logo
H5N1 Bird Flu Threat: Experts Sound Alarm Over Potential Pandemic As Infections Spread To All 50 US States

H5N1 Bird Flu Threat: Experts Sound Alarm Over Potential Pandemic As Infections Spread To All 50 US States

There is a possibility for virus adaptation and widespread infections among humans, they warned
The latest data also revealed that there are "ongoing mutations" across the circulating avian influenza viruses
The warning comes as the HHS pursues an overhaul of the US public health system
Virology experts from across 40 countries have sounded the alarm over the rising threat of H5N1 avian flu, a subtype of the influenza A virus that causes respiratory disease in birds (avian influenza or bird flu), and has now affected humans too.
In a commentary published this week in the medical journal The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, top virologists warned of the recent emergence of "highly pathogenic" H5N1 infections not only in dairy cows, but also in humans in the U.S.
Dozens of individuals affected: Virologists
According to the virologists, there have been over 995 dairy cows and at least 70 humans affected by the virus infections, including a severe case that became the "first reported H5N1-related death in the U.S."
The infections were recorded from 2024 through April 2025, "with the epizootic now present in all 50 states and human cases in 13 states and Canada."
They also cited a February report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that highlighted increased evidence of the virus's transmission to people.
"While the H5N1 outbreak in dairy cows and associated farm workers has not resulted in sustained human-to-human transmission, the possibility of virus adaptation and widespread infections requires proactive and vigilant measures," they pointed out.
They also urged leaders not just in the United States, but across the world, to improve preventive measures by utilizing all the knowledge painfully learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Evidence shows the virus is mutating
Aside from a growing number of people getting infected with the virus, sequencing data from circulating avian influenza viruses suggest "ongoing mutations and reassortment/mixing of genomic segments."
The widespread viral circulation has apparently affected not only dairy cows, but also other mammal species, including suspected cases in sea lions and minks.
"In mammals, these viruses may acquire mutations that increase their ability to transmit and replicate efficiently in mammals, eventually including humans," they warned, though they noted that such cases have yet to be demonstrated.
How worried should Americans be?
The virologists explained that in the past human H5N1 infections were primarily from bird-to-human transmission. However, recent data indicated that the situation had changed.
Furthermore, the proportion of undiagnosed human infections is currently unknown, which further raises the risk of exposure and eventual infection.
According to the experts, the following can play a role in the transmission of H5N1 to humans: Contaminated poultry products
Improper pasteurization and improper cooking of poultry and dairy products
Handling of infected poultry or cows
Direct contact with products from infected cows or poultry
Domestic pets that consume infected birds
The experts have urged leaders to improve various measures to prevent the bird flu's spread, including for biosecurity and biocontainment in farms, as well as awareness campaigns to keep the public informed about the avian influenza.
Warning comes at critical time in federal government
The virology warning comes at a time when concerns are rife over the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which recently saw staff reductions across a wide range of professionals, including researchers and medical experts.
The layoffs reportedly included some staff members of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) who worked on the agency's response to the bird flu.
Despite the potential for a bird flu pandemic, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. seems committed to his initiative of overhauling the public health system and dismantling institutions he deems are not critical.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr Declares 'Stop Trusting Experts' as He Pledges AI Revamp for HHS: 'You Can Do Drug Approvals Quickly With AI'
RFK Jr Declares 'Stop Trusting Experts' as He Pledges AI Revamp for HHS: 'You Can Do Drug Approvals Quickly With AI'

Int'l Business Times

time5 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

RFK Jr Declares 'Stop Trusting Experts' as He Pledges AI Revamp for HHS: 'You Can Do Drug Approvals Quickly With AI'

