What to know about a potential deal to keep TikTok running in US
The details and timing of a potential deal are not clear. TikTok did not immediately respond to messages for comment on Monday.
Emarketer analyst Jeremy Goldman said while TikTok is 'reportedly planning' a U.S. version of its app to comply with legal restrictions, the platform — if it launches without the original TikTok algorithm — 'risks losing the very personalization that drives user engagement.'
In other words, TikTok just isn't TikTok without its algorithm.
'And getting millions to download a new app is no small feat, to say the least,' Goldman added.
Here's what to know about where TikTok stands in the U.S. following Trump's comments.
Extensions continue
Though he has no clear legal basis to do so, Trump has continued to extend the deadline for TikTok to avoid a ban in the U.S. This gives his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership.
It is not clear how many times Trump can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges against the administration. Trump has amassed more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok.'
TikTok stays for now
For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S. Tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to offer and support the app, on the promise that Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them.
Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago.
A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren't sure.
Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report.
Trump said Friday that on Monday or Tuesday, the U.S. would take the proposal to Chinese leader Xi Jinping or one of his representatives. The president said he thinks they 'probably' need China to approve the deal but he wasn't sure they needed to.
When asked whether he was confident China would approve the deal, Trump said, 'I'm not confident but I think so.'
He said that for the U.S., 'we make a lot of money if the deal goes through.'
Who wants to buy TikTok?
Wednesdays
Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture.
Although it's unclear if ByteDance plans to sell TikTok, several potential bidders have come forward in the past few months.
Aides for Vice President JD Vance, who was tapped to oversee a potential deal, have reached out to some parties, such as the artificial intelligence startup Perplexity AI, to get additional details about their bids, according to a person familiar with the matter. In January, Perplexity AI presented ByteDance with a merger proposal that would combine Perplexity's business with TikTok's U.S. operation.
Perplexity had no comment on Monday.
Other potential bidders include a consortium organized by billionaire business executive Frank McCourt, which recently recruited Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian as a strategic adviser. Investors in the consortium say they've offered ByteDance $20 billion in cash for TikTok's U.S. platform. And if successful, they plan to redesign the popular app with blockchain technology they say will provide users with more control over their online data.
Among the possible investors are the software company Oracle and the investment firm Blackstone. Neither company immediately responded to messages seeking comment on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Could Apple Soon Lose Its Top Position in Warren Buffett's Portfolio?
Key Points Apple has been one of Warren Buffett's largest holdings for years, but the distance between second spot has been shrinking. Buffett has been unloading Apple stock and it has also been falling in value. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Warren Buffett has famously referred to iPhone maker Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) as "probably the best business I know in the world." It's long been one of Buffett's favorite stocks, and it has been a staple in the Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) portfolio for years. But while it still remains the top holding in the portfolio, it may not stay in that position for much longer. Here's why that could happen and what it might mean for investors. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Apple is no longer far and away the biggest Buffett holding It wasn't all that long ago when Apple was easily the largest holding in Berkshire's portfolio, and it wasn't even close. As of the end of 2023, Apple accounted for half of the entire portfolio and was worth more than $174 billion. The next-largest holding was Bank of America, which accounted for just 10% of the portfolio and was worth a little less than $35 billion at the time. The idea of Apple falling in the second spot just didn't look like a conceivable scenario. However, with Buffett selling Apple stock since then and shares of the tech giant also falling, that has resulted in a much different makeup of Berkshire's portfolio today. Berkshire's position in Apple has been trimmed by two-thirds and was worth nearly $67 billion as of the end of March. While that was still good enough for the top spot and represented 26% of all holdings, the second spot, which belonged to American Express, accounted for 16% of the portfolio and was worth nearly $41 billion. Today, the gap is even thinner, with Apple's share of the Berkshire portfolio coming in at just under 22% versus nearly 17% for American Express. Could Apple fall out of Berkshire's portfolio entirely? Apple has been a beloved Buffett stock for years, but amid fears of a rising capital gains tax rate, the billionaire investor has been drastically reducing his company's position in the tech giant. Even if Buffett doesn't sell any more Apple shares, the stock's falling valuation could lead to it falling to the second-largest holding in the fund in the near future. Shares of Apple are down 6% over the past 12 months, while American Express has risen by more than 37% over that stretch (returns as of July 7). Investors have been bearish on Apple over the slow rollout of artificial intelligence (AI) features for its latest iPhone. Without a drastic change and a way to convince investors that it's still a good growth stock and the business isn't falling behind its rivals, this downward trend may continue. In the longer term, I could see Apple even leaving the Berkshire portfolio permanently. Buffett is stepping down as CEO this year, at which point Greg Abel will take over. Under new leadership, there could be greater changes ahead, including potentially exiting the company's position in Apple and opting for stocks that may be better positioned for growth in AI. While that's not a guarantee, it may be a plausible scenario, especially if Apple struggles to show that it can keep up with its key competitors. Is Apple still worth investing in? Whether Apple is or isn't in Berkshire's portfolio shouldn't dictate whether you buy the stock or not. It may impact the stock in the short term as Buffett fans may follow suit and sell shares of Apple as well. Ultimately, however, whether you buy the stock or not should depend on your long-term investing strategy. If you're willing to be patient and invest in a blue chip stock that has phenomenal financials, including annual free cash flow of around $100 billion, then this can be a good investment to put into your portfolio today. While it may be a volatile road ahead for Apple, with a strong ecosystem of products and ample resources at its disposal, I'm confident the company can be a big player in AI and turn things around -- it's just a matter of how long it may take for that to happen. Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $695,481!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $969,935!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to179%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Bank of America, and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump contemplates taking control of Washington, D.C., government
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday his administration was considering taking over governance of Washington, D.C., and suggested he could take similar action in New York because of his distaste for the leading candidate for mayor there. Trump has made a similar threat regarding Washington before, but has not followed through even as he criticized crime rates and bashed other institutions there. The president, speaking during a cabinet meeting at the White House, said his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was in close touch with Mayor Muriel Bowser, who favors making the city a U.S. state. 'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to. We could run D.C. I mean, we're ... looking at D.C.,' Trump said. 'Susie Wiles is working very closely with the mayor.' Bowser's office declined to comment. The District of Columbia was established in 1790 with land from neighboring Virginia and Maryland. Congress has control of its budget, but voters elect a mayor and city council, thanks to a law known as the Home Rule Act. For Trump to take over the city, Congress likely would have to pass a law revoking that act, which Trump would have to sign. U.S. Supreme Court clears path for Trump's plans to cut federal work force Becoming the 51st state would give Washington's roughly 700,000 residents voting representation in Congress. Democrats support that plan, while Republicans, who are reluctant to hand Democrats any politically safe seats in the House of Representatives and Senate, oppose it. Trump suggested his administration would run the city better with an appointed leader than the democratically elected government. 'We would run it so good, it would be run so proper. We'd get the best person to run it,' he said. 'The crime would be down to a minimum, would be much less. And you know we're thinking about doing it, to be honest with you.' While Trump said his administration had a good relationship with Bowser, he had less complimentary words for Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who won the race to be the Democratic Party's nominee in New York's November mayoral election. Trump described Mamdani as a 'disaster.' A representative for Mamdani did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'We're going to straighten out New York... Maybe we're going to have to straighten it out from Washington,' Trump said. 'We're going to do something for New York. I can't tell you what yet, but we're going to make New York great again also.'
Calgary Herald
33 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Trump to hit Canadian copper with drastic 50% tariff, clobbering massive export market
Article content Copper is also used in plumbing, construction materials, and solar cells, notes a Natural Resources Canada document. Article content The impacts could be felt across Canada. British Columbia and Ontario lead in copper production, with nearly 46 and 44 per cent of the country's total output, respectively. But refined copper is produced in Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador, while recycled copper is smelted in facilities in Quebec. Article content Pierre Gratton, President and CEO of the Mining Association of Canada, said the situation is less concerning for B.C. mines as they sell raw materials to Europe and Asia. But for the copper refineries and smelting in Quebec, the situation is 'very concerning,' he said. Article content 'As usual, President Trump has jumped the gun. We need to find out what this means, whether our trade talks include copper, and how it will be applied,' said Gratton. Article content Article content He added that the North American copper market is 'very integrated' so it could hurt both sides, while inadvertently helping China which operates 'newer, lower cost refineries.' Article content On American markets, futures contracts for copper jumped 13 per cent to an all-time high on Tuesday. Article content Carney has been in discussions directly with Trump in recent weeks in hopes of signing a new economic and security agreement with the U.S. Article content He has so far held off matching counter-tariffs of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum pending these discussions, but those could come into force on July 21 if they do not come to an agreement. It is unclear for now if Canada would retaliate on copper as well. Article content Carney is currently on a 'reduced schedule' this week to 'reflect a brief period of local vacation.' He is remaining in the National Capital Region and the surrounding areas, according to a statement put out by his team. Article content Article content Despite that, Carney's team said he would remain in close contact with his team and officials on key priorities including the ongoing negotiations with the U.S. Article content The looming copper tariffs are a sign that Trump plans to go ahead with a list of sectoral levies beyond his current import taxes on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Article content Earlier this year, Trump launched investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 into multiple products, including copper and pharmaceuticals, citing national security concerns. Article content Trump said he also will announce duties soon on pharmaceuticals but suggests he would give manufacturers a year before introducing those tariffs. Article content 'After that they're going to be tariffed if they have to bring the pharmaceuticals into the country, the drugs and other things, into the country,' Trump said. 'They're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent.'
