Foraco International Reports Q1 2025 Results
Q1 2025 Financial Highlights:
Revenue for the first quarter of 2025 totaled US$55.0 million, compared to US$77.1 million in Q1 2024. As anticipated, the Asia Pacific region delivered an excellent performance, driven by strong operational execution and the deployment of proprietary rigs while revenue in other regions was adversely impacted by several factors, including the phasing of contracts with major clients (US$11.6 million), and the Company's strategic exit from unstable jurisdictions (US$4.8 million) In addition, unfavorable foreign exchange variations affected the revenue by US$4.0 million.
Profitability
Profitability declined primarily due to client driven delays in launching contract awards, the ramp-up of new contracts typically associated with lower margins, and the relative weight of fixed operational costs amid reduced revenue volumes.
EBITDA was US$7.0 million (12.8% of revenue), compared to US$15.1 million (19.6%) in Q1 2024 excluding the proceeds from the sale of the Russian joint venture),
Net profit totaled US$1.0 million (2% of revenue), versus US$6.4 million (8%) in Q1 2024 excluding the proceed from the sale of the Russian joint venture,
Net debt stood at US$69.5 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to US$60.9 million at year-end 2024.
Tim Bremner, CEO of Foraco, commented:
"As expected, the first quarter of 2025 was marked by client-initiated delays in contract awards and the ramp-up of new contracts. Against this backdrop, the current quarter is not an indication of the full year trend. We are pleased to highlight that our Asia Pacific operations delivered an excellent performance, generating US$20.4 million in revenue — a 39% year-over-year increase — underpinned by strong execution and the deployment of proprietary rigs, which we plan to increase in the near future. Our Water division delivered strong performance, posting a 40% revenue increase. We are therefore confident in the validity of our strategy focused on stable jurisdictions, servicing top-tier clients and adapting to market evolution."
Fabien Sevestre, CFO of Foraco, added:
"In Q1 2025, we maintained financial discipline amidst a challenging environment. Our EBITDA margin stood at 12.8% mainly due to the ramp up of new contracts typically associated with lower margins and the relative weight of fixed operational costs. We successfully reduced SG&A expenses in absolute terms, keeping them stable at 8% of revenue. Capital Expenditures were limited to US$3.3 million in Q1 2025, primarily allocated to new proprietary rigs. As a result, our free Cash Flow before debt servicing was reduced to US$5.9 million, compared to US$17.2 million in Q1 2024. Our Net Debt improved at US$69.5 million as of March 31, 2025 compared to US$ 85.0 million last year. Going forward, we will continue to closely monitor our financial position and to take proactive measures to adapt our cost structure to market conditions".
Income Statement
(1) This line item includes amortization and depreciation expenses related to operations
Highlights – Q1 2025
Revenue
Revenue for Q1 2025 totaled US$55.0 million, compared to US$77.1 million in Q1 2024. As expected, the Asia Pacific region delivered an excellent performance, while revenue in other regions was impacted by the phasing of contracts by some major clients (US$11.6 million) and the Company's strategic exit from unstable jurisdictions (US$4.8 million). In addition, unfavorable foreign exchange variation affected revenue by US$4.0 million.
Mining activity was the most affected by the factors described above while Water activity increased by 40% to reach a record revenue for a first quarter at US$11.3 million.
Profitability
Gross margin for Q1 2025, including depreciation within cost of sales, was US$7.7 million (14.1% of revenue), compared to US$16.8 million (21.8% of revenue) in Q1 2024. The decline in gross margin was primarily driven by the phasing and the ramp-up of new contracts (typically associated with lower margins) and the relative weight of fixed operational costs due to lower revenue levels.
During the quarter, EBITDA amounted to US$7.0 million (or 12.8% of revenue) compared to US$17.6 million (or 22.8% of revenue) in the previous year.
Net profit for the quarter amounted to US$1.0 million (2% of the revenue) compared to US$8.5 million (11% of revenue) in Q1 2024.
Net debt
As of December 31, 2024, the net debt, including the impact of IFRS 16, stood at US$ 69.5 million, compared to US$85.0 million as of March 31, 2024.
Financial results
Revenue
Q1 2025
Revenue for Q1 2025 totaled US$55.0 million, compared to US$77.1 million in Q1 2024. The Asia Pacific region delivered an excellent performance, while revenue in other regions was impacted by (i) the phasing of contracts with major clients (US$11.6 million), (ii) the Company's strategic exit from unstable jurisdictions (US$4.8 million), and (iii) unfavorable foreign exchange effects (US$4.0 million).