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing renewed scrutiny after declaring the public should "stop trusting experts" while unveiling his plans to integrate artificial intelligence across federal health agencies, including accelerating drug approvals at the FDA. Speaking on "The Tucker Carlson Show" on Monday, Kennedy said he is leading an "AI revolution" within the Department of Health and Human Services, enlisting tech talent from Silicon Valley to overhaul outdated systems like the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). His goal, he explained, is to automate and streamline processes like drug approvals without relying on animal testing, arguing that AI tools can achieve results "very, very quickly." "We are at the cutting edge of AI," Kennedy said. "We're implementing it in all of our departments. At FDA, we're accelerating drug approvals so that you don't need to use primates or even animal models. You can do the drug approvals very, very quickly with AI." Kennedy's remarks included sweeping criticisms of the scientific establishment, including the assertion that trusting public health experts is "not a feature of science," but instead akin to "totalitarianism." He claimed that Americans were wrongly discouraged from conducting their own COVID-19 research, adding, "We need to stop trusting the experts, right?" While Kennedy did not specify which AI systems would be used for drug approvals, he suggested the agency would move away from traditional clinical models in favor of simulated testing. During the interview, he repeated misleading claims about COVID-19 vaccine trials, suggested former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci should face legal consequences and called for a national "truth commission" to investigate the government's pandemic response. While Kennedy says the agency is actively recruiting engineers and data scientists for his AI initiative, he has yet to announce any formal rule changes or provide technical guidance for how AI would meet existing regulatory standards. Originally published on Latin Times

Germany and COVID-19: What went wrong? – DW – 06/28/2025
Germany and COVID-19: What went wrong? – DW – 06/28/2025

DW

time28-06-2025

  • DW

Germany and COVID-19: What went wrong? – DW – 06/28/2025

The German parliament is seeking to assess the political impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Former Health Minister Jens Spahn is under attack over the possible misuse of public funds. Jens Spahn, the former German health minister, faced scrutiny this week over the possible misuse of public funds in the large-scale procurement of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. He had to answer to questions from the budget committee over why he ordered masks at a very high price and then failed to accept or pay for them. Germany's government could face payments of some €2.3 billion ($2.7 billion) to health-product manufacturers if courts rule against it in the dozens of lawsuits that have been filed over the issue. Spahn has defended his actions, though he admitted last year that he should have done things differently. The heavily redacted version of a report commissioned by Spahn's successor, Karl Lauterbach, was presented to the budget committee of the Bundestag this week. It stated that Spahn's procurement decision was made "against the advice of his specialized departments." The socialist Left Party has called for Spahn to step down from his current role as parliamentary leader of the ruling conservative bloc of Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU), one of the most powerful positions in the Bundestag. "Anyone who throws our tax money out of the window so carelessly should no longer be allowed to hold an important political office," said Left Party co-leader Ines Schwerdtner. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany's governing parties — the CDU/CSU and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) — have sought to establish an inquiry commission to investigate actions taken by the government during the pandemic, including lockdowns that had a major impact on the country's economy. The Left Party had already suggested such a commission last year. "Firstly, lost trust should be regained through a serious review," read the party's motion put to the parliament. "Secondly, to gain insights and recommendations for action that will help us to deal with the pandemic in a more forward-looking, intelligent and effective way before and during a recurring pandemic situation." Among the supporters of such a commission is Hendrik Streeck, who became known as one of Germany's leading virologists during the pandemic. He went on to win a Bundestag seat for the center-right CDU in Bonn in February this year. The 47-year-old now sits on the parliamentary health committee and is also the federal commissioner for addiction and drug issues. Streeck considers it "absolutely necessary" to re-examine how the pandemic was handled, since it was the biggest health crisis since World War Two, he told DW. Streeck is hoping to get answers to the question of how scientific advice reaches the government in a crisis like the coronavirus pandemic. "This is an area of tension between science, politics and the public," the virologist said. He also wants the new commission to take a critical look at the coordination between the federal and state levels of government. During the pandemic, the leaders of Germany's 16 states convened with the federal government to agree measures such as imposing complete lockdowns. Streeck doubts that this was the best framework, as it meant that the parliament was often relegated to a limited control function. Trained nurse and Left Party Bundestag member Stella Merendino, also a member of the health committee, also wants a review as the basis for lessons to learned for the future. "I experienced the pandemic in a hospital emergency room," she told DW. "I saw people die alone, while we were not allowed to let them see their relatives." The 31-year-old also saw hospital staff collapse from exhaustion and grief. "We worked through shifts without knowing whether we would stay healthy ourselves," she said. "There was no adequate protective equipment, no psychological support, hardly any recognition and, to this day, no systematic evaluation of what this meant for our staff." Merendino also believes that many people were left alone during the pandemic to cope with their economic worries, childcare, and loneliness. "This has fueled anger and mistrust that continues to this day," she said. "We don't have to convince everyone, but we have to listen. And as politicians, we must have the courage to admit mistakes." Above all, Merendino expects to ensure more support for people who are still suffering from the consequences of COVID-19. "I know nursing staff who are no longer able to work because of Long Covid. Many are fighting for recognition, for medical care, for financial security. And all this in a healthcare system that is already overburdened." Meanwhile, Streeck believes that the commission should look beyond Germany's borders for its reappraisal. "More data, more analysis would help us to get a more accurate picture," he said. He is convinced that this would help mitigate the divisions he still sees in society. Streeck says that three groups have formed: "Some who don't want to deal with it. The others who say: We were too lax, we did too little. And the third, who say: We went far too far." Everyone has to be taken seriously, says Streeck. "The best thing that can happen is to talk about it." The review commission could be set up to start its work after the summer break, in September you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

