Target boycott leaders plan protests on anniversary of George Floyd's murder
Pastor Jamal-Harrison Bryant, senior pastor of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Georgia, said his church will protest outside a Target in Conyers, Georgia, an Atlanta suburb. Sixty-seven churches across the country will hold additional protests, he said during a May 18 church service. They are a way to continue pressuring Target to re-establish its commitment to DEI and other demands by the organizers of what was originally called the Target Fast and is now called the Target Boycott, said Bryant, an activist and author.
Target is headquartered in Minneapolis where Floyd died and after his death, the retailer made a pledge to the Black community to boost efforts in inclusion, Bryant said in an interview with USA TODAY. But since then, Target has fallen in the eyes of many in the Black community, Bryant said.
"They made this pledge not under political duress, not in response to protest, but we thought out of conscious and clean hands," Bryant said.
Target did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
There have been two boycotts specifically aimed at Target – one which began on Feb. 1 to coincide with Black History Month and another that started March 5 to coincide with Lent. Both were started by leaders in the Black community in response to Target's retreat from DEI initiatives and other measures of support.
The first indefinite Target boycott was launched at the start of February by Minnesota activists, including Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights attorney and founder of the Racial Justice Network. Armstrong has previously told USA TODAY that Target's DEI retreat was a slap in the face to many Black shoppers who supported the retailer.
A separate 40-day "Target Fast" started by Bryant began on March 5 to coincide with Lent. Since Target did not reinstate its DEI initiatives, the effort is ongoing and has been redubbed The Target Boycott.
Separately, there are also ongoing consumer boycotts led by The People's Union, which organized a Feb. 28 one-day economic blackout of all consumer spending. The group has since held several weekly boycotts of other businesses and had a three-day economic blackout in April.
The Latino community has also been active on social media using the hashtag #LatinoFreeze, encouraging supporters to "hold your money'' amid freezes on DEI initiatives, reduced funding for the National Institutes of Health and actions on immigration.
The four demands of Bryant's group include:
Honor the $2 billion pledge to the Black business community that Target previously had in place, which entailed purchasing Black-owned products, services and investing in Black media.
Deposit $250 million across 23 Black-owned banks to strengthen Black financial institutions.
Establish community retail centers at 10 historically Black colleges and universities to educate and empower future Black entrepreneurs.
Fully restore and recommit to DEI at every level of the company.
On April 17, the Rev. Al Sharpton, founder and president of the National Action Network (NAN) met with Target CEO Brian Cornell – at Cornell's request. Sharpton has since confirmed that Bryant was in attendance at the meeting.
Bryant told USA TODAY that the meeting was productive and Cornell said a commitment to re-establish the $2 billion pledge was underway and that it would be complete by July 31. No announcements have been made by Target or Bryant's group regarding the July 31 deadline. However, Bryant said since the other three demands have not been met, the boycott will continue.
Bryant also told USA TODAY that Cornell met with President Donald Trump a few days after their meeting and Bryant had not heard from Target since, but was still expecting the July 31 pledge to happen.
"I feel this has been impactful and effective," Bryant said of the initial boycott.
A Target spokesperson confirmed that the retailer in January said it "will complete its $2 billion commitment to invest in Black-owned brands and businesses through its REACH program in 2025 as planned." When asked for clarification if the initiative would be re-instated by July 31, as Bryant was told, a Target spokesperson said there has been no specific date set other than sometime this year.
The spokesman for Target, which had not responded to previous inquiries from USA TODAY about the consumer boycotts, also released this statement: "We are absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity for everyone – our team members, our guests and our supply partners. To do that, we're focusing on what we do best: providing the best retail experience for the more than 2,000 communities we're proud to serve."
The spokesman also provided an internal memo sent on May 5 from Cornell to Target's employees. In it, Cornell acknowledged a "tough few months."
"There's been a lot coming at us – macro challenges in the environment, but also headlines, social media and conversations that may have left you wondering: Where does Target stand? What's true? What's not?" Cornell wrote.
"I recognize that silence from us has created uncertainty, so I want to be very clear: We are still the Target you know and believe in—a company that welcomes all and aims to bring joy to everyone, every day."
Leaders of the consumer boycotts have been pointing to Target's stock plummeting since earlier this year and data showing online and in-person activity at Target and several other retailers being down, to point to success, as previously reported by USA TODAY.
But data from several firms show a mix of results, with sales at some retailers increasing or remaining flat for the first quarter.
Consumer boycott: Target boycott continues, more on the way
Conservative activists have successfully rallied in recent years to force retailers and companies to rein in their DEI efforts by staging boycotts to hurt sales.
In campaigns using hashtags and slogans like "go woke go broke," boycotts waged by conservative activists have taken aim at some of the nation's largest consumer names, including Target. Some have succeeded in slashing sales and forcing policy changes.