Activity in North America declined by 33% to US$18.1 million in Q1 2025, compared to US$27.0 million in Q1 2024. The decrease was primarily due to delays initiated by clients in launching contract awards and the starting up some contracts.
Asia Pacific marked an excellent quarter at US$20.4 million, a 39% increase compared to Q1 2024. This growth is primarily attributable to successful operations and commissioning of new proprietary rigs, notably enhancing the Water related services valued by clients.
Revenue in South America was US$10.1 million, down from US$25.6 million last year. In Chile and Argentina, the Company started new long-term contracts during this quarter including the mobilization and learning curve phases which impacts revenue and margins. In Brazil, the Company was impacted by disruption in the usual mobilization process due to client-driven delays.
In the EMEA region, revenue was US$6.4 million in Q1 2025, compared to US$9.8 million in Q1 2024. This decrease was primarily due to the Company's exit from the CIS region. Excluding the CIS region, revenue in Africa and Europe grew by 28%, supported by the start of contracts that are significant for the region.
Overall, rig utilization rate in Q1 2025 was 30% compared to 42% in Q1 2024.
Gross profit
Q1 2025
The Q1 2025 gross margin, including depreciation within cost of sales, was US$7.7 million (or 14.1% of revenue) compared to US$16.8 million (or 21.8% of revenue) in Q1 2024. The decline in gross margin in the mining segment was primarily driven by the phasing and the ramp-up of new contracts (typically associated with lower margins) and the relative weight of fixed operational costs due to lower revenue levels. The gross profit in the water segment increased by 2.7 times compared to last year, driven by the deployment of new proprietary rigs in long-term contracts.
Q1 2025
SG&A decreased 23% compared to the same quarter last year. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A remained stable at approximately 8.5% of revenue.
Operating result
Q1 2025
The operating profit was US$2.9 million compared to US$12.6 million in the same quarter last year.
Financial position
The following table provides a summary of the Company's cash flows for Q1 2025 and Q1 2024:
In Q1 2025, the cash generated from operations before working capital requirements amounted to US$7.0 million compared to US$17.6 million in Q1 2024.
During the same period, working capital requirements were US$7.6 million, a decrease compared to the same period last year, primarily driven by tightened control on working capital management and the reduction in activity.
During the period, Capex totaled US$3.3 million in cash compared to US$6.2 million in Q1 2024. Capex primarily relates to new proprietary rigs, and the acquisition of ancillary equipment and rods.
Strategy
The Company's strategy is to assist its customers in exploring or managing their deposits throughout the entire cycle, with a special focus on the life of mine activity. The Company intends to continue developing and growing its services across the world with a focus on stable jurisdictions, high tech drilling services, optimal commodities mix including battery metals and gold - with a significant presence in water related drilling services - and a gradual implementation of remote-controlled rigs and other advanced digital applications. The Company expects to execute its strategy primarily through organic growth and targeted acquisitions.
The Company addressed the environmental, social and governance (ESG) requirements, and implemented a pragmatic and measurable approach to ESG with quantitative KPIs to maximize improvement and efficiencies.
Currency exchange rates.
The exchange rates for the periods under review are provided in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Q4 2024.
Non-IFRS measures
EBITDA represents Net income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash share based compensation expenses. EBITDA is a non-IFRS quantitative measure used to assist in the assessment of the Company's ability to generate cash from its operations. The Company believes that the presentation of EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the drilling industry. EBITDA is not defined in IFRS and should not be considered to be an alternative to Profit for the period or Operating profit or any other financial metric required by such accounting principles.
Net debt corresponds to the current and non-current portions of borrowings and the consideration payable related to acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents.
Reconciliation of the EBITDA is as follows:
Conference call and webcast
On April 30, 2025, Company Management will conduct a conference call at 10:00 am Eastern Time to review the financial results. The call will be hosted by Tim Bremner, CEO, and Fabien Sevestre, CFO.
You can join the call by dialing 1-888-699-1199 or 1-416-945-7677. You will be put on hold until the conference call begins. A live audio webcast of the Conference Call will also be available
https://app.webinar.net/XlKOq7Oq0ej
An archived replay of the webcast will be available for 90 days.
