh Dhearg GAC said it believed the fire had been started deliberately. "The club has made great efforts in recent years to improve our club facilities for our members and local community and are deeply concerned by this act of vandalism at a time when our facilities are needed the most," a spokesperson Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service said it attended a fire at the club in Hannahstown at about 18:00 BST on Saturday. Belfast city councillor Arder Carson said the fire was "a pure act of deliberate vandalism that fills you with despair"."Attacking the very organisation that provides so much for young people and the entire community. It has to be condemned without reservation," the Sinn Féin councillor appealed for anyone with information to come forward.


Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
An institutional intifada is coming to crush a Reform government
In England's fractured five-party system – featuring Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, Reform and the Green/Islamist/far-Left movement – a hung Parliament is certain sooner or later, in any event. Especially once Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are factored in, with their nationalists and unionists. This explains why Labour is likely to form a new government after the next election – even if it exhausts its stupendous parliamentary majority, the second largest since World War Two, in much the same way that it is exhausting the nation's finances. For in a hung Parliament, one must have allies. And Labour has more potential partners than anyone else: the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish Nationalists, Plaid Cymru, Northern Ireland nationalists, Greens and Islamists. None of these may want to join a coalition government with Labour if one is offered. But they will surely be even more unwilling to form one with parties of the Right. Meanwhile, the Conservatives and Reform would have only – a few Ulster unionists apart – each other as potential partners, if one assumes that the Liberal Democrats won't work with either. Which would be bigger? Perhaps by the next election the party of which I'm a member, the Conservatives, will once again be the main party of the Right – especially in the event of a crash in the markets that leaves other parties, with their promises of higher spending and lower taxes, over-promised and under-prepared. But as I write, it looks unlikely. It is no longer absurd to imagine Reform as the larger of the two Right-wing parties in parliament. What would happen next? Perhaps Nigel Farage would offer the disorientated Tories a coalition, and so swallow up whatever was left of them. For what it's worth, I would prefer a confidence and supply arrangement – partly because I'm a convinced Conservative, even in these unpromising circumstances, and partly because I'm not convinced by Reform. But regardless of our party political preferences, we should want a future Reform administration to succeed: all of us, because it is in our interest for government to work, and Conservatives in particular, because – as conservatives with a small C as well as a large one – a legitimate Right-wing party should be preferable to a legitimate Left-wing one. But if parties with experience, like the Conservatives and Labour, find it hard to govern, one without it, like Reform, would find it next to impossible. Here are three illustrations. On day one, the new Reform administration instructs the Royal Navy to return small boats containing illegal migrants to France as they cross the Channel. Naval officers refuse, asserting that the French will refuse to accept the returns, that there is a risk that migrants will scupper their boats, and that in these circumstances refusing to take them to Britain would breach international law. On day five, Reform's new Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, a businessman with no political experience, is accused of bullying civil servants. Downing Street's Propriety and Ethics unit steps in. Staffed by civil servants and based in the Cabinet Office, the unit has a formidable reputation. It helped to investigate Nadhim Zahawi, Priti Patel, Dominic Raab and Chris Pincher under the last government. All were forced out, rightly or wrongly. On day 10, the new Reform home secretary, like Suella Braverman, demands that the Progress flag, which represents the LGBTQ+ cause, no longer be flown above the Home Office. He has no more luck than Braverman, who said later: 'I couldn't even get the flag of a horrible political campaign I disagreed with taken down from the roof of the government department I was supposed to be in charge of.' There is a fashion on the Right for blaming a 'blob' of unaccountable quangocrats, activist judges, politicised civil servants and outdated international agreements for intensifying Britain's problems. Some Labour MPs, since their party took office, have overlapping complaints. Both underplay the main source of the problem: a House of Commons that is no longer providing enough effective, coherent legislation and efficient, commanding ministers. But regardless of one's view of the matter, there can be no doubt that a Reform government would be seen, in some corners of Westminster and Whitehall, as illegitimate. And would be met from day one by an institutional intifada. My impression is that those at the top of Reform think of themselves as Big Men with Strong Views. They certainly have the latter – hence the falling out of Farage and Rupert Lowe. And maybe, in government, they would prove themselves the former. Perhaps a Reform government would beat establishment resistance to a pulp (metaphorically, not literally). But as matters stand, it looks like Reform that's cruising for a bruising – if it ever makes government at all. Getting the system to work takes time even if it likes the look of you. Tony Blair complained of 'scars on my back' after trying to reform the public sector. The Civil Service came to terms with Margaret Thatcher only in her second term. Before she won her first election, John Hoskyns, a businessman, devised a plan for government to tackle the problems of the day: inflation, trade union militancy, decline. It was called Stepping Stones. If Farage is to follow in her footsteps, he needs a modern equivalent: a strategic plan for getting his most radical measures – leaving the ECHR, abandoning the net zero targets, scrapping the Equality Act – through Parliament (where they would meet particular resistance in the Lords) in order to ensure that they gain the democratic legitimacy to which the courts would bow. During the 1980s, the key question was what a new Right-wing government should do. Today, it's how to do it. Are the Big Men thinking big enough?


NBC News
7 hours ago
- NBC News
More than 70 arrested at U.K. protests in support of banned group Palestine Action
More than 70 people were arrested Saturday at protests in the U.K. against the Palestine Action group being proscribed a terrorist organization by the British government following a break-in and vandalism at a Royal Air Force base. In London, the Metropolitan Police said 42 people had been arrested by late afternoon. All but one of the arrests were for showing support for a proscribed organization, which police have said includes chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos. Another person was arrested for common assault. A further 16 arrests were made in Manchester, according to Greater Manchester Police, while South Wales Police said 13 people were also held in Cardiff. In London, it was the second straight week protesters gathered to support the pro-Palestinian activist group. Its outlawing has meant support for the organization is deemed a criminal offense. Police arrested 29 people at a similar protest last weekend. Two groups gathered underneath both the statues of Indian independence leader Mahatma Gandhi and South Africa's first post-apartheid president, Nelson Mandela, in Parliament Square. Signs with the wording 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action,' were held aloft in silence as the protesters were surrounded by police officers and members of the media. Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the ground as police searched their bags and took away signs. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square. The official designation earlier this month of Palestine Action as a proscribed group under the Terrorism Act 2000 means that membership in the group and support for its actions are punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organizations are already proscribed under the U.K. act, including the militant groups Hamas and al-Qaida. The government moved to ban Palestine Action after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, England, on June 20, damaging two planes using red paint and crowbars in protest at the British government's ongoing military support for Israel in its war in Gaza. Police said that the incident caused around $9.4 million of damage. Four people between 22 and 35 years old were charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to the interests of the U.K. The four are scheduled to appear on July 18 at the Central Criminal Court in London, better known as the Old Bailey.