Now Target and other companies find themselves under attack from the other side, facing calls for boycotts from DEI supporters angry over the rollbacks.
Bryant said churches will walk out at 12 p.m. ET on May 25. Protestors are asked to be silent for 9 minutes and 40 seconds, according to Bryant, to symbolize the amount of time that Derek Chauvin's knee was on Floyd's neck.
Bryant told USA TODAY that he took extra precautions in planning the protests to ensure everyone's safety.
"I am very reticent in calling for a protest in mass of Black people under this administration," Bryant said, referring to protestors potentially getting arrested. Bryant said he has paired pastors in the various cities with members of the National Bar Association, "So that people have somebody to mitigate for them in the event that it goes a different way," he said.
Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her on X, Facebook or Instagram @blinfisher and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, which will include consumer news on Fridays, here.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Protests coming to Target on anniversary of George Floyd's death
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
White House backs away from IVF mandate despite Trump's campaign pledge, Washington Post
WASHINGTON − The White House has no current plans to mandate insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization, despite President Donald Trump's campaign promise to expand access to fertility treatments, The Washington Post reported on Saturday. Trump signed an executive order earlier this year directing the government to expand access to IVF and reduce the costs of the popular fertility treatment. More: Some workers are job hopping for fertility benefits. Employers are trying to keep up. White House officials say expanding IVF access remains a priority, but legal constraints prevent mandating coverage without Congressional approval, and no bill is currently planned, the Post reported. Officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment by USA TODAY. Contributing: Francesca Chambers


Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Americans' perception of discrimination against Black people dropped in last four years
A new report shows that slightly less than half of U.S. adults believe that Black and Hispanic people face "a great deal" or "quite a bit" of discrimination in the United States. According to the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll, the number of people saying Asian people and Black people are experiencing discrimination has dropped since the last time the survey was conducted in April 2021. Four in 10 say that Black and Hispanic people face "quite a bit" or "a great deal" of discrimination. Three in 10 say the same about Asian people, and one in 10 say it about White people, according to the report. The previous Associated Press-NORC poll was conducted a year after the death of George Floyd when protests occurred all across the country calling for an end to racial discrimination in police activities. The last survey showed that 61% of U.S. adults said there was a great deal or quite a bit of discrimination against Black Americans. The new survey also noted that while many groups experience discrimination, the report showed skepticism that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are effective at mitigating discrimination. "Many say DEI programs do not make a difference and roughly 3 in 10 think DEI initiatives increase discrimination against most racial and ethnic groups including White people. About a third feel DEI efforts are reducing discrimination against women, Hispanic people, and Asian people while 4 in 10 say the same about Black people," the report stated. The Philadelphia Tribune interviewed Americans to get their reactions to the latest poll. Claudine Brider, a 48-year-old Black Democrat in Compton, California, told the Tribune that "the concept of DEI has made the workplace difficult for Black people and women in new ways." "Anytime they're in a space that they're not expected to be, like seeing a Black girl in an engineering course... they are seen as only getting there because of those factors," Brider said. "It's all negated by someone saying, 'You're only here to meet a quota.'" Gilbert, Arizona resident Pete Parra said that "DEI is making things harder for racial minorities now." He worries about how his two adult Hispanic sons will be treated when they apply for work. "I'm not saying automatically just give it to my sons," said Parra, who leans toward the Democratic Party. But he's concerned that now factors other than merit may take priority. "If they get passed over for something," he said, "they're not going to know (why)." Many proponents of DEI argue that the effort corrects historical injustices and systemic inequities. However, conservatives say that it promotes division instead, leading DEI initiatives to face opposition from conservative groups and state legislatures across the U.S.

Boston Globe
7 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘Great news but a weird twist.' After the NIH moved to restore hundreds of grants, researchers remain in limbo.