About Foraco International SA
Foraco International SA (TSX: FAR) is a leading global mineral drilling services company that provides a comprehensive and reliable service offering in mining and water projects. Supported by its founding values of integrity, innovation and involvement, Foraco has grown into the third largest global drilling enterprise with a presence in 17 countries across five continents. For more information about Foraco, visit www.foraco.com.
"Neither TSX Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release."
Caution concerning forward-looking statements
This document may contain "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. These statements and information include estimates, forecasts, information and statements as to Management's expectations with respect to, among other things, the future financial or operating performance of the Company and capital and operating expenditures. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of words such as "may", "will", "should", "plans", "expects", "intends", "anticipates", "believes", "budget", and "scheduled" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. Forward-looking statements and information are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements and information are not guarantees and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations are disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Information Form dated March 2, 2025, which is filed with Canadian regulators on SEDAR (www.sedar.com). The Company expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements and information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All written and oral forward-looking statements and information attributable to Foraco or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
10 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump and Carney to meet in the coming days, but how close is a Canada-U.S. trade deal?
The Canada-U.S. trade minister Dominic LeBlanc says the two leaders will meet in the coming days, but can trade deal be reached? CTV's Colton Praill reports.
Japan Forward
3 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Do Not Open Japan-US Trade Deal to Distorted Interpretation
このページを 日本語 で読む A trade deal was concluded by the Shigeru Ishiba administration and the Donald Trump administration. But, were the provisions of the agreement actually finalized? It is difficult to dispel doubts on that score. There are stark differences in how the Japanese and US sides explain provisions on new investment in the United States. This is a cause for concern in the actual implementation of the agreement. One of the main pillars of the Japan-US agreement sets reciprocal tariffs and auto tariffs the US imposes on Japanese imports at 15%. However, no written agreement has been drawn up. Isn't that the cause of the differences in perception between the two sides? Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba should have spoken directly with President Trump immediately after the agreement was reached to share his views. His failure to do so has created a major problem. If things continue as they are, it is possible that the US side will try to force its own interpretation on Japan. If that were to happen, Japan's national interest might well suffer damage. The Prime Minister and Minister for Economic Revitalization Ryosei Akazawa should clarify the reasons for these differing perceptions during the extraordinary Diet session that convened on August 1. They have a duty to explain to the satisfaction of the Japanese people that the agreement will be appropriately implemented. US President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on July 31 (©Reuters via Kyodo) Regarding Japanese investment in the United States, Trump posted on social media that Japan will invest $550 billion USD (approximately ¥80 trillion JPY) in the United States. Furthermore, he said, the US will receive 90% of the profits. In response, the Japan side has explained that the $550 billion in question is actually the upper limit for investments, loans, and loan guarantees. Of this, the "90%" of the profits the US would stand to make from the deal are from investment projects. That amounts to just 1% to 2% of the $550 billion, according to Akazawa. As for the issue of rice, the US side claims that Japan's imports of American rice will increase by 75%. However, Japan has not provided any specific details. Won't this really amount to sacrificing Japan's agricultural sector? US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also declared that he intends to review Japan's compliance with the agreement quarterly. He has further threatened that tariffs will be raised to 25% if Trump is not satisfied. That would provide leeway for Trump to unilaterally scrap the agreement. The lack of a joint document sharing a mutual understanding of what the agreement entails has left a legacy of problems. The Japanese side prioritized an early conclusion to the talks. That allowed the delay of the time-consuming task of hammering out a written agreement. Their excuse was to avoid a situation where an agreement could not be reached by the Trump-imposed deadline of August 1. On that date, Trump's reciprocal tariffs on Japan were scheduled to rise to 25%. Even if that is true, it will end up counterproductive if the agreement comes to be distorted by the US interpretation. Above all, the Ishiba government should urge the Trump administration to quickly align their respective views. We should realize that, unless both sides share a mutual understanding, economic uncertainty from Trump's tariffs will not dissipate. Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
China pushes back at US demands to stop buying Russian and Iranian oil