RFK Jr. Admits Removing Fluoride From Drinking Water Will 'Probably' Lead to More Cavities in Children
RFK Jr. Admits Removing Fluoride From Drinking Water Will 'Probably' Lead to More Cavities in Children

Int'l Business Times

time26-06-2025

  • Int'l Business Times

RFK Jr. Admits Removing Fluoride From Drinking Water Will 'Probably' Lead to More Cavities in Children

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. admitted that one of the points on his agenda, removing fluoride from water supplies across the nation, would "probably" result in more Americans getting cavities hence worsening dental health in the United States. Kennedy appeared on Fox News with Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt on Thursday in conversation with host Harris Faulkner. The two were hosting an event at the Oklahoma State Capitol in Oklahoma City on the same day in order to begin the "Make Oklahoma Healthy Again" campaign focused on promoting "common-sense health policies, medical freedom, and a return to personal responsibility." "On the issue of fluoride, what has been the response from dentists in America who may be concerned that some children in lower incomes in particular don't get those dental preventative situations where they can go in and get their teeth indemnified and treated against cavities?" Faulkner asked. "Well, people will still get indemnified for it, to the extent that they are already indemnified. But you know, it is an issue. It's a balance. You're gonna see probably slightly more cavities, although in Europe, where they banned fluoride, they did not see an uptick in cavities. The issue is, parents need to decide, because science is very clear on fluoride," Kennedy responded. Social media users quickly took to online platforms to ridicule the Health Secretary's rhetoric. "Fluoride is safe and effective. RFK has no medical or Dental background that makes him an expert on Fluoride," wrote one. "On the downside there will be more cavities but on the upside there will be... um actually there is no upside," joked another. "More cavities for kids in families who can't afford dental care. And neglected cavities can cause other health issues with infections etc, not to mention leading to the need for more serious and expensive dental work..." noted a third. "So they admit that taking out fluoride is bad, yet they'll still do it. Morons," said a fourth. "Some dentists are excited. They will have a lot more business soon," said another. The American Dental Association has reiterated their support for fluoridating water supplies after RFK Jr. announced his intention to direct the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to denounce water fluoridation. "As dentists, we see the direct consequences fluoride removal has on our patients and it's a real tragedy when policymakers' decisions hurt vulnerable kids and adults in the long term. Blindly calling for a ban on fluoridated water hurts people, costs money, and will ultimately harm our economy," said ADA President Brett Kessler, D.D.S. Originally published on Latin Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store