Advertisement In New England, 63 of those grants, worth $126 million, are set to be restored, according to a Globe analysis based on the The grants were restored as the result of a lawsuit filed by the American Public Health Association and 16 state attorneys general arguing that the NIH improperly ended funding tied to topics like gender identity, health disparities, vaccine hesitancy, and DEI efforts. The judge in the case ruled in June that the terminations were 'illegal and void' and ordered the government to immediately make the funds available. The Trump administration has appealed the decision. Advertisement The grants are a fraction of the more than $3.1 billion in funding from the National Science Foundation and the Department of Health and Human Services that the Trump administration has canceled across New England. At a status hearing on the case Monday, attorneys representing the public health association said that more than 50 of its roughly 300 affected research grants across the country have not been reinstated, and that the NIH has not provided a timeline for when all grants will be restored. Researchers face other obstacles as well. At Harvard, virtually all federal funding remains frozen as part of the administration's broader assault on the university. Others face reduced staffing, due to layoffs, and shortened deadlines to complete their research. And funding at the federal level remains subject to sudden reversals, as shown Tuesday night when the White House In a statement Thursday, the NIH told the Globe it 'has been working to reinstate grants to comply with the court's order.' Scott Delaney, a Harvard scientist and co-creator of Grant Watch, said many researchers remain wary despite the win because of further appeals and reviews. 'Every indication is that NIH will continue to cut research on trans health and on DEI. They still remain hostile to broad bodies of research, and they continue to ask researchers to rewrite their grants to avoid certain topics,' said Delaney, who lost his own NIH funding and received a But many are pressing ahead despite the obstacles and hoping for the best. Advertisement Nancy Krieger, a professor of social epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, learned this month that her funding would be restored. She said that despite feeling vindicated by US District Court Judge William G. Young's ruling, she cannot access the funds due to the federal freeze on funds to Harvard. Since 2019, Krieger and her team have been working to measure the impact of six types of discrimination — including racism, sexism, and ageism — on health. The researchers enrolled 699 patients who completed two study questionnaires online and at three Boston community health centers — including Fenway Health, Mattapan Community Health Center, and Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center in Dorchester — to test how discrimination contributes to psychological distress and sleep disorders. 'We can resume the work because we had completed all data collection and we were in the phase of data analysis and manuscript preparation,' Krieger said. 'Whether or not the funding ever truly gets reinstated for my grant — and I would like that it is — it's important, given the complexities, to make sure these things go from a court order to reality.' At Tufts, the school lost and then suddenly regained a pipeline for young talent, though several young scientists lost out in the process. The university hosts one of just 22 NIH-sponsored programs in the country that trains a diverse group of postdoctoral scholars in both research and teaching. The program, called the Institutional Research Career and Academic Development Award, or IRACDA, focuses on underrepresented groups. 'We were ramping up for another five years after earning highly competitive funding last fall,' said Mitch McVey, program director and professor of biology at Tufts. 'Then the new administration came in, and everything changed.' Advertisement When the NIH terminated funding, four incoming applicants had their offers rescinded just one day after receiving them. Marissa Maroni, 28, celebrated the news with her husband and prepared to move back to her home state. 'It felt like the right next step, personally and professionally,' said Maroni, who is finishing her PhD at the University of Pennsylvania. 'But just a day later, I got an email saying the program was canceled. It was incredibly disheartening.' The loss also affects Bunker Hill Community College, University of Massachusetts Boston, and Suffolk University, where IRACDA scholars like Maroni were slated to teach next year. McVey said Tufts might extend the offers again to the four applicants but, 'We're trying to balance the risk involved here, which would be that if the government wins the appeal, the funding will likely be terminated again. We don't want to put the scholars in a position where their job security is always in jeopardy, so we're trying to figure out how to best navigate this situation. It's not easy.' At Yale, nine NIH grants that were terminated are in the process of reinstatement. Four of those belong to John Pachankis, a Yale School of Public Health professor who has spent the past 20 years investigating why people in the LGBTQ+ community are at higher risk for depression, anxiety, and suicide. The sudden March terminations not only disrupted years of research but also halted the rollout of promising mental health interventions. One of Pachankis's halted trials aimed to train front-line mental health providers working at 90 LGBTQ+ community centers across 35 states in cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat depression, anxiety, and substance use. Advertisement 'Right before the funding termination, we learned that our trained mental health providers had started delivering our cognitive-behavioral therapy to over 4,000 LGBT people in just four months,' he said. The funding cut prevented them from studying the longer-term impact of the therapy and ways to sustain it in local communities. Restarting the work has been slow and resource-intensive, he said. It requires updating ethics approvals, reconvening data safety review boards, updating clinical trials registries, drafting now-overdue progress reports, and restarting trials enrollment while no longer having sufficient staff to do this work. 'The research infrastructure took years to build, was collapsed in a day, and will take months if not longer to rebuild,' Pachankis said. 'My confidence in future federal funding for this research remains shaken, but my team's commitment to asking and answering important scientific questions isn't going away.' Meanwhile, at Brown, Moitra is figuring out how to move forward with his research. Between 2022 and early 2024, he and his team recruited 240 LGBTQ+ participants, offering two counseling sessions to study the mental health impacts from the pandemic. After funding was pulled, Moitra said, they lost 40 participants' worth of data that had timed out after those participants received just one counseling session. Now that the grant has been reinstated, Moitra's team is left racing against the clock as the deadline for the funding to be used remains Aug. 31. The researchers are applying for a no-cost extension to allow them to complete the work without requesting additional funds. 'After five-plus months of uncertainty, we were moving on,' Moitra said. 'It's hard to scramble it all back together.' Advertisement Sarah Rahal can be reached at