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. and Chinese officials may be able to settle many of their differences to reach a trade deal and avert punishing tariffs, but they remain far apart on one issue: the U.S. demand that China stop purchasing oil from Iran and Russia. 'China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests,' China's Foreign Ministry posted on X on Wednesday following two days of trade negotiations in Stockholm, responding to the U.S. threat of a 100% tariff. 'Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything. China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests,' the ministry said. The response is notable at a time when both Beijing and Washington are signaling optimism and goodwill about reaching a deal to keep commercial ties between the world's two largest economies stable — after climbing down from sky-high tariffs and harsh trade restrictions. It underscores China's confidence in playing hardball when dealing with the Trump administration, especially when trade is linked to its energy and foreign policies. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, emerging from the talks, told reporters that when it comes to Russian oil purchases, the 'Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously.' 'We don't want to impede on their sovereignty, so they would like to pay a 100% tariff,' Bessent said. On Thursday, he called the Chinese 'tough' negotiators, but said China's pushback hasn't stalled the negotiations. 'I believe that we have the makings of a deal,' Bessent told CNBC. Gabriel Wildau, managing director of the consultancy Teneo, said he doubts President Donald Trump would actually deploy the 100% tariff. 'Realizing those threats would derail all the recent progress and probably kill any chance' for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to announce a trade deal if they should meet this fall, Wildau said. In seeking to restrict oil sales by Russia and Iran, a major source of revenue for both countries, the U.S. wants to reduce the funding available for their militaries, as Moscow pursues its war against Ukraine and Tehran funds militant groups across the Middle East. China plays hardball When Trump unveiled a sweeping plan for tariffs on dozens of countries in April, China was the only country that retaliated. It refused to give in to U.S. pressure. 'If the U.S. is bent on imposing tariffs, China will fight to the end, and this is China's consistent official stance,' said Tu Xinquan, director of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. WTO is the acronym for the World Trade Organization. Negotiating tactics aside, China may also suspect that the U.S. won't follow through on its threat, questioning the importance Trump places on countering Russia, Tu said. Scott Kennedy, senior adviser and trustee chair in Chinese Business and Economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said Beijing is unlikely to change its posture when it sees inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy goals toward Russia and Iran, whereas Beijing's policy support for Moscow is consistent and clear. It's also possible that Beijing may want to use it as another negotiating tool to extract more concessions from Trump, Kennedy said. Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Beijing now sees itself as 'the one holding the cards in its struggle with Washington.' He said Trump has made it clear he wants a 'headline-grabbing deal' with Xi, 'so rejecting a U.S. demand to stop buying oil from Iran or Russia is probably not seen as a deal‑breaker, even if it generates friction and a delay.' Continuing to buy oil from Russia preserves Xi's 'strategic solidarity' with Russian President Vladimir Putin and significantly reduces the economic costs for China, Russel said. 'Beijing simply can't afford to walk away from the oil from Russia and Iran,' he said. 'It's too important a strategic energy supply, and Beijing is buying it at fire‑sale prices.' China depends on oil from Russia and Iran A 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that roughly 80% to 90% of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy benefits from the more than 1 million barrels of Iranian oil it imports per day. After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the Strait of Hormuz in June following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, China spoke out against closing the critical oil transit route. China also is an important customer for Russia, but is second to India in buying Russian seaborne crude oil exports. In April, Chinese imports of Russian oil rose 20% over the previous month to more than 1.3 million barrels per day, according to the KSE Institute, an analytical center at the Kyiv School of Economics. This past week, Trump said the U.S. will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. India's Foreign Ministry said Friday its relationship with Russia was 'steady and time-tested.' Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and a top policy adviser, said Trump has been clear that it is 'not acceptable' for India to continue financing the Ukraine war by purchasing oil from Russia. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil,' Miller said on Fox News Channel's 'Sunday Morning Futures.' He said the U.S. needs 'to get real about dealing with the financing of this war.' Congress demands action Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, is pushing for sanctions and tariffs on Russia and its financial backers. In April, he introduced a bill that would authorize the president to impose tariffs as high as 500% not only on Russia but on any country that 'knowingly' buys oil, uranium, natural gas, petroleum products or petrochemical products from Russia. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'The purpose of this legislation is to break the cycle of China — a communist dictatorship — buying oil below market price from Putin's Russia, which empowers his war machine to kill innocent Ukrainian civilians,' Graham said in a June statement. The bill has 84 co-sponsors in the 100-seat Senate. A corresponding House version has been introduced, also with bipartisan support. Republicans say they stand ready to move on the sanctions legislation if Trump asks them to do so, but the bill is on hold for now. ___ Associated Press writers David McHugh in Frankfurt and Rajesh Roy in New Delhi and researcher Yu Bing in Beijing contributed to the